Disaster For Atheists!!

[xnun]

A whole flock of new Christians (or at least theists) has joined
AvC. The number of them is becoming too great for the atheitards to
drive them away with the same old hackneyed labels
and baseless postulations, not to mention obscenities and profanities.

I suggest the atheitards call an emergency meeting in the moderator
forum to discuss this crisis.
I am really looking forward to that :)

[FreeThinker]

1. There are far more Christians/theists in the world than atheists.
It would make statistical sense if that ratio reflected the membership
of this group.
2. Perhaps these new members joined to actually learn something. By
the way, being educated moves you away from theism.

[kenandkids]

which explains why she is so terribly entrenched in religious
nonsense.

[Trance Gemini]

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:27 PM, kenandkids <kenan...@gmail.com> wrote:

which explains why she is so terribly entrenched in religious
nonsense.

Some of the new theist members, unlike XNun/Thetard, actually want to engage in intelligent debate and find her and others trolling offensive.

Maybe XNun/Thetard (if she's capable and I doubt she is) should try to learn something from them.
 

--
I want to dance. I want to win. I want that Bingo trophy! --Mrs. Mia Wallace (paraphrased)

[Neil Kelsey]

On Apr 20, 6:20 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>   A whole flock of new Christians (or at least theists) has joined
> AvC.

Oh no! Whatever shall we do!

> The number of them is becoming too great for the atheitards to
> drive them away

I'd settle for one of you to come up with some evidence to support
your wild claims about God instead of these hackneyed diversions
you're so fond of using.

> with the same old hackneyed labels

Then come up with a new proof of God and we'll find a new way to shoot
it down.

> and baseless postulations,

"I don't believe you" is not a baseless postulation. We have good
reasons not to believe you - you're a proven liar with no evidence.

> not to mention obscenities and profanities.

Playing the offended card is not evidence that God exists.

>   I suggest the atheitards call an emergency meeting in the moderator
> forum to discuss this crisis.
> I am really looking forward to that :)

Of course you are. You take joy in the pain of others. That's your
defining trait.

[e_space]

yep...i came here to learn something...how to be void...prolly help
with meditation hahahahaha

> > I am really looking forward to that :)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

[e_space]

intelligent debate? boy, did they take a left trun at albequerque!

On Apr 21, 8:12 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> (paraphrased)- Hide quoted text -

[DoctorWinslow]

Yep, these atheitards don't have anything to say except, "prove it."
When we prove it and they cannot refute it, their profanities and
obscenities ensue.

I can only pity these atheitard. Poor guys, they cannot even discuss
rationally.

[e_space]

aww...is she hurting poor neily? hey...if u 'claim' that 'god' does
not exist, dont u have to prove it to? or are u just saying that u are
not sure?

[Neil Kelsey]

On Apr 21, 6:58 am, e_space <espace1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> aww...is she hurting poor neily?

Yes, whe's hurting my feelings. Hey, why don't you pester her, since
you say you're not a theist (HA HA HA HA HA HA), and help US out for a
while?

> hey...if u 'claim' that 'god' does
> not exist,

I didn't claim that, genius. I just don't believe HER claim. Or yours.
Neither of you seem acquainted with the concept of evidence.
Diversions are not evidence that god/spirit exist.

> dont u have to prove it to?

Nope. Go take a logic course.

> or are u just saying that u are
> not sure?

I am sure that I don't believe her about God, and I'm sure I don't
believe you about spirit.

> On Apr 21, 9:30 am, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 20, 6:20 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > >   A whole flock of new Christians (or at least theists) has joined
> > > AvC.
>
> > Oh no! Whatever shall we do!
>
> > > The number of them is becoming too great for the atheitards to
> > > drive them away
>
> > I'd settle for one of you to come up with some evidence to support
> > your wild claims about God instead of these hackneyed diversions
> > you're so fond of using.
>
> > > with the same old hackneyed labels
>
> > Then come up with a new proof of God and we'll find a new way to shoot
> > it down.
>
> > > and baseless postulations,
>
> > "I don't believe you" is not a baseless postulation. We have good
> > reasons not to believe you - you're a proven liar with no evidence.
>
> > > not to mention obscenities and profanities.
>
> > Playing the offended card is not evidence that God exists.
>
> > >   I suggest the atheitards call an emergency meeting in the moderator
> > > forum to discuss this crisis.
> > > I am really looking forward to that :)
>
> > Of course you are. You take joy in the pain of others. That's your

> > defining trait.- Hide quoted text -

[Neil Kelsey]

On Apr 21, 6:58 am, DoctorWinslow <doctorwins...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 20, 8:20 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >   A whole flock of new Christians (or at least theists) has joined
> > AvC. The number of them is becoming too great for the atheitards to
> > drive them away with the same old hackneyed labels
> > and baseless postulations, not to mention obscenities and profanities.
>
> >   I suggest the atheitards call an emergency meeting in the moderator
> > forum to discuss this crisis.
> > I am really looking forward to that :)
>
> Yep, these atheitards don't have anything to say except, "prove it."

Do you think there's some sort of date of expiry for when you don't
have to supply proof anymore?

> When we prove it

You have never proved it.

> and they cannot refute it,

Refute what?

> their profanities and
> obscenities ensue.

Pretending you're offended is not evidence that God exists.

> I can only pity these atheitard. Poor guys, they cannot even discuss
> rationally.

Projection is not evidence that God exists.

[Trance Gemini]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Neil Kelsey <neil_...@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 20, 6:20 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>   A whole flock of new Christians (or at least theists) has joined
> AvC.

Oh no! Whatever shall we do!

> The number of them is becoming too great for the atheitards to
> drive them away

I'd settle for one of you to come up with some evidence to support
your wild claims about God instead of these hackneyed diversions
you're so fond of using.

> with the same old hackneyed labels

Then come up with a new proof of God and we'll find a new way to shoot
it down.

> and baseless postulations,

"I don't believe you" is not a baseless postulation. We have good
reasons not to believe you - you're a proven liar with no evidence.

> not to mention obscenities and profanities.

Playing the offended card is not evidence that God exists.

Not to mention the sheer hypocrisy of being offended when others do exactly what she does.

Of course in her somewhat twisted and bizarre thinking it's probably not obscene or a profanity for her to repeatedly post phuck or a$$hole but it is obscene and a profanity for atheists to post fuck or asshole.

>   I suggest the atheitards call an emergency meeting in the moderator
> forum to discuss this crisis.
> I am really looking forward to that :)

Of course you are. You take joy in the pain of others. That's your
defining trait.

[Dev]

I like this line:

"Do you think there's some sort of date of expiry for when you don't
have to supply proof anymore?"

There's a nice observation in there. It seems like every thetard comes
here, _doesn't_ answer questions or provide counterarguments, and
days, weeks, months, years later: "man, we've been over that thing
that I never addressed". simon is the perfect example of this with his
"infinitely upcoming rational argument for God".

[Dev]

So you've started a bunch of new sockpuppets? What a sad person you
must be.

[dead kennedy]

On 21 Apr, 14:58, DoctorWinslow <doctorwins...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yep, these atheitards don't have anything to say except, "prove it."

prove it.

> When we prove it and they cannot refute it, their profanities and
> obscenities ensue.

arsehole.

[kenandkids]

you've never proven anything other than the fact that you truly
deserve the gloss doktor thinkslow.

On Apr 21, 6:58 am, DoctorWinslow <doctorwins...@gmail.com> wrote:

[Neil Kelsey]

On Apr 21, 8:02 am, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I like this line:
>
> "Do you think there's some sort of date of expiry for when you don't
> have to supply proof anymore?"
>
> There's a nice observation in there. It seems like every thetard comes
> here, _doesn't_ answer questions or provide counterarguments, and
> days, weeks, months, years later: "man, we've been over that thing
> that I never addressed".

Some of them do that starting out of the gate, like the 3 Stooges in
this thread.

> simon is the perfect example of this with his
> "infinitely upcoming rational argument for God".

I always assumed people would have worked out that kind of lame
bullshit in Grade school until I started talking to theists online.

> On Apr 21, 8:13 am, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 21, 6:58 am, DoctorWinslow <doctorwins...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 20, 8:20 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > >   A whole flock of new Christians (or at least theists) has joined
> > > > AvC. The number of them is becoming too great for the atheitards to
> > > > drive them away with the same old hackneyed labels
> > > > and baseless postulations, not to mention obscenities and profanities.
>
> > > >   I suggest the atheitards call an emergency meeting in the moderator
> > > > forum to discuss this crisis.
> > > > I am really looking forward to that :)
>
> > > Yep, these atheitards don't have anything to say except, "prove it."
>
> > Do you think there's some sort of date of expiry for when you don't
> > have to supply proof anymore?
>
> > > When we prove it
>
> > You have never proved it.
>
> > >  and they cannot refute it,
>
> > Refute what?
>
> > >  their profanities and
> > > obscenities ensue.
>
> > Pretending you're offended is not evidence that God exists.
>
> > > I can only pity these atheitard. Poor guys, they cannot even discuss
> > > rationally.
>

> > Projection is not evidence that God exists.- Hide quoted text -

[Dev]

Yeah, people who have never posted on a group like this or debated
much religion in "real life" really don't get just how fucktarded
theists really are when confronted about their beliefs. It's pretty
overwhelming that so many people _really are_ *that* stupid and
insane.

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

[dali_70]

More like a new flock of flamers, trolls and idiots.

[e_space]

yup...voidism is ure strong suit alright...and to imagine u seem to
think it is something to brag about! ...sad

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

[e_space]

atheists seem to be very good at name calling...other than voidism,
that seems to be what u are best at...u must be very proud of ure
accomlishments...hahahaha

[Neil Kelsey]

On Apr 21, 9:26 am, e_space <espace1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yup...voidism is ure strong suit alright...and to imagine u seem to
> think it is something to brag about! ...sad

Strawman arguments are not evidence that spirit/god exists.

[Turner Hayes]

Oh, fuck off, you contemptible harpy.

[Turner Hayes]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Turner Hayes <lordla...@gmail.com> wrote:

Oh, fuck off, you contemptible harpy.

Oh, I'm sorry. How rude of me. I meant "phuck off".

[Sketch System]

Moron,

We want more theists in this group. We particularly want theists
capable of debate.

You may shove your trolling assumption.

On Apr 20, 6:20 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

[Sketch System]

On Apr 21, 6:56 am, e_space <espace1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> intelligent debate? boy, did they take a left trun at albequerque!

What you have done is degrade the quality of this group.

Please leave.

[Trance Gemini]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Sketch System <sketch...@gmail.com> wrote:

Moron,

We want more theists in this group.  We particularly want theists
capable of debate.

You may shove your trolling assumption.

Even some theists have complained about the theist trolls like her.
 

On Apr 20, 6:20 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>   A whole flock of new Christians (or at least theists) has joined
> AvC. The number of them is becoming too great for the atheitards to
> drive them away with the same old hackneyed labels
> and baseless postulations, not to mention obscenities and profanities.
>
>   I suggest the atheitards call an emergency meeting in the moderator
> forum to discuss this crisis.
> I am really looking forward to that :)

[Sketch System]

On Apr 21, 6:58 am, DoctorWinslow <doctorwins...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yep, these atheitards don't have anything to say except, "prove it."
> When we prove it and they cannot refute it, their profanities and
> obscenities ensue.

Fool, you have proven nothing.

> I can only pity these atheitard. Poor guys, they cannot even discuss
> rationally.

Does you God like it when you dodge responsibility?

[rappoccio]

On Apr 20, 9:20 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>   A whole flock of new Christians (or at least theists) has joined
> AvC. The number of them is becoming too great for the atheitards to
> drive them away with the same old hackneyed labels
> and baseless postulations, not to mention obscenities and profanities.
>
>   I suggest the atheitards call an emergency meeting in the moderator
> forum to discuss this crisis.
> I am really looking forward to that :)

Is it really hard to keep up this persecution complex, or does it come
naturally to you?

[kenandkids]

>Even some theists have complained about the theist trolls like her

i'm stunned... really... just stunned...

On Apr 21, 10:56 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:

[xnun]

On Apr 20, 7:07 pm, FreeThinker <kiphug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 1. There are far more Christians/theists in the world than atheists.
> It would make statistical sense if that ratio reflected the membership
> of this group.

--------------------------------
That hasn't been true in this forum until OldMan and Doctor
Rappoccio
became the owners. The attacks on Christians by the atheists would
have made Hitler's Brown Shirts proud.
--------------------------------
'> 2. Perhaps these new members joined to actually learn something. By

> the way, being educated moves you away from theism.

------------------------------
It depends on what you call "education." In thie USA, public education
has become a process of dumbing down across the board.

[xnun]

On Apr 21, 5:12 am, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe XNun/Thetard (if she's capable and I doubt she is) should try to learn
> something from them.

------------------------------
Is this from Mrs. Mia Wallace or the Hypnotized Horoscope?

I may be schizophrenic, but at least I have each other :)

[xnun]

On Apr 21, 6:58 am, DoctorWinslow <doctorwins...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I can only pity these atheitards. Poor guys, they cannot even discuss
> rationally.
------------------------------
Pathetic, aren't they? There are no positive values in their lives.

[xnun]

-----------------------------------
Why, Dr. Rappoccio, please explain by the scientific method how
my recommending a strategy for the atheitards is my persecution
complex. Of course, the long string of assaults on my character
preceding this wouldn't make me think that the athietards were
trying to find ways to silence me.

[Bob T.]

Have you ever considered that maybe people find you obnoxious because
you behave obnoxiously?

- Bob T.

[xnun]

-----------------------------------
Yes, but they still won't leave me alone and stop reading my
posts :)

[kenandkids]

carefull, she just might call you a phucking @$$hole and complain
about you being crude or mean.

> - Bob T.- Hide quoted text -

[DoctorWinslow]

Yep and pathetic is an understatement as an attribute of these
atheitards. They have no values at all. I wonder if they even have a
concept of sin or even believe there is a sin?

[kenandkids]

well actually thinkslow, you don't need to wonder. you've been told
over and over that sin does not exist. sin is a term used by religion
to stop you from obeying the genetic imperatives that are a necessary
and important part of all life.

> concept of sin or even believe there is a sin?- Hide quoted text -

[Bob T.]

Sin is a religious concept - it's doing something that God doesn't
approve of. Since atheists don't believe that God exists at all, His
approval is not important to us.

However, despite your silly slander above, of course atheists do have
values. We just believe that values are not determined by mythical
deities, we believe that values are defined by humans.

- Bob T.

[DoctorWinslow]

On Apr 21, 2:01 pm, kenandkids <kenandk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> well actually thinkslow, you don't need to wonder. you've been told
> over and over that sin does not exist. sin is a term used by religion
> to stop you from obeying the genetic imperatives that are a necessary
> and important part of all life.

There we go, no values at all. Nada, zilch, zero, nyet, kaput.

[kenandkids]

i am once again humbled by the reasoning of those incapable of
reading.

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

[Skeptic]

On Apr 20, 6:20 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>   A whole flock of new Christians (or at least theists) has joined
> AvC. The number of them is becoming too great for the atheitards to
> drive them away

Like bedbugs and cockroaches.

Are you saying that N + K idiots are more right than N idiots?

[Steve in Virginia]

You do realize that National Socialism was a political movement - and
many of its members were Christians.

[Steve in Virginia]

You forgot the "q" after the "c"....but it's silent anyway. ;)

On Apr 21, 1:30 pm, Turner Hayes <lordlacol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> I am really looking forward to that :)- Hide quoted text -

[rappoccio]

On Apr 21, 2:41 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 21, 11:26 am, rappoccio <rappoc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 20, 9:20 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > >   I suggest the atheitards call an emergency meeting in the moderator
> > > forum to discuss this crisis. I am really looking forward to that :)
>
> > Is it really hard to keep up this persecution complex, or does it come
> > naturally to you?
>
> -----------------------------------
>   Why, Dr. Rappoccio, please explain by the scientific method how
> my recommending a strategy for the atheitards is my persecution
> complex.

You've made a postulation:

"A whole flock of new Christians (or at least theists) has joined
AvC. The number of them is becoming too great for the atheitards to
drive them away with the same old hackneyed labels
and baseless postulations, not to mention obscenities and profanities"

1) You haven't demonstrated that atheists have any intention of
"driving away" theists as a whole. Please demonstrate this. Now,
INDIVIDUAL theists and atheists are a different story... there are
lots of unpopular people on this board, on both sides of the argument.
But you haven't made that argument.

2) You have claimed that atheists make "baseless postulations". Please
substantiate this. Examples are good here.

3) "Ob$cenitie$ and profanitie$": Pot, meet kettle.

> Of course, the long string of assaults on my character
> preceding this wouldn't make me think that the athietards were
> trying to find ways to silence me.

There are a handful of people with the authority to "silence you" on
this board, I am one of them. So is OldMan, Dev, Kitty, Simonsaysbye,
Brock, Dag Yo, and BlueSci. None of us have attempted to ban you...
fancy that. You make posts like this to be a drama queen and work on
your persecution complex.

Hence, my comment: Is it difficult for you to maintain that

[Neil Kelsey]

On Apr 21, 1:05 pm, Steve in Virginia <chandler2...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> You do realize that National Socialism was a political movement - and
> many of its members were Christians.

I happen to be reading Hitler's "Mein Kampf," and just came across the
following passage:

"What we must fight for is to safeguard the existence and reproduction
of our race and our people, the sustenance of our children, and the
purity of our blood, the freedom and independence of the fatherland,
so that our people may mature for the fulfillment of the mission
allotted it by the CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE."

Hitler was a Christian, and he was as confused by Christianity as any
other Christian seems to be.

> On Apr 21, 2:32 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 20, 7:07 pm, FreeThinker <kiphug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > 1. There are far more Christians/theists in the world than atheists.
> > > It would make statistical sense if that ratio reflected the membership
> > > of this group.
>
> > --------------------------------
> >   That hasn't been true in this forum until OldMan and Doctor
> > Rappoccio
> > became the owners.  The attacks on Christians by the atheists would
> > have made Hitler's Brown Shirts proud.
> > --------------------------------
> > '> 2. Perhaps these new members joined to actually learn something. By> the way, being educated moves you away from theism.
>
> > ------------------------------
> > It depends on what you call "education." In thie USA, public education

> > has become a process of dumbing down across the board.- Hide quoted text -

[Medusa]

On Apr 21, 8:58 am, DoctorWinslow <doctorwins...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yep, these atheitards don't have anything to say except, "prove it."
> When we prove it and they cannot refute it, their profanities and
> obscenities ensue.

You just post rumors and fallacies. You're not doing your case any
good at all.

> I can only pity these atheitard. Poor guys, they cannot even discuss
> rationally.

You have just described yourself; you don't discuss, you just drag out
tired old cliches.

Medusa

[Medusa]

On Apr 21, 1:32 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> --------------------------------
>   That hasn't been true in this forum until OldMan and Doctor
> Rappoccio
> became the owners.  The attacks on Christians by the atheists would
> have made Hitler's Brown Shirts proud.

That is a sick statement: comparing genocide with Online debates.

> --------------------------------
> '> 2. Perhaps these new members joined to actually learn something. By> the way, being educated moves you away from theism.
>
> ------------------------------
> It depends on what you call "education." In thie USA, public education
> has become a process of dumbing down across the board.

Prove this statement. Public education in the United States varies by
area, depending on how much tax money is available.

I attended one of the best-rated public school system in the country.
Many chose it over the religious schools when they reached high
school.

Medusa

[Trance Gemini]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:29 PM, kenandkids <kenan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Even some theists have complained about the theist trolls like her

i'm stunned... really... just stunned...

There are theists here who are interested in debate.

The only ones that defend this behavior do so because they are either guilty of the same behavior or they are defending their camp "right or wrong" which is, in my opinion, a morally bankrupt position to take.
 

[e_space]

whats to debate? u dont have anything to say other than 'prove it'
echoing throughout the rafters

On Apr 21, 1:54 pm, Sketch System <sketch.sys...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moron,
>
> We want more theists in this group.  We particularly want theists
> capable of debate.
>
> You may shove your trolling assumption.
>

> On Apr 20, 6:20 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >   A whole flock of new Christians (or at least theists) has joined
> > AvC. The number of them is becoming too great for the atheitards to
> > drive them away with the same old hackneyed labels
> > and baseless postulations, not to mention obscenities and profanities.
>
> >   I suggest the atheitards call an emergency meeting in the moderator
> > forum to discuss this crisis.

> > I am really looking forward to that :)- Hide quoted text -

[e_space]

finally realizing it? roflmfao

> > (paraphrased)- Hide quoted text -

[e_space]

and i suppose morality falls into this non-existant void?

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

[e_space]

ure humbled cuz ure head is about 4 feet below ure ankles...right
beside your morality or lack thereof

[e_space]

roflmfao...why waste rationality on voiders? your arguments are as
empty as your spiritual existance

[e_space]

<----loves debating, but not when words echo through the void and
seldom result in anything other than name calling and repetitious
responses... www.proveitproveitproveitproveit.void

On Apr 21, 6:15 pm, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> (paraphrased)- Hide quoted text -

[Turner Hayes]

.void is not yet a valid TLD.

[Medusa]

On Apr 21, 5:40 pm, e_space <espace1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> roflmfao...why waste rationality on voiders? your arguments are as
> empty as your spiritual existance

Thanks for proving my point.

Medusa

[xnun]

Thank you for your response. I'll try to do it justice
tomorrow; right now I have some appointments.

[dead kennedy]

On 21 Apr, 22:23, Medusa <Medusa4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 21, 1:32 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > --------------------------------
> >   That hasn't been true in this forum until OldMan and Doctor
> > Rappoccio
> > became the owners.  The attacks on Christians by the atheists would
> > have made Hitler's Brown Shirts proud.
>
> That is a sick statement: comparing genocide with Online debates.

its not an unfounded comparison, every sunday morning she meets a
generation of hitlers brown shirts who tell her how proud they are of
the way christians attack atheists.

[dead kennedy]

errrm, you know that being strapped down and forced to take your meds,
cant really be called an "appointment" ?

> > persecution complex, or does it come naturally to you?- Hide quoted text -

[trog69]

> Yep and pathetic is an understatement as an attribute of these
> atheitards. They have no values at all. I wonder if they even have a
> concept of sin or even believe there is a sin?

I heard that. Ohhh, I'm sooooo ashamed, that I might be called a
sinner. How will I ever live with myself?

[e_space]

ure welcome...whatever ure void opinion was :-)

[e_space]

boy...thats one rotten dead kennedy...somebody should bury the
stinking piece of humanity...yucky...and u wonder where i get off with
the sarcastic posts??? lol

[e_space]

hopefully u wont?

> > concept of sin or even believe there is a sin?- Hide quoted text -

[e_space]

and i suggest u cancel ure psychiatric appointment cuz ure just a pile
of rotting voidness...would u at least mind taking a shower before u
come here and stink up the place? thanks in advance ;^)

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

[TLC]

I like e_space, because in a debate he doesn't know the meaning of the
word 'fear'... but then again he doesn't know the meaning of most
words.

[Kilmir]

On Apr 21, 9:07 pm, DoctorWinslow <doctorwins...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2:01 pm, kenandkids <kenandk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > well actually thinkslow, you don't need to wonder. you've been told
> > over and over that sin does not exist. sin is a term used by religion
> > to stop you from obeying the genetic imperatives that are a necessary
> > and important part of all life.
>
> There we go, no values at all. Nada, zilch, zero, nyet, kaput.

<snip>

Are you seriously trying the morality argument? That's rather..
pathetic.
Morals and ethics formed along with humans. The earliest concepts like
protecting family / tribe even by sacrificing yourself are grounded in
hereditary traits which help genetic survival.
Later on when humans became more intelligent and had gained decent
empathy simple survival logic established most of the basic laws like
no killing or stealing within the tribe and more general rules like
treat others as you want them to treat you.
These days reasoning and logic is the main basis for the dominant
morals and ethics, though some aspects are still remnanst of old
emotional thinking.

No gods were needed, are needed or will ever be needed. Absolute
morals is a nice concept but we have no reason at all to assume
something like that exists.


Kilmir

[e_space]

words are wasted on voidness...get it? no...i guess not :^( ...and
what would i be afraid of? the empty darkness? nah...im used to it,
especially after coming here for a couple of weeks...hahahahaha

[ZonkTheBear]

On 22 Apr, 02:36, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Pathetic, aren't they? There are no positive values in their lives.

What in Valhall's name would you know about that?


On 22 Apr, 02:36, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 21, 6:58 am, DoctorWinslow <doctorwins...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > On Apr 20, 8:20 pm, xnun <xnun2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > >   I suggest the atheitards call an emergency meeting in the moderator
> > > forum to discuss this crisis.
> > > I am really looking forward to that :)
>