--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "API Craft" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to api-craft+...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/api-craft?hl=en.
Thanks Glenn :) didn't think I would get an answer from someone I know! What about the user of the alternate ids?
That's the problem. A transaction has the third party id (what they key off of) and the system has it's own too (sometimes used as confirmation code). One is used in the post and the other in the delete.
I'm following the plural form. Theoretically you could omit the id and GET all transactions in a date time range.
I guess it would be best to disambiguate the 2 and specify auth and ref in the url.. What would you suggest that look like?
Just one. With two ids. One is the internal, one is the external that the 3rd party provided
The record has both after a successful payment. One is the reference provided when trying to make a payment and the other is the transaction id if the payment was successful.
--
Link doesn't seem to work..
It's a payment processor. So not really restful