On Jan 8, 6:11 am, Petzl <
pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 01:05:28 +1100, Gordon Levi
>
> <gor...@address.invalid> wrote:
> >DC <
u...@nospam.net> wrote:
>
> >>"Pilot losses at Qantas and the battle for the public ear"
>
> >>
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2012/01/04/pilot-losses-at-qa...
>
> >It might be just another conspiracy theory but this and everything
> >else Joyce does gives credence to the theory that Joyce is trying to
> >lower the price of Qantas shares to the point that an Airline Partners
> >takeover will succeed next time.
>
> Don't look to me like Joyce has a clue on how to drive QANTAS
> profitability up either?
> BigCharts.Com graph of QANTAS not looking goodhttp://
tinyurl.com/7jur4zf
Oi Pretzel . Damn good link that . Market watch is one of my
favourites when used for fiscal crystal ball gazing .
I am not sure that young Mr Joyce is actually clueless in the airline
running business .
My difficulty however,is trying to figure out his agenda .I am sure he
has one but what exactly it is and the end result escapes me .
That said (and with my fiscal and commerce hat on) All airlines and
Qantas in particular need to keep an eye on reserves ,coming fuel hike
and other expenses (such as when carbon tax type issues begin to
bite ) Look at China's reaction to the fees imposed by EU fees
China being the growth cash cow or hope of aircraft manufacturers .
Dixon has a lot to answer for and although no great fan of Joyce s
lack of transparency the poor little bugger inherited a poisoned
chalice to an extent .
This compounded by having to stick with an aged and somewhat tired
and tatty fleet because of late delivery of new hulls . Incidents
that made it easy for the press to engage in Qantas bashing and a PR
department that in my opinion could not organise a fart in a dysentery
ward . Market share drops (in part) because of that .
Re your link read in conjunction and compared to other airlines (not
at the end of long routes and with greater markets from which to
draw) it is not as bad as you may at first perceive relative to the
industry world wide. That said a LOT of work and fence mending with
employees and public *is* required
But again I am compelled to suggest that the overseas division should
revert to Government ownership for reasons previously suggested a wee
while back .
Regards
Philc