Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion How do I review cards that I have already reviewed?

Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 00:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: pharmtech <azful...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: ankisrs@googlegroups.com
To: ankisrs@googlegroups.com
Message-ID: <4477063.1082.1309679112881.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqml20>
In-Reply-To: <1ec13036-77b6-46d4-bc78-b42426114cd9@a10g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: How do I review cards that I have already reviewed?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1080_15586012.1309679112879"

------=_Part_1080_15586012.1309679112879
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1081_28214179.1309679112879"

------=_Part_1081_28214179.1309679112879
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Saturday, July 2, 2011 11:37:40 PM UTC-7, Timo Nevalainen wrote:
>
> Howabout intentionally pressing "again" button then? 
> Doesn't that effectively zero the count so you get them again faster. 
>

Yes, that works. But, as described in the document I linked to in my first 
reply, that has problems associated with it *if you're requirements* won't 
tolerate starting over. As mentioned in that document, button-1 multiplier 
(50%) makes it a little better to pull in dates which move too far into the 
future (without going all the way back to new scheduling). But, using 
button-1 (with a multiplier or not) causes you to see the card one more time 
than you wanted to see it. 


------=_Part_1081_28214179.1309679112879
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Saturday, July 2, 2011 11:37:40 PM UTC-7, Timo Nevalainen wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">Howabout intentionally pressing "again" button then?
<br>Doesn't that effectively zero the count so you get them again faster.
<br></blockquote><div><br></div>Yes, that works. But, as described in 
the document I linked to in my first reply, that has problems associated
 with it *if you're requirements* won't tolerate starting over. As 
mentioned in that document, button-1 multiplier (50%) makes it a little 
better to pull in dates which move too far into the future (without 
going all the way back to new scheduling). But, using button-1 (with a 
multiplier or not) causes you to see the card one more time than you 
wanted to see it. <br><br>
------=_Part_1081_28214179.1309679112879--

------=_Part_1080_15586012.1309679112879--