Ok, found the problem by doing a diff on the kernel/.config files.
There were several differences, the main ones being in MS_DOS FAT
support. Fixing those solved the problem.
Mike
On Jun 15, 5:32 pm, Akash Choudhari <
akas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please put the logs onhttp://
pastebin.com/and send the link
>
> - Akash
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:19 PM, M&M stich <
mstic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, binaries from the 2 setups work differently, even though we've
> > maintained them the "same". Something must be different, but I can't figure
> > what. The other interesting thing is the apparent confusion of the 1st and
> > 3rd partitions. The first one 179:1 has only MLO, u-boot.bin and uImage.
> > The 3rd 179:3 has the .jpg files and is the one that is accessible in the
> > working case.
>
> > I do have the full logs, but they are a bit long. Also have bugreport, but
> > that is very long.
> > M
>
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Deva R <
r.deva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> is it like you have two build setups, and binaries from those setups
> >> behave differently on same beagleboard+sd-card?
>
> >> >W/vold ( 859): Volume '/sdcard' already mounted at startup
> >> you would've checked that, you can see in working case, /sdcard is mounted
> >> bit early, but vfat partition is rejected in failure case..
>
> >> i didnt get any ready hints, but complete log (bootargs, kernel traces, FS
> >> boot) will give some clue.
>