Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
architecture-rules-users
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion wildcards
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mike Nereson  
View profile  
 More options May 14 2008, 8:18 pm
From: "Mike Nereson" <mikenere...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 20:18:09 -0400
Local: Wed, May 14 2008 8:18 pm
Subject: Re: wildcards
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Andrew, I am glad to hear that. Mykola and I are the two developers on
Architecture Rules. He is working hard on the maven plugin. I would have
implemented the wild cards for you already if my main computer's motherboard
didn't crash about 2 months ago. As soon as I replace that part, I'll be
able to knock out that wild card support for you. I am really glad to hear
that you want to use it.

I really really appreciate the feedback. Once we get the wild cards in, and
you are using it, please don't hesitate to send us an update as to how you
are you using architecture rules, how well, or not well its working for you,
and any suggestions that you have to make it better.

Again, thanks.

~ Mike

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Andrew <andrew.i.s...@gmail.com> wrote:

> As further feedback, I'll be applying this promising tool to our
> flagship application's codebase as soon as wildcards are available.
> Any idea when this might be? I appreciate you are probably working
> solo on this project in your spare time, so I don't want to hassle you
> too much.

> Cheers,

> Andrew

> On Apr 24, 5:01 am, "Mike Nereson" <mikenere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sakke, I can't wait to finish implementing wild card support so that
> > you can test it for us ( :

> > Again, thanks for the feedback, for sticking with us, and for
> > reaffirming the need for wild card support.

> > --
> > ~ Mike Nereson

> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Sakke Wiik <sakke.w...@gmail.com>
> wrote:

> > >  I agree with Andrew. We're currently not using this tools because it's
> > >  too complex without package wildcards. More info in my previous post

> http://groups.google.com/group/architecture-rules-users/browse_frm/th...

> > >  cheers,
> > >  Sakke Wiik

> > >  On Apr 22, 4:12 pm, "Mike Nereson" <mikenere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >  > Thanks for the feedback, Andrew. I can appreciate your example.

> > >  > The whole reason for this project was to create a clean and simple,
> > >  > easy to read and easy to maintain interface to JDepend's ability to
> > >  > assert dependency rules. I think, based on your example, that we
> need
> > >  > to implement support for terminating wildcards for both packages and
> > >  > violations.

> > >  > --
> > >  > ~ Mike Nereson

--
~ Mike Nereson

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google