Re: Swann's Horror budget 'leads to horror rates'
Polly the Parrot
<sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Independent economic forecaster Access Economics said that while the
> Labor Government started in fine style its decisions to date have
> harmed that fight.
Flanges Bum, care to comment?
Mr 7%
"Polly the Parrot" <flatula...@deadspam.com> wrote in message
news:20080509134220.2ca5e6bc@dhcppc1...
On?
Polly the Parrot
> >> Independent economic forecaster Access Economics said that while
> >> the Labor Government started in fine style its decisions to date
> >> have harmed that fight.
> >
> > Flanges Bum, care to comment?
>
> On?
Doh! Above statement, of course.
Sir John Howard
FlangesBum is too stupid to make a sensible comment.
Mr 7%
That he is not cutting Peter Costello's wreckless spending from the last
budget enough???
My comment would be this... any cuts on the wreckless spending by the
previous government is welcome, and the fact the economist believe it
doesn't go far enough shows how wreckless that spending in the Howard years
actually was.
The original poster of course being the dumbfuck Lib loser he is(he still
thinks Howard got knighted ffs! rofl) incorrectly titled the post from the
get go, which should have read Swann's nice budget, "leads to horror rates"
because the author of the piece clearly says he needs to lay down a horror
budget to rein in inflation.
Michael
"Sir John Howard" <sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:272be587-703c-448c...@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
This coming from a man named "Sir John HOward"?
Mr 7%
"Michael" <mic...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:aV8Vj.9078$ko5...@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
LOL. This fuckwit was told weeks ago that the Queen isn't giving Howard a
knighthood because he is a loser
Polly the Parrot
> >> >> Independent economic forecaster Access Economics said that while
> >> >> the Labor Government started in fine style its decisions to date
> >> >> have harmed that fight.
> >> >
> >> > Flanges Bum, care to comment?
> >>
> >> On?
> >
> > Doh! Above statement, of course.
>
> That he is not cutting Peter Costello's wreckless spending from the
> last budget enough???
Err... look again. An independent report. Nothing in the first para
above about what you are "commenting" at all that I could see.
Particularly the last 8 words!
Sir John Howard
At least I can spell "Howard", twit!
Kwyjibo
You can't spell "cur" though, fuckwit.
--
Kwyj.
Sir John Howard
> "Sir John Howard" <sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:a270039e-dfc3-43f3...@q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > Michael wrote:
> >> "Sir John Howard" <sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:272be587-703c-448c...@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> >> > Polly the Parrot wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, 8 May 2008 17:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Sir John Howard
> >> >> <sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Independent economic forecaster Access Economics said that while the
> >> >> > Labor Government started in fine style its decisions to date have
> >> >> > harmed that fight.
> >> >>
> >> >> Flanges Bum, care to comment?
> >> >
> >> > FlangesBum is too stupid to make a sensible comment.
> >>
> >> This coming from a man named "Sir John HOward"?
> >
> > At least I can spell "Howard", twit!
>
> You can't spell "cur" though, fuckwit.
As in your name, Wayne Kerr?
Kwyjibo
And you still managed to get it wrong.
--
Kwyj.
Sir John Howard
> "Sir John Howard" <sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:de2ef738-5f2c-4df5...@v26g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
> > Kwyjibo wrote:
> >> "Sir John Howard" <sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:a270039e-dfc3-43f3...@q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >> > Michael wrote:
> >> >> "Sir John Howard" <sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:272be587-703c-448c...@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> >> >> > Polly the Parrot wrote:
> >> >> >> On Thu, 8 May 2008 17:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Sir John Howard
> >> >> >> <sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Independent economic forecaster Access Economics said that while
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > Labor Government started in fine style its decisions to date have
> >> >> >> > harmed that fight.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Flanges Bum, care to comment?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > FlangesBum is too stupid to make a sensible comment.
> >> >>
> >> >> This coming from a man named "Sir John HOward"?
> >> >
> >> > At least I can spell "Howard", twit!
> >>
> >> You can't spell "cur" though, fuckwit.
> >
> > As in your name, Wayne Kerr?
>
> And you still managed to get it wrong.
OK, suit yourself, Argus Tuft.
Mr 7%
I read the entire article fuckwit to put your selected snippet into
perspective.
Your particular paragraph in your hack n slash job you did on the article
was about the economist complaing Wayne Swan's recent budget concessions had
NOT gone far enough in cutting the wreckless spending of the previous
government.
Now fuckwit, what bit do you want me to comment on? I agree with the
economist completely, Wayne Swan needs to cut the wreckless spending by the
previous government even further.
Polly the Parrot
> Now fuckwit, what bit do you want me to comment on? I agree with the
> economist completely, Wayne Swan needs to cut the wreckless spending
> by the previous government even further.
Thanks for the comment, weasel arse.
Mr. 7%
Come on lightweight, tell us all what the economist was actually complaining
about.
He was complaining Labor didn't cut enough spending, true/false?
Polly the Parrot
> Come on lightweight, tell us all what the economist was actually
> complaining about.
The fucking complete slippery slimy snake - Flanges Bum.
Read the article, shit for brains.
Mr. 7%
We are waiting fuckwit....
Oh come on, are all you light weights this easy?
Sir John Howard
> "Polly the Parrot" <flatula...@deadspam.com> wrote in message
> news:20080512220329.16e53775@dhcppc1...
> > On Mon, 12 May 2008 21:31:03 +1000 "Mr. 7%" <nor...@noreply.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Come on lightweight, tell us all what the economist was actually
> >> complaining about.
> >
> >
> > The fucking complete slippery slimy snake - Flanges Bum.
> >
> > Read the article, shit for brains.
>
> We are waiting fuckwit....
Admission you can't read noted.
> Oh come on, are all you light weights this easy?
You certainly are.
Mr. 7%
"Sir John Howard" <sirjoh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9f0f52af-94a7-4915...@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Kindie dropout FlangesBum AKA Mr. 0% wrote:
>> "Polly the Parrot" <flatula...@deadspam.com> wrote in message
>> news:20080512220329.16e53775@dhcppc1...
>> > On Mon, 12 May 2008 21:31:03 +1000 "Mr. 7%" <nor...@noreply.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Come on lightweight, tell us all what the economist was actually
>> >> complaining about.
>> >
>> >
>> > The fucking complete slippery slimy snake - Flanges Bum.
>> >
>> > Read the article, shit for brains.
>>
>> We are waiting fuckwit....
>
> Admission you can't read noted.
Still waiting......... akekekeke.
me@hotmail.com Lu R
Who give a toss what some LIEBERAL cronies think??