Re: Neumann TLM 102

Soundhaspriority

unread,

Oct 15, 2009, 1:48:11 AM10/15/09

to

"Ty Ford" <tyre...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C6FBBC5A...@News.Individual.NET...
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:31:18 -0400, Don Pearce wrote
> (in article <4adfab45...@news.eternal-september.org>):
>
>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:24:22 -0400, Ty Ford <tyre...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Sp3UyUUk-w
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ty Ford
>>>
>>
>> Youtube has marked it private.
>>
>> d
>
> Now?
>
> Ty
>
I can view it. BTW, I attended the presentation by the Neumann worldwide VP
of sales, of their digital microphone system, at the Thursday symposium. The
system is a marvel, but the comparisons he offered were not, in my opinion,
useful to making an informed decision of purchase. I could design a much
better demo, and can't believe a company supposedly skilled at audio could
have done something so lame and stupid.

Perhaps someone can call them and suggest they retain me for their demo
productions.

Bob Morein
(310) 237-6511

Soundhaspriority

unread,

Oct 15, 2009, 2:47:37 AM10/15/09

to

Brian L. McCarty, the Eunuch of Cairns, wrote...[forgery]

Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post02.iad!news.buzzardnews.com!not-for-mail
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:48:11 +1000
Subject: Re: Neumann TLM 102

Brian, one of my spotters says you've put on weight. Why?

Bob Morein
(310) 237-6511

Soundhaspriority

unread,

Oct 15, 2009, 2:51:08 AM10/15/09

to

BTW, Brian. You did come up at AES. You are a topic of discussion.

Bob Morein
(310) 237-6511

Petra Wagner

unread,

Oct 15, 2009, 2:58:02 PM10/15/09

to

Hello I found your mail in google groups. I do not know what you like
to do with it in detail, but I can give you some hints:

This mic is really perfect for speech recording with post processing
with tube preamps if needed, than it meets well the demands of
recording modern vocals (were sounds comes mostly from the mouth,
rather than the breast as with classical voices) you also can use this
for some solo instrument emphasis of reed instruments. It is not
perfect for this, but I would rate it as good fro professinal demands.

For wooden instruments or grouped sounds, like a "capella into one" as
well as with stereo recordings, choose a more neutral mic - even if
large diafragms are desired.

Richard Crowley

unread,

Oct 15, 2009, 7:59:32 PM10/15/09

to

Petra Wagner wrote:
> Hello I found your mail in google groups. I do not know what you like
> to do with it in detail, but I can give you some hints:

This is not mail. And though you may be reading this in Google
Groups, these are not a "Google Groups". You may want to
familarize yourself with Usenet before posting again.

What other microphones are you comparing with the TLM102?
How long have you been using the TLM102? How did you get
one for that long when they do not yet appear to be generally
available? For example there is no evidence online that any of
the more popular retailers have it available yet.

Audio1

unread,

Oct 16, 2009, 7:51:55 AM10/16/09

to

Richard Crowley wrote:
> Petra Wagner wrote:
>> Hello I found your mail in google groups. I do not know what you like
>> to do with it in detail, but I can give you some hints:
>
> This is not mail. And though you may be reading this in Google
> Groups, these are not a "Google Groups". You may want to
> familarize yourself with Usenet before posting again.

Try that again in German and maybe you'll get an idea of why Petra
phrased it the way Petra did.