Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
-- Craig's List
1 view
Skip to first unread message
dolf
Feb 6, 2013, 11:17:14 PM2/6/13
to
On 7/02/13 10:33 AM, Gillard the Liar wrote:
> Craig Thomson:-
>
> - Alleged to have stolen or dishonestly obtained more than $42,000-00
>
> - Allegedly spent more than $27,000-00 including:-
>
> - Sexual services $5,000-00
>
> - Porn Movies $600-00
>
> - Food/Drinks $1,700-00
>
> - Travel / Hotels/ car rentals/ parking $10,500-00
>
> Number of charges increased to 154.
>
> Prosecution brief runs to 20 volumes!
>
> Despite what bringnobrainalong keeps squealing about, and despite what
> Thomson's lawyer said; there does not appear to be a charge of
> spending money on an ice cream.
>
> Interesting how moron wog bringnobrainalong constantly defends
> Thomson, and by implication, union corruption and fraud!
>
>
These expenditures would have in all common sense, been approved by
Craig Thomson's immediate superior as boss as consistent with the
corporate culture and ethos.
A formal monogamous definition of gamogenesis: �marriage means the union
of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered
into for life� only occurred in August 2004 with the passage of the
Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill as an Act to amend the Australian
Commonwealth Marriage Act 1961 and Family Law Act 1975.
If there were sexual services in which Craig Thomson engages as
hospitality and entertainment costs occurred against his Diner's Club
Corporate Card before August 2004, then he doesn't have this charge to
consider.
- dolf
- www.dolfboek.com
> Craig Thomson:-
>
> - Alleged to have stolen or dishonestly obtained more than $42,000-00
>
> - Allegedly spent more than $27,000-00 including:-
>
> - Sexual services $5,000-00
>
> - Porn Movies $600-00
>
> - Food/Drinks $1,700-00
>
> - Travel / Hotels/ car rentals/ parking $10,500-00
>
> Number of charges increased to 154.
>
> Prosecution brief runs to 20 volumes!
>
> Despite what bringnobrainalong keeps squealing about, and despite what
> Thomson's lawyer said; there does not appear to be a charge of
> spending money on an ice cream.
>
> Interesting how moron wog bringnobrainalong constantly defends
> Thomson, and by implication, union corruption and fraud!
>
>
These expenditures would have in all common sense, been approved by
Craig Thomson's immediate superior as boss as consistent with the
corporate culture and ethos.
A formal monogamous definition of gamogenesis: �marriage means the union
of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered
into for life� only occurred in August 2004 with the passage of the
Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill as an Act to amend the Australian
Commonwealth Marriage Act 1961 and Family Law Act 1975.
If there were sexual services in which Craig Thomson engages as
hospitality and entertainment costs occurred against his Diner's Club
Corporate Card before August 2004, then he doesn't have this charge to
consider.
- dolf
- www.dolfboek.com
dolf
Feb 7, 2013, 4:37:04 PM2/7/13
to
2007 and that he was in charge for at least some of that time.
- dolf
- www.dolfboek.com
Kangaroo Court Australia
Feb 7, 2013, 8:30:05 PM2/7/13
to
"Unsafe" High Court Australia accused of undermining the Australian
Constitution: Thorpe, pham, Zhang, Ngo vs Commonwealth; Because
Freedom and Habeas Corpus cannot protect themselves
http://www.scribd.com/doc/123922586/Unsafe-High-Court-Australia-accused-of-undermining-the-Australian-Constitution-Thorpe-pham-Zhang-Ngo-vs-Commonwealth-Because-Freedom-and-Habeas
TO The Respondents
AND TO: The Honourable Nicola Roxon MP
Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of
Australia
nic...@nicolaroxonmp.com,
Nicola.roxon...@aph.gov.au,attor...@ag.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Greg Smith MP
Attorney-General of New South Wales
off...@smith.minister.nsw.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Robert Clark MP
Attorney-General of Victoria
robert.cl...@parliament.vic.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Jairod Bleigie MP
Attorney-General of Queensland
Attor...@ministerial.qld.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Christian Porter MLA
Attorney-General of Western Australia
christian.por...@mp.wa.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable John Rau MP
Attorney-General of South Australia
a...@agd.sa.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Brian Wightman MP
Attorney-General of Tasmania
Brian.Wight...@dpac.tas.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Simon Corbell MLA
Attomey-General of the Australian Capital Territory
corb...@act.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Johan Wessel Elferink MLA
Attomey-General of the Northern Territory of Australia
john.elfer...@nt.gov.au,
To Distrust the Judiciary means the beginning of the end of Society
1. We give NOTICE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER: Thorpe, Pham, Zhang, Ngo
vs Attorney Generals, Human Rights Commission & Ors. Should have been
Filed today in the High Court at Melbourne 5 Feb 2013.
2. To Ms Marion Le, we apologise for the delay: an unfortunate glitch
with our computer systems, and we needed a quick break. A journey of a
thousand miles, starts with one step, today. If you can relay on to Mr
Ngo our best wishes. We will try our best to get him a re-trial.
3. For those looking to Apply the prerogative writs:
a. form 12: Application for an order to show cause
b. form 21: Summons
c. Affidavit in support
d. Notice of a Constitutional Matter
e. Outline of submission
Good Luck
LT Pham
PO BOX 1255
St Albans
VIC 3020
5 attachments — Download all attachments
HC_Form-12_05022013 (web).pdf
631K View Download
HC_form-21_05022013 (web).pdf
179K View Download
HC_Affidavit-Form.05022013 (web).pdf
691K View Download
HC_Notice_of_A_Constitutional_Matter_05022013 (web).pdf
616K View Download
HC_Outline of Submission_04022013 (web).pdf
1285K View Download
dolf
Feb 7, 2013, 9:44:59 PM2/7/13
to
know you have been using Craig's List for sexual favours!! But did you
inhale?"
The very House of Parliament of which he is now and presently an elected
member had in August 2004 passed a law about the status of marriage.
Craig Thompson can parade his wife to the court when it suits him. And
when it comes to appropriate boundaries on hospitality and entertainment
costs which are given him then its a question of the union business
being in compliance with that legislation.
After August 2004 they are clearly inappropriate costs for an allegedly
a married man. That the continuing costs after that date is now
entirely due to their being claimed as a function and conditions of
employment prior to that date. And only ceased when the individual
contract for employment ceased.
There seemed to be no objections by the wife made to the court in
relation to the claimed as a function and conditions of employment.
- dolf
- www.dolfboek.com
dolf
Feb 7, 2013, 9:46:52 PM2/7/13
to
Kangaroo Court Australia
Feb 7, 2013, 9:53:20 PM2/7/13
to
dolf
Feb 7, 2013, 10:16:29 PM2/7/13
to
Similarly Peter Slipper ('former speaker of the House') can parade his
wife when it suits him.
It's a wonder Christopher ('the pixie' aka pixy) Pyne isn't making an
outrage of it.
On 7/02/13 10:33 AM, Gillard the Liar wrote:
> Craig Thomson:-
>
> - Alleged to have stolen or dishonestly obtained more than
> $42,000-00
>
> - Allegedly spent more than $27,000-00 including:-
>
> - Sexual services $5,000-00
>
> - Porn Movies $600-00
>
> - Food/Drinks $1,700-00
>
> - Travel / Hotels/ car rentals/ parking $10,500-00
>
> Number of charges increased to 154.
>
> Prosecution brief runs to 20 volumes!
>
> Despite what bringnobrainalong keeps squealing about, and despite
> what Thomson's lawyer said; there does not appear to be a charge of
> spending money on an ice cream.
>
> Interesting how moron wog bringnobrainalong constantly defends
> Thomson, and by implication, union corruption and fraud!
>
>
These expenditures would have in all common sense, been approved by
Craig Thomson's immediate superior as boss as consistent with the
corporate culture and ethos.
A formal monogamous definition of gamogenesis: “marriage means the union
wife when it suits him.
It's a wonder Christopher ('the pixie' aka pixy) Pyne isn't making an
outrage of it.
On 7/02/13 10:33 AM, Gillard the Liar wrote:
> Craig Thomson:-
>
> - Alleged to have stolen or dishonestly obtained more than
> $42,000-00
>
> - Allegedly spent more than $27,000-00 including:-
>
> - Sexual services $5,000-00
>
> - Porn Movies $600-00
>
> - Food/Drinks $1,700-00
>
> - Travel / Hotels/ car rentals/ parking $10,500-00
>
> Number of charges increased to 154.
>
> Prosecution brief runs to 20 volumes!
>
> Despite what bringnobrainalong keeps squealing about, and despite
> what Thomson's lawyer said; there does not appear to be a charge of
> spending money on an ice cream.
>
> Interesting how moron wog bringnobrainalong constantly defends
> Thomson, and by implication, union corruption and fraud!
>
>
These expenditures would have in all common sense, been approved by
Craig Thomson's immediate superior as boss as consistent with the
corporate culture and ethos.
of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered
into for life” only occurred in August 2004 with the passage of the
Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill as an Act to amend the Australian
Commonwealth Marriage Act 1961 and Family Law Act 1975.
If there were sexual services in which Craig Thomson engages as
hospitality and entertainment costs occurred against his Diner's Club
Corporate Card before August 2004, then he doesn't have this charge to
consider.
It seems the period we are looking at is the 5 years between 2002 to
2007 and that he was in charge for at least some of that time.
Commonwealth Marriage Act 1961 and Family Law Act 1975.
If there were sexual services in which Craig Thomson engages as
hospitality and entertainment costs occurred against his Diner's Club
Corporate Card before August 2004, then he doesn't have this charge to
consider.
It seems the period we are looking at is the 5 years between 2002 to
2007 and that he was in charge for at least some of that time.
dolf
Feb 7, 2013, 10:55:25 PM2/7/13
to
Look Kanga you jingoist, what God has brought together, let no man tear
asunder!
Similarly Peter Slipper ('former speaker of the House') can parade his
wife when it suits him.
It's a wonder Christopher ('the pixie' aka pixy) Pyne isn't making an
outrage of it.
On 7/02/13 10:33 AM, Gillard the Liar wrote:
> Craig Thomson:-
>
> - Alleged to have stolen or dishonestly obtained more than
> $42,000-00
>
> - Allegedly spent more than $27,000-00 including:-
>
> - Sexual services $5,000-00
>
> - Porn Movies $600-00
>
> - Food/Drinks $1,700-00
>
> - Travel / Hotels/ car rentals/ parking $10,500-00
>
> Number of charges increased to 154.
>
> Prosecution brief runs to 20 volumes!
>
> Despite what bringnobrainalong keeps squealing about, and despite
> what Thomson's lawyer said; there does not appear to be a charge of
> spending money on an ice cream.
>
> Interesting how moron wog bringnobrainalong constantly defends
> Thomson, and by implication, union corruption and fraud!
>
>
These expenditures would have in all common sense, been approved by
Craig Thomson's immediate superior as boss as consistent with the
corporate culture and ethos.
A formal monogamous definition of gamogenesis: “marriage means the union
Kangaroo Court Australia (nwn.we...@gmail.com): "Doofus, he can rape
his wife if he so chooses, but he cannot rape the funds of hard working
aussies"
Look Kanga you jingoist, what God has brought together, let no man tear
asunder!
Similarly Peter Slipper ('former speaker of the House') can parade his
wife when it suits him.
It's a wonder Christopher ('the pixie' aka pixy) Pyne isn't making an
outrage of it.
- dolf
- www.dolfboek.com
asunder!
Similarly Peter Slipper ('former speaker of the House') can parade his
wife when it suits him.
outrage of it.
On 7/02/13 10:33 AM, Gillard the Liar wrote:
> Craig Thomson:-
>
> - Alleged to have stolen or dishonestly obtained more than
> $42,000-00
>
> - Allegedly spent more than $27,000-00 including:-
>
> - Sexual services $5,000-00
>
> - Porn Movies $600-00
>
> - Food/Drinks $1,700-00
>
> - Travel / Hotels/ car rentals/ parking $10,500-00
>
> Number of charges increased to 154.
>
> Prosecution brief runs to 20 volumes!
>
> Despite what bringnobrainalong keeps squealing about, and despite
> what Thomson's lawyer said; there does not appear to be a charge of
> spending money on an ice cream.
>
> Interesting how moron wog bringnobrainalong constantly defends
> Thomson, and by implication, union corruption and fraud!
>
>
These expenditures would have in all common sense, been approved by
Craig Thomson's immediate superior as boss as consistent with the
corporate culture and ethos.
of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered
into for life” only occurred in August 2004 with the passage of the
Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill as an Act to amend the Australian
Commonwealth Marriage Act 1961 and Family Law Act 1975.
If there were sexual services in which Craig Thomson engages as
hospitality and entertainment costs occurred against his Diner's Club
Corporate Card before August 2004, then he doesn't have this charge to
consider.
It seems the period we are looking at is the 5 years between 2002 to
2007 and that he was in charge for at least some of that time.
Kangaroo Court Australia (nwn.we...@gmail.com): "Doofus Dolf: we
know you have been using Craig's List for sexual favours!! But did you
inhale?"
The very House of Parliament of which he is now and presently an elected
member had in August 2004 passed a law about the status of marriage.
Craig Thompson can parade his wife to the court when it suits him. And
when it comes to appropriate boundaries on hospitality and entertainment
costs which are given him then its a question of the union business
being in compliance with that legislation.
After August 2004 they are clearly inappropriate costs for an allegedly
a married man. That the continuing costs after that date is now
entirely due to their being claimed as a function and conditions of
employment prior to that date. And only ceased when the individual
contract for employment ceased.
There seemed to be no objections by the wife made to the court in
relation to the claimed costs as a function and conditions of employment.
Commonwealth Marriage Act 1961 and Family Law Act 1975.
If there were sexual services in which Craig Thomson engages as
hospitality and entertainment costs occurred against his Diner's Club
Corporate Card before August 2004, then he doesn't have this charge to
consider.
It seems the period we are looking at is the 5 years between 2002 to
2007 and that he was in charge for at least some of that time.
Kangaroo Court Australia (nwn.we...@gmail.com): "Doofus Dolf: we
know you have been using Craig's List for sexual favours!! But did you
inhale?"
The very House of Parliament of which he is now and presently an elected
member had in August 2004 passed a law about the status of marriage.
Craig Thompson can parade his wife to the court when it suits him. And
when it comes to appropriate boundaries on hospitality and entertainment
costs which are given him then its a question of the union business
being in compliance with that legislation.
After August 2004 they are clearly inappropriate costs for an allegedly
a married man. That the continuing costs after that date is now
entirely due to their being claimed as a function and conditions of
employment prior to that date. And only ceased when the individual
contract for employment ceased.
There seemed to be no objections by the wife made to the court in
Kangaroo Court Australia (nwn.we...@gmail.com): "Doofus, he can rape
his wife if he so chooses, but he cannot rape the funds of hard working
aussies"
Look Kanga you jingoist, what God has brought together, let no man tear
asunder!
Similarly Peter Slipper ('former speaker of the House') can parade his
wife when it suits him.
outrage of it.
- dolf
- www.dolfboek.com
0 new messages