CITES Suspends Trade of 7 Nations

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Barry K. MacKay

unread,
Jul 27, 2012, 8:04:54 AM7/27/12
to ar-...@googlegroups.com


7 Nations Face Sanctions over Endangered Species
by Naharnet Newsdesk 6 hours ago


Seven nations may lose their ability to legally trade tens of thousands
of wildlife species after U.N. conservation delegates agreed Thursday to
penalize them for lacking tough regulations or failing to report on
their wildlife trade.

The suspensions against the seven nations - Comoros, Guinea-Bissau,
Paraguay, Nepal, Rwanda, Solomon Islands and Syria - were approved by
consensus among the delegates and would take effect Oct. 1.

They would prevent the countries from legally trading in any of the
35,000 species regulated by the 175-nation Convention on International
Trade in Endangered Species, said Juan Carlos Vasquez, a spokesman for
the U.N. office that administers the treaty.

Delegations to the weeklong meeting of CITES, a treaty overseen by the
U.N. Environment Program in Geneva, agreed to trade suspensions against
Comoros, Guinea-Bissau, Paraguay and Rwanda based on their lack of
national laws for regulating the lucrative wildlife trade.

The Geneva meeting's attendees also agreed to trade suspensions against
Guinea-Bissau, Nepal, Rwanda, Solomon Islands and Syria based on their
failure to adequately report what they are doing to regulate wildlife
trade, as they are required to do under the CITES treaty.

To avoid the sanctions, and the prospect of losing millions of dollars
in commerce, the seven must now draw up the required legislation or
submit their missing annual reports to CITES by Oct. 1.

According to CITES, about 97 percent of the species it regulates are
commercially traded for food, fuel, forest products, building materials,
clothing, ornaments, health care, religious items, collections, trophy
hunting and other sport. The other 3 percent are generally prohibited.

CITES estimates the regulated global wildlife trade is between $350
million and $530 million a year, or almost $2.2 billion over the five
years from 2006 to 2010. During that time, logging of big leaf mahogany
alone accounted for $168 million in trade. By volume, American black
bears, South American grey foxes, Senegal parrots and Malaysian box
turtles were among the most traded.

TRAFFIC, a wildlife trade monitoring network, estimates that commercial
trade in wildlife has risen sharply from around $160 billion a year in
the early 1990s. But the multibillion-dollar illegal trade in wildlife
is a growing problem, and environmentalists say a big reason is nations'
failure to enact stiff penalties for traffickers or enforce wildlife
laws already on the books.

The delegates are expected to consider on Friday a more controversial
topic: a call to resume the legal ivory trade as a way to stop the
recent rise in elephant poaching in Africa.

That proposal, put forward in a CITES-commissioned report, would set up
a centralized system to allow for the sale of ivory from elephants that
either died naturally or as a result of trophy hunting, or were
considered a threat or culled for ecological reasons.

It is the first time such a proposal has been made since a global ban on
ivory went into effect in 1989. That ban mostly halted widespread
poaching, but in the past decade the problem has worsened owing mainly
to an Asian appetite for ivory chopsticks, statues and jewelry.

The rise in rhino poaching also is on the agenda.

Experts rank wildlife smuggling among the top aims of criminal networks,
along with drugs and human trafficking. CITES says wildlife crime
remains poorly studied, but it says international estimates of the scale
of illegal wildlife trade range from between $16 billion and $27 billion
a year.

Tiger parts, elephant ivory, rhino horn and exotic birds and reptiles
are among the most trafficked items. To fight it, CITES has formed a
consortium with Interpol, the U.N. office on drugs and crime, the World
Bank and the World Customs Organization.

http://www.naharnet.com/stories/en/47977-7-nations-face-sanctions-over-endan
gered-species


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages