Received: by 10.101.105.39 with SMTP id h39mr11323727anm.14.1279036504202;
        Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: arora-dev@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.100.86.11 with SMTP id j11ls1806928anb.4.p; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 
	08:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.133.6 with SMTP id k6mr527095ann.48.1279036502052; Tue, 13 
	Jul 2010 08:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 41g2000yqn.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:55:02 
	-0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinLAwb2FDK0D5t0pZcN6gc4io9VOMASbr2OQO3m@mail.gmail.com>
X-IP: 79.157.128.25
References: <AANLkTil7YHtD3FzLXBat7F8G43NoSoFfMWdTVtqmiWxY@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTinLAwb2FDK0D5t0pZcN6gc4io9VOMASbr2OQO3m@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) 
	AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.99 Safari/533.4,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <8d72c220-9284-48ae-b7c1-fb0a0edb5d04@41g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Flash plugin crash on Webkit - ( was - Re: Arora does the 
	Development will continue?)
From: kazehiri <diego...@live.com>
To: arora-dev <arora-dev@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mmmm...is a plugin's problem no?You know if you can report bugs to
Adobe? The fault is yours, if they did open source ...I will try to
report it.Thanks again.


On 12 jul, 22:05, Diego Iastrubni <diegoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW: plugins are disabled on the dialog box (no little check box is
> selected!). Still the plugin gets loaded. NICE.
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Diego Iastrubni <diegoi...@gmail.com>wr=
ote:
>
>
>
> > The crash is caused by the plugin, directly. See this trace:
>
> > elcuco@pinky:~/src/github/arora$ gdb ./arora
> > GNU gdb (GDB) 7.1-ubuntu
> > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <
> >http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. =A0Type "show cop=
ying"
> > and "show warranty" for details.
> > This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu".
> > For bug reporting instructions, please see:
> > <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
> > Reading symbols from
> > /home/elcuco/src/github/arora/arora...done.
>
> > (gdb)
> > r
>
> > Starting program:
> > /home/elcuco/src/github/arora/arora
>
> > [Thread debugging using libthread_db
> > enabled]
>
> > [New Thread 0xb69d6b70 (LWP 1998)]
> > [New Thread 0xb5c3fb70 (LWP 1999)]
> > [New Thread 0xb52ffb70 (LWP 2000)]
> > [Thread 0xb52ffb70 (LWP 2000) exited]
> > [New Thread 0xb52ffb70 (LWP 2001)]
> > [New Thread 0xb31ffb70 (LWP 2002)]
> > [New Thread 0xb29feb70 (LWP 2003)]
> > [New Thread 0xb21fdb70 (LWP 2004)]
> > [New Thread 0xb19fcb70 (LWP 2005)]
>
> > (process:1995): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **:
> > /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.24.1/gobject/gtype.c:2706: You forgot to call
> > g_type_init()
>
> > (process:1995): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion
> > `initialization_value !=3D 0' failed
>
> > (process:1995): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion
> > `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed
>
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > 0x05645705 in gdk_pixbuf_new_from_data () from
> > /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 =A00x05645705 in gdk_pixbuf_new_from_data () from
> > /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
> > #1 =A00x0564d00f in gdk_pixbuf_from_pixdata () from
> > /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
> > #2 =A00x0564d2d3 in gdk_pixbuf_new_from_inline () from
> > /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
> > #3 =A00x046b7335 in ?? () from
> > /usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so
> > #4 =A00x046b5d8e in ?? () from
> > /usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so
> > #5 =A00x046ba28e in NP_Initialize () from
> > /usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so
>
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:16 PM, kazehiri <diego...@live.com> wrote:
>
> >> Ok,I'm sorry I didn't know ...What if it's a bug where I put
> >> it?.Thanks for all.
> >> On 11 jul, 19:15, Diego Iastrubni <diegoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 8:07 PM, kazehiri <diego...@live.com> wrote:
> >> > > That is a bug.no?And that can=B4t be fixed..? Maybe this is a prob=
lem
> >> to
> >> > > QtWebKit because if =A0also happens to Rekonq...
>