Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion More Applications on SDCARD
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Eric F  
View profile  
 More options Oct 27 2009, 5:35 pm
From: Eric F <ericfrie...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 27 2009 5:35 pm
Subject: Re: More Applications on SDCARD
I've followed every single Apps on SD card thread that's ever been on
android-platform AND android-discuss. People act like "this issue has
been hashed out over and over again previously" as a way of dismissing
any communication on this. The truth is the tip of the iceberg has
barely been reached each time.

Now that it is clear that Android 2.0 does not support any kind of
apps on SD and that Google still neglected to hit the send button on
the email saying "512MB isn't really enough guys". We need to revisit
this. We need a complete  list of requirements from OHA that are non
negotiable (as in, a guarantee that a solution meeting those
requirements can be merged into AOSP master). We need the Android
developers responsible for:

vold
Package Installation Manager
All the SD card related settings, setup, etc
Application security model
Possibly someone low level on Dalvik to answer questions on memory
management and process killing in the event of SD card failure
Launcher (we want to gray out unavailable programs)
and we probably need an Android Product Manager (if you have such a
role)

We need these people to join this discussion and make sure at the very
least they put in what OHA requirements are non-negotiable, what
problems they foresee, and optionally ideas on how to go start a final
design.

Let's be serious. Just tell us this will or won't happen so we don't
waste OUR valuable time. Otherwise whatever ends up sounding good here
after a lot of careful design will just be discarded in one sentence
by the above individuals at a later date. I would just like an end to
the hypocrisy. Just say "this isn't going to happen. sorry guys, maybe
next year" if that's what you mean. Otherwise, the people involved
should start collaborating, perhaps a wiki design doc and start making
serious progress on this.

-E

On Oct 22, 12:31 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:

> All right, here are a few hints of things which I think have been
> discussed in the past (though I don't remember whether that was in
> public or not).


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.