On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Mike Nereson <mikenere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew. Its temporary. Hopefully up today or tomorrow. Sorry about that.

> No progress on the wild cards. I am back on my computer though, so I will
> see if I can start them this weekend.

> Thanks for hanging in there with us.

> ~ Mike Nereson

> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Andrew Swan <andrew.i.s...@gmail.com>
> wrote:

>> Hi Mike,

>> Just checking in to see how wildcards are going; I went to the web site
>> but got a 404 error at this URL:

>> http://www.72miles.com/architecturerules

>> Is the site just down temporarily?

>> Andrew

>> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Mike Nereson <mikenere...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:

>>> Andrew, I am glad to hear that. Mykola and I are the two developers on
>>> Architecture Rules. He is working hard on the maven plugin. I would have
>>> implemented the wild cards for you already if my main computer's motherboard
>>> didn't crash about 2 months ago. As soon as I replace that part, I'll be
>>> able to knock out that wild card support for you. I am really glad to hear
>>> that you want to use it.

>>> I really really appreciate the feedback. Once we get the wild cards in,
>>> and you are using it, please don't hesitate to send us an update as to how
>>> you are you using architecture rules, how well, or not well its working for
>>> you, and any suggestions that you have to make it better.

>>> Again, thanks.

>>> ~ Mike

>>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Andrew <andrew.i.s...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>> As further feedback, I'll be applying this promising tool to our
>>>> flagship application's codebase as soon as wildcards are available.
>>>> Any idea when this might be? I appreciate you are probably working
>>>> solo on this project in your spare time, so I don't want to hassle you
>>>> too much.

>>>> Cheers,

>>>> Andrew

>>>> On Apr 24, 5:01 am, "Mike Nereson" <mikenere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Sakke, I can't wait to finish implementing wild card support so that
>>>> > you can test it for us ( :

>>>> > Again, thanks for the feedback, for sticking with us, and for
>>>> > reaffirming the need for wild card support.

>>>> > --
>>>> > ~ Mike Nereson

>>>> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Sakke Wiik <sakke.w...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:

>>>> > >  I agree with Andrew. We're currently not using this tools because
>>>> it's
>>>> > >  too complex without package wildcards. More info in my previous
>>>> post

>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/architecture-rules-users/browse_frm/th.
>>>> ..

>>>> > >  cheers,
>>>> > >  Sakke Wiik

>>>> > >  On Apr 22, 4:12 pm, "Mike Nereson" <mikenere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >  > Thanks for the feedback, Andrew. I can appreciate your example.

>>>> > >  > The whole reason for this project was to create a clean and
>>>> simple,
>>>> > >  > easy to read and easy to maintain interface to JDepend's ability
>>>> to
>>>> > >  > assert dependency rules. I think, based on your example, that we
>>>> need
>>>> > >  > to implement support for terminating wildcards for both packages
>>>> and
>>>> > >  > violations.

>>>> > >  > --
>>>> > >  > ~ Mike Nereson

>>> --
>>> ~ Mike Nereson