> Just checking in to see how wildcards are going; I went to the web site but
> got a 404 error at this URL:

> http://www.72miles.com/architecturerules

> Is the site just down temporarily?

> Andrew

> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Mike Nereson <mikenere...@gmail.com>
> wrote:

>> Andrew, I am glad to hear that. Mykola and I are the two developers on
>> Architecture Rules. He is working hard on the maven plugin. I would have
>> implemented the wild cards for you already if my main computer's motherboard
>> didn't crash about 2 months ago. As soon as I replace that part, I'll be
>> able to knock out that wild card support for you. I am really glad to hear
>> that you want to use it.

>> I really really appreciate the feedback. Once we get the wild cards in,
>> and you are using it, please don't hesitate to send us an update as to how
>> you are you using architecture rules, how well, or not well its working for
>> you, and any suggestions that you have to make it better.

>> Again, thanks.

>> ~ Mike

>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Andrew <andrew.i.s...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> As further feedback, I'll be applying this promising tool to our
>>> flagship application's codebase as soon as wildcards are available.
>>> Any idea when this might be? I appreciate you are probably working
>>> solo on this project in your spare time, so I don't want to hassle you
>>> too much.

>>> Cheers,

>>> Andrew

>>> On Apr 24, 5:01 am, "Mike Nereson" <mikenere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Sakke, I can't wait to finish implementing wild card support so that
>>> > you can test it for us ( :

>>> > Again, thanks for the feedback, for sticking with us, and for
>>> > reaffirming the need for wild card support.

>>> > --
>>> > ~ Mike Nereson

>>> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Sakke Wiik <sakke.w...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:

>>> > >  I agree with Andrew. We're currently not using this tools because
>>> it's
>>> > >  too complex without package wildcards. More info in my previous post

>>> http://groups.google.com/group/architecture-rules-users/browse_frm/th...

>>> > >  cheers,
>>> > >  Sakke Wiik

>>> > >  On Apr 22, 4:12 pm, "Mike Nereson" <mikenere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >  > Thanks for the feedback, Andrew. I can appreciate your example.

>>> > >  > The whole reason for this project was to create a clean and
>>> simple,
>>> > >  > easy to read and easy to maintain interface to JDepend's ability
>>> to
>>> > >  > assert dependency rules. I think, based on your example, that we
>>> need
>>> > >  > to implement support for terminating wildcards for both packages
>>> and
>>> > >  > violations.

>>> > >  > --
>>> > >  > ~ Mike Nereson

>> --
>> ~ Mike Nereson