freaknik
pcnot
I'm Kevin Alfred Strom and this is American Dissident Voices.
Did you know that the Los Angeles Police Department
has orders not to arrest or disturb in any way
certain lawbreakers who just happen to belong to
an influential minority group?
Did you know that openly racial organizations receive
large sums of U.S. taxpayer's money on a
regular basis? But that other racial organizations,
which just happen to represent traditional
Americans, are treated essentially as outlaws?
There is a racial double standard in America and
throughout the Western world. It's a double
standard that says that Black, Chicano and Jewish
racial feelings are good and healthy; whereas any
manifestation of White racial awareness is somehow evil.
It's a double standard that says that this
program and the organization behind it ought to be outlawed
and ought to be shunned by all
right-thinking servants of Big Brother; whereas similar
organizations and radio programs which speak
up for the interests of Mexicans, Jews, or Africans, are
not only laudable but deserve to and do
actually receive taxpayer funding. It's a double standard
that says non-Whites with poorer
standardized test scores deserve preference in hiring or
college admission, while millions of the sons
and daughters of the race that founded and built this
country are left out in the cold and will ultimately
be asked to pay the bills for this treason. And it's a
double standard that looks the other way at the
rampant lawbreaking of minority criminals, while
making the slightest infraction by a so-called
"prejudiced" White person into a Federal case with
accompanying national headlines.
We're going to pierce the curtain of media censorship
and expose this double standard for what it
really is, next, on American Dissident Voices.
I have before me an exact reproduction of a motion
adopted by the Los Angles City Council, as
introduced by 14th District Councilman Richard Alatorre,
and seconded by Councilman Farrell.
Many of you won't believe this, but I'll be happy to send
a photocopy of this public document to
anyone who sends us a contribution this week to keep us
on the air. This motion consists of a series
of official changes in policy, limiting the powers of
the Los Angeles Police Department with regard to
one specific category of lawbreaker - specifically,
illegal aliens, who, as we all know, are with very
few exceptions in the LA area, Chicanos from Mexico
or other parts of Central America. In this
motion, they generally use the euphemism "undocumented"
when describing these flagrant violators
of our laws and invaders and occupiers of our country.
Let me read you just a bit of this incredible document:
In section one, it states "it is the policy of the Los
Angeles Police Department that undocumented
alien status in itself is not a matter for police action."
In other words, if you or I violate a law, no
matter how small or insignificant the infraction, we can
expect to be arrested, prosecuted, and
punished. But if a Chicano breaks what ought to be one
of the most important laws of all, the laws
protecting our borders from invasion, his crime is
not even to be noticed or reported, according to
the official policy of the Los Angeles City Council.
In section two, it states, beginning in large capital
letters: "NO ARRESTS BASED SOLELY ON
IMMIGRATION STATUS. No officer of the Los Angeles Police
Department shall initiate an
enforcement activity or police action against an individual
solely on the basis of an individual['s]
immigration status." It seems a certain class of criminals
is now immune to arrests and can break the
law with virtual impunity. The hands of the police are tied.
I ask, whatever happened to equal
protection under the law? It seems that some groups,
to paraphrase George Orwell, are now "more
equal" than others.
In section three, this LA City Council resolution states:
"...no officer of the Los Angeles Police
Department shall cooperate with the Immigration and
Naturalization service to inquire into the
immigration status of an individual, except and unless
required by city, county, state or federal law to
inquire into the immigration status of an individual
seeking LAPD employment." So the police are
now forbidden to cooperate with the Immigration and
Naturalization Service, and the only
circumstances under which an LAPD officer can do so
is when they're hiring new employees and
unfortunately some outdated laws still on the books
force them to hire individuals who are at least
nominally Americans.
But it goes even further than that. In section four,
it states: "...no officer of the Los Angeles Police
Department shall assist or cooperate with any Immigration
and Naturalization Service investigation,
detention, or arrest procedure ... except or unless...
the Department has probable cause to believe
that the subject of the investigation has committed or
is committing a felony."
Section five: "...under no circumstances shall officers
of the Department detain witnesses or victims
or assist the INS in such detention..." Section six:
"...neither any officer of the Los Angeles Police
Department or Department administration shall release
or threaten to release information [to anyone]
regarding an individual's immigration status..." unless
a long and strict laundry list of conditions are
met.
Section seven states: "...no officer of the Los Angeles
Police Department shall release or threaten to
release any information regarding the immigration status
of a child under the age of 18 under any
circumstances except and unless that child has been previously
adjudicated for a delinquent act." In
other words, if you are an LA police officer, and you newly
arrest a Chicano delinquent, and you
find out he is in the United States illegally, not only may
you not enforce the immigration laws of our
country, but you are forbidden from passing on the information
about his lawbreaking to any other
agency that still might have the authority to enforce those laws.
It seems unbelievable - yet there it is in black and white.
The Los Angeles City Council, effectively
taken over by non-Americans and by traitors, openly declaring
that its police department is
forbidden to enforce the laws securing our borders against
invasion, and putting every stumbling
block possible in the way of the other agencies charged
with protecting our borders.
How much clearer do I have to make it, my fellow Americans?
There's been a revolution in this
country, and you lost.
Do you expect any police force, politically controlled by
groups hostile to White survival, to be of
any substantial protective value in the riots and bloodbaths
that are sure to be in our future in the
racial cauldrons that our major metropolitan areas have become?
How much use was the LA police
force when Black violence came to that city following the
Rodney King verdict? And, Mr. and Mrs.
Ordinary American, if you are forced to defend yourself in
such a situation in the future, possibly
wounding or killing a marauding rioter in the process in
order to protect your family's life and
property - just who do you think will charged with a crime?
The marauding rioters - or you? And
what kind of a jury do you think you're going to get to
judge your case when you are charged with a
"racist hate crime?" And if the jury does by some miracle
vote in your favor, do you think that the
political establishment is going to let it go at that?
What happened to the LA officers in the Rodney
King trial when the jury acquitted them the first time?
Something to think about, my friends.
Something that you ought to sit down and think about for
a long, long, time. While you were
watching "Happy Days" or "Star Trek," your country has
been stolen from you. It has been truly said
that the price of Liberty is eternal vigilance. And you,
Mr. and Mrs. American, have been asleep on
the watch.
I've got some more documents for you today that you've
probably never heard of.
How many of you have heard of a Chicano organization
called "La Raza?" That group, whose name
literally means "The Race," is much more than you have
been led to believe. They distribute a
publication entitled "El Plan de Aztlan." "El Plan de
Aztlan" is much more than a plan - more than a
manifesto - it's really a declaration of war against us.
They even have it available in English so that we
Americans can read it too - so we certainly can't call
their war against us a "conspiracy" or claim that
they've been hiding their intentions.
Let's take a close look at this "Plan de Aztlan."
"In the spirit of a new people that is conscious not
only of its proud history but also of the brutal
Gringo invasion of our territories, WE, the Chicano
inhabitants and civilizers of the northern land of
Aztlan from whence came our forefathers, reclaiming
the land of their birth and consecrating the
determination of our people of the sun, DECLARE that
the call of our blood is our power, our
responsibility, and our inevitable destiny."
I'm beginning to get the impression that when these
Mexicans say "Aztlan," what they're referring to
is really what is now called the United States of
America and Canada. Let's see if that impression is
justified.
I continue with the Chicano document, "El Plan de Aztlan:"
"Aztlan belongs to those who plant the seeds, water
the fields, and gather the crops and not to the
foreign Europeans. We do not recognize capricious
frontiers on the bronze continent."
Again, it's quite clear that by "the bronze continent,"
he means all of North America. I continue with
the quotation:
"Brotherhood unites us, and love for our brothers makes
us a people whose time has come and who
struggles against the foreigner Gabacho who exploits
our riches and destroys our culture. With our
heart in our hands and our hands in the soil, we declare
the independence of our mestizo nation. We
are a bronze people with a bronze culture. Before the
world, before all of North America, before all
our brothers in the bronze continent, we are a nation,
we are a union of free pueblos, we are Aztlan.
[last two phrases translated] FOR THE RACE, EVERYTHING.
OUTSIDE THE RACE,
NOTHING."
Now first let me say that I have nothing at all against
Mexican Nationalism, as long as they confine
both themselves and their ambitions to South of the Rio Grande.
But I must also say that "El plan de Aztlan" sounds to
me like a racial declaration of war against
White Americans. It certainly is not a manifesto of
integration and interracial "brotherhood," is it? Yet
where are the television and newspaper reporters, where
are the editorial writers and commentators,
where are Geraldo Rivera and Donahue when it comes to
threat of "Chicano Hate Groups" or
"Mexican racism?" Here is a well-organized group, calling
itself "The Race" no less, which receives
recognition and even funding from major institutions like
city governments and colleges and
universities, and which therefore receives support and
funding from you and me; a group which
preaches the end of America as we have known her, and
the foreign takeover of our entire continent
- none of which they even try to hide behind code words
or clever euphemisms - and the controlled
media are virtually silent.
Yet let even the slightest peep be emitted in favor of
the values or even the very survival of ordinary
White Americans, the people who founded and built this
country, and the vicious media attacks
come screaming and spitting "racist - hatred - bigot -
anti-semitic" from every direction. What an
obvious double standard. What an obvious anti-American
agenda. We Americans need to learn that
the controlled media in this country represent the greatest
threat to our continued survival as a
people.
The controlled media not only lie to us by twisting the
facts and selective reporting; they also engage
in brainwashing on a mass scale by embedding their multiracial,
multicultural, One World agenda into
the plots and characters of their television dramas and comedies.
Don't believe it? Listen to this, from the horse's mouth,
so to speak, of the controlled media:
Reprinted in Michael Hoffman's Researcher newsletter, this
quote is from Newsweek of March 29,
1993 -
"The White male ... in the world of images and ideas ...
he's taking a clobbering. On TV, the White
male is a boob or a villain, not just in such shows as
Roseanne but in the ads too.... Everywhere in
the culture, from low to high, is the image of the White
male as Ice Person: can't jump, can't dance,
can't feel.... Up to a point, trashing White males was
good clean fun, in the all-American tradition of
deflating the pompous and the powerful: the insufferable
Jim Anderson of Father Knows Best richly
deserved getting Simpsonized.... Turnabout is fair play."
Well, I wonder just who it is that is "turning the tables"
on us? Newsweek's writer didn't say. It is
clear though, that the controlled media have an agenda,
a plan for the future of this continent, that
definitely doesn't include any place for White Americans
except perhaps as tax-paying serfs. So
keep your mouth shut and work hard!
Unless, of course, you actually do care about the future
of our nation and our people, if don't want
your children to grow up as slaves or victims in a
Third World miasma that would be America in
name only - in that case, my friend, welcome to the
growing ranks of the politically incorrect, the
thought criminals who actually dare to cry out against
the engineers of America's destruction. I
suggest you unplug your television for at least a year,
get a copy of our book catalog, start reading,
and start thinking.
I think I've made it abundantly clear that there is a
glaringly obvious double standard with regard to
race in this country. Certain favored groups can insult
and assault us, and nothing is said or done.
Certain favored groups can issue manifestos calling for
the invasion and takeover of this country, yet
the establishment turns a blind eye. Certain favored
groups can break the law with impunity.
Yet let a patriotic White American speak his mind,
which happens very infrequently these days, and
judging by the media reaction, you'd think a felony
had been committed.
That's really more than a double standard.
It's psychological intimidation.
But more and more Americans are refusing to be
intimidated any more. More and more are
speaking out, unafraid of being called "politically incorrect."
More and more of us are starting to
realize that the America we loved is disappearing before our
eyes, and we know that something must
be done about it.
But patriotic Americans desperately need education and
direction. We certainly aren't going to get it
from the major media or the Republicans or the Democrats.
And I am afraid that we won't get it
from the "safe" conservatives or the media evangelists either.
All of those groups are so tied into and
dependent on the current political and economic system that
they would never do or say anything
that seriously threatened that system. But it is the current
system that embodies the racial double
standard I've been talking about today. It is the current
political and economic system that is choking
the life out of what used to be called America. The current
system is not the system established by
our founding fathers. It has been slowly but purposefully
changed until today it is the greatest enemy
of our people's future and freedom. It is this system which
forbids the discussion of the honest racial
separatism that is the only chance for the survival of our
- or anyone else's - nation and culture.
There is no group, no organization, no radio program, no
one on the scene today which tells the
uncensored truth as we do here. We are not the brainchild
of a powerful corporation wanting only to
influence society to maximize its profits. We are not
motivated by a narrow religious viewpoint,
among the many that divide our people. We are an
organization of American patriots and racial
patriots around the world who have rationally appraised
our perilous situation, who have come
together to pool our resources and join our hands to
cleanse and restore our nation and civilization.
I know that to someone who is new to our ideas - new to
our point of view - much of what I say
may seem "too radical" or unbelievable. But I invite you
to check the facts for yourself. One of the
best possible ways for you to begin to understand
what has gone wrong with America, and what
needs to be done to set things right again, is for
you to obtain a copy of our huge volume containing
the very best articles from our patriotic newspaper
over a 12-year period. It's entitled The Best of
Attack and National Vanguard and I'm offering it as
our Radio Offer Number 4 to every listener
who contributes $25 or more to keep this program on
the air. The Best of Attack and National
Vanguard is not just an ordinary book. It is a huge,
virtually encyclopedic compendium of articles on
every subject of interest to patriots, from history,
politics, art, music, racial science, to philosophy
and religion. Its 217 pages are oversized, packed with
information, and copiously illustrated. It's not
an exaggeration to say that reading this book
is the equivalent of a graduate-level course in modern
political reality. It is essential reading for every
responsible and concerned listener to this program.
Just send a donation of $25 or more, money which is
vitally necessary to keep this program on the
air, and ask for Radio Offer Number 4. Our address
is National Vanguard Books, Department R,
PO Box 90 Hillsboro WV 24946 USA. That's National
Vanguard Books, Department R, PO Box
90, Hillsboro WV 24946 USA. And don't forget to ask
for Radio Offer Number 4.
Friends, please remember what I said earlier -
unplug your television, learn, read, evaluate, think for
yourself, think about the future we're making for our
children and their children - and then act. This is
Kevin Alfred Strom saying thanks for listening and I'll
see you next week on American Dissident
Voices.
pcnot
"Martin Luther King, Jr."
by Kevin Alfred Strom
(a speech given by Mr. Strom on the nationwide
radio program, AMERICAN DISSIDENT
VOICES, January 15th, 1994)
WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of
the first things that they did was to
confiscate all the privately-held weapons, to
deny the people the physical ability to resist tyranny. But
even more insidious than the theft of the people's
weapons was the theft of their history. Official
Communist "historians" rewrote history to fit the
current party line. In many countries, revered
national heroes were excised from the history books,
or their real deeds were distorted to fit
Communist ideology, and Communist killers and
criminals were converted into official "saints."
Holidays were declared in honor of the beasts who
murdered countless nations.
Did you know that much the same process has
occurred right here in America?
Every January, the media go into a kind of almost
spastic frenzy of adulation for the so-called
"Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr." King has
even had a national holiday declared in his
honor, an honor accorded to no other American, not
Washington, not Jefferson, not Lincoln.
(Washington and Lincoln no longer have holidays --
they share the generic-sounding "President's
Day.") A liberal judge has sealed the FBI files on
King until the year 2027. What are they hiding?
Let's take a look at this modern-day plastic god.
Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher
known at the time only as "Daddy King."
"Daddy King" named his son Michael. In 1935, "Daddy King"
had an inspiration to name himself
after the Protestant reformer Martin Luther. He declared
to his congregation that henceforth they
were to refer to him as "Martin Luther King" and to his
son as "Martin Luther King, Jr." None of this
name changing was ever legalized in court. "Daddy" King's
son's real name is to this day Michael
King.
King's Brazen Cheating
We read in Michael Hoffman's "Holiday for a Cheater":
The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947
at the Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized
from a homily by Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson
Fosdick entitled "Life is What You Make It,"
according to the testimony of King's best friend of
that time, Reverend Larry H. Williams. The first
book that King wrote, "Stride Toward Freedom, - -was
plagiarized from numerous sources, all
unattributed, according to documentation recently
assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D.
Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow. And no
less an authoritative source than the four
senior editors of "The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.
- - (an official publication of the Martin
Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc.,
whose staff includes King's widow Coretta),
stated of King's writings at both Boston University and
Crozer Theological Seminary: "Judged
retroactively by the standards of academic scholarship,
[his writings] are tragically flawed by
numerous instances of plagiarism.... Appropriated passages
are particularly evident in his writings in
his major field of graduate study, systematic theology."
King's essay, "The Place of Reason and
Experience in Finding God," written at Crozer, pirated
passages from the work of theologian Edgar
S. Brightman, author of "The Finding of God- -. Another
of King's theses, "Contemporary
Continental Theology," written shortly after he entered
Boston University, was largely stolen from a
book by Walter Marshall Horton. King's doctoral dissertation,
"A Comparison of the Conceptions
of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman,"
for which he was awarded a PhD
in theology, contains more than fifty complete sentences
plagiarized from the PhD dissertation of Dr.
Jack Boozer, "The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich's
Concept of God." According to "The Martin
Luther King Papers", in King's dissertation "only 49
per cent of sentences in the section on Tillich
contain five or more words that were King's own...."!
In "The Journal of American History", June
1991, page 87, David J. Garrow, a leftist academic who
is sympathetic to King, says that King's
wife, Coretta Scott King, who also served as his secretary,
was an accomplice in his repeated
cheating. Reading Garrow's article, one is led to the
inescapable conclusion that King cheated
because he had chosen for himself a political role in
which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the
intellectual ability to obtain the title fairly, went
after it by any means necessary. Why, then, one might
ask, did the professors at Crozer Theological Seminary
and Boston University grant him passing
grades and a PhD? Garrow states on page 89: "King's
academic compositions, especially at Boston
University, were almost without exception little more
than summary descriptions... and comparisons
of other's writings. Nonetheless, the papers almost
always received desirable letter grades, strongly
suggesting that King's professors did not expect more...."
The editors of "The Martin Luther King Jr.
Papers" state that "...the failure of King's teachers to
notice his pattern of textual appropriation is
somewhat remarkable...."
But researcher Michael Hoffman tells us "...actually the
malfeasance of the professors is not at all
remarkable. King was politically correct, he was Black,
and he had ambitions. The leftist [professors
were] happy to award a doctorate to such a candidate no
matter how much fraud was involved. Nor
is it any wonder that it has taken forty years for the
truth about King's record of nearly constant
intellectual piracy to be made public."
Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King's vision
of a racially mixed and Marxist America,
purposely covered up his cheating for decades. The cover-up
still continues. From the "New York
Times" of October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on October
10th of that year, a committee of
researchers at Boston University admitted that, "There is
no question but that Dr. King plagiarized in
the dissertation." However, despite its finding, the
committee said that "No thought should be given
to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree," an
action the panel said "would serve no purpose."
No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of
his willful fraud as a student, the "reverend" and
the "doctor" should be removed from King's name.
Communist Beliefs and Connections
Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is
not a bona fide PhD, and his name isn't really
"Martin Luther King, Jr." What's left? Just a sexual
degenerate, an America-hating Communist, and a
criminal betrayer of even the interests of his own people.
On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin
Luther King and four others at a
strange institution called the Highlander Folk School in
Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander Folk
School was a Communist front, having been founded by Myles
Horton (Communist Party organizer
for Tennessee) and Don West (Communist Party organizer for
North Carolina). The leaders of this
meeting with King were the aforementioned Horton and West,
along with Abner Berry and James
Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the
Communist Party, USA. The agenda of
the meeting was a plan to tour the Southern states to
initiate demonstrations and riots.
From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King's associate,
advisor, and personal secretary was one
Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined the Young Communist
League at New York City College.
Convicted of draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years
in 1944. On January 23, 1953 the "Los
Angeles Times" reported his conviction and sentencing to
jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and
homosexual perversion. Rustin attended the 16th Convention
of the Communist Party, USA in
February, 1957. One month later, he and King founded the
Southern Christian Leadership
Conference, or SCLC for short. The president of the
SCLC was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The
vice-president of the SCLC was the Reverend Fred
Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an
identified Communist front known as the Southern
Conference Educational Fund, an organization
whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden, was
simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for
Cuba Committee, of which you may have heard. The program
director of the SCLC was the
Reverend Andrew Young, in more recent years Jimmy Carter's
ambassador to the UN and mayor
of Atlanta. Young, by the way, was trained at the Highlander
Folk School, previously mentioned.
Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin
organized the first of King's famous
marches on Washington. The official organ of the Communist
Party, "The Worker,- - openly
declared the march to be a Communist project. Although
he left King's employ as secretary in 1961,
Rustin was called upon by King to be second in command
of the much larger march on Washington
which took place on August 28, 1963.
Bayard Rustin's replacement in 1961 as secretary and
advisor to King was Jack O'Dell, also known
as Hunter Pitts O'Dell. According to official records,
in 1962 Jack O'Dell was a member of the
National Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had
been listed as a Communist Party
member as early as 1956. O'Dell was also given the job
of acting executive director for SCLC
activities for the entire Southeast, according to the
St. Louis "Globe-Democrat - -of October 26,
1962. At that time, there were still some patriots in
the press corps, and word of O'Dell's party
membership became known.
What did King do? Shortly after the negative news
reports, King fired O'Dell with much fanfare.
And he then, without the fanfare, "immediately hired
him again- - as director of the New York office
of the SCLC, as confirmed by the "Richmond News-Leader
- -of September 27, 1963. In 1963 a
Black man from Monroe, North Carolina named Robert
Williams made a trip to Peking, China.
Exactly 20 days before King's 1963 march on Washington,
Williams successfully urged Mao
Tse-Tung to speak out on behalf of King's movement. Mr.
Williams was also around this time
maintaining his primary residence in Cuba, from which he
made regular broadcasts to the southern
US, three times a week, from high-power AM transmitters
in Havana under the title "Radio Free
Dixie." In these broadcasts, he urged violent attacks
by Blacks against White Americans.
During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled
"Negroes With Guns." The writer of the foreword
for this book? None other than Martin Luther King, Jr.
It is also interesting to note that the editors
and publishers of this book were to a man all supporters
of the infamous Fair Play for Cuba
Committee.
According to King's biographer and sympathizer David J.
Garrow, "King privately described himself
as a Marxist." In his 1981 book, "The FBI and Martin Luther
King, Jr.", Garrow quotes King as
saying in SCLC staff meetings, "...we have moved into a new
era, which must be an era of
revolution.... The whole structure of American life must be
changed.... We are engaged in the class
struggle."
Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described
as King's behind-the-scenes "handler."
Levison, who had for years been in charge of the secret
funnelling of Soviet funds to the Communist
Party, USA, was King's mentor and was actually the brains
behind many of King's more successful
ploys. It was Levison who edited King's book, "Stride
Toward Freedom." It was Levison who
arranged for a publisher. Levison even prepared King's
income tax returns! It was Levison who
really controlled the fund-raising and agitation
activities of the SCLC. Levison wrote many of King's
speeches. King described Levison as one of his "closest friends."
FBI: King Bought Sex With SCLC Money
The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years
been aware of Stanley Levison's Communist
activities. It was Levison's close association with King
that brought about the initial FBI interest in
King.
Lest you be tempted to believe the controlled media's lie
about "racists" in the FBI being out to "get"
King, you should be aware that the man most responsible
for the FBI's probe of King was Assistant
Director William C. Sullivan. Sullivan describes himself
as a liberal, and says that initially "I was one
hundred per cent for King...because I saw him as an
effective and badly needed leader for the Black
people in their desire for civil rights." The probe
of King not only confirmed their suspicions about
King's Communist beliefs and associations, but it also
revealed King to be a despicable hypocrite, an
immoral degenerate, and a worthless charlatan.
According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had
direct access to the surveillance files on King
which are denied the American people, King had embezzled
or misapplied substantial amounts of
money contributed to the "civil rights" movement. King
used SCLC funds to pay for liquor, and
numerous prostitutes both Black and White, who were
brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a
time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted
for several days. These types of activities were
the norm for King's speaking and organizing tours.
In fact, an outfit called The National Civil Rights
Museum in Memphis, Tennessee, which is putting
on display the two bedrooms from the Lorraine Motel
where King stayed the night before he was
shot, has declined to depict in any way the "occupants
- -of those rooms. That"according to exhibit
designer Gerard Eisterhold"would be "close to blasphemy.
" The reason? Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
spent his last night on Earth having sex with two women
at the motel and physically beating and
abusing a third.
Sullivan also stated that King had alienated the affections
of numerous married women. According to
Sullivan, who in 30 years with the Bureau hadáseen
everything there was to be seen of the seamy
side of life, King was one of only seven people he had
ever encountered who was such a total
degenerate.
Noting the violence that almost invariably attended
King's supposedly "non-violent" marches,
Sullivan's probe revealed a very different King from
the carefully crafted public image. King
welcomed members of many different Black groups as
members of his SCLC, many of them
advocates and practitioners of violence. King's only
admonition on the subject was that they should
embrace "tactical nonviolence."
Sullivan also relates an incident in which King met
in a financial conference with Communist Party
representatives, not knowing that one of the participants
was an infiltrator actually working for the
FBI.
J. Edgar Hoover personally saw to it that documented
information on King's Communist connections
was provided to the President and to Congress. And
conclusive information from FBI files was also
provided to major newspapers and news wire services.
But were the American people informed of
King's real nature? No, for even in the 1960s, the fix
was in"the controlled media and the bought
politicians were bound and determined to push their
racial mixing program on America. King was
their man and nothing was going to get in their way.
With a few minor exceptions, these facts have
been kept from the American people. The pro-King propaganda
machine grinds on, and it is even
reported that a serious proposal has been made to add some
of King's writings as a new book in the
Bible.
Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of this radio program
is far greater than to prove to you the
immorality and subversion of this man called King. I
want you to start to think for yourselves. I want
you to consider this: What are the forces and motivation
behind the controlled media's active
promotion of King? What does it tell you about our
politicians when you see them, almost without
exception, falling all over themselves to honor King
as a national hero? What does it tell you about
our society when any public criticism of this moral
leper and Communist functionary is considered
grounds for dismissal? What does it tell you about
the controlled media when you see how they have
successfully suppressed the truth and held out a picture
of King that can only be described as a
colossal lie? You need to think, my fellow Americans.
You desperately need to wake up.
(For a current schedule of this radio program, and for
our catalog of over 300 books, tapes, and
videos that the controlled media don't want you to see,
send $1 to National Vanguard Books,
Department R, PO Box 90, Hillsboro WV 24946 USA.)
pcnot
pcnot
You know, what passes for
history these days in the controlled media and in the public
schools is becoming more and more
removed from the realm of reality. The reason this is
happening is because the truth about our
founding fathers and about the history of America makes
the present-day political establishment very
uncomfortable.
So our media masters and the lying politicians who
serve them must hide the truth about our history
or be exposed for the traitors and fakers that most of them are.
One area where truth is notably absent is in so-called
Black History. Our schoolchildren are being
taught incredible whoppers, such as the claim that
Hannibal and Cleopatra and Beethoven were
Black, that the ancient Egyptians were Black, that
a Black co-discovered the North Pole with
Admiral Peary, and that a Black man was the
developer of blood plasma technology.
Even more insidious, our children are being
taught blatant untruths about our past, about our
founding fathers and other major personalities of
American history, whose words are being edited
and altered to make them consonant with the Third
World America that certain forces are trying to
build.
Stay tuned, for you're about to hear some forbidden
truths today on American Dissident Voices.
Before I go forward with the main subject of my show,
let me just take a minute and set the record
straight with regard to the tall tales that too
often pass for "Black history." Some of these whoppers
are a result of over-enthusiastic history-rewriters,
anxious to find as many Black contributions to
history as possible - scholarship be damned, mistakenly
associating everything on the continent of
Africa with Black people. As any high-school graduate
could have told you thirty years ago before
our schools had been totally corrupted, Africa north of
the Sahara is and always was inhabited
mainly by Caucasians of various kinds, not by Black people.
Hannibal was White, as his
contemporary portrait sculpture testifies. Cleopatra was
of pure Greek descent. The ancient
Egyptians were also undoubtedly Caucasians, though in
later years there was some intermarriage
with their Black slaves. As to Beethoven, that absurd
allegation can be disproved by contemporary
portraiture. Matthew Henson, who was Black, was Admiral
Peary's valet, and nothing more. And
Charles Drew, who did have a hand in the development of
the use of blood plasma, was at most
1/32 Black.
It's interesting to note that Abraham Lincoln's birthday
falls in the month which has lately been
designated by our masters as "Black History Month," the
month of February. I do not know for
certain if this was a purposeful decision on the part
of the change agents who created this
celebration, but it would not surprise me. For it is
upon the persona and career of Abraham Lincoln
that they have built a great mythology justifying the
current unfair and unequal system of minority
favoritism that it is our misfortune to live under.
Abraham Lincoln, they say, was a great exponent of
racial equality who freed the slaves, and had he
lived, would have been an enthusiastic advocate of
"civil rights" for Blacks as we understand that
term today.
Well, ladies and gentlemen, I'm here to tell you
today that nothing could be further from the truth. If
Abraham Lincoln were alive today he would be attacked
by the Liberal media as the most
despicable bigot and racist this world has ever seen,
far to the right of even David Duke. Don't
believe me? I will not ask you to believe me - I will
only ask you to listen to what I am about to
reveal to you from contemporary historical documents
and the writings of Mr. Lincoln himself.
I offer the following facts and statements in a spirit
of good will to all. My purpose is not to lionize or
to criticize Abraham Lincoln. My purpose is not to use
Mr. Lincoln as a mouthpiece for my or
anyone else's views. I offer this information to all who
hear me, whatever their race or political
viewpoint, in the spirit of objective truth only. Remember,
you will be hearing Lincoln's words, not
mine.
First I will quote from the text of the Emancipation Proclamation
itself:
"I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States,
and commander-in-Chief of the Army and
Navy thereof, do hereby proclaim and declare that...it
is my purpose upon the next meeting of
Congress to again recommend...the immediate or gradual
abolishment of Slavery...and that the effort
to colonize persons of African descent, with their consent,
upon the continent or elsewhere, with the
previously obtained consent of the government existing
there, will be continued; that on the first day
of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight
hundred and sixty three, all persons held as
slaves within any State, or any designated part of a State,
the people whereof shall then be in
rebellion against the United States, shall be then,
thenceforward and forever free...."
Even the Emancipation Proclamation itself makes it
clear that Lincoln's policy was to give the slaves
their freedom, yes - but also to grant them the real
freedom of a life in their own country in Africa;
thus the reference to "colonize persons of African
descent...upon the continent [of Africa]...."
Shortly after reading the Proclamation to his cabinet,
President Lincoln met with a group of
prominent free Blacks in the White House. The purpose
of the meeting: to enter into a general
program which would solve the race problem through a
peaceful and voluntary separation of the
races.
Lincoln's viewpoint that separation of the races was
the best solution to the problems of slavery and
racial conflict was not a hastily-adopted political
position. He had considered the problem for many
years, and had spoken and written often on behalf of
freedom and African colonization. For
example, he stated in one of the famous Lincoln-Douglas debates:
"I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been,
in favor of bringing about in any way the social
and political equality of the white and black races -
that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of
making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying
them to hold office, nor to inter-marry with
white people; and I will say in addition to this that
there is a physical difference between the white
and black races which I believe will forever forbid
the two races living together on terms of social
and political equality."
Lincoln further stated in the Lincoln-Douglas debates,
specifically on the subject of repatriation of
those of African descent to Africa:
"Such separation, if effected at all, must be effected
by colonization... ...what colonization most
needs is a hearty will... Let us be brought to believe
that it is morally right, and at the same time
favorable to, or at least not against, our interests
to transfer the African to his native clime, and we
shall find a way to do it, however great the task may be."
Some of the vendors of fake history have made the claim,
when confronted with these
unimpeachable quotations from President Lincoln, that he
changed his mind on the subject in the
years after he issued the Emancipation Proclamation. But
according to the autobiography of Union
General Benjamin F. Butler, Abraham Lincoln made the
following statement in a conversation with
Butler in early April 1865, less than two weeks before
his assassination on April 15th:
"But what shall we do with the negroes after they are
free? I can hardly believe that the South and
the North can live in peace, unless we can get rid of
the negroes. ...You have been a staunch friend
of the [Black] race from the time you first advised me
to enlist them at New Orleans. You have had
a good deal of experience in moving bodies of men by
water, - your movement up the James was a
magnificent one. Now, we shall have use for our very
large navy; what, then, are our difficulties in
sending all the blacks away? ...I fear a race war....
I wish you would carefully examine the question
and give me your views upon it and go into the figures,
as you did before in some degree, so as to
show whether the negroes can be exported."
Now, remember, friends, these are not my words. These
are the words of President Abraham
Lincoln. It is a sad day in America when a man can be
denied his freedom of speech, as sometimes
happens these days, or lose his job, because he expresses
essentially the same viewpoint that
President Lincoln espoused.
Now President Lincoln is not the only American historical
figure whose views have been
misrepresented by the media, the government, and the academy.
Thomas Jefferson has sadly
suffered the same fate of having his words edited to "fit in"
with currently fashionable "politically
correct" ideology.
In Washington, DC; not too far from the shores of the Potomac
River, and in the opposite direction,
not too far from the "adult bookstores," burned-out
and boarded-up buildings, hulks of stripped and
abandoned cars, and the corpses of the victims of the
daily gang murders in that city; stands one of
the most beautiful buildings on this planet. I am speaking
of that awe-inspiring rotunda of classic
Greek proportions, the Jefferson Memorial. On the inside
walls of the rotunda are engraved in the
massive blocks of marble many of Jefferson's more
famous quotations, including his "I have sworn
upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every
form of tyranny over the mind of man." Well, it is
just such a tyranny that we labor under today, and it
is my dolorous duty to inform you that, even in
the Jefferson Memorial itself, his words have been
edited to deceive the reader. On one of these
marble panels are carved the following words:
"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate
than that these people [the Blacks] are to be
free. [period!]" Now let me read you the full quotation
of that sentence of Thomas Jefferson's, from
which the preceding was only a misleading extract.
This is from Thomas Jefferson's autobiography, first
published by his grandson, Thomas Jefferson
Randolph in 1829 and again published by special Act
of Congress in 1853. The original manuscript
is in the National Archives in Washington, DC, if
they haven't used it to wrap crack cocaine in yet. I
quote from page 51, dated January 6, 1821:
"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of
fate than that these people are to be free;
[semicolon!] nor is it less certain that the two
races, equally free, cannot live in the same government.
Nature, habit, opinion have drawn indelible lines
of distinction between them. It is still in our power
to direct the process of emancipation and deportation,
peaceably, and in such slow degree, as that
the evil will wear off insensibly, and their place be
....filled up by free White laborers. If, on the
contrary, it is left to force itself on, human nature
must shudder at the prospect held up." I'll give you
the deliberately misquoted first sentence of that passage again:
"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate
than that these people are to be free; nor is it
less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot
live in the same government."
In his book, Notes on the State of Virginia, volume 8, page
380, Jefferson stated:
"...they [the Blacks] should continue with their parents
to a certain age, then to be brought up, at the
public expense, to tillage, arts, or sciences, according
to their geniuses, till the females should be
eighteen and the males twenty-one years of age, when
they should be colonized to such place as the
circumstances of the time should render most proper...
...to declare them a free and independent
people, and to extend to them our alliance and protection,
till they have acquired strength; and to
send vessels, at the same time, to other parts of the world
for an equal number of white inhabitants,
to induce them to migrate hither...."
That quote can also be found in the well-known Jefferson
Cyclopedia, first published by Funk and
Wagnalls in 1900 and still available in many libraries,
under entry 7973, "Slaves, Emancipation of."
Both Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln were advocates
of a peaceful separation of the races
as solution to the multiple problems and perennial ill-will
that characterize any attempt at a multiracial
society. But not only were they advocates on a personal level,
they were active members of an
organization dedicated to that same purpose, called the
American Colonization Society, founded in
1817 in Washington, DC. Among its distinguished
members were Francis Scott Key, John
Randolph, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James
Monroe, Charles Fenton Mercer, John
Marshall, Andrew Jackson, Daniel Webster, Henry Clay,
and Abraham Lincoln.
It was the American Colonization Society which arranged
for the purchase of land in Africa, which
would eventually form the country called Liberia. This
land was purchased with the intent that freed
slaves would make their homes there in their own all-Black
society, and these plans were actually
put into effect, though never on the scale originally planned.
The very name of the country, Liberia,
was based on the Latin word meaning "freedom." The capital
of Liberia, Monrovia, takes its name
from President James Monroe, a leading figure in the Society.
And Liberia's flag is almost identical to
the Stars and Stripes, with one large white star
replacing our field of stars. To this day, many of the
leading families of Liberia are descended from freed
slaves who migrated there during the nineteenth
century.
It wasn't only eminent White American historical
figures who supported this eminently fair and sane
solution to racial conflict, however. Black nationalists
such as Marcus Garvey, Paul Cuffe, M. M. L.
Gordon, and Bishop Henry M. Turner lent their support and
leadership to the cause of separation
and repatriation also. In 1935, a petition signed by over
400,000 Blacks was presented to the
Franklin Roosevelt White House, stating in part:
"Given an opportunity in our ancestral Africa, the
knowledge of farming and of simple farm
machinery and implements, which we have acquired
here would enable us to carve a frugal but
decent livelihood out of the virgin soil and favorable
climate of Liberia... We are a liability now, and
any cost of this project, no matter how great, would
still, we sincerely believe, be a sound investment
for the American people... "
Though the Memorialists, as this group of Black
nationalists called themselves, got no help from the
Roosevelt White House, which was at that stage already
planning the disastrous multiracial future of
this country, they did succeed in getting the legislature
of Virginia to pass a resolution calling for
Federal aid to the colonization movement.
Today, we still see a division in the Black community
between integrationists and nationalists. Today
Louis Farrakhan is the most widely known of the
nationalists, who want a separate nation, preferably
in Africa, where Blacks would have their own government
and a society more in tune with their
natural inclinations and interests. It is the leftist
and communist-associated integrationists, the
followers of Martin Luther King, who are today on the
wane among Blacks, and the nationalists who
are riding the crest of a rising wave of separatist sentiment,
especially among young Blacks. The
recent idealized cinema portrayal of Malcolm X, who
once said
"Give us some land of our own and
let us go for ourselves!," is a part of this growing trend.
I think it is important for White people to understand
that although the Black nationalists may have
some bizarre historical and biological theories, and while
they may call us names like "White devils"
and worse, it is their position of racial separatism
that offers the most direct, most reasonable, and
really the only workable solution to the burgeoning
race problem in this country. The race problem is
so pervasive in America that it fills our newspapers
from front to back with crimes, lawsuits, political
battles, job disputes, and other conflicts; it fills
our prisons and ruins countless lives. It absorbs the
energies of our nation which could otherwise be put to
productive use. It cries out for a solution. The
philosophy of racial separatism is in harmony with
traditional American principles and was in fact, as
I have shown you, the very program espoused by the
universally acknowledged giants of America's
political foundation. It cannot be attacked as "racist"
by either side, since large and respected groups
on both sides of the racial line see it as the only answer.
The primary opposition to it comes from the
controlled media and the bought politicians, who seem
bound and determined to erect a multiracial
social experiment over the corpse of what used to be America.
Ladies and gentlemen, I am about to offer you something
very rare and very special. It is a book by
Arthur J. Demarest, entitled Resettlement. It deals
clearly and in detail with the issues that I have only
begun to touch on in this program. Resettlement is
not an anti-Black book. It is really not even a
political book at all. It is a superbly researched,
well-reasoned, and strictly objective attempt at a
solution to racial strife and conflict. I am offering
this hardback, 165-page book to every listener
who contributes $8 or more for the continued broadcasting
of this program. Resettlement is the
work of a mature scholar, a man who has spent a
lifetime studying social, political, and
anthropological problems. Not content with mere
analysis, he presents a solution - what he calls "the
only solution that has not been tried, the only one that cannot fail."
Resettlement is yours as our Radio Offer Number 10.
Just send as much as you can afford to help us
pay for the radio time on this station, and to help
us go on more and more stations around the
country and the world. Your support is vital. Right
now we have a 250,000 Watt station in Europe
that is willing and anxious to carry our program,
but we have insufficient funds to go on. So please
send as much as you can today. If you give $8 or more
this week, and request Radio Offer Number
10, you will receive a copy of this fine book, which is,
due to censorship, generally unavailable in
libraries and bookstores. Just write to National
Vanguard Books, Department R, Post Office Box
90, Hillsboro, WV 24946 USA. That's $8 or more to
National Vanguard Books, Department R,
Post Office Box 90, Hillsboro, WV 24946 USA, and
remember to ask for Radio Offer Number 10.
Please join us again next week, for more forbidden
truths that you won't hear anywhere else on the
radio dial, on American Dissident Voices.
Lloyd R. Parker
: The Racial Double Standard
:
: I'm Kevin Alfred Strom and this is American Dissident Voices.
:
: Did you know that the Los Angeles Police Department
: has orders not to arrest or disturb in any way
: certain lawbreakers who just happen to belong to
: an influential minority group?
Shriners?
:
: Did you know that openly racial organizations receive
: large sums of U.S. taxpayer's money on a
: regular basis?
The military? Naw, that's just a homophobic organization.
: But that other racial organizations,
: which just happen to represent traditional
: Americans, are treated essentially as outlaws?
:
Traditional Americans? Do you mean slave owners? Lynch mobs? Or is
dragging someone behind your truck a "traditional American" activity?
: We're going to pierce the curtain of media censorship
: and expose this double standard for what it
: really is, next, on American Dissident Voices.
If it's censorship, why are you still able to pos..[awk]
:
: I have before me an exact reproduction of a motion
: adopted by the Los Angles City Council, as
: introduced by 14th District Councilman Richard Alatorre,
: and seconded by Councilman Farrell.
: Many of you won't believe this, but I'll be happy to send
: a photocopy of this public document to
I don't believe the Los Angeles city council really exists.
: anyone who sends us a contribution this week to keep us
: on the air. This motion consists of a series
: of official changes in policy, limiting the powers of
: the Los Angeles Police Department with regard to
: one specific category of lawbreaker - specifically,
: illegal aliens, who, as we all know, are with very
: few exceptions in the LA area, Chicanos from Mexico
: or other parts of Central America.
I heard illegal Belgians were the problem. Oh well.
: In this
: motion, they generally use the euphemism "undocumented"
: when describing these flagrant violators
: of our laws and invaders and occupiers of our country.
:
: Let me read you just a bit of this incredible document:
:
: In section one, it states "it is the policy of the Los
: Angeles Police Department that undocumented
: alien status in itself is not a matter for police action."
: In other words, if you or I violate a law, no
: matter how small or insignificant the infraction, we can
: expect to be arrested, prosecuted, and
The LA police enforce state and city laws. Immigration laws are federal
laws. I doubt the LAPD would go out of their way to arrest someone for
violation of federal OSHA laws, or minimum wage laws, or lying to the FBI,
to name some other violations.
~ººMISSYºº~ ®
Daniel Forester
> You sound very angry ~ why did you title your posts freaknik?
>
> From what I understand Freaknik is a bunch of college students getting
> together and enjoying time off from school. Are you saying it is a
> racial event?
>
> I personally went downtown last year (and I am white mind you ~ and
> not
> a college student) and had a great time.
I went myself, and had a decent time, but there were DEFINITELY a few
things I could've gone without seeing...
--
Daniel E. Forester
-Insert Organization/Position Here-
http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gte061f/
(h) 404.206.0469 || (p) 770.580.1673
Andy Walton
:The Racial Double Standard
:
:I'm Kevin Alfred Strom and this is American Dissident Voices.
From "On Tactics and Strategy for Usenet," a how-to guide for Neo-Nazis by
a young man who has since left the "movement:"
Crucial to our USENET campaign is that our message is disseminated
beyond "our" groups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,
alt.politics.white-power, alt.revolution.counter, alt.skinheads, and to
a certain extent, alt.revisionism.
We MUST move out beyond our present domain, and take up positions on
"mainstream" groups
"pcnot" isn't the first to try this spew, and won't be the last.
--
"The good news is that you're normal. The bad news is that normal is
the one condition there's no treatment for." -- Dr. Laura
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Walton * att...@mindspring.com * http://atticus.home.mindspring.com/
Andy Walton
:by Kevin Alfred Strom
From "On Tactics and Strategy for Usenet," a how-to guide for Neo-Nazis by
a young man who has since left the "movement:"
Crucial to our USENET campaign is that our message is disseminated
beyond "our" groups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,
alt.politics.white-power, alt.revolution.counter, alt.skinheads, and to
a certain extent, alt.revisionism.
We MUST move out beyond our present domain, and take up positions on
"mainstream" groups
"pcnot" isn't the first to try this spew, and won't be the last.
--
"I have no use for humility. I am a fellow with an exceptional talent."
-- Jackie Gleason
Andy Walton
:by Kevin Alfred Strom
From "On Tactics and Strategy for Usenet," a how-to guide for Neo-Nazis by
a young man who has since left the "movement:"
Crucial to our USENET campaign is that our message is disseminated
beyond "our" groups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,
alt.politics.white-power, alt.revolution.counter, alt.skinheads, and to
a certain extent, alt.revisionism.
We MUST move out beyond our present domain, and take up positions on
"mainstream" groups
"pcnot" isn't the first to try this spew, and won't be the last.
--
"I want to know how God created the world. I am not interested in this or
that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element; I want to know
His thoughts; the rest are details." -- Albert Einstein
Andy Walton
:Welcome to American Dissident Voices. I'm Kevin Alfred Strom.
From "On Tactics and Strategy for Usenet," a how-to guide for Neo-Nazis by
a young man who has since left the "movement:"
Crucial to our USENET campaign is that our message is disseminated
beyond "our" groups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,
alt.politics.white-power, alt.revolution.counter, alt.skinheads, and to
a certain extent, alt.revisionism.
We MUST move out beyond our present domain, and take up positions on
"mainstream" groups
"pcnot" isn't the first to try this spew, and won't be the last.
--
"Five tacos, one taco burger. Do you know where the American Dream is?"
-- Hunter S. Thompson, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas
The Sanity Inspector
--
bruce
The dignified don't even enter in the game.
--The Jam
TheNIGHTCRAWLER
Fact.
Using it to promote the Aryan race? Hey fucker, I don't got blond
hair and blue eyes, but even the devil wants to play this game.
Come play w/ me in hell....
my home,
TheNIGHTCRAWLER