Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Asstraylian democracy, what a farce: It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Kangaroo Court Australia

unread,
Oct 10, 2012, 8:59:48 PM10/10/12
to
TO: The Respondents
AND TO: The Honourable Nicola Roxon MP
Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of
Australia
nic...@nicolaroxonmp.com, Nicola.roxon...@aph.gov.au,
attor...@ag.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Greg Smith MP
Attorney-General of New South Wales
off...@smith.minister.nsw.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Robert Clark MP
Attorney-General of Victoria
robert.cl...@parliament.vic.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Jairod Bleigie MP
Attorney-General of Queensland
Attor...@ministerial.qld.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Christian Porter MLA
Attorney-General of Western Australia
christian.por...@mp.wa.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable John Rau MP
Attorney-General of South Australia
a...@agd.sa.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Brian Wightman MP
Attorney-General of Tasmania
Brian.Wight...@dpac.tas.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Simon Corbell MLA
Attomey-General of the Australian Capital Territory
corb...@act.gov.au,
AND TO: The Honourable Johan Wessel Elferink MLA
Attomey-General of the Northern Territory of Australia
john.elfer...@nt.gov.au,
1. We give NOTICE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER: Pham vs Drakopoulos,
City of Greater Dandenong & Ors, S CI 2012 5043
2. A hearing of the Appellant's application is listed for hearing
before Justice Of the Supreme Court of Victoria on 22 October 2012.
3. Temp Exhibit 1 at
http://www.scribd.com/doc/106874876/Corrupt-racist-australian-judicia...
and the Temp Exhibit 2 as attached
1. The Appellant gives notice that this proceeding involves a
matter
arising under the Constitution or involving its interpretation within
the meaning of s 78B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth).
Nature of constitutional matter
2. The constitutional issue raised by the Appellant’s
application
for
referral to the Court of Appeal pursuant to s33 of the Charter for
Human Rights and Responsibility Act 2006, on a Question of Law is the
jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Victoria to make a bare
declaration as to the privileges, powers and immunities of the
administrative and or judicial arm of Victorian Civil and
Administrative Tribunal and the Supreme Court Victoria, and
Inconsistent Interpretation of the Charter, pursuant to ss 36 and 39
of the Charter;
The determination of this issue may raise for consideration ss 98,
107, 108, 117, 118 of the Constitution.
Facts showing that s 78B Judiciary Act I903 (Cth) applies
3. Consider this to be a draft of the facts; to be filled out
asap
with conduct of VCAT;
4. Appellant submits the VCAT Charter of Service;
5.
6. On 26 September 2012, on appeal from Associate Justice
Landsdowne,
Temp Exhibit 1
7. The Supreme Court staff failed to file the Affidavit of Le
Tuan
Pham dated 13 September in support of that appeal; in front of Dixon
J
for consideration;
8. Referral of question of law to the Court of Appeal pursuant
to
s33
of the Charter was refused by Dixon J and decision is reserved
without
hearing as to stay of proceedings on other matters before the Supreme
Court;
9. On 1 October 2012, on appeal from VCAT in front of AJ
Mukhtar;
Referral of question of law to the Court of Appeal pursuant to s33 of
the Charter, was refused without proper reasons; Decision is filed
and
will be rigorously challenged;
10. On 4 October 2012, the Appellant tried to file on appeal from
VCAT
pursuant to s148 of VCAT Act;
11. The Supreme Court Prothonotary refused filing of those
Originating
Motions without proper reasons as a breach of the Charter; Temp
Exhibit 2
12. There appears to be an abuse of discretion and a concerted
effort
to hijack the Charter, judicially and extra-judicially;
13. A hearing of the Appellant's application is listed for
hearing
before Justice
Of the Supreme Court of Victoria on 22 October 2012.
14. Authorities:
a. Momcilovic v The Queen [2011] HCA 34 (8 September 2011)
b. Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Limited [2010] HCA 32
c. Gurnett v The Macquarie Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd [No 2][126]
FILED: Friday, 5 October 2012
Le Tuan Pham
Student-At-law
Human Rights Defender
105
06
0 new messages