APML.Public.General

I wondered, what current standard or initiative can best be compared with the earlier APML? Tin Can

Its a pity attention wasn't something that came up in the context of the W3C Social Web report:

Give it the shot then :) I'll get a notifier. On Nov 29, 2009, at 11:43 PM, Paul Jones wrote:

Hi Gerard, 2009/11/22 Gérard Dupont <ger.d...@gmail.com> The stream view of APML does make a

Great ! I asked for this synthesis just after reading your mail indeed, I was afraid to miss extra

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:16 PM, <apml-...@googlegroups.com> wrote: Today's Topic

I'm working on a product that should take advantage of some APML stuff. Once I get things working

I saw it, too. The UI for editing your concept preference weights by manually increasing/decreasing

> Gérard, you were saying that you had some ideas about APML going forward? Well my major idea,

Isn't it a good place to try to discuss about semantic-APML ? ---------- Forwarded message ------

Hi Folks, This my 3rd attempt to create a proof of concept that a better social media can be built

Hi Roberto, Due to substantial spam problems, we've had to restrict page modifications to admins

Hi Matthias, I don't really think we know at this stage how much the APML spec will differ, so

Do you mean rdf:about?

Just to let you know there was an interesting APML-related entry in the recent SIOC Data Competition

I think this topic has already been discussed but no string decision have been taken so far. Here is

yeah, what he said ;) lol Ash On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:07 AM, David P. Novakovic <davidnovakovic@

On 30 Sep 2008, at 22:30, Gérard Dupont wrote: Perhaps we could kepe the old "application"

On 19 Sep 2008, at 17:21, Paul Jones wrote: > I'm actually wondering whether the co-ordinate

+1 for me. On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 18:31 +0100, Paul Jones wrote: > Hi Trent, > > > Sorry

Hi everyone, Just wanted to highlight that the BBC has launched a new Radio service that includes

Well, I don't know. I think this is the same problem with head/body tags : depending on your XML

Much good discussion going on, and it's interesting to see the clarification of everyone's

RE: > It might be worth a look at SKOS for this: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-skos-

It is possible for the processing system to go and collect additional metadata for each item, but I

If its a person I'm attending to, then it would be a refinement of a concept - a "concept of

Also, has anything been written up (lately) on the proposed structure for APML extensions? I'm

I hear you guys about KISS. My concern is, as an APML consumer, we're not getting enough value

> but I foresee what Paul > talk about when speaking about parsers that need to download

Dan, Welcome! Looking forward to working with you. Cheers, Tim On Jul 24, 3:38 pm, Dan Becker <dan