We lost Lloyd Parker in 2002...
Peter Alerich
...after the big defeat of the liberal Dems in Georgia.
I'm wondering which bleeding heart liberal we'll lose this time
around?
Peter
FACE
wrote:
I thought loyd from floyd made his final post just before gore conceded in
2000. Not long afterwards, someone said he was over getting killfiled on
some NASCAR group.
FACE
Brett
He's still there - he also responds to cross-posted crap that includes
sci.military.naval in its list of victims.
Who we "lose" in this election - Kev/MorganPark/AftonOkla/KevinXKitchen. He
will then reappear with a new identity and claim he isn't Kev.
FACE
>
>Who we "lose" in this election - Kev/MorganPark/AftonOkla/KevinXKitchen. He
>will then reappear with a new identity and claim he isn't Kev.
All from the dark and dreaded root of stahl, one of the single unhappiest
people in the world. Remember shortly after 911 when "aftonokla" wanted to
know how he could continue to contribute to Hamas. Gawd, what a troll.
FACE
ivy_mike
> ...after the big defeat of the liberal Dems in Georgia.
I think we lost Lloyd after the 2000 Pres. election didn't we?
Dat boy did love dem Clintons.
> I'm wondering which bleeding heart liberal we'll lose this time
> around?
I've got nothing against liberals, but I've got a lot against hypocrisy,
and there's plenty of that from all sides.
I hope Kerry wins. You should too, because, if you can't see the damage
Bush has done in four years, you should at least see that it'll, perhaps,
open the door for Hillary making a real run at 2008. Do you want that?
I'll never believe she could win, but she run at it, which will mean
a lot more of her in front of the cameras for the next four years.
Do you want that?
--
Regards, IM
Glenn Snyder
Hope is all you KerryKoolaiders have.
Worthless.
> You should too,
Spoken like an 8 yr. old.
> because, if you can't see the damage
> Bush has done in four years,
So?
He's still light years superior to ANY demonkrap.
> you should at least see that it'll, perhaps,
> open the door for Hillary making a real run at 2008. Do you want that?
Get over yourself.
Conservatives don't take advice from the enemy.
We don't need you to tell us how to deal with the Hilldabeast.
Why would we want the advice of a LOSER?
> I'll never believe she could win, but she run at it, which will mean
> a lot more of her in front of the cameras for the next four years.
> Do you want that?
Who cares, little boy?
The Courts will be packed with Conservative judges by then.
You small thinking liberals keep worrying about the
stupid shit...Usenet is here for you.
The Sanity Inspector
ivy_...@my-deja.com (ivy_mike) wrote...:
[...]
>I hope Kerry wins. You should too, because, if you can't see the damage
>Bush has done in four years, you should at least see that it'll, perhaps,
>open the door for Hillary making a real run at 2008. Do you want that?
>I'll never believe she could win, but she run at it, which will mean
>a lot more of her in front of the cameras for the next four years.
>Do you want that?
Mmmm...
http://www.celluloid-wisdom.com/pw/index.php?/weblog/entry/if_kerry_loses_2008/
No!
--
bruce
The dignified don't even enter in the game.
-- The Jam
Holger Dansk
> Peter Alerich <sco...@ringnorth.com> wrote in message news:<o14mn0hima0b0673c...@4ax.com>...
> > ...after the big defeat of the liberal Dems in Georgia.
>
> I think we lost Lloyd after the 2000 Pres. election didn't we?
> Dat boy did love dem Clintons.
>
> > I'm wondering which bleeding heart liberal we'll lose this time
> > around?
>
> I've got nothing against liberals, but I've got a lot against hypocrisy,
> and there's plenty of that from all sides.
>
> I hope Kerry wins.
Haven't you heard? Bush is going to win by a landslide. This poll
has been correct 11 out of 12 elections since 1956. (48 years) Check
this web site:
http://www.weeklyreader.com/election_vote.asp
Bush only wins in the 10th grade.
http://www.weeklyreader.com/election_results.asp
Children have great instincts about people. If they don't like
someone and just kind of avoid them, then that's not a nice person.
Dogs are the same way.
>You should too, because, if you can't see the damage
> Bush has done in four years,
Damage? Don't be ridiculous. We are attacked by Islamic Terrorist
killing more people than the attack on Pearl Harbor. Our country had
already been in a recession for 6 months prior to Bush becoming
President. Now we have the fastest growing economy in the world and
our employment is better than in the Clinton administration. We have
killed most of Osama Bin Laden's army or barbarians. Bin Ladin is
terrified of George W. Bush. They have had a successful election in
Afghanistan. Saddam Hussein has been captured. Iraq is going to have
their first elections in January.
Bush has been doing a marvelous job.
>you should at least see that it'll, perhaps,
> open the door for Hillary making a real run at 2008. Do you want that?
Rudy Giuliani, with Arnold Schwartzenegger as his running mate will
clean Hillary's clock. She probably would even be afraid to run
against them.
> I'll never believe she could win, but she run at it, which will mean
> a lot more of her in front of the cameras for the next four years.
> Do you want that?
The low down sorry bitch is probably going to try to be President of
the UN.
Holger
eldorado
> ivy_...@my-deja.com (ivy_mike) wrote in message news:<13077cb5.04102...@posting.google.com>...
> > Peter Alerich <sco...@ringnorth.com> wrote in message news:<o14mn0hima0b0673c...@4ax.com>...
> > > ...after the big defeat of the liberal Dems in Georgia.
> >
> > I think we lost Lloyd after the 2000 Pres. election didn't we?
> > Dat boy did love dem Clintons.
> >
> > > I'm wondering which bleeding heart liberal we'll lose this time
> > > around?
> >
> > I've got nothing against liberals, but I've got a lot against hypocrisy,
> > and there's plenty of that from all sides.
> >
> > I hope Kerry wins.
>
> Haven't you heard? Bush is going to win by a landslide. This poll
> has been correct 11 out of 12 elections since 1956. (48 years) Check
> this web site:
>
> http://www.weeklyreader.com/election_vote.asp
>
> Bush only wins in the 10th grade.
>
> http://www.weeklyreader.com/election_results.asp
>
> Children have great instincts about people. If they don't like
> someone and just kind of avoid them, then that's not a nice person.
> Dogs are the same way.
Then how would you explain this? Nickolodean's poll gives it to Kerry. -
you think kids that watch Nickolodean just have worst "instincts"?
http://www.nick.com/all_nick/specials/kidsPickThePresident/results.jhtml
--
Randomly generated signature --
God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh. [Voltaire]
KStahl
I just polled five of my friends and all of them will be voting for
Kerry. Not a single dissenter.
Actually, it is pretty difficult to have Republicans as friends since
they are prone to name-calling, innuendo, insults and generally
derogatory disposition towards liberals.
Brett
<..>
> >>Children have great instincts about people. If they don't like
> >>someone and just kind of avoid them, then that's not a nice person.
> >>Dogs are the same way.
> >
> >
> > Then how would you explain this? Nickolodean's poll gives it to
Kerry. -
> > you think kids that watch Nickolodean just have worst "instincts"?
> >
> > http://www.nick.com/all_nick/specials/kidsPickThePresident/results.jhtml
>
> I just polled five of my friends and all of them will be voting for
> Kerry. Not a single dissenter.
So it appears the rumors are true.
The five friends you feel comfortable with are the four fingers and thumb on
your left hand.
The Sanity Inspector
[...]
>Actually, it is pretty difficult to have Republicans as friends since
>they are prone to name-calling, innuendo, insults and generally
>derogatory disposition towards liberals.
Constantly being compared to Hitler over every difference of policy
opinion can cause people to overreact like that, sometimes...
KStahl
> Using typesetting technology that was not widely available in 1972,
> KStahl <kts...@yahoo.com> wrote...:
>
> [...]
>
>
>>Actually, it is pretty difficult to have Republicans as friends since
>>they are prone to name-calling, innuendo, insults and generally
>>derogatory disposition towards liberals.
>
>
> Constantly being compared to Hitler over every difference of policy
> opinion can cause people to overreact like that, sometimes...
And Republicans are totally innocent of any similar tactics? Just read
any of Ann Coulter's recent columns.
Brett
"KStahl" <kts...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:xoOdnTbkRaI...@comcast.com...
Out of interest I did, the latest has the title: "40 excuses and a mule".
"... And Democrats wonder why they have to ask white people to hold
"African-Americans for Kerry-Edwards" signs at their rallies - as happened
in St. Petersburg, Fla., last Saturday. The Kerry campaign is hemorrhaging
black voters like teenaged girls fleeing an R. Kelly house party. None of
the Democrats' top black leaders - Jesse, Al, Bill Clinton - has been able
to stem the tide.
Here's the deal on politics and race in America: Republicans don't need
black voters, but they want them. Democrats don't want black voters, but
they need them. Blacks have been the Democrats' most loyal voters, typically
giving the party upward of 90 percent of their vote. But Democrats ignore
blacks.
That's according to none other than the Rev. Jesse Jackson, who said
precisely that in a speech to "Campaign for America's Future" at the
Democratic National Convention this summer. ..."
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/ac20041028.shtml
Jim
> Out of interest I did, the latest has the title: "40 excuses and a mule".
>
> "... And Democrats wonder why they have to ask white people to hold
> "African-Americans for Kerry-Edwards" signs at their rallies - as happened
> in St. Petersburg, Fla., last Saturday. The Kerry campaign is hemorrhaging
> black voters like teenaged girls fleeing an R. Kelly house party. None of
> the Democrats' top black leaders - Jesse, Al, Bill Clinton - has been able
> to stem the tide.
> Here's the deal on politics and race in America: Republicans don't need
> black voters, but they want them. Democrats don't want black voters, but
> they need them. Blacks have been the Democrats' most loyal voters,
> typically giving the party upward of 90 percent of their vote. But
> Democrats ignore blacks.
>
> That's according to none other than the Rev. Jesse Jackson, who said
> precisely that in a speech to "Campaign for America's Future" at the
> Democratic National Convention this summer. ..."
>
> http://www.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/ac20041028.shtml
Republicans hope they can scare black voters by using cheap tactics like
this one:
http://laweekly.blogs.com/joshuah_bearman/2004/10/how_they_do_par_1.html
It won't work. Black voters are more afraid of what will happen if Bush gets
re-elected. I believe we'll see that clearly tonight when the votes come
in.
Brett
So are you saying Kerry/Edwards are against gay adoption?
FACE
wrote:
22:25
I hate to let you in on this Jim, but the heavily black states have already
been called for Bush. The exception is Florida which with 80 % of precincts
reporting and Bush 52, Kerry 47, has not been called.
FACE
smiles
>
> I'm wondering which bleeding heart liberal we'll lose this time
> around?
Maybe ... just Maybe ... his employeer (Emory) said stop posting on "company
time" ... and he does not care to do it on his own. He was fun to debate.
Jim
>>Republicans hope they can scare black voters by using cheap tactics like
>>this one:
>>
>>http://laweekly.blogs.com/joshuah_bearman/2004/10/how_they_do_par_1.html
>>
>>It won't work. Black voters are more afraid of what will happen if Bush
>>gets re-elected. I believe we'll see that clearly tonight when the votes
>>come in.
>
> 22:25
> I hate to let you in on this Jim, but the heavily black states have
> already
> been called for Bush. The exception is Florida which with 80 % of
> precincts reporting and Bush 52, Kerry 47, has not been called.
I hate to let you in on this, but he fact that a "heavily black" state went
to Bush does not signify that black voters were for Bush. Blacks are not a
majority in any state and could never swing a state for a presidential
candidate. All indications are that blacks voted heavily Democratic
yesterday.
TheNIGHTCRAWLER
>Using typesetting technology that was not widely available in 1972,
>KStahl <kts...@yahoo.com> wrote...:
>
>[...]
>
>>Actually, it is pretty difficult to have Republicans as friends since
>>they are prone to name-calling, innuendo, insults and generally
>>derogatory disposition towards liberals.
>
>Constantly being compared to Hitler over every difference of policy
>opinion can cause people to overreact like that, sometimes...
OK, is there any reason behind that? The newsgroups are unquestionably
vocal in comparisons. Unquestionably free thought, ideas, and original
direction. Freedom of the usenet. FCC bought into is as sufficient
reason to re-allocate the airwaves.
I quit a night job due to the loss. I spend too much time on the road
to tolerate righteous radio. Pain in the ass. I'll be leaving the
groups to go be unhappy due to the loss and suppression as I see it.
I've lost happiness, well-being, security, and the workforce will lose
company stability, because I am that and now I'm hunting for a job in a
serious manner. Any place I've worked, I hold things together. Forget
Hitler. Take it a step at a time. There must be a progression in
business and life. Think electric. Electricity follows the path of
least resistance. Federal govn't makes changes, there is massive
restructuring of those paths. That's why the preference for changes lie
within a state or county to see where the changes will take people.
I like life in the open w/out anyone accusing people of anything. Most
times it's BS anyway. Manipulation and coercion. For atl.general, I
just say how I feel, if I have an idea I put it out there. Some things
work for me. I put that out there. Here. There. Everywhere. Unlike
many, I have no intention to change direction .
That direction lies in improving my life and thereby improving America.
Somebody should keep some track records. *sigh*
NC
TheNIGHTCRAWLER
KStahl
So what type of work are you looking for? What are your qualifications?
The only thing I've even figured out is that you may be in the general
IT community but I've never understood why you were working night shift
for so long.
--
Do not ask for whom the bell tolls.............
Holger Dansk
I don't know anything about Nickolodean. I doubt if it's goes back 13
elections like the weekly reader. Do the kids on Nickolodean like
rap. If so, that would explain it.
Holger
Holger Dansk
Some of your Democrat friends might like this opportunity. It's free.
Holgr
stati...@yahoo.com
I don't know.(An ancient expressio which means the same thing as "I'm
not sure.") The Weekly Reader group may be younger and not as
interested in watching TV as much as the Nickolodean group. Maybe more
of them read.
Holger