As the the Mad Monk persists with his ridiculous claim that "global
warming had stopped some years ago" and that "AGW was a load of crap",
the Bureau of Meteorology annual statement said temperatures were
quickly rising above the long-term average at a level ''consistent
with global warming''. In fact, Australia had its hottest decade since
modern record-keeping began.
As Peter Garrett rightly said, the report was consistent with the
"unequivocal science view" that global warming was happening as a
consequence of human activities.
So will the people devastated by fire in recent time vote for a
modern, forward thinking believer in science...Kevin Rudd?
Or will they vote for the Mad Monk and his band of old-fashioned
climate deniers who would be happier living in the Middle Ages?
Heatwave shows need for carbon deal: Garrett
THE Federal Government has said climate data showing last year was
Australia's second-hottest on record means the Senate should pass the
emissions trading scheme next month.
The Bureau of Meteorology annual statement said temperatures were
quickly rising above the long-term average at a level ''consistent
with global warming''.
In line with most other world regions, Australia had its hottest
decade since modern record-keeping began.
The Opposition said it was cynical to link the data to the emissions
trading legislation, and said if emissions needed to be cut then
''direct action'', such as changing soil composition to absorb more
carbon, would suffice.
But the Government claimed science was on its side.
"It's up to the Senate and Mr Abbott to recognise that climate change
is real, to recognise that for Australians warming is happening," the
Environment Minister, Peter Garrett, said yesterday.
The report was consistent with the "unequivocal science view" that
global warming was happening as a consequence of human activities,
"and it's in our economic and environmental interest to arrest it", he
said.
"The Australian public expect decent climate change policy from the
Leader of the Opposition. At the moment all they're getting is
mistakes and thought bubbles."
Mr Garrett called on Tony Abbott to produce figures that showed global
warming had stopped or admit he was wrong on climate change.
It was a reference to a statement by Mr Abbott last month that global
warming had stopped some years ago, even as carbon emissions continued
to rise.
The day after Mr Abbott's comment, the World Meteorological
Organisation published annual figures showing warming had continued as
expected.
Yesterday the Opposition Leader said the weather bureau was the
recognised centre of expertise on climate measurement, but that did
not mean the Government's emissions trading legislation - which he
again called a ''great, big new tax'' - was the best way to tackle
climate change.
And Europe is having its coldest winter in 100 years.
Yep, tell me again ... it's global warming.
Wazzat??? ... oh that's different ... that's called climate change.
In the Andes in South America winter came 3 months earlier last year causing
people to die from respiratory infections and starvation due to crop
failures.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_of_Peru
On ya briagolong!
Look out. The sky is falling.
"bringyagrogalong" <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote in message
news:4c09e10a-abee-40ea...@j5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> And I venture that neither will the relatives of the 173 who died in
> the Victorian bushfires.
>
> As the the Mad Monk persists with his ridiculous claim that "global
> warming had stopped some years ago" and that "AGW was a load of crap",
> the Bureau of Meteorology annual statement said temperatures were
> quickly rising above the long-term average at a level ''consistent
> with global warming''. In fact, Australia had its hottest decade since
> modern record-keeping began.
>
When did the Mad Monk say global warming happened years ago since he became
leader of the opposition party?
They're one-offs you retard.
We're always going to have inconsistent weather patterns.
But the Bureau of Meteorology annual statement is all about TRENDS.
You do have an appreciation for the difference?
And according to the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and the
UK Met Office, the first decade of this century has been by far the
warmest on record.
It's been the hottest in the 160-year instrumental record of global
temperatures, and significantly warmer than the 1990s, the 1980s or
any other decade since global surface temperature measurements began
in 1860.
It's not that difficult to understand, Andy, I'll put it in language
so that even a hillbilly like you can understand it...
Carbon dioxide is being pumped out at ever increasing rates, primarily
from burning fossil fuels, and it's being pumped out faster then the
natural environment can absorb it, which is currently around 55%. The
other 45% is adding to the greenhouse gasses that trap heat radiation
coming off the earths surface and reradiates it back down, thus
warming the planet.
See, it's easy to understand, isn't it? It's called science. (look it
up, I'll wait)
There, you've learned something. Use it wisely!
Don't hold your breath waiting for an answer ... quite likely Serge
the liar is fabricating quotes as usual.
>See, it's easy to understand, isn't it? It's called science. (look it
>up, I'll wait)
PML ... that from someone who believes the Apollo 11 moon walk was
faked, despite no credible evidence to support that conspiracy
bullshit whatsoever.
Yet here we have the shill pushing so-called "climate change" as
science ... and co-sponsored by a washed-up rock star no less ;-)
Global warming? Man-made, no less? Whatever ... you shills better
hope the voters won't start asking questions about the massive cold
spell now wreaking havoc in Europe, India, China and the Far East ...
and remain as ignorant as you'd like them to be while trying to sell
them massive ETS tax hikes.
Floods? Cold spells? Snow? Drought? Bush fires? Once upon a time,
we just put it all down to the "weather" (look it up, I'll wait) ...
but that was before the watermelons repackaged it as "AGW" and now try
to flog this as a way to claw back some political power and no doubt
provide a convenient excuse for falling living standards they seem so
determined to deliver.
As M Serge rightly anticipates, the situation is not very bright
indeed with the worse Summer & Autumn ahead for Australia, resulting
from well documented Collective Crimes
Mr Kanga is one of the few people aware of the real situation & it is
a shame that such much aware gentleman 's should not be able to
express himself without a volley of stalking shits ' worthless
comments !!! Pathetic !
Welcome to reality now, with the following link :
Summer 2010 set to be one of the worst for Australian bushfire
Fires consume Western Australia, as floodwaters drown parts of the
east coast
Australian weather bureau has for the first time issued a
‘catastrophic’ fire danger alert, the highest rating on their warning
system.
etc
(continued a) t http://feww.wordpress.com/2009/12/30/australia-drought-deluge-and-more-fire/
Thank you Mr Serge & Mr Kanga to be just what you are, so
exceptionally honest in such Convict Rabble environment ... How much
must you suffer at time being so superior & so vastly intelligent with
regards to those Toads croaking endlessly around !!!
With best regards
jpturcaud
Except that it is wrong, more heat is radiated
to space than "back down", GreenHouse Gases are
what cools the atmosphere, and only the temperature
of the atmosphere about two meters above the ground
is factored in the annual Global average temperature.
More than half the population of the world
lives north of the 35th parallel and need space
heating for more than half the year.
There is not much chance of the western
free countries reducing CO2 emissions with
so much immigration, more than a million
people a year are swearing oaths of allegiance
in the US.
AGW theory totally ignores the obvious
self regulating mechanisms in nature, something
other than just em radiation is involved in the
relatively narrow range of 280 K to 290 K over
the last 500,000 years of glacial history.
And then bravely running away.
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ipvdBnU8F8
- KRudd at his finest.
"The Labour Party is corrupt beyond redemption!"
- Labour hasbeen Mark Latham in a moment of honest clarity.
"This is the recession we had to have!"
- Paul Keating explaining why he gave Australia another Labour recession.
"Silly old bugger!"
- Well known ACTU pisspot and sometime Labour prime minister Bob Hawke
responding to a pensioner who dared ask for more.
"By 1990, no child will live in poverty"
- Bob Hawke again, desperate to win another election.
"A billion trees ..."
- Borke, pissed as a newt again.
"Well may we say 'God save the Queen' because nothing will save the governor
general!"
- Egotistical shithead and pompous fuckwit E.G. Whitlam whining about his
appointee for Governor General John Kerr.
"SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU DUMB CUNT!"
- FlangesBum on learning the truth about Labour's economic capabilities.
"I don't care what you fuckers think!"
- KRudd the KRude Rat at his finest again.
"We'll just change it all when we get in."
- Garrett the carrott
You have proved only one thing.
ALP stooges are dumb.
Unfortunately for you, the scientisst know the difference between
climate and weather. You apparently don't.
Harry K
Who is this bastard troll, ":Serge"?
OS
The "rock star"? You mean the one that reminds me of skull and
crossbones?
OS
"ralph" <rste...@geocities.com> wrote in message
news:vdo8k5tu4hq6p5n1v...@4ax.com...
I figured as much. The mad monk has since said he believes in global
warming. When he says it stopped happening years ago I will attack him but
until I have a quote since he became opposition leader I don't believe a
word of it.
Ralph doesn't give a shit about global warming and its effect on the
planet
Only people who care about the future of their kids care about it and
he's on record as not giving a toss about his kids and actually
complaining that he has to pay them child support.
So I'd be very careful about anything that selfish mongrel has to say.
He's a loathsome piece of work and recognised as such by the Family
Court who awarded custody of his kids to his long-suffering wife.
Who cares anyway when you blokes are unable to realize that the basic
reasons why the fires spread so fast were inappropriate housing
standards & township planning !
Just try to learn to build fireproof houses in the first place,
fucking Antipodean Retards !!! ... and then protect their access with
low lying water saturated shrubs ?
Okay ?
Now scramble into action !
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
>So I'd be very careful about anything that selfish mongrel has to say.
Bawahahahahahahahah aha
Where have you been, maggot?
I notice that you have done a runner from Tex, who has comprehensively
thrashed you in debate!
LOL!
Please, tell us again how "nobody has gone bankrupt under Rudd".
ROFLMAO at your stupidity!
I note Serge the liar (and jew-hating racist) doesn't even bother to
deny he fabricated Tony Abbott quotes ... instead of he just posts
more fabrications.
Since the dumbfuck nazi can never provide any links to support his
slanderous fabrications, I'll provide a link with some pictures to
remind us all of where a century of global warming has left us at the
start of 2010 ...
So Adolf ... you don't want your children denied the opportunitiy to
freeze to death, is that it? No surprise there.
I didn't fabricate anything. The quote is in the link I provided on
this very thread, ergo:
"It was a reference to a statement by Mr Abbott last month that global
warming had stopped some years ago".
I take it that you also question that the Mad Monk ever said that
climate change was "crap".
> Since the dumbfuck nazi can never provide any links to support his
> slanderous fabrications
I just did, you retard.
> I'll provide a link with some pictures to
> remind us all of where a century of global warming has left us at the
> start of 2010 ...
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1240319/As-Britain-told-expec...
>
> So Adolf ... you don't want your children denied the opportunitiy to
> freeze to death, is that it? No surprise there.
Thanks for the link, Ralph. Gee! snow in winter. LOL
I wouldn't have expected anything else.
Poor old Ralph thinks that because it's summer in Australia it's also
summer in the northern hemisphere. ROFL
Let's face it, he's not the sharpest arrow in the quiver.
Actually you post so many fabricated quotes these days, and never a
link to back it up, I just assume most of what you post is "crap".
That's the problem when you're a pathological liar ... nothing you say
can be believed these days.
>> Since the dumbfuck nazi can never provide any links to support his
>> slanderous fabrications
>
>I just did, you retard.
>
You mean this link below which you posted ...it hardly backs up your
slander against Abbott does it, liar?
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/heatwave-shows-need-for-carbon-deal-garrett-20100105-lses.html
Yesterday the Opposition Leader said the weather bureau was the
recognised centre of expertise on climate measurement, but that did
not mean the Government's emissions trading legislation - which he
again called a ''great, big new tax'' - was the best way to tackle
climate change.
''If we are going to tackle climate change, let's take direct action,
let's not raise the price of ordinary daily life,'' Mr Abbott said.
''That's why I think the Government is dead wrong on this.''
>> I'll provide a link with some pictures to
>> remind us all of where a century of global warming has left us at the
>> start of 2010 ...
>
>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1240319/As-Britain-told-expec...
>>
>> So Adolf ... you don't want your children denied the opportunitiy to
>> freeze to death, is that it? �No surprise there.
>
>Thanks for the link, Ralph. Gee! snow in winter. LOL
>
>I wouldn't have expected anything else.
>
>Poor old Ralph thinks that because it's summer in Australia it's also
>summer in the northern hemisphere. ROFL
>
Summer here? In the driest continent (bar Antarctica). Gee! Bush
fires in WA ... just as has been seen in Australia for THOUSANDS of
summers before.
And it's not just snowing up north ... they are setting RECORD cold
temperatures ...despite a century of your "global warming".
Yet another embarrassment for the shills trying to sell us their ETS
tax hikes, just after northern hemisphere countries laughed us off the
icy streets of Copenhagen :D
>Let's face it, he's not the sharpest arrow in the quiver.
You're the one spruiking Rudd's ETS tax hike to supposedly fix "global
warming" and the milennia-old problem of Aussie bush fires in summer
... while the northern half of the globe set records for freezing
temperatures in 2010.
Oh yeah ... I'm sure those nations wlll be keen to jump on the ETS
bandwagon ... just as soon as they dig themselves out of the latest
dumping of snow ;-)
LOL You heard it here first folks:
"GreenHouse Gases are what cools the atmosphere".
Gee! I wonder why they call them "greenhouse" gases. It appears that
all those greenhouses dotting the Dutch countryside are to actually
lower the temperature inside. Interesting!
The fact is, greenhouse gases trap heat in the lower atmosphere and re-
radiate it back down. Without a natural greenhouse effect, the
temperature of the Earth would be about zero degrees F.
Unfortunately, flat-earthers like "I M @ good guy" represents the
level of knowledge and understanding of the AGW deniers.
They really should all be living back in the Middle Ages.
Maybe not.
>"GreenHouse Gases are what cools the atmosphere".
What else could, only Long Wave Infra-Red radiation
radiates at the right temperature to cool the atmosphere,
and that is what GreenHouse Gases do.
>Gee! I wonder why they call them "greenhouse" gases.
A mistaken impression?
>It appears that
>all those greenhouses dotting the Dutch countryside are to actually
>lower the temperature inside. Interesting!
Don't confuse yourself, you might not be
smart enough to clear things up.
>The fact is, greenhouse gases trap heat in the lower atmosphere and re-
>radiate it back down. Without a natural greenhouse effect, the
>temperature of the Earth would be about zero degrees F.
Without an atmosphere it would get hotter than
that in daytime, and colder at night.
But with an N2 and O2 atmosphere, it would be
different, even without GHGs.
>Unfortunately, flat-earthers like "I M @ good guy" represents the
>level of knowledge and understanding of the AGW deniers.
YASW. Name what cools the atmosphere if
it isn't GreenHouse Gases.
>They really should all be living back in the Middle Ages.
The AGW creeps want everybody to live like that,
instead of burning natural gas, they would have me
wearing fur clothing, only the anti-fur creeps would
not allow it.
GreenHouses do not have much CO2 in them,
in fact not enough to satisfy the plants, so the owners
burn natural gas or propane in unvented stoves, that
both warms the GreenHouse and emits water and CO2,
and the plants love it.
Plants love CO2, and I do, I can't stand diet cola
without the CO2.
The sun warms the atmosphere and the surface
of Earth, and GHGs, mostly water vapor, cool the
atmosphere, less than 20 percent of the heat from
the sun is radiated to space by the surface, more
than 80 percent is radiated to space by water vapor
and a fraction of that is radiated to space by CO2.
AGW nuts will just have to get used to the idea
that GHGs cool the atmosphere because nobody can
name anything else that radiates the atmosphere's
heat to space.