Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
New York Times Targets the Pope Again
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  8 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Tracey Maddow  
View profile  
 More options Mar 17 2010, 2:53 pm
From: Tracey Maddow <tracey.maddow...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: New York Times Targets the Pope Again
Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments on the latest attack
on the pope by the New York Times:

Once upon a time there was a homosexual priest who was accused of
molesting boys in Germany. That was 30 years ago. At the approval of
Archbishop Joseph Ratzinger (now the pope), he was sent away for
therapy and was later reinstated; years later, under a new archbishop,
there was another incident and more therapy.

We know this because the New York Times (which does not like to report
on molesting rabbis in 2010), told us about this on Saturday in a
front-page article. Today, it ran a front-page article on the same
story. Was there any difference? Yes. On Saturday, the Times was only
able to identify the priest as bearing the initial "H." Today, it has
real news: his name is Hullermann. And now "H" has been suspended.

Was it wrong to send abusers to therapy? Is it wrong today? The Times
does not say. While it is painfully obvious that psychologists and
psychiatrists have oversold their competency in treating abusers, it
has long been considered to be both scientifically and ethically
sound. It still is. Perhaps that view is unwarranted, but it is flatly
unfair to cherry pick Catholic decision-makers for indictment when
therapy fails.

The Times also wrote today that when the pope was Cardinal Ratzinger
under Pope John Paul II, he was "in charge of reviewing sexual abuse
cases for the Vatican." In doing so, the Times leaves the impression
that Ratzinger was in charge of overseeing these cases when the
scandal developed. Nonsense. The Times reported on January 9, 2002
that he had just been appointed to this role. Thus, he had nothing to
do with this issue at the time when most of the abuse took place
(mid-60s to mid-80s).

The Times has a vested ideological interest in keeping this story
alive. To say it dislikes Pope Benedict XVI intensely is an
understatement.

Source: http://www.catholicleague.org/release.php?id=1797


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Trance Gemini  
View profile  
 More options Mar 17 2010, 2:58 pm
From: Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:58:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [AvC] New York Times Targets the Pope Again

What about the Star Tribune?

And here's a new scandal in Brazil.

http://www.startribune.com/world/87888222.html?elr=KArks:DCiUBcy7hUia...

 Excerpts:
'"I think it is more (a problem) of homosexuality than pedophilia," Barbosa
says. Asked directly if he ever abused boys, Barbosa says he could only
answer such a question "in confession." He then ends the interview, which
was aired Thursday and posted on SBT's YouTube page.'

 Didn't take long for a priest to demonize homosexuality with an unrelated
connection to pedophilia, did it?

 Lucky for him Ratzinger is in charge.  He'll likely get away scot-free.

 Question: Is water-boarding an acceptable means of getting the confession?

--
"Love is friendship on fire" --Anonymous

"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to
skyscrapers" --Panama Floyd, aa#2015


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tracey Maddow  
View profile  
 More options Mar 17 2010, 3:03 pm
From: Tracey Maddow <tracey.maddow...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 17 2010 3:03 pm
Subject: Re: New York Times Targets the Pope Again
On Mar 17, 11:58 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What about the Star Tribune?

And Hitchens' article as well. We targeted the Times because this
issue was already resolved in 2002, in which the Times reported that
the pope had nothing to do with it because he was just appointed to
the post. Why the Times is bringing it up again, is beyond anybody's
comprehension.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Trance Gemini  
View profile  
 More options Mar 17 2010, 3:03 pm
From: Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:03:31 -0400
Local: Wed, Mar 17 2010 3:03 pm
Subject: Re: [AvC] New York Times Targets the Pope Again

And what about The Australian?

Regarding Ratzinger and Germany.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/popes-brother-georg-ratzin...

"The German Government has gone so far as to accuse the Vatican of
suppressing the truth. On Monday Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, the
Justice Minister, said that a "wall of silence" was imposed on Catholic-run
schools by a 2001 Vatican directive which declared cases of abuse "subject
to papal confidentiality". It was issued at a time when Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger, the current Pope, was head of doctrine.

The Vatican has switched to crisis management amid the sex abuse allegations
and the threat of lawsuits across Europe and North America. Last month the
Pope summoned Irish bishops to Rome and lectured them about the "heinous
crime" of sexual abuse. He is due to issue a pastoral letter on the subject
before Easter to Irish Catholics."

--
"Love is friendship on fire" --Anonymous

"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to
skyscrapers" --Panama Floyd, aa#2015


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tracey Maddow  
View profile  
 More options Mar 17 2010, 3:07 pm
From: Tracey Maddow <tracey.maddow...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 17 2010 3:07 pm
Subject: Re: New York Times Targets the Pope Again
On Mar 17, 12:03 pm, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> And what about The Australian?

Yes, nobody is denying it and actually, everybody in the Catholic
Church is abhorring it. We cannot condone any criminal act by anybody.
The reason why the Times is in my other response to you.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Trance Gemini  
View profile  
 More options Mar 17 2010, 3:12 pm
From: Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:12:20 -0400
Local: Wed, Mar 17 2010 3:12 pm
Subject: Re: [AvC] Re: New York Times Targets the Pope Again

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Tracey Maddow
<tracey.maddow...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Mar 17, 11:58 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What about the Star Tribune?

> And Hitchens' article as well. We targeted the Times because this
> issue was already resolved in 2002, in which the Times reported that
> the pope had nothing to do with it because he was just appointed to
> the post. Why the Times is bringing it up again, is beyond anybody's
> comprehension.

In what way is it resolved Tracey?

By blaming homosexuals for these crimes by pedophile priests?

By forcing the Irish taxpayer to pay damages to the victims while the
Catholic Church rolls in their billions of dollars?

When will the Catholic Church take responsibility for their criminal acts?

--
"Love is friendship on fire" --Anonymous

"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to
skyscrapers" --Panama Floyd, aa#2015


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tracey Maddow  
View profile  
 More options Mar 17 2010, 3:15 pm
From: Tracey Maddow <tracey.maddow...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 17 2010 3:15 pm
Subject: Re: New York Times Targets the Pope Again
On Mar 17, 12:12 pm, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Tracey Maddow
> <tracey.maddow...@gmail.com>wrote:

> > On Mar 17, 11:58 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > What about the Star Tribune?

> > And Hitchens' article as well. We targeted the Times because this
> > issue was already resolved in 2002, in which the Times reported that
> > the pope had nothing to do with it because he was just appointed to
> > the post. Why the Times is bringing it up again, is beyond anybody's
> > comprehension.

> In what way is it resolved Tracey?

It is resolved only on the case of the pope. He had nothing to do with
it. The cleric was in the wrong and I hope that he rot in hell.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eris  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2010, 2:22 pm
From: Eris <vith...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 20 2010 2:22 pm
Subject: Re: New York Times Targets the Pope Again
What is inaction Tracy?

On Mar 17, 3:15 pm, Tracey Maddow <tracey.maddow...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »