Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Horny again
37 views
Skip to first unread message
Peter
May 9, 2012, 12:29:38 AM5/9/12
to
Diogenes
May 9, 2012, 6:09:33 AM5/9/12
to
On 09 May 2012 04:29:38 GMT, Peter <som...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>http://www.gizmag.com/hornster-worlds-loudest-bicycle-horn/22457/?utm_source=Gizmag+Subscribers&utm_campaign=3c85b43cf2-UA-2235360-4&utm_medium=email
Please take this crap to aus.bicycle
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
>http://www.gizmag.com/hornster-worlds-loudest-bicycle-horn/22457/?utm_source=Gizmag+Subscribers&utm_campaign=3c85b43cf2-UA-2235360-4&utm_medium=email
Please take this crap to aus.bicycle
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
George W Frost
May 9, 2012, 7:01:17 AM5/9/12
to
"Diogenes" <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote in message
news:6igkq7tok24jepiig...@4ax.com...
( thereby bringing up more than one recall of an event )
Where you went on for days about installing a horn on your bike
it was all about you and your bike and how good you were to put the loudest
horn on your bike
And if I recall, it wouldn't work properly because of you not being able to
understand basic wiring diagrams
so Gerry
Why don't you take you and all your crap to aus.bicycle and leave Peter to
relate something which he thinks is relevant to this group ?
atec77
May 9, 2012, 8:01:00 AM5/9/12
to
next time
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
Diogenes
May 9, 2012, 8:32:23 AM5/9/12
to
On Wed, 9 May 2012 21:01:17 +1000, "George W Frost"
<georg...@gone.com> wrote:
>
>"Diogenes" <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote in message
>news:6igkq7tok24jepiig...@4ax.com...
>> On 09 May 2012 04:29:38 GMT, Peter <som...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.gizmag.com/hornster-worlds-loudest-bicycle-horn/22457/?utm_source=Gizmag+Subscribers&utm_campaign=3c85b43cf2-UA-2235360-4&utm_medium=email
>>
>> Please take this crap to aus.bicycle
<georg...@gone.com> wrote:
>
>"Diogenes" <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote in message
>news:6igkq7tok24jepiig...@4ax.com...
>> On 09 May 2012 04:29:38 GMT, Peter <som...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.gizmag.com/hornster-worlds-loudest-bicycle-horn/22457/?utm_source=Gizmag+Subscribers&utm_campaign=3c85b43cf2-UA-2235360-4&utm_medium=email
>>
>> Please take this crap to aus.bicycle
>I can recall and I am sure that there are others who recall as well
>( thereby bringing up more than one recall of an event )
>Where you went on for days about installing a horn on your bike
>it was all about you and your bike and how good you were to put the loudest
>horn on your bike
>And if I recall, it wouldn't work properly because of you not being able to
>understand basic wiring diagrams
>so Gerry
>Why don't you take you and all your crap to aus.bicycle and leave Peter to
>relate something which he thinks is relevant to this group ?
Air horns on bicycles have what exactly to do with a motorcycle
>( thereby bringing up more than one recall of an event )
>Where you went on for days about installing a horn on your bike
>it was all about you and your bike and how good you were to put the loudest
>horn on your bike
>And if I recall, it wouldn't work properly because of you not being able to
>understand basic wiring diagrams
>so Gerry
>Why don't you take you and all your crap to aus.bicycle and leave Peter to
>relate something which he thinks is relevant to this group ?
newsgroup, George?
But I will agree that Peter is free to bring us news of this sort.
You (and maybe even Peter) seem to fail to realise that I was induging
in a bit TIC humour of the ultra dry type. As I am often wont to do.
I notice your idiot mate was quick to join you in your ranting.
Have you gotten in touch with the RAE Vietnam Association yet?
http://www.raevietnamassociation.org/ They still seem to be unaware
that there was a detatchment of RAE in Vietnam in May 1962. You owe
it to the official history of the Australian Army, and the RAE in
particular, to set the record straight, old chap. Bwahahahaha...
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
George W Frost
May 9, 2012, 9:26:42 AM5/9/12
to
"Diogenes" <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote in message
not so long ago, you were even doubting a recent poster called Felicity as
being a real person
You just would not have a fucking clue, would you ?
You doubt everyone but yourself
You are a fucking loser Gerry
Always was and always will be
Can't get any friends of your own so you beg borrow or steal others
You raised doubts on my military history and you also claim that you are
against all wars
That is the phrasing of a person who detests violence
Yet Gerry, there you were, not so long ago, bragging and boasting to someone
on this group about you were so happy when you allegedly shot someone as
they came over the hill.
You are a fucking has-been Gerry
even then, I really doubt that you has been anywhere.
You could start up a new motorcycle group called the Wannabees, or the
Coodabeens
with you as president, secretary, treasurer and only member
Diogenes
May 9, 2012, 6:40:09 PM5/9/12
to
On Wed, 9 May 2012 23:26:42 +1000, "George W Frost"
have a go at me.
>...and not so long ago, you were even doubting a recent poster called Felicity as
>being a real person.
Wrong. I absolutely accept that Felicity is a real person.
>You just would not have a fucking clue, would you ?
Oh, I have a clue or two...
>You doubt everyone but yourself
I often doubt myself.
>You are a fucking loser Gerry.
Well, you're right, it's not about winning. And you are apthetic liar
who tries to pass himself off as a Veitnam veteran when you are no
such thing.
>Always was and always will be.
So certain are you...
>Can't get any friends of your own so you beg borrow or steal others.
Felicity is my friend...
>You raised doubts on my military history and you also claim that you are
>against all wars.
>That is the phrasing of a person who detests violence.
I am not an unconditional pacifist. I accept that in rare
circumstances war may be justified. But none of the wars we "played"
in since WWII fit the bill.
>Yet Gerry, there you were, not so long ago, bragging and boasting to someone
>on this group about you were so happy when you allegedly shot someone as
>they came over the hill.
I have no fucking idea what you're talking about. Perhaps if you
quoted me verbatim I'd be able to respond.
>You are a fucking has-been Gerry
>even then, I really doubt that you has been anywhere.
You may doubt it, but the Austrlian government does not. Perhaps you
are projecting?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
>You could start up a new motorcycle group called the Wannabees, or the
>Coodabeens with you as president, secretary, treasurer and only member.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
>Gerry, there you go again
Yep... and that'll happen every time you jump out of your box and
have a go at me.
>...and not so long ago, you were even doubting a recent poster called Felicity as
>being a real person.
Wrong. I absolutely accept that Felicity is a real person.
>You just would not have a fucking clue, would you ?
>You doubt everyone but yourself
>You are a fucking loser Gerry.
Well, you're right, it's not about winning. And you are apthetic liar
who tries to pass himself off as a Veitnam veteran when you are no
such thing.
>Always was and always will be.
So certain are you...
>Can't get any friends of your own so you beg borrow or steal others.
Felicity is my friend...
>You raised doubts on my military history and you also claim that you are
>That is the phrasing of a person who detests violence.
I am not an unconditional pacifist. I accept that in rare
circumstances war may be justified. But none of the wars we "played"
in since WWII fit the bill.
>Yet Gerry, there you were, not so long ago, bragging and boasting to someone
>on this group about you were so happy when you allegedly shot someone as
>they came over the hill.
quoted me verbatim I'd be able to respond.
>You are a fucking has-been Gerry
>even then, I really doubt that you has been anywhere.
are projecting?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
>You could start up a new motorcycle group called the Wannabees, or the
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
Saddle Tramp
May 9, 2012, 7:44:56 PM5/9/12
to
On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:40:09 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
wrote:
>
>>Yet Gerry, there you were, not so long ago, bragging and boasting to someone
>>on this group about you were so happy when you allegedly shot someone as
>>they came over the hill.
>
>I have no fucking idea what you're talking about. Perhaps if you
>quoted me verbatim I'd be able to respond.
>
As requested, quoted verbatim. You always seem to "forget" when it
suits you. :-)
He had snuck up to within eight metres of me (the jungle's a bit like
that, you know...) and fired a magazine-and-a-half of AK47 ammo at me
before I managed to hose him away with my M60. He died fighting for
his country's indpendence right there and then because he was a rotten
shot and I, unbeknownst to him, had been certified as Best GPMG Shot
in my platoon at Infantry Centre. Upon coming home, I was freqeuntly
looked up to as some kind of hero by gilded youths (and blathering
idiotic wannabes like your bum-buddy, George W. Frost) whose brains
had been befuddled by our war mongering national rhetoric, especially
the shit spoken on Anzac days and every time an American leader is in
town. I too might have felt some pride had I been more thoroughly
brainwashed.
But I digress...
The point I'm trying to make, Peter, is that people have indeed tried
shooting me. And failed. Most of them died in the attempt.
Fancy your chances, Peter?
wrote:
>
>>Yet Gerry, there you were, not so long ago, bragging and boasting to someone
>>on this group about you were so happy when you allegedly shot someone as
>>they came over the hill.
>
>I have no fucking idea what you're talking about. Perhaps if you
>quoted me verbatim I'd be able to respond.
>
suits you. :-)
He had snuck up to within eight metres of me (the jungle's a bit like
that, you know...) and fired a magazine-and-a-half of AK47 ammo at me
before I managed to hose him away with my M60. He died fighting for
his country's indpendence right there and then because he was a rotten
shot and I, unbeknownst to him, had been certified as Best GPMG Shot
in my platoon at Infantry Centre. Upon coming home, I was freqeuntly
looked up to as some kind of hero by gilded youths (and blathering
idiotic wannabes like your bum-buddy, George W. Frost) whose brains
had been befuddled by our war mongering national rhetoric, especially
the shit spoken on Anzac days and every time an American leader is in
town. I too might have felt some pride had I been more thoroughly
brainwashed.
But I digress...
The point I'm trying to make, Peter, is that people have indeed tried
shooting me. And failed. Most of them died in the attempt.
Fancy your chances, Peter?
Diogenes
May 10, 2012, 1:50:27 AM5/10/12
to
On Thu, 10 May 2012 09:14:56 +0930, Saddle Tramp
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:40:09 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>wrote:
>>...you also claim that you are against all wars
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:40:09 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>wrote:
>>That is the phrasing of a person who detests violence.
>>>Yet Gerry, there you were, not so long ago, bragging and boasting to someone
>>>on this group about you were so happy when you allegedly shot someone as
>>>they came over the hill.
>>I have no fucking idea what you're talking about. Perhaps if you
>>quoted me verbatim I'd be able to respond.
>>
>As requested, quoted verbatim. You always seem to "forget" when it
>suits you. :-)
I wasn't trying avoid anything, you disingenuous fuckwit.
>>>on this group about you were so happy when you allegedly shot someone as
>>>they came over the hill.
>>I have no fucking idea what you're talking about. Perhaps if you
>>quoted me verbatim I'd be able to respond.
>>
>As requested, quoted verbatim. You always seem to "forget" when it
>suits you. :-)
>He had snuck up to within eight metres of me (the jungle's a bit like
>that, you know...) and fired a magazine-and-a-half of AK47 ammo at me
>before I managed to hose him away with my M60. He died fighting for
>his country's indpendence right there and then because he was a rotten
>shot and I, unbeknownst to him, had been certified as Best GPMG Shot
>in my platoon at Infantry Centre. Upon coming home, I was freqeuntly
>looked up to as some kind of hero by gilded youths (and blathering
>idiotic wannabes like your bum-buddy, George W. Frost) whose brains
>had been befuddled by our war mongering national rhetoric, especially
>the shit spoken on Anzac days and every time an American leader is in
>town. I too might have felt some pride had I been more thoroughly
>brainwashed.
>
>But I digress...
>
>The point I'm trying to make, Peter, is that people have indeed tried
>shooting me. And failed. Most of them died in the attempt.
above incident happened was in 1969. My anti-war stance did not begin
till about 1995.
George is trying to compare apples and oranges I'm afraid. Also,
nowhere did I say, as George claimed, that I was "so happy when I shot
that person."
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
George W Frost
May 10, 2012, 4:01:53 AM5/10/12
to
"Diogenes" <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote in message
> I managed to hose him away with my M60. He died fighting for
>his country's indpendence right there and then because he was a rotten
>shot and I, unbeknownst to him, had been certified as Best GPMG Shot
>in my platoon at Infantry Centre. Upon coming home, I was freqeuntly
>looked up to as some kind of hero by gilded youths (and blathering
>idiotic wannabes like your bum-buddy, George W. Frost)
is not bragging about your conquests and bragging is feeling happy with
>his country's indpendence right there and then because he was a rotten
>shot and I, unbeknownst to him, had been certified as Best GPMG Shot
>in my platoon at Infantry Centre. Upon coming home, I was freqeuntly
>looked up to as some kind of hero by gilded youths (and blathering
>idiotic wannabes like your bum-buddy, George W. Frost)
yourself
your idea of happy is quite different to thousands of others.
The term being "happy", "glad" , "enthralled", or other words depicting an
attitude of someone
can all be bundled together to mean happy
no matter which word you or anyone else uses.
You went on to say that you were adored and looked up to as a gold plated
hero by young kids on the block
But,
there is that but, Gerry.
I did not at any time whatsoever
"look up to you as a hero"
your words, not mine:
>I was freqeuntly
>looked up to as some kind of hero by gilded youths (and blathering
>idiotic wannabes like your bum-buddy, George W. Frost)
Wake up to yourself Gerry, you are not that popular,
>looked up to as some kind of hero by gilded youths (and blathering
>idiotic wannabes like your bum-buddy, George W. Frost)
you are a legend in your own lunch-box.
You may be good at copy and paste
but you are not as good or intelligent as you think
Even when you get caught out, you pass it off as being
"Not my words" or "That's not what I said"
Diogenes
May 10, 2012, 9:52:04 AM5/10/12
to
On Thu, 10 May 2012 18:01:53 +1000, "George W Frost"
<georg...@gone.com> wrote:
>If this:
>> I managed to hose him away with my M60. He died fighting for
>>his country's indpendence right there and then because he was a rotten
>>shot and I, unbeknownst to him, had been certified as Best GPMG Shot
>>in my platoon at Infantry Centre. Upon coming home, I was freqeuntly
>>looked up to as some kind of hero by gilded youths (and blathering
>>idiotic wannabes like your bum-buddy, George W. Frost)
>is not bragging about your conquests and bragging is feeling happy with
>yourself your idea of happy is quite different to thousands of others.
Which bit, George?
<georg...@gone.com> wrote:
>If this:
>> I managed to hose him away with my M60. He died fighting for
>>his country's indpendence right there and then because he was a rotten
>>shot and I, unbeknownst to him, had been certified as Best GPMG Shot
>>in my platoon at Infantry Centre. Upon coming home, I was freqeuntly
>>looked up to as some kind of hero by gilded youths (and blathering
>>idiotic wannabes like your bum-buddy, George W. Frost)
>is not bragging about your conquests and bragging is feeling happy with
>yourself your idea of happy is quite different to thousands of others.
The bit where I point out that the poor prick I killed never had a
chance because I had a more powerful weapon and had received far
better training than he had? That bit? That wasn't bragging, that was
me highlighting the unfair advantage I had over the poor guy being
murdered by me.
Or did you mean the bit which you distorted with your "creative"
omissions? Here, I'll reprint that bit for you with ALL of the
relevant bit you deleted put back in again:
"Upon coming home, I was freqeuntly looked up to as some kind of hero
by gilded youths (and blathering idiotic wannabes like your bum-buddy,
George W. Frost) whose brains had been befuddled by our war mongering
national rhetoric, especially the shit spoken on Anzac days and every
time an American leader is in town. I too might have felt some pride
had I been more thoroughly brainwashed."
out that only a brainwashed idiot would have thought that I was a
hero.
As usual, your cognitive skills were out to lunch.
You are truly an idiot George.
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
Saddle Tramp
May 10, 2012, 8:53:58 PM5/10/12
to
On Thu, 10 May 2012 18:01:53 +1000, "George W Frost"
<georg...@gone.com> wrote:
I agree with George, you are a braggart.
>>
>>>He had snuck up to within eight metres of me (the jungle's a bit like
>>>that, you know...) and fired a magazine-and-a-half of AK47 ammo at me
>>>before I
Please answer the following points.
1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
from eight metres, before returning fire?
2. Why did you not engage him when he was changing magazines?
>>> managed to hose him away with my M60. He died fighting for
>>>his country's indpendence right there and then because he was a rotten
>>>shot and I,
3. I don't believe you! An AK47 is a powerful weapon, please explain
how he missed you after firing, what, some 40 bullets from eight
metres?
>>> unbeknownst to him, had been certified as Best GPMG Shot
>>>in my platoon at Infantry Centre.
Braggart!
>>> Upon coming home, I was freqeuntly
>>>looked up to as some kind of hero by gilded youths
Braggart!
>>>(and blathering
>>>idiotic wannabes like your bum-buddy, George W. Frost) whose brains
>>>had been befuddled by our war mongering national rhetoric, especially
>>>the shit spoken on Anzac days and every time an American leader is in
>>>town. I too might have felt some pride had I been more thoroughly
>>>brainwashed.
>>>
>>>But I digress...
>>>
>>>The point I'm trying to make, Peter, is that people have indeed tried
>>>shooting me. And failed. Most of them died in the attempt.>
Braggart!
>> OK, now I know what we're referring to, try this on for size: The
>> above incident happened was in 1969. My anti-war stance did not begin
>> till about 1995.
So, it was OK to murder (your word) in 1969 but not in 1995?????
>
>> George is trying to compare apples and oranges I'm afraid. Also,
>> nowhere did I say, as George claimed, that I was "so happy when I shot
>> that person."
Nowhere did you show any remorse.
You seemed to me to be bragging that you killed him. The way you
described, "I managed to hose him away with my M60", sounds to me like
you enjoyed it. Did you? Or were you just bragging again?
<georg...@gone.com> wrote:
I agree with George, you are a braggart.
>>
>>>He had snuck up to within eight metres of me (the jungle's a bit like
>>>that, you know...) and fired a magazine-and-a-half of AK47 ammo at me
>>>before I
1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
from eight metres, before returning fire?
2. Why did you not engage him when he was changing magazines?
>>> managed to hose him away with my M60. He died fighting for
>>>his country's indpendence right there and then because he was a rotten
>>>shot and I,
how he missed you after firing, what, some 40 bullets from eight
metres?
>>> unbeknownst to him, had been certified as Best GPMG Shot
>>>in my platoon at Infantry Centre.
>>> Upon coming home, I was freqeuntly
>>>looked up to as some kind of hero by gilded youths
>>>(and blathering
>>>idiotic wannabes like your bum-buddy, George W. Frost) whose brains
>>>had been befuddled by our war mongering national rhetoric, especially
>>>the shit spoken on Anzac days and every time an American leader is in
>>>town. I too might have felt some pride had I been more thoroughly
>>>brainwashed.
>>>
>>>But I digress...
>>>
>>>The point I'm trying to make, Peter, is that people have indeed tried
>>>shooting me. And failed. Most of them died in the attempt.>
>> OK, now I know what we're referring to, try this on for size: The
>> above incident happened was in 1969. My anti-war stance did not begin
>> till about 1995.
>
>> George is trying to compare apples and oranges I'm afraid. Also,
>> nowhere did I say, as George claimed, that I was "so happy when I shot
>> that person."
You seemed to me to be bragging that you killed him. The way you
described, "I managed to hose him away with my M60", sounds to me like
you enjoyed it. Did you? Or were you just bragging again?
Saddle Tramp
May 10, 2012, 8:54:08 PM5/10/12
to
On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:50:27 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
wrote:
>
>>As requested, quoted verbatim. You always seem to "forget" when it
>>suits you. :-)
>
>I wasn't trying avoid anything, you disingenuous fuckwit.
>
Do you always use profanities when you disagree with someone?
You wanted a verbatim quote, I gave you one.
wrote:
>
>>As requested, quoted verbatim. You always seem to "forget" when it
>>suits you. :-)
>
>I wasn't trying avoid anything, you disingenuous fuckwit.
>
You wanted a verbatim quote, I gave you one.
Marty H
May 10, 2012, 8:59:39 PM5/10/12
to
On May 10, 11:52 pm, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2012 18:01:53 +1000, "George W Frost"
>
> On Thu, 10 May 2012 18:01:53 +1000, "George W Frost"
>
weeks...
above is the reason why Aus.moto is dead.
these 2 fuckwits killed it...
mh
George W Frost
May 10, 2012, 10:24:11 PM5/10/12
to
"Diogenes" <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote in message
Diogenes
May 11, 2012, 12:11:00 AM5/11/12
to
On Fri, 11 May 2012 12:24:11 +1000, "George W Frost"
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
>Gerry, why don't you quit while you are behind?
George, have you gotten in touch with the RAE Vietnam Association yet?
http://www.raevietnamassociation.org/ They still seem to be unaware
that there was you and a detatchment of RAE in Vietnam in May 1962.
You owe it to the official history of the Australian Army, and the RAE
in particular, to set the record straight, old chap.
Waiting...
in particular, to set the record straight, old chap.
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
Diogenes
May 11, 2012, 12:19:58 AM5/11/12
to
On Fri, 11 May 2012 10:23:58 +0930, Saddle Tramp
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>Please answer the following points.
>1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
>from eight metres, before returning fire?
You're assuming a lot. That was a very abbreviated account of what
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>Please answer the following points.
>1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
>from eight metres, before returning fire?
happened. If you knew the longer version, you'd realise that your
question is wrong. Are you ever going to get the full version? I
doubt it. You've already decided that I'm bullshitting and bragging,
so won't waste any more time with you.
>2. Why did you not engage him when he was changing magazines?
>>>> managed to hose him away with my M60. He died fighting for
>>>>his country's indpendence right there and then because he was a rotten
>>>>shot and I,
>
>3. I don't believe you! An AK47 is a powerful weapon, please explain
>how he missed you after firing, what, some 40 bullets from eight
>metres?
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
Peter
May 11, 2012, 1:07:09 AM5/11/12
to
> You're assuming a lot. That was a very abbreviated account of what
> happened. If you knew the longer version, you'd realise that your
> question is wrong. Are you ever going to get the full version? I
> doubt it. You've already decided that I'm bullshitting and bragging,
> so won't waste any more time with you.
>
I'm getting confused...
> happened. If you knew the longer version, you'd realise that your
> question is wrong. Are you ever going to get the full version? I
> doubt it. You've already decided that I'm bullshitting and bragging,
> so won't waste any more time with you.
>
Who is this?
>> 2. Why did you not engage him when he was changing magazines?
>
> See above.
:-P
George W Frost
May 11, 2012, 4:30:43 AM5/11/12
to
"Diogenes" <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote in message
George W Frost
May 11, 2012, 4:31:23 AM5/11/12
to
"Diogenes" <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote in message
Diogenes
May 11, 2012, 6:05:55 AM5/11/12
to
Diogenes
May 11, 2012, 6:06:38 AM5/11/12
to
On Fri, 11 May 2012 18:31:23 +1000, "George W Frost"
<georg...@gone.com> wrote:
>Give up Gerry, you are getting further behind
George, have you gotten in touch with the RAE Vietnam Association yet?
<georg...@gone.com> wrote:
>Give up Gerry, you are getting further behind
http://www.raevietnamassociation.org/ They still seem to be unaware
that there was you and a detatchment of RAE in Vietnam in May 1962.
You owe it to the official history of the Australian Army, and the RAE
in particular, to set the record straight, old chap.
in particular, to set the record straight, old chap.
Saddle Tramp
May 11, 2012, 8:00:38 AM5/11/12
to
On Fri, 11 May 2012 14:19:58 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
wrote:
>On Fri, 11 May 2012 10:23:58 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Please answer the following points.
>
>>1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
>>from eight metres, before returning fire?
>
>You're assuming a lot. That was a very abbreviated account of what
>happened. If you knew the longer version, you'd realise that your
>question is wrong.
I can only base my question(s) on what you posted, I am not a mind
reader. Nevertheless, why did you allow him to fire all those bullets
at you from such a short distance? Why did you not "'neutralize" him
when he was changing magazines? Two simple questions!
> Are you ever going to get the full version? I
>doubt it. You've already decided that I'm bullshitting and bragging,
>so won't waste any more time with you.
Again, I can only comment on what you have posted, not what actually
happened. From what you have posted....Yes, I believe you are
bullshitting and bragging.
I would be interested in the full version, as I'm sure George and
others here would be.
wrote:
>On Fri, 11 May 2012 10:23:58 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Please answer the following points.
>
>>1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
>>from eight metres, before returning fire?
>
>You're assuming a lot. That was a very abbreviated account of what
>happened. If you knew the longer version, you'd realise that your
>question is wrong.
reader. Nevertheless, why did you allow him to fire all those bullets
at you from such a short distance? Why did you not "'neutralize" him
when he was changing magazines? Two simple questions!
> Are you ever going to get the full version? I
>doubt it. You've already decided that I'm bullshitting and bragging,
>so won't waste any more time with you.
happened. From what you have posted....Yes, I believe you are
bullshitting and bragging.
I would be interested in the full version, as I'm sure George and
others here would be.
Diogenes
May 11, 2012, 8:53:19 AM5/11/12
to
On Fri, 11 May 2012 21:30:38 +0930, Saddle Tramp
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>I would be interested in the full version, as I'm sure George and
>others here would be.
Pfffffffffft
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>I would be interested in the full version, as I'm sure George and
>others here would be.
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
Saddle Tramp
May 11, 2012, 10:13:18 AM5/11/12
to
On Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:19 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
wrote:
You keep on asking George for his service details, so that he can
prove to you that he served in Vietnam, yet when I ask you a few
simple questions you clam up.
So, what are we led to believe? Personally, because you won't answer a
few simple questions, I have my doubts that the "before I managed to
hose him away with my M60", incident took place at all. That's why I
think you are bullshitting.
wrote:
prove to you that he served in Vietnam, yet when I ask you a few
simple questions you clam up.
So, what are we led to believe? Personally, because you won't answer a
few simple questions, I have my doubts that the "before I managed to
hose him away with my M60", incident took place at all. That's why I
think you are bullshitting.
Diogenes
May 11, 2012, 5:35:58 PM5/11/12
to
On Fri, 11 May 2012 23:43:18 +0930, Saddle Tramp
I have given enough information here to verify who I am and that I
"served" (I call it murdered) in Vietnam.
You're a ring-in hiding behind a pseudonym whose sole purpose so far
has been to try to ridicule and invaidate my comments and to ride
shotgun for George. I'll tell you nothing and take you nowhere,
fuckwit.
>So, what are we led to believe?
Whatever you want to.
>Personally, because you won't answer a few simple questions, I have
>my doubts that the "before I managed to hose him away with my M60",
>incident took place at all. That's why I think you are bullshitting.
You clearly mistake me for someone who gives a shit.
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:19 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 21:30:38 +0930, Saddle Tramp
>><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I would be interested in the full version, as I'm sure George and
>>>others here would be.
>>
>>Pfffffffffft
>On Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:19 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 21:30:38 +0930, Saddle Tramp
>><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I would be interested in the full version, as I'm sure George and
>>>others here would be.
>>
>>Pfffffffffft
>You keep on asking George for his service details, so that he can
>prove to you that he served in Vietnam, yet when I ask you a few
>simple questions you clam up.
George is a fraud. He knows he's a fraud.
>prove to you that he served in Vietnam, yet when I ask you a few
>simple questions you clam up.
I have given enough information here to verify who I am and that I
"served" (I call it murdered) in Vietnam.
You're a ring-in hiding behind a pseudonym whose sole purpose so far
has been to try to ridicule and invaidate my comments and to ride
shotgun for George. I'll tell you nothing and take you nowhere,
fuckwit.
>So, what are we led to believe?
>Personally, because you won't answer a few simple questions, I have
>my doubts that the "before I managed to hose him away with my M60",
>incident took place at all. That's why I think you are bullshitting.
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
George W Frost
May 11, 2012, 6:07:12 PM5/11/12
to
"Diogenes" <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote in message
Soon you will have dug yourself so far down that you will be in China and we
wont have to listen to your drivel
Diogenes
May 11, 2012, 6:08:06 PM5/11/12
to
On Fri, 11 May 2012 10:24:08 +0930, Saddle Tramp
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:50:27 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>wrote:
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:50:27 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>wrote:
>Do you always use profanities when you disagree with someone?
Are still sodomising little boys?
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
Sigmund_F
May 11, 2012, 6:37:12 PM5/11/12
to
On Sat, 12 May 2012 08:07:12 +1000, "George W Frost"
<georg...@gone.com> wrote:
>Keep going Gerry,
>Soon you will have dug yourself so far down that you will be in China and we
>wont have to listen to your drivel
<georg...@gone.com> wrote:
>Keep going Gerry,
>Soon you will have dug yourself so far down that you will be in China and we
>wont have to listen to your drivel
George, have you gotten in touch with the RAE Vietnam Association yet?
http://www.raevietnamassociation.org/
They still seem to be unaware that you and a detatchment of RAE were
http://www.raevietnamassociation.org/
in Vietnam "from march 1962 through to 1963."
You owe it to the official history of the Australian Army, and the RAE
in particular, to set the record straight, old chap.
Lots of love,
Sigmund
Saddle Tramp
May 11, 2012, 8:09:45 PM5/11/12
to
On Sat, 12 May 2012 07:35:58 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
you can come up with some evidence that he is a fraud.
>I have given enough information here to verify who I am and that I
>"served" (I call it murdered) in Vietnam.
I'm not interested in who you are in RL, or your service in Vietnam. I
asked you a few simple questions regarding the incident where you,
"hosed him away because he was a rotten shot".
I am beginning to think that particular incident never took place, and
it's all a figment of your imagination, so that you can brag about it
to all your mates.
it.
> whose sole purpose so far
>has been to try to ridicule and invaidate my comments and to ride
No! I asked you a few simple questions regarding the incident where
you, "hosed him away because he was a rotten shot".
>shotgun for George. I'll tell you nothing and take you nowhere,
>fuckwit.
You're resorting to using profanities again, have I hit a nerve or are
you afraid of the truth?
>>So, what are we led to believe?
>
>Whatever you want to.
Until you answer a couple of simple questions, I believe you made up
the story about shooting that guy, etc, etc.
wrote:
>On Fri, 11 May 2012 23:43:18 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:19 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 21:30:38 +0930, Saddle Tramp
>>><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I would be interested in the full version, as I'm sure George and
>>>>others here would be.
>>>
>>>Pfffffffffft
>
>>You keep on asking George for his service details, so that he can
>>prove to you that he served in Vietnam, yet when I ask you a few
>>simple questions you clam up.
>
>George is a fraud. He knows he's a fraud.
>On Fri, 11 May 2012 23:43:18 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:19 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 21:30:38 +0930, Saddle Tramp
>>><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I would be interested in the full version, as I'm sure George and
>>>>others here would be.
>>>
>>>Pfffffffffft
>
>>You keep on asking George for his service details, so that he can
>>prove to you that he served in Vietnam, yet when I ask you a few
>>simple questions you clam up.
>
>George is a fraud. He knows he's a fraud.
On Sat, 12 May 2012 07:35:58 +1000, in aus.motorcycles you wrote:
>On Fri, 11 May 2012 23:43:18 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:19 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 21:30:38 +0930, Saddle Tramp
>>><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I would be interested in the full version, as I'm sure George and
>>>>others here would be.
>>>
>>>Pfffffffffft
>
>>You keep on asking George for his service details, so that he can
>>prove to you that he served in Vietnam, yet when I ask you a few
>>simple questions you clam up.
>
>George is a fraud. He knows he's a fraud.
Given the choice, George is the one I would believe, unless of course
>On Fri, 11 May 2012 23:43:18 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:19 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 21:30:38 +0930, Saddle Tramp
>>><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I would be interested in the full version, as I'm sure George and
>>>>others here would be.
>>>
>>>Pfffffffffft
>
>>You keep on asking George for his service details, so that he can
>>prove to you that he served in Vietnam, yet when I ask you a few
>>simple questions you clam up.
>
>George is a fraud. He knows he's a fraud.
you can come up with some evidence that he is a fraud.
>I have given enough information here to verify who I am and that I
>"served" (I call it murdered) in Vietnam.
asked you a few simple questions regarding the incident where you,
"hosed him away because he was a rotten shot".
I am beginning to think that particular incident never took place, and
it's all a figment of your imagination, so that you can brag about it
to all your mates.
>
>You're a ring-in hiding behind a pseudonym
This is usenet, of course I'm using a pseudonym, I'm not hiding behind
>You're a ring-in hiding behind a pseudonym
it.
> whose sole purpose so far
>has been to try to ridicule and invaidate my comments and to ride
you, "hosed him away because he was a rotten shot".
>shotgun for George. I'll tell you nothing and take you nowhere,
>fuckwit.
you afraid of the truth?
>>So, what are we led to believe?
>
>Whatever you want to.
the story about shooting that guy, etc, etc.
>
>>Personally, because you won't answer a few simple questions, I have
>>my doubts that the "before I managed to hose him away with my M60",
>>incident took place at all. That's why I think you are bullshitting.
>
>You clearly mistake me for someone who gives a shit.
>
Obviously you do, otherwise you wouldn't be replying to my post.
>>Personally, because you won't answer a few simple questions, I have
>>my doubts that the "before I managed to hose him away with my M60",
>>incident took place at all. That's why I think you are bullshitting.
>
>You clearly mistake me for someone who gives a shit.
>
Saddle Tramp
May 11, 2012, 8:09:53 PM5/11/12
to
On Sat, 12 May 2012 08:08:06 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
wrote:
>On Fri, 11 May 2012 10:24:08 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:50:27 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>>wrote:
>
>>Do you always use profanities when you disagree with someone?
>
>Are still sodomising little boys?
>
Now you are resorting to verbal abuse. Is it something I've said? I
thought you didn't give a shit?
wrote:
>On Fri, 11 May 2012 10:24:08 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:50:27 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>>wrote:
>
>>Do you always use profanities when you disagree with someone?
>
>Are still sodomising little boys?
>
thought you didn't give a shit?
Sigmund_F
May 11, 2012, 8:32:07 PM5/11/12
to
On Sat, 12 May 2012 09:39:53 +0930, Saddle Tramp
When you used the line "Do you always use profanities when you
disagree with someone?" you were using a cheap rhetorical stunt called
a loaded question.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question
A famous loaded questions is "Are you still beating your wife?"
Gerry responded to your loaded question with an another loaded
question, i.e. "Are still sodomising little boys?"
And now you call that verbal abuse. So, it seems that you don't mind
verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
"foul".
Interesting.
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 12 May 2012 08:08:06 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 10:24:08 +0930, Saddle Tramp
>><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:50:27 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>>>wrote:
>>
>>>Do you always use profanities when you disagree with someone?
>>
>>Are still sodomising little boys?
>Now you are resorting to verbal abuse.
[sigh] I will explain:
>On Sat, 12 May 2012 08:08:06 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 10:24:08 +0930, Saddle Tramp
>><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:50:27 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>>>wrote:
>>
>>>Do you always use profanities when you disagree with someone?
>>
>>Are still sodomising little boys?
>Now you are resorting to verbal abuse.
When you used the line "Do you always use profanities when you
disagree with someone?" you were using a cheap rhetorical stunt called
a loaded question.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question
A famous loaded questions is "Are you still beating your wife?"
Gerry responded to your loaded question with an another loaded
question, i.e. "Are still sodomising little boys?"
And now you call that verbal abuse. So, it seems that you don't mind
verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
"foul".
Interesting.
Nev..
May 12, 2012, 12:03:49 AM5/12/12
to
strangely misplaced since they published details of your own death. Who
can believe anything they claim to be true?
Nev..
Diogenes
May 12, 2012, 12:24:59 AM5/12/12
to
On Sat, 12 May 2012 14:03:49 +1000, "Nev.." <id...@mindless.com>
wrote:
Ah, there goes Nev again... Spruiking misinformation again.
Neither of those organisations has claimed that I was killed in
Vietnam (or anywhere else). You're full of shit, Nev. Again.
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
wrote:
Neither of those organisations has claimed that I was killed in
Vietnam (or anywhere else). You're full of shit, Nev. Again.
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
Nev..
May 12, 2012, 1:33:11 AM5/12/12
to
Nev..
George W Frost
May 12, 2012, 1:48:11 AM5/12/12
to
"Diogenes" <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote in message
you are dead
now go and lay down like a good little boy
> =================
>
> Onya bike
>
> Gerry
George W Frost
May 12, 2012, 1:49:48 AM5/12/12
to
"Sigmund_F" <tranq...@the.asylum> wrote in message
news:004rq7993pdmtk160...@4ax.com...
another one has escaped from the looney bin
George W Frost
May 12, 2012, 1:52:14 AM5/12/12
to
"Sigmund_F" <tranq...@the.asylum> wrote in message
haven't you ?
Saddle Tramp
May 12, 2012, 6:35:50 AM5/12/12
to
On Sat, 12 May 2012 10:32:07 +1000, Sigmund_F <tranq...@the.asylum>
Who are you, Gerry's guardian?
>
>When you used the line "Do you always use profanities when you
>disagree with someone?" you were using a cheap rhetorical stunt called
>a loaded question.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question
>
>A famous loaded questions is "Are you still beating your wife?"
>
>Gerry responded to your loaded question with an another loaded
>question, i.e. "Are still sodomising little boys?"
>
>And now you call that verbal abuse.
Yes I do.
> So, it seems that you don't mind
>verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
>"foul".
Please show and, "quote verbatim", where I have verbally abused Gerry.
>Interesting.
Not!
wrote:
>On Sat, 12 May 2012 09:39:53 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 12 May 2012 08:08:06 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 10:24:08 +0930, Saddle Tramp
>>><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:50:27 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Do you always use profanities when you disagree with someone?
>>>
>>>Are still sodomising little boys?
>
>>Now you are resorting to verbal abuse.
>
>[sigh] I will explain:
Don't bother, I was discussing this with Gerry, not you.
>On Sat, 12 May 2012 09:39:53 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 12 May 2012 08:08:06 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 11 May 2012 10:24:08 +0930, Saddle Tramp
>>><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:50:27 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
>>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Do you always use profanities when you disagree with someone?
>>>
>>>Are still sodomising little boys?
>
>>Now you are resorting to verbal abuse.
>
>[sigh] I will explain:
Who are you, Gerry's guardian?
>
>When you used the line "Do you always use profanities when you
>disagree with someone?" you were using a cheap rhetorical stunt called
>a loaded question.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question
>
>A famous loaded questions is "Are you still beating your wife?"
>
>Gerry responded to your loaded question with an another loaded
>question, i.e. "Are still sodomising little boys?"
>
>And now you call that verbal abuse.
> So, it seems that you don't mind
>verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
>"foul".
>Interesting.
Not!
Sigmund_F
May 12, 2012, 9:15:08 AM5/12/12
to
On Sat, 12 May 2012 20:05:50 +0930, Saddle Tramp
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>Please show and, "quote verbatim", where I have verbally abused Gerry.
Please show and "quote verbatim" where Gerry verbally abused you.
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>Please show and, "quote verbatim", where I have verbally abused Gerry.
Saddle Tramp
May 12, 2012, 10:04:51 AM5/12/12
to
On Sat, 12 May 2012 23:15:08 +1000, Sigmund_F <tranq...@the.asylum>
wrote:
As requested,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>I wasn't trying avoid anything, you disingenuous fuckwit.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>You're a ring-in hiding behind a pseudonym whose sole purpose
> so far has been to try to ridicule and invaidate my comments and to ride shotgun
Now you quote verbatim where I have verbally abused Gerry.
> So, it seems that you don't mind
>verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
>"foul".
I'm not sure why you got involved in this discussion between Gerry and
me. Why is it that you feel you have to answer for him? Is Gerry
incapable of answering my questions? He has avoided my initial three
simple questions, perhaps you can answer them for him........
1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
from eight metres, before returning fire?
wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>I wasn't trying avoid anything, you disingenuous fuckwit.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>You're a ring-in hiding behind a pseudonym whose sole purpose
> so far has been to try to ridicule and invaidate my comments and to ride shotgun
> for George. I'll tell you nothing and take you nowhere,
>fuckwit.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>fuckwit.
>
>
>Are still sodomising little boys?
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Are still sodomising little boys?
>
Now you quote verbatim where I have verbally abused Gerry.
> So, it seems that you don't mind
>verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
>"foul".
me. Why is it that you feel you have to answer for him? Is Gerry
incapable of answering my questions? He has avoided my initial three
simple questions, perhaps you can answer them for him........
1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
from eight metres, before returning fire?
2. Why did you not engage him when he was changing magazines?
Peter
May 12, 2012, 6:04:46 PM5/12/12
to
Saddle Tramp <spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote in
news:4besq7h9a7esjgnns...@4ax.com:
> Don't bother, I was discussing this with Gerry, not you.
>
> Who are you, Gerry's guardian?
Think about it.
My guess is it is Gerry (at it again).
--
:-P
news:4besq7h9a7esjgnns...@4ax.com:
> Don't bother, I was discussing this with Gerry, not you.
>
> Who are you, Gerry's guardian?
My guess is it is Gerry (at it again).
--
:-P
Peter
May 12, 2012, 6:16:17 PM5/12/12
to
Saddle Tramp <spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote in
news:nmpsq7d2mopqbbj9f...@4ax.com:
>
> I'm not sure why you got involved in this discussion between Gerry and
> me. Why is it that you feel you have to answer for him? Is Gerry
> incapable of answering my questions? He has avoided my initial three
> simple questions, perhaps you can answer them for him........
crazy/>
--
:-P
George W Frost
May 12, 2012, 6:53:05 PM5/12/12
to
"Peter" <som...@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA052522F91EE8s...@198.186.190.14...
Sigmund_F
May 12, 2012, 7:25:53 PM5/12/12
to
On Sat, 12 May 2012 23:34:51 +0930, Saddle Tramp
>>You're a ring-in hiding behind a pseudonym whose sole purpose
>> so far has been to try to ridicule and invalidate my comments and to ride shotgun
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>Are still sodomising little boys?
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Now you quote verbatim where I have verbally abused Gerry.
[sigh] I will explain [again]:
When you used the line "Do you always use profanities when you
disagree with someone?" you were using a cheap rhetorical stunt called
a loaded question.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question
A famous loaded questions is "Are you still beating your wife?"
Gerry responded to your loaded question with an another loaded
question, i.e. "Are still sodomising little boys?"
And now you call that verbal abuse. So, it seems that you don't mind
>I'm not sure why you got involved in this discussion between Gerry and
>me. Why is it that you feel you have to answer for him?
Ah, that's easy to explain.
A while ago, due to the activities of idiotic Usenet user in a
newsgroup far, far away, Gerry decided to use the pseudonym Sigmund_F
as a way of facilititating continued dialogue with idiots who generate
crap which is likely to cause both Sigmund_F and said idiots to be
killfiled by more sane readers.
Think of the pseudonym Sigmund_F as a convenience tool. It alllows
discerning readers of this newsgroup to identify threads which they
may wish to skip in the interests of sanity.
Given your behaviour, Gerry thought it best to let Sigmund_F deal with
you whilst he continues to chat amicably with the saner people in this
newsgroup.
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 12 May 2012 23:15:08 +1000, Sigmund_F <tranq...@the.asylum>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 12 May 2012 20:05:50 +0930, Saddle Tramp
>><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Please show and, "quote verbatim", where I have verbally abused Gerry.
>>
>>Please show and "quote verbatim" where Gerry verbally abused you.
>
>As requested,
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>I wasn't trying avoid anything, you disingenuous fuckwit.
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, since you are a disingenuous fuckwit, that's hardly abuse.
>On Sat, 12 May 2012 23:15:08 +1000, Sigmund_F <tranq...@the.asylum>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 12 May 2012 20:05:50 +0930, Saddle Tramp
>><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Please show and, "quote verbatim", where I have verbally abused Gerry.
>>
>>Please show and "quote verbatim" where Gerry verbally abused you.
>
>As requested,
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>I wasn't trying avoid anything, you disingenuous fuckwit.
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>You're a ring-in hiding behind a pseudonym whose sole purpose
>> for George. I'll tell you nothing and take you nowhere,
>>fuckwit.
See above.
>>fuckwit.
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>Are still sodomising little boys?
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Now you quote verbatim where I have verbally abused Gerry.
When you used the line "Do you always use profanities when you
disagree with someone?" you were using a cheap rhetorical stunt called
a loaded question.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question
A famous loaded questions is "Are you still beating your wife?"
Gerry responded to your loaded question with an another loaded
question, i.e. "Are still sodomising little boys?"
verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
"foul".
Interesting.
"foul".
>I'm not sure why you got involved in this discussion between Gerry and
>me. Why is it that you feel you have to answer for him?
A while ago, due to the activities of idiotic Usenet user in a
newsgroup far, far away, Gerry decided to use the pseudonym Sigmund_F
as a way of facilititating continued dialogue with idiots who generate
crap which is likely to cause both Sigmund_F and said idiots to be
killfiled by more sane readers.
Think of the pseudonym Sigmund_F as a convenience tool. It alllows
discerning readers of this newsgroup to identify threads which they
may wish to skip in the interests of sanity.
Given your behaviour, Gerry thought it best to let Sigmund_F deal with
you whilst he continues to chat amicably with the saner people in this
newsgroup.
Sigmund_F
May 12, 2012, 7:32:27 PM5/12/12
to
pseudonym in another newsgroup which you also frequent, I'd hardly
call that a guess, Peter. You're being less than frank with your
friends here, Peter.
George W Frost
May 12, 2012, 8:02:43 PM5/12/12
to
"Sigmund_F" <tranq...@the.asylum> wrote in message
his name is Peter
get that Gerry?....
PETER !! NOT FRANK
Nigel Allen
May 12, 2012, 8:11:04 PM5/12/12
to
N/
George W Frost
May 12, 2012, 8:28:02 PM5/12/12
to
"Nigel Allen" <d...@REMOVETHISedrs.com.au> wrote in message
news:Otednfd1vOyFYTPS...@westnet.com.au...
Nigel Allen
May 12, 2012, 8:44:36 PM5/12/12
to
N/
George W Frost
May 12, 2012, 8:48:37 PM5/12/12
to
news:oKadncRSt7tonjLS...@westnet.com.au...
First, second or tenth
doesn't matter which
doesn't matter which
Saddle Tramp
May 13, 2012, 7:09:10 PM5/13/12
to
>And now you call that verbal abuse. So, it seems that you don't mind
>verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
>"foul".
>A while ago, due to the activities of idiotic Usenet user in a
>newsgroup far, far away, Gerry decided to use the pseudonym Sigmund_F
>as a way of facilititating continued dialogue with idiots who generate
>crap which is likely to cause both Sigmund_F and said idiots to be
>killfiled by more sane readers.
>
>Think of the pseudonym Sigmund_F as a convenience tool. It alllows
>discerning readers of this newsgroup to identify threads which they
>may wish to skip in the interests of sanity.
>Given your behaviour, Gerry thought it best to let Sigmund_F deal with
>you whilst he continues to chat amicably with the saner people in this
>newsgroup.
courteous to you throughout this thread. I have not swore at you or
used any abusive language; unlike yourself, when conversing with me.
At the same time perhaps you would like to answer my original
questions,
Diogenes
May 14, 2012, 3:05:40 AM5/14/12
to
On Mon, 14 May 2012 08:39:10 +0930, Saddle Tramp
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>I don't believe you!
Fine by me. Now fuck off, stupid.
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>I don't believe you!
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
George W Frost
May 14, 2012, 3:14:33 AM5/14/12
to
"Diogenes" <cy...@society.sux.ok> wrote in message
Diogenes,
Sigmund_F,
Walt,
or whoever you are today
Sigmund_F
May 14, 2012, 7:13:06 AM5/14/12
to
On Mon, 14 May 2012 08:39:10 +0930, Saddle Tramp
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>
>>And now you call that verbal abuse. So, it seems that you don't mind
>>verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
>>"foul".
>
>Again, SigmundGerry, show me where I have verbally abused Gerry.
You disingenuous fuckwit. You called Gerry a braggart when he spoke
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>
>>And now you call that verbal abuse. So, it seems that you don't mind
>>verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
>>"foul".
>
>Again, SigmundGerry, show me where I have verbally abused Gerry.
about his service in Vietnam hosing away the Gooks. Admitted, he was
at the time, brainwashed by the Government, but he was a brave soldier
doing his duty, unlike you and the fraudulent George.
>
>>A while ago, due to the activities of idiotic Usenet user in a
>>newsgroup far, far away, Gerry decided to use the pseudonym Sigmund_F
>>as a way of facilititating continued dialogue with idiots who generate
>>crap which is likely to cause both Sigmund_F and said idiots to be
>>killfiled by more sane readers.
>>
>>Think of the pseudonym Sigmund_F as a convenience tool. It alllows
>>discerning readers of this newsgroup to identify threads which they
>>may wish to skip in the interests of sanity.
>
>OK, I will now refer to you as SigmundGerry to avoid any confusion.
Fuck off you disingenuous twat.
>>A while ago, due to the activities of idiotic Usenet user in a
>>newsgroup far, far away, Gerry decided to use the pseudonym Sigmund_F
>>as a way of facilititating continued dialogue with idiots who generate
>>crap which is likely to cause both Sigmund_F and said idiots to be
>>killfiled by more sane readers.
>>
>>Think of the pseudonym Sigmund_F as a convenience tool. It alllows
>>discerning readers of this newsgroup to identify threads which they
>>may wish to skip in the interests of sanity.
>
>OK, I will now refer to you as SigmundGerry to avoid any confusion.
>>Given your behaviour, Gerry thought it best to let Sigmund_F deal with
>>you whilst he continues to chat amicably with the saner people in this
>>newsgroup.
>
>My behaviour??? Please clarify, SigmundGerry. I have been polite and
>courteous to you throughout this thread. I have not swore at you or
>used any abusive language; unlike yourself, when conversing with me.
credentials/Vietnam service, or are you just another fraud same as
George.
>
>At the same time perhaps you would like to answer my original
>questions,
>
>1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
>from eight metres, before returning fire?
>
>2. Why did you not engage him when he was changing magazines?
>
>3. I don't believe you! An AK47 is a powerful weapon, please explain
>how he missed you after firing, what, some 40 bullets from eight
>metres?
Gerry doesn't have to prove anything, you disingenuous fuckwit. As
>At the same time perhaps you would like to answer my original
>questions,
>
>1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
>from eight metres, before returning fire?
>
>2. Why did you not engage him when he was changing magazines?
>
>3. I don't believe you! An AK47 is a powerful weapon, please explain
>how he missed you after firing, what, some 40 bullets from eight
>metres?
Gerry has already stated, that was a very abbreviated account of what
happened. If you knew the longer version, or the number of 'contacts'
that he was involved in, then you would begin to understand. Gerry
hated war as only a soldier who has lived it can, only as one who has
seen its brutality, its futility and stupidity.
Now fuck and shove all your ad hominem up your arse.
George W Frost
May 14, 2012, 9:02:28 AM5/14/12
to
"Sigmund_F" <tranq...@the.asylum> wrote in message
> On Mon, 14 May 2012 08:39:10 +0930, Saddle Tramp
> <spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>And now you call that verbal abuse. So, it seems that you don't mind
>>>verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
>>>"foul".
>>
>>Again, SigmundGerry, show me where I have verbally abused Gerry.
well Gerry,
> <spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>And now you call that verbal abuse. So, it seems that you don't mind
>>>verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
>>>"foul".
>>
>>Again, SigmundGerry, show me where I have verbally abused Gerry.
Diogenes,
Sigmund_F
Walt
or whoever you were yesterday,
or may be today,
or even tomorrow
You have shown yourself to be exactly what you are
A braggart
a liar
a bully
a coward
a wannabe
a pretentious hero
a wanker
and of course,
a fool,
Which brings to mind something my Father told me and I am sure it has been
said over the years and quite often.
And that was
Never argue with a fool. they will soon bring you down to their level
Sigmund_F
May 14, 2012, 9:28:19 AM5/14/12
to
On Mon, 14 May 2012 23:02:28 +1000, "George W Frost"
<georg...@gone.com> wrote:
>well Gerry,
>Diogenes,
>Sigmund_F
>Walt
>or whoever you were yesterday,
>or may be today,
>or even tomorrow
>You have shown yourself to be exactly what you are
>A braggart
>a liar
>a bully
>a coward
>a wannabe
>a pretentious hero
>a wanker
>and of course,
>a fool,
>Which brings to mind something my Father told me and I am sure it has been
>said over the years and quite often.
>And that was
>Never argue with a fool. they will soon bring you down to their level
In your dreams, but... consider the following:
<georg...@gone.com> wrote:
>well Gerry,
>Diogenes,
>Sigmund_F
>Walt
>or whoever you were yesterday,
>or may be today,
>or even tomorrow
>You have shown yourself to be exactly what you are
>A braggart
>a liar
>a bully
>a coward
>a wannabe
>a pretentious hero
>a wanker
>and of course,
>a fool,
>Which brings to mind something my Father told me and I am sure it has been
>said over the years and quite often.
>And that was
>Never argue with a fool. they will soon bring you down to their level
[1] You get basic facts about Vietnam 1962/63 horribly wrong time
and time again. Facts which no Vietnam veteran who was there from
1962 to 1963 would have gotten wrong.
[2] When challenged, you hide behind your pseudonym and offer no
evidence whatsover supporting your claim to have been there from March
1962 to 1963 as part of a RAE Detatchment.
[3] None of the Army history about Vietnam which I have read (and I
have several authoritative books on the subject) records any RAE
Detatchment being in Vietnam from March1962 to 1963, yet such an event
would have huge historical significance since it would invalidate the
claim by the AATTV, which did not arrive there till August 1962, that
it was the first Australian unit in Vietnam.
[4] The RAE Vietnam Association apparently has no knowledge of any
RAE Detatchment being in Vietnam 1962/62.
[5] The book "No Need for Heroes", written by Major Sandy
MacGregor, the OC of 3 Field Troop, RAE, makes the claim (which
reverberates right through the Australian Army's offical Vietnam War
history) that his unit (sent as a support element to 1RAR in 1965)
was the first RAE unit which served in South Vietnam.
[6] Having been informed (by me) that the Army's official history is
unaware of your RAE Detatchement's tour of duty in Vietnam, you
inexplicably show no interest whatsoever in writing to either the
Australian War Memorial, or to your buddies in the RAE Vietnam
Association, to get this important historical fact recognised.
[7] Nor have any of the other phantom members of that phantom RAE
Detatchment apparently felt the need to have their tour of duty
recognised by Australia's military historians.
Admit it, George, you were never there.
Sigmund_F
May 14, 2012, 9:54:54 AM5/14/12
to
Amusing, but to state the bleeding obvious,
SaddleTramp/BasilBrush/ShyBiker is now impersonating me.
Saddle Tramp
May 14, 2012, 10:11:45 AM5/14/12
to
On Mon, 14 May 2012 21:13:06 +1000, Sigmund_F <tranq...@the.asylum>
wrote:
>On Mon, 14 May 2012 08:39:10 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>And now you call that verbal abuse. So, it seems that you don't mind
>>>verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
>>>"foul".
>>
>>Again, SigmundGerry, show me where I have verbally abused Gerry.
>
>You disingenuous fuckwit. You called Gerry a braggart when he spoke
>about his service in Vietnam hosing away the Gooks. Admitted, he was
>at the time, brainwashed by the Government, but he was a brave soldier
>doing his duty, unlike you and the fraudulent George.
>>
<snip the rest of SigmundGerry's profanities and verbal abuse>
There you go again, Sigmund/Gerry, more profanities and verbal abuse.
All I want is a few simple answers to my questions.
>1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo
> at you, from eight metres, before returning fire?
>
>2. Why did you not engage him when he was changing magazines?
>
>3. I don't believe you! An AK47 is a powerful weapon, please
> explain how he missed you after firing, what, some 40 bullets
> from eight metres?
>
I'm more convinced now, then ever before, that the incident concerning
the shooting of the guy never took place, because every time I ask you
a couple of questions about it, you resort to verbal abuse and
profanities.
You are avoiding those questions like the plague, come on,
SigmundGerry, what's your problem, why won't you answer my questions?
Time to hit the sack now, speak to you tomorrow.
G'night
wrote:
>On Mon, 14 May 2012 08:39:10 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>And now you call that verbal abuse. So, it seems that you don't mind
>>>verbally abusing Gerry, but when you're on the receving end, you cry
>>>"foul".
>>
>>Again, SigmundGerry, show me where I have verbally abused Gerry.
>
>You disingenuous fuckwit. You called Gerry a braggart when he spoke
>about his service in Vietnam hosing away the Gooks. Admitted, he was
>at the time, brainwashed by the Government, but he was a brave soldier
>doing his duty, unlike you and the fraudulent George.
>>
There you go again, Sigmund/Gerry, more profanities and verbal abuse.
All I want is a few simple answers to my questions.
>1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo
> at you, from eight metres, before returning fire?
>
>2. Why did you not engage him when he was changing magazines?
>
>3. I don't believe you! An AK47 is a powerful weapon, please
> explain how he missed you after firing, what, some 40 bullets
> from eight metres?
>
>My behaviour??? Please clarify, SigmundGerry. I have
> been polite and courteous to you throughout this thread.
> I have not swore at you or used any abusive language; unlike
> yourself, when conversing with me.
>
>4. Please show me where I have verbally abused Gerry.
> been polite and courteous to you throughout this thread.
> I have not swore at you or used any abusive language; unlike
> yourself, when conversing with me.
>
I'm more convinced now, then ever before, that the incident concerning
the shooting of the guy never took place, because every time I ask you
a couple of questions about it, you resort to verbal abuse and
profanities.
You are avoiding those questions like the plague, come on,
SigmundGerry, what's your problem, why won't you answer my questions?
Time to hit the sack now, speak to you tomorrow.
G'night
Peter
May 14, 2012, 5:26:13 PM5/14/12
to
Sigmund_F <tranq...@the.asylum> wrote in
news:22q1r798kecjm1t10...@4ax.com:
> You disingenuous fuckwit. You called Gerry a braggart when he spoke
> about his service in Vietnam hosing away the Gooks. Admitted, he was
> at the time, brainwashed by the Government, but he was a brave soldier
> doing his duty, unlike you and the fraudulent George.
So this is Sigmund_F aka Walt aka Peter aka Dallas aka keyboard warrior aka
Gerry Binder having a go at George for being fraudulent.
I find your choice of language offensive and it truely shows you have not
really grown as a person as much as you feel and claim.
My observation is we seem to have the same argument going both ways, but
only one person really gives a toss. ;-)
I have a cure for mental health!
I would like to call it the "tap on the chin" approach.
I have seen this tested many times with great succsess.
Gerry, I would be happy to offer my assistance if you would like to give it
a go!
With love.
BTW Gerry. Maybe it would help if you looked up the term Sheep-Dipped.
--
:-P
news:22q1r798kecjm1t10...@4ax.com:
> You disingenuous fuckwit. You called Gerry a braggart when he spoke
> about his service in Vietnam hosing away the Gooks. Admitted, he was
> at the time, brainwashed by the Government, but he was a brave soldier
> doing his duty, unlike you and the fraudulent George.
Gerry Binder having a go at George for being fraudulent.
I find your choice of language offensive and it truely shows you have not
really grown as a person as much as you feel and claim.
My observation is we seem to have the same argument going both ways, but
only one person really gives a toss. ;-)
I have a cure for mental health!
I would like to call it the "tap on the chin" approach.
I have seen this tested many times with great succsess.
Gerry, I would be happy to offer my assistance if you would like to give it
a go!
With love.
BTW Gerry. Maybe it would help if you looked up the term Sheep-Dipped.
--
:-P
Diogenes
May 14, 2012, 11:54:09 PM5/14/12
to
On Thu, 10 May 2012 17:59:39 -0700 (PDT), Marty H <hyt...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>and to all the old faces that have dropped in over that last few
>weeks...
>
>above is the reason why Aus.moto is dead.
>
>these 2 fuckwits killed it...
The usual sore-loser crap by MartyH, whose IQ has yet to reach tripe
digits.
Marty, if people left because they don't know how to skip threads (or
individuals) which they don't like (or disgree with), then that is
just the Usenet gene pool doing a bit of housekeeping.
Are you still going down on Knobdribble?
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
wrote:
>and to all the old faces that have dropped in over that last few
>weeks...
>
>above is the reason why Aus.moto is dead.
>
>these 2 fuckwits killed it...
The usual sore-loser crap by MartyH, whose IQ has yet to reach tripe
digits.
Marty, if people left because they don't know how to skip threads (or
individuals) which they don't like (or disgree with), then that is
just the Usenet gene pool doing a bit of housekeeping.
Are you still going down on Knobdribble?
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
Diogenes
May 15, 2012, 12:01:43 AM5/15/12
to
On Mon, 14 May 2012 23:41:45 +0930, Saddle Tramp
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 14 May 2012 21:13:06 +1000, Sigmund_F <tranq...@the.asylum>
>wrote:
<spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 14 May 2012 21:13:06 +1000, Sigmund_F <tranq...@the.asylum>
>wrote:
>>You disingenuous fuckwit. You called Gerry a braggart when he spoke
>>about his service in Vietnam hosing away the Gooks. Admitted, he was
>>at the time, brainwashed by the Government, but he was a brave soldier
>>doing his duty, unlike you and the fraudulent George.
><snip the rest of SigmundGerry's profanities and verbal abuse>
Except, my Pommie friend, that messages was a forgery. It was not
>>about his service in Vietnam hosing away the Gooks. Admitted, he was
>>at the time, brainwashed by the Government, but he was a brave soldier
>>doing his duty, unlike you and the fraudulent George.
><snip the rest of SigmundGerry's profanities and verbal abuse>
posted by my alterego Sigmund_F. It was a meretricious impersonation.
BTW, ShyBiker, BasilBrush, or Saddle Tramp, why do you come here? You
seem to have no genuing interest in contributing to this newsgroup.
Begone, you Pommie TROLL !!!
>There you go again, Sigmund/Gerry, more profanities and verbal abuse.
>Time to hit the sack now, speak to you tomorrow.
>
>G'night
You're posting from Britain, you Pommie TROLL.
>
>G'night
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
Diogenes
May 15, 2012, 12:12:45 AM5/15/12
to
On 14 May 2012 21:26:13 GMT, Peter <som...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>Sigmund_F <tranq...@the.asylum> wrote in
>news:22q1r798kecjm1t10...@4ax.com:
>
>> You disingenuous fuckwit. You called Gerry a braggart when he spoke
>> about his service in Vietnam hosing away the Gooks. Admitted, he was
>> at the time, brainwashed by the Government, but he was a brave soldier
>> doing his duty, unlike you and the fraudulent George.
>
>So this is Sigmund_F aka Walt aka Peter aka Dallas aka keyboard warrior aka
>Gerry Binder having a go at George for being fraudulent.
>
>I find your choice of language offensive and it truely shows you have not
>really grown as a person as much as you feel and claim.
Were you capable of nuanced reading, Peter, you weold have realised
>Sigmund_F <tranq...@the.asylum> wrote in
>news:22q1r798kecjm1t10...@4ax.com:
>
>> You disingenuous fuckwit. You called Gerry a braggart when he spoke
>> about his service in Vietnam hosing away the Gooks. Admitted, he was
>> at the time, brainwashed by the Government, but he was a brave soldier
>> doing his duty, unlike you and the fraudulent George.
>
>So this is Sigmund_F aka Walt aka Peter aka Dallas aka keyboard warrior aka
>Gerry Binder having a go at George for being fraudulent.
>
>I find your choice of language offensive and it truely shows you have not
>really grown as a person as much as you feel and claim.
that the message you were responding to was _not_ written by my
alterego Sigmund_F, but a rather poor forgery.
So, if you find it offensive, why don't you unmask the forger adn have
a go at him/her. It has nothing whatsoever to do with me.
>I have a cure for mental health!
>I would like to call it the "tap on the chin" approach.
>I have seen this tested many times with great succsess.
>Gerry, I would be happy to offer my assistance if you would like to give it
>a go!
disagreement, Peter Tippett. Have you stopped beating your sex-object
yet?
>With love.
You have a psychopath's concept of love, Peter Tippett.
>BTW Gerry. Maybe it would help if you looked up the term Sheep-Dipped.
relevant to this thread, Peter Tippett?
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
Nev..
May 15, 2012, 3:55:47 AM5/15/12
to
it or just fuck off like he wants you to.
Nev..
Diogenes
May 15, 2012, 4:26:12 AM5/15/12
to
On Tue, 15 May 2012 17:55:47 +1000, "Nev.." <id...@mindless.com>
wrote:
Dear Readers (i.e. those who can actually read), Nev has got it wrong.
AGAIN !!! D'oh...
I'm not saying _anything_like_ what Nev is suggesting.
I'm saying "If there's aynthing in a Usenet newsgroup message or
thread you don't like, the only two choices you have are:
[1] Respond to it.
Or...
[2] Skip it.
That's what works.
What DOESN'T work in Usenet is control-freak whingers like Nev et al
trying to lay down "rules" about what's OK and what's not OK.
Usenet, like it or not, is anarchistic by its very nature.
Any attempt to project _your_ "rules" onto it is futile. And doomed
to failure.
Those who understand this have no trouble in staying.
The rest invariably run away screaming:
"They're all bastards!"
"They didn't conform to my rules!"
"I hate the place!"
"They made me leave!"
Welcome to Applied Psychology 101
(and the REAL world),
boyz and gurlz. :-)))
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
wrote:
AGAIN !!! D'oh...
I'm not saying _anything_like_ what Nev is suggesting.
I'm saying "If there's aynthing in a Usenet newsgroup message or
thread you don't like, the only two choices you have are:
[1] Respond to it.
Or...
[2] Skip it.
That's what works.
What DOESN'T work in Usenet is control-freak whingers like Nev et al
trying to lay down "rules" about what's OK and what's not OK.
Usenet, like it or not, is anarchistic by its very nature.
Any attempt to project _your_ "rules" onto it is futile. And doomed
to failure.
Those who understand this have no trouble in staying.
The rest invariably run away screaming:
"They're all bastards!"
"They didn't conform to my rules!"
"I hate the place!"
"They made me leave!"
Welcome to Applied Psychology 101
(and the REAL world),
boyz and gurlz. :-)))
=================
Onya bike
Gerry
Saddle Tramp
May 15, 2012, 7:53:04 AM5/15/12
to
On Mon, 14 May 2012 23:54:54 +1000, Sigmund_F <tranq...@the.asylum>
wrote:
>
>
>Amusing, but to state the bleeding obvious,
>SaddleTramp/BasilBrush/ShyBiker is now impersonating me.
OMG. According to SigmundGerry, there are THREE people impersonating
him. Interesting..... three impostors impersonating another impostor.
Apparently, SigmundGerry will do anything to avoid answering my
questions.
wrote:
>
>
>Amusing, but to state the bleeding obvious,
>SaddleTramp/BasilBrush/ShyBiker is now impersonating me.
him. Interesting..... three impostors impersonating another impostor.
Apparently, SigmundGerry will do anything to avoid answering my
questions.
Saddle Tramp
May 15, 2012, 7:53:04 AM5/15/12
to
On Tue, 15 May 2012 14:01:43 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
message you are referring to. I do wish you had stuck to using one
pseudonym.
>BTW, ShyBiker, BasilBrush, or Saddle Tramp, why do you come here? You
>seem to have no genuing interest in contributing to this newsgroup.
I've been a lurker here for some time. I saw your "request".....
"I have no fucking idea what you're talking about. Perhaps if you
quoted me verbatim I'd be able to respond".
.......And I simply provided you with your request.
ShyBiker, I have seen some of his posts here, but Basil Brush?? Who is
Basil Brush? I don't see any of his posts here. I thought he was a
pommie glove puppet.
>
>Begone, you Pommie TROLL !!!
I agree with you! We don't want ANY Trolls in here, especially pommie
Trolls.
>>There you go again, Sigmund/Gerry, more profanities and verbal abuse.
>>Time to hit the sack now, speak to you tomorrow.
>>
>>G'night
>
>You're posting from Britain, you Pommie TROLL.
Who is posting from Britain SigmundGerry, please be more precise, you
are becoming very confusing.
wrote:
>On Mon, 14 May 2012 23:41:45 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 14 May 2012 21:13:06 +1000, Sigmund_F <tranq...@the.asylum>
>>wrote:
>
>>>You disingenuous fuckwit. You called Gerry a braggart when he spoke
>>>about his service in Vietnam hosing away the Gooks. Admitted, he was
>>>at the time, brainwashed by the Government, but he was a brave soldier
>>>doing his duty, unlike you and the fraudulent George.
>
>><snip the rest of SigmundGerry's profanities and verbal abuse>
>
>Except, my Pommie friend, that messages was a forgery. It was not
>posted by my alterego Sigmund_F. It was a meretricious impersonation.
SigmundGerry you have me confused. Please indicate clearly which
>On Mon, 14 May 2012 23:41:45 +0930, Saddle Tramp
><spare...@thebikersshop.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 14 May 2012 21:13:06 +1000, Sigmund_F <tranq...@the.asylum>
>>wrote:
>
>>>You disingenuous fuckwit. You called Gerry a braggart when he spoke
>>>about his service in Vietnam hosing away the Gooks. Admitted, he was
>>>at the time, brainwashed by the Government, but he was a brave soldier
>>>doing his duty, unlike you and the fraudulent George.
>
>><snip the rest of SigmundGerry's profanities and verbal abuse>
>
>Except, my Pommie friend, that messages was a forgery. It was not
>posted by my alterego Sigmund_F. It was a meretricious impersonation.
message you are referring to. I do wish you had stuck to using one
pseudonym.
>BTW, ShyBiker, BasilBrush, or Saddle Tramp, why do you come here? You
>seem to have no genuing interest in contributing to this newsgroup.
"I have no fucking idea what you're talking about. Perhaps if you
quoted me verbatim I'd be able to respond".
.......And I simply provided you with your request.
ShyBiker, I have seen some of his posts here, but Basil Brush?? Who is
Basil Brush? I don't see any of his posts here. I thought he was a
pommie glove puppet.
>
>Begone, you Pommie TROLL !!!
Trolls.
>>There you go again, Sigmund/Gerry, more profanities and verbal abuse.
>>Time to hit the sack now, speak to you tomorrow.
>>
>>G'night
>
>You're posting from Britain, you Pommie TROLL.
are becoming very confusing.
Saddle Tramp
May 15, 2012, 7:53:04 AM5/15/12
to
On Tue, 15 May 2012 14:12:45 +1000, Diogenes <cy...@society.sux.ok>
wrote:
>
>Were you capable of nuanced reading, Peter, you weold have realised
>that the message you were responding to was _not_ written by my
>alterego Sigmund_F, but a rather poor forgery.
>
According to GerrySigmund, there is a forger impersonating one of his
pseudonyms. In other words, an impostor impersonating another
impostor.
My view on all this is, SigmundGerry is calling a double bluff. I've
had a look at the headers, and while not an expert on the matter, they
seem the same to me.
SigmundGerry states, "but a rather poor forgery". Perhaps then, as he
appears to be an expert on the matter, would he point out to us why he
thinks it's a poor forgery.....with facts, not his suppositions.
wrote:
>
>Were you capable of nuanced reading, Peter, you weold have realised
>that the message you were responding to was _not_ written by my
>alterego Sigmund_F, but a rather poor forgery.
>
pseudonyms. In other words, an impostor impersonating another
impostor.
My view on all this is, SigmundGerry is calling a double bluff. I've
had a look at the headers, and while not an expert on the matter, they
seem the same to me.
SigmundGerry states, "but a rather poor forgery". Perhaps then, as he
appears to be an expert on the matter, would he point out to us why he
thinks it's a poor forgery.....with facts, not his suppositions.
Peter
May 17, 2012, 11:21:36 PM5/17/12
to
> Another not-so-subtle offer of violence as a way or resolving
> disagreement, Peter Tippett
Just an offer of asistance.
With love!
--
:-P
Copter_Six
May 19, 2012, 1:09:43 AM5/19/12
to
On 5/10/2012 7:53 PM, Saddle Tramp wrote:
>
> Please answer the following points.
AK-47 - Superior Weapon over the M-60???? That right there shows
Gerry the idiot has no idea about weapons.
--
Copter Six
*Psychopath: A Journey Through the Madness*
=================================================
>Hopefully, you haven't ignited another flame war.
Que sera, sera...
walnut war cry
______________
/ \
| WHAAAAAAAAAAA! |
\__ _________/
/ ,'
_.~._ /,'
,~'.~@~.`~.
/ : _..._ : \
{ :,"''\\`".: }
`C) 0 _ 0 (--.._,-"""-.__
( ) @ ( ) `.
`-.-_-.-' \
,' \ / ,` ;`-._,-.
,' ,'/ ,' `---t.,-. \_
,--.,',' ,'----.__\ _( \----'
'///,`,--.,' `-.__.--' `. )
'///,' `-`
>
> Please answer the following points.
>
> 1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
> from eight metres, before returning fire?
>
> 2. Why did you not engage him when he was changing magazines?
Gerry the idiot was hiding under the stove in the kitchen he worked in.
> 1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
> from eight metres, before returning fire?
>
> 2. Why did you not engage him when he was changing magazines?
AK-47 - Superior Weapon over the M-60???? That right there shows
Gerry the idiot has no idea about weapons.
--
Copter Six
*Psychopath: A Journey Through the Madness*
=================================================
>Hopefully, you haven't ignited another flame war.
Que sera, sera...
walnut war cry
______________
/ \
| WHAAAAAAAAAAA! |
\__ _________/
/ ,'
_.~._ /,'
,~'.~@~.`~.
/ : _..._ : \
{ :,"''\\`".: }
`C) 0 _ 0 (--.._,-"""-.__
( ) @ ( ) `.
`-.-_-.-' \
,' \ / ,` ;`-._,-.
,' ,'/ ,' `---t.,-. \_
,--.,',' ,'----.__\ _( \----'
'///,`,--.,' `-.__.--' `. )
'///,' `-`
Copter_Six
May 19, 2012, 1:19:17 AM5/19/12
to
On 5/12/2012 9:04 AM, Saddle Tramp wrote:
>
> 1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
> from eight metres, before returning fire?
>
> 2. Why did you not engage him when he was changing magazines?
>
>
> 1. Why did you let him fire a magazine-and-half of AK47 ammo at you,
> from eight metres, before returning fire?
>
> 2. Why did you not engage him when he was changing magazines?
>
> 3. I don't believe you! An AK47 is a powerful weapon, please explain
> how he missed you after firing, what, some 40 bullets from eight
> metres?
Gerry .... it's 05:18:00 ZULU. You are awake and just answered one of
> how he missed you after firing, what, some 40 bullets from eight
> metres?
my posts. Tell us quick -- the 3 common problems that cause an M-60 to
jam and how to clear the jam... Quick now... no Googling. You are
such an expert you know this surely.
Clocks running....
bthu...@gmail.com
May 19, 2012, 6:26:18 AM5/19/12
to
Copter_Six wrote:
> AK-47 - Superior Weapon over the M-60????
Surely it depends on the situation?
> AK-47 - Superior Weapon over the M-60????
BTH
Copter_Six
May 20, 2012, 2:13:47 AM5/20/12
to
weapon and a light machinegun. The M-60 will chew the jungle down and
keep chewing. It doesn't surprise me gerry doesn't know the difference.
The guy with the AK-47, or I should say AKM, wouldn't stand a chance.
bthu...@gmail.com
May 20, 2012, 5:46:58 AM5/20/12
to
Copter_Six wrote:
> On 5/19/2012 5:26 AM, bthu...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Copter_Six wrote:
> >> AK-47 - Superior Weapon over the M-60????
> >
> > Surely it depends on the situation?
>
> On 5/19/2012 5:26 AM, bthu...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Copter_Six wrote:
> >> AK-47 - Superior Weapon over the M-60????
> >
> > Surely it depends on the situation?
>
> Nah --- It seems gerry doesn't know the difference between an automatic
> weapon and a light machinegun. The M-60 will chew the jungle down and
> keep chewing. It doesn't surprise me gerry doesn't know the difference.
> The guy with the AK-47, or I should say AKM, wouldn't stand a chance.
I was meaning more like (say) in a tunnel or something. Granted, neither weapon would be as effective as a pistol (or even a sharp pointy stick), but I expect that the more compact weapon would be at least *slightly* more useful.
> weapon and a light machinegun. The M-60 will chew the jungle down and
> keep chewing. It doesn't surprise me gerry doesn't know the difference.
> The guy with the AK-47, or I should say AKM, wouldn't stand a chance.
BTH
Copter_Six
May 25, 2012, 1:23:42 AM5/25/12
to
Cook emptied 2 mags at Genius Gerry. More than 60 rounds. Take 8 giant
steps. That's how far he said he was. Even genius gerry should have
changed that story. A guy like gerry in my unit, making some stupid
braggart claims, telling everyone "look at me" .... every real soldier
listening would have blown him off. gerry thought he had an audience
that would worship him and all his heroics.
gerry is a liar.
0 new messages