Re: To all our resident anti-gun posters
John-Melb
<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
> **Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.
<SNIP>
That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.
OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"
Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"
The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.
atec7 7
he is also an utter dick
kreed
indeed
Trevor Wilson
"John-Melb" <mcnama...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:532c115f-70ca-4a72...@i12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> **Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.
<SNIP>
That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.
OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"
**Sure. I DON'T CARE ABOUT GUNS. I typed it in caps in the hope that you can
understand. I care about strong, homogeneous, well supported and policed gun
control laws.
Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"
**Asked and answered.
The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.
**Nope, but you sure are. Guns are not the problem. The idiot holding the
gun may well be, however. In that sense, gun control laws are very
important.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
John-Melb
wrote:
> "John-Melb" <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:532c115f-70ca-4a72...@i12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"
>
> <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
> > **Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.
>
> <SNIP>
>
> That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
> time.
>
> OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
> over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"
>
> **Sure. I DON'T CARE ABOUT GUNS. I typed it in caps in the hope that you can
> understand. I care about strong, homogeneous, well supported and policed gun
> control laws.
>
You describe gun laws which require the same level of control for
anitque pinfires as for a Luger or Colt Automatic, laws which place
muzzleloaded shotguns in a differing, harder to obtain, "category" to
breach loading shotguns, laws which based the security levels for
ammuntion not on the type or quality of ammunition, but on the licence
under which the ammunition is owned, laws which caused the destruction
of over 600,000 lawfully owned sporting firearms, but appear unable to
stop criminal gans obtaining Glocks, as "strong, homogeneous, well
supported and policed gun control laws."
Fascinating, and certainly illustrative of your ignorance of the
subject matter.
> Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
> rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
> about guns"
>
> **Asked and answered.
Really, I must have missed it, care to provide a cite?
Betcha can't
>
> The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
> mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
> He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.
>
> **Nope, but you sure are. Guns are not the problem. The idiot holding the
> gun may well be, however. In that sense, gun control laws are very
> important.
>
So you still haven't worked out what "anti-gun" means in common
discussion, despite describing yourself as "not anti-gun" ? You
really do struggle with reality, dear fellow, stay away from lead for
another decade or three and things might improve for you.
"Guns are not the problem" good, I'll quote you on that........
Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart
> --
> Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au
John-Melb
> control laws. You are far too stupid to understand them, so I won't bother.
> The differences are profound and deep, along with very good policing of
> those laws in Australia.
>
I was describing "Australian" gun laws you ignorant tool!
> > Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
> > rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
> > about guns"
>
> > **Asked and answered.
>
> Really, I must have missed it, care to provide a cite?
>
> **Look up.
>
> Betcha can't
>
> **Moron.
Failure to provide proof of your assertions is noted, by your own
admission, this means you're lying.
>
>
>
> > The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
> > mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
> > He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.
>
> > **Nope, but you sure are. Guns are not the problem. The idiot holding the
> > gun may well be, however. In that sense, gun control laws are very
> > important.
>
> So you still haven't worked out what "anti-gun" means in common
> discussion, despite describing yourself as "not anti-gun" ?
>
> **On the contrary, it is YOU who has failed miserably to explain what is
> meant by the term: anti-gun.
>
But you must know what it means, you've described yourself in the same
terms
> You
> really do struggle with reality, dear fellow, stay away from lead for
> another decade or three and things might improve for you.
>
> "Guns are not the problem" good, I'll quote you on that........
>
> **Keep it in context and quote in full, moron.
>
Sure, "Guns are not the problem"
> --
> Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
the watcher
you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
Professionally yours
Dr Patric
John-Melb
wrote:
> you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
> for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
> usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
> group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
> Professionally yours
> Dr Patric
Interesting, tell me, when Trevor Tosspot previously used aus.hi-fi to
launch his anti-gun venom and vitriol, did you complain about his
posts, or do you find them OK, and are just upset when an alternative
viewpoint appears?
After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.
the watcher
perhaps you might try usenetrules/etiquette like most of us do but as I
posted, whatever tw did,you have confirmed that as I stated in your case
it is truly sbout pot,kettle,black
DrPatric
John-Melb
wrote:
> perhaps you might try usenetrules/etiquette like most of us do but as I
> posted, whatever tw did,you have confirmed that as I stated in your case
> it is truly sbout pot,kettle,black
> DrPatric
So, I'm correct in assuming you never complained about Trevor
Tosspot's inanae anti-gun rants appearing on aus.hi-fi but are now
sooking about alternative viewpoint on the same forum?
keithr
Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.
John-Melb
> Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
> hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
> groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.
Yes, Keith, you've already made it quite clear that you don't have an
issue with Trevor posting his O/T rants on aus.electronics, but get
quite upset when alternative viewpoint appears.
How is Dorothy, by the way?
Bret L
>
> > After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.
>
> Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
> hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
> groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.
R.a.o. has no on topic, everything BUT audio is fair game.
Gun control is people control, ultimately. Moreover, and more to the
point, it's about who has the guns and may do what to whom.
Gun control took over in Australia when that effectively small island
nation became in effect a vaginocracy. Female rule is the rule of
abstract notions of safety and security which are often at great
variance with reality, very especially when that reality is filtered
by the usual suspects-a media of mass information and entertainment
dedicated to the growth of big, overwhelming state control by special
interests.
John Knox wrote a diatribe in 1558 against feminocracy, and to those
of us who do not hold the tenets of Christianity as literal truth, it
may seem ridiculous today. However, in his day, Christianity was still
Western Christianity, adapted to his peculiar people, and ours (I
presume here that Australian readers are, at least overwhelmingly, of
European descent). Therefore, I believe a reading of his text will
still have some validity to us half a millennium later.
The majority of females in Australia may not have a great interest in
gun control per se one way or another: some will undoubtedly and
sensibly feel they should be allowed to carry a firearm in the cities
as protection against crime, and rural ones may even more think that
anyone in a country such as Australia, with its lethal fauna in
abundance, should be carrying an effective firearm. But that isn't the
point. Organized feminist doctrine wants men disarmed so they are at
the mercy of the Nanny State in all things, in which feminists,
sodomites, halfwits, and members of influential alien minorities have
disproportionate if not absolute control.
The feminine spirit has had disproportionate sway in Australia for
most of a century. The basic mentality is that of "cutting down the
tall poppies", of enforced egalitarianism, of an over powering
atmosphere of Scargill mentality trade unionism and a contempt of
anyone who would change the extant order for good or ill, except to
the extent those wanting change could enforce the widespread universal
propaganda that this or that particular change was really staying the
same, that keeping things as they were would really be to change even
more fundamental values.
Of course, this has propagated through the entire Western world in
much the same fashion. In my nation, or what is left of it, we fancy
ourselves the lone holdout, but that can't last forever. It has
already broken down in a great number of ways. In my opinion,
regaining manly virtue is key to our survival as a people everywhere
our people dwell.
Jeßus
@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, mcnama...@hotmail.com said...
:
:On Nov 18, 4:08�pm, the watcher <""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au">
You really are a fuckwit.
And I suspect, an anti-gun nut in disguise.
keithr
You may be right, he seems hell-bent on ruining the reputation of gun
owners.
keithr
Yada yada yada, are you capable of more than one idea?
> How is Dorothy, by the way?
Don't ask me after all it is your friend not mine.
Seek treatment now, the longer you leave it, the more your trevor
obsession will hurt you.
John-Melb
> John-Melb wrote:
> > On Nov 18, 8:24 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
>
> >> Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
> >> hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
> >> groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.
>
> > Yes, Keith, you've already made it quite clear that you don't have an
> > issue with Trevor posting his O/T rants on aus.electronics, but get
> > quite upset when alternative viewpoint appears.
>
> Yada yada yada, are you capable of more than one idea?
Yes, why do you ask?
>
> > How is Dorothy, by the way?
>
> Don't ask me after all it is your friend not mine.
You raised mention of Dorothy before me
> Seek treatment now, the longer you leave it, the more your trevor
> obsession will hurt you.
And you medical qualifications for recommending "treatment" are?
keithr
A lifetimes observation of those who needed treatment and those who did not.
Jeßus
Jeßus
0f9f11...@s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, mcnama...@hotmail.com
said...
:
And yours are? Considering your frequent diagnosis of Trevor...