I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
Steps (I hope I have them right): sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects are now included in the default manifest) in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh . build/envsetup.sh lunch htc_dream-eng make
At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on the web site as soon as I get a chance.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<j...@android.com> wrote: > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> Steps (I hope I have them right): > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects > are now included in the default manifest) > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh > . build/envsetup.sh > lunch htc_dream-eng > make
> At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further > warning.
repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git - b
cupcake-release
But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
up.
Thanks for all your help
On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
> instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't work
> right.
> JBQ
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<j...@android.com> wrote:
> > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> > Steps (I hope I have them right):
> > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects
> > are now included in the default manifest)
> > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
> > . build/envsetup.sh
> > lunch htc_dream-eng
> > make
> > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
> > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on
> > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> > warning.
> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> warning.
> repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git - b
> cupcake-release
> But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
> branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
> not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
> up.
> Thanks for all your help
> On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
> > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't work
> > right.
> > JBQ
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<j...@android.com>
> wrote:
> > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
> > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects
> > > are now included in the default manifest)
> > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
> > > . build/envsetup.sh
> > > lunch htc_dream-eng
> > > make
> > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
> > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on
> > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> > > warning.
> > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> > warning.
With the current setup, short of doing some manual setup, you'll need
to use the "true" cupcake. The differences between cupcake and
cupcake-release won't make any significant difference here.
If you want to do a manual setup, look at the history in
platform/manifest, grab the change I did recently in cupcake, apply it
manually locally on your cupcake-release manifest (and add
revision="cupcake" to both lines that you're adding).
> repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git - b
> cupcake-release
> But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
> branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
> not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
> up.
> Thanks for all your help
> On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
>> The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
>> instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't work
>> right.
>> JBQ
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<j...@android.com> wrote:
>> > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
>> > Steps (I hope I have them right):
>> > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects
>> > are now included in the default manifest)
>> > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
>> > . build/envsetup.sh
>> > lunch htc_dream-eng
>> > make
>> > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
>> > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on
>> > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
>> > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> > warning.
>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> warning.
> repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git - b
> cupcake-release
> But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
> branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
> not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
> up.
> Thanks for all your help
> On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
> > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't work
> > right.
> > JBQ
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<j...@android.com> wrote:
> > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
> > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects
> > > are now included in the default manifest)
> > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
> > > . build/envsetup.sh
> > > lunch htc_dream-eng
> > > make
> > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
> > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on
> > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> > > warning.
> > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> > warning.
> > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
> > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
> > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
> > up.
> > Thanks for all your help
> > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
> > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't work
> > > right.
> > > JBQ
> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<j...@android.com> wrote:
> > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
> > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects
> > > > are now included in the default manifest)
> > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
> > > > . build/envsetup.sh
> > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
> > > > make
> > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
> > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on
> > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> > > > warning.
> > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> > > warning.
You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
complete.
I submitted a patch for this some time ago: https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
also be compiled from source.
On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
> > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
> > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
> > up.
> > Thanks for all your help
> > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
> > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't work
> > > right.
> > > JBQ
> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<j...@android.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
> > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects
> > > > are now included in the default manifest)
> > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
> > > > . build/envsetup.sh
> > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
> > > > make
> > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
> > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on
> > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> > > > warning.
> > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> > > warning.
Cupcake is the "mainline" cupcake codeline, cupcake-release is closer
to what shipped on consumer devices (their current states are close to
SDK-1.5r3 and CRC01, respectively). The difference between them isn't
large.
We recommend that OEMs shipping consumer devices do so from the
cupcake-release branch, but for development purposes you can use
either, and if you want to play with the code on dream right now the
only codelines that are configured out of the box to do so are
cupcake, donut and master. Most probably, future ancillary codelines
will also have that, but for now that's the current setup.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Johan de Koning<ikbennu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I did the repo init and sync again this time with the cupcake branch
> repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git - b
> cupcake
> This version also contains the vendor/htc/dream-open.
> So does this mean that cupcake is for the device? And cupcake-release
> for....?
> On 23 jul, 22:50, Johan de Koning <ikbennu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What do you mean with sync cupcake? From this threadhttp://groups.google.com/group/android-platform/browse_thread/thread/...
>> I though that the cupcake-release is the branch for the devices. So
>> what I did when initializing the branch is
>> repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git - b
>> cupcake-release
>> But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
>> branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
>> not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
>> up.
>> Thanks for all your help
>> On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
>> > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
>> > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't work
>> > right.
>> > JBQ
>> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<j...@android.com> wrote:
>> > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
>> > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
>> > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects
>> > > are now included in the default manifest)
>> > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
>> > > . build/envsetup.sh
>> > > lunch htc_dream-eng
>> > > make
>> > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
>> > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on
>> > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
>> > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> > > warning.
>> > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> > warning.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Johan de Koning<ikbennu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
> complete.
> I submitted a patch for this some time ago: https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 > But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
> also be compiled from source.
> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dont you need to add
>> > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
>> > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
>> > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
>> > up.
>> > Thanks for all your help
>> > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
>> > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
>> > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't work
>> > > right.
>> > > JBQ
>> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<j...@android.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
>> > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
>> > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects
>> > > > are now included in the default manifest)
>> > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
>> > > > . build/envsetup.sh
>> > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
>> > > > make
>> > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
>> > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on
>> > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
>> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> > > > warning.
>> > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> > > warning.
> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
> complete.
> I submitted a patch for this some time ago:https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 > But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
> also be compiled from source.
> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
> > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
> > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
> > > up.
> > > Thanks for all your help
> > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
> > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't work
> > > > right.
> > > > JBQ
> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<j...@android.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
> > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects
> > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
> > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
> > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
> > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
> > > > > make
> > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
> > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on
> > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> > > > > warning.
> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> > > > warning.
> Is the SdkSetup package not needed anymore (and is it still inside the
> git source tree)?
> On 23 jul, 23:20, Johan de Koning <ikbennu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
> > files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
> > complete.
> > I submitted a patch for this some time ago:
> https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 > > But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
> > needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
> > also be compiled from source.
> > On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
> > > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
> > > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
> > > > up.
> > > > Thanks for all your help
> > > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> > > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
> > > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't
> work
> > > > > right.
> > > > > JBQ
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<
> j...@android.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> > > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
> > > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary
> projects
> > > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
> > > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
> > > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
> > > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
> > > > > > make
> > > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
> > > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions
> on
> > > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> > > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
> private
> > > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
> further
> > > > > > warning.
> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
> further
> > > > > warning.
The SdkSetup also makes it possible to accept/make calls (don't know
exactly if it was making calls or receiving calls). Some provisioning
flash will be set.
There is new OTAProvisioningClient project which could do probally the
same (looking at the description) but there are no commits inside this
project
On 23 jul, 23:31, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> SdkSetup in the first boot set things up like .. home key confugurations ..
> which allowed long homekey press .. not sure if it is still needed
> -Dan
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Johan de Koning <ikbennu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > Is the SdkSetup package not needed anymore (and is it still inside the
> > git source tree)?
> > On 23 jul, 23:20, Johan de Koning <ikbennu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
> > > files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
> > > complete.
> > > I submitted a patch for this some time ago:
> >https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 > > > But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
> > > needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
> > > also be compiled from source.
> > > On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
> > > > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
> > > > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
> > > > > up.
> > > > > Thanks for all your help
> > > > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> > > > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
> > > > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't
> > work
> > > > > > right.
> > > > > > JBQ
> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<
> > j...@android.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> > > > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
> > > > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary
> > projects
> > > > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
> > > > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
> > > > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
> > > > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
> > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
> > > > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions
> > on
> > > > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> > > > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
> > private
> > > > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
> > further
> > > > > > > warning.
> > > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
> > further
> > > > > > warning.
That's yet another orthogonal issue. Yeah, that kind of hack is still
needed. I've been wishing to get this fixed just about forever, just
never found time to come up with an acceptable solution.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Johan de Koning<ikbennu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the SdkSetup package not needed anymore (and is it still inside the
> git source tree)?
> On 23 jul, 23:20, Johan de Koning <ikbennu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
>> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
>> complete.
>> I submitted a patch for this some time ago:https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 >> But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
>> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
>> also be compiled from source.
>> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
>> > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
>> > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
>> > > up.
>> > > Thanks for all your help
>> > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
>> > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
>> > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't work
>> > > > right.
>> > > > JBQ
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<j...@android.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
>> > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
>> > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects
>> > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
>> > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
>> > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
>> > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
>> > > > > make
>> > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
>> > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on
>> > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
>> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> > > > > warning.
>> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> > > > warning.
> That's yet another orthogonal issue. Yeah, that kind of hack is still
> needed. I've been wishing to get this fixed just about forever, just
> never found time to come up with an acceptable solution.
> JBQ
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Johan de Koning<ikbennu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is the SdkSetup package not needed anymore (and is it still inside the
> > git source tree)?
> > On 23 jul, 23:20, Johan de Koning <ikbennu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
> >> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
> >> complete.
> >> I submitted a patch for this some time ago:https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 > >> But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
> >> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
> >> also be compiled from source.
> >> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
> >> > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
> >> > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
> >> > > up.
> >> > > Thanks for all your help
> >> > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> >> > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
> >> > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't work
> >> > > > right.
> >> > > > JBQ
> >> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<j...@android.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> >> > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
> >> > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects
> >> > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
> >> > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
> >> > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
> >> > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
> >> > > > > make
> >> > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
> >> > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on
> >> > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> >> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> >> > > > > warning.
> >> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> >> > > > warning.
> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> warning.
BTW, thanks for all the interest in getting the Android Open-Source
Project to run on Dream. I'm planning to improve the support as time
goes, and the recent manifest change is just a beginning. I'm going to
plug process holes as time goes, and my end goal is get to a state
where it's possible to build an actually usable and fully functional
system image from the open-source tree.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Johan de Koning<ikbennu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW about the SdkSetup. I was mistaken. It is still part of the
> source. Under developmen/apps
> On 23 jul, 23:39, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
>> That's yet another orthogonal issue. Yeah, that kind of hack is still
>> needed. I've been wishing to get this fixed just about forever, just
>> never found time to come up with an acceptable solution.
>> JBQ
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Johan de Koning<ikbennu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Is the SdkSetup package not needed anymore (and is it still inside the
>> > git source tree)?
>> > On 23 jul, 23:20, Johan de Koning <ikbennu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
>> >> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
>> >> complete.
>> >> I submitted a patch for this some time ago:https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 >> >> But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
>> >> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
>> >> also be compiled from source.
>> >> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
>> >> > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
>> >> > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
>> >> > > up.
>> >> > > Thanks for all your help
>> >> > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
>> >> > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't work
>> >> > > > right.
>> >> > > > JBQ
>> >> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<j...@android.com>
>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
>> >> > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
>> >> > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary projects
>> >> > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
>> >> > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
>> >> > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
>> >> > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
>> >> > > > > make
>> >> > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
>> >> > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions on
>> >> > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
>> >> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> >> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> >> > > > > warning.
>> >> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> >> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> >> > > > warning.
>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> warning.
> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
> complete.
> I submitted a patch for this some time ago:
> https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 > But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
> also be compiled from source.
> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dont you need to add
> > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
> > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
> > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
> > > up.
> > > Thanks for all your help
> > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
> > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't work
> > > > right.
> > > > JBQ
> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<
> j...@android.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
> > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary
> projects
> > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
> > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
> > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
> > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
> > > > > make
> > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
> > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions
> on
> > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
> further
> > > > > warning.
> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
> further
> > > > warning.
make: *** No rule to make target
`vendor/htc/dream-open/proprietary/libOmxCore.so', needed by
`out/target/product/dream-open/obj/lib/libOmxCore.so'. Stop.
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c: In function
'btk_DCR_assignImageROI':
external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:238: warning: signed and
unsigned type in conditional expression
external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:239: warning: signed and
unsigned type in conditional expression
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hmm .. isn't all public commits to be made against master only ??
> -Dan
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Johan de Koning <ikbennu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
>> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
>> complete.
>> I submitted a patch for this some time ago:
>> https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 >> But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
>> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
>> also be compiled from source.
>> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dont you need to add
>> > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
>> > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
>> > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
>> > > up.
>> > > Thanks for all your help
>> > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
>> > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
>> > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't
>> work
>> > > > right.
>> > > > JBQ
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru<
>> j...@android.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
>> > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
>> > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary
>> projects
>> > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
>> > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
>> > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
>> > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
>> > > > > make
>> > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
>> > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions
>> on
>> > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
>> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
>> private
>> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
>> further
>> > > > > warning.
>> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
>> further
>> > > > warning.
In general, given the current process, yes, we (Google) are only
equipped to accept contributions done against master.
vendor/htc/dream-open (formerly known as vendor/htc/dream) was
special, in that it didn't actually exist on Google's internal
servers. That meant that work on it had to happen directly in the
open, so that contributing against any of its branches wasn't
necessarily unreasonable (but it wasn't ideal). It also meant that it
was grossly unmaintained and entirely untested.
I want to get out of that mode and turn Dream into a reliable device
for framework development in the android open-source project.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka<danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hmm .. isn't all public commits to be made against master only ??
> -Dan
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Johan de Koning <ikbennu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
>> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
>> complete.
>> I submitted a patch for this some time ago:
>> https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 >> But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
>> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
>> also be compiled from source.
>> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dont you need to add
>> > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
>> > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
>> > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
>> > > up.
>> > > Thanks for all your help
>> > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
>> > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
>> > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't
>> > > > work
>> > > > right.
>> > > > JBQ
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste
>> > > Queru<j...@android.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
>> > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
>> > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary
>> > > > > projects
>> > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
>> > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
>> > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
>> > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
>> > > > > make
>> > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
>> > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions
>> > > > > on
>> > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
>> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
>> > > > > private
>> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
>> > > > > further
>> > > > > warning.
>> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
>> > > > further
>> > > > warning.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka<danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> without any changes ..
> the following build error on cupcake ..
> make: *** No rule to make target
> `vendor/htc/dream-open/proprietary/libOmxCore.so', needed by
> `out/target/product/dream-open/obj/lib/libOmxCore.so'. Stop.
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c: In function
> 'btk_DCR_assignImageROI':
> external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:238: warning: signed and
> unsigned type in conditional expression
> external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:239: warning: signed and
> unsigned type in conditional expression
> -Dan
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> hmm .. isn't all public commits to be made against master only ??
>> -Dan
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Johan de Koning <ikbennu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
>>> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
>>> complete.
>>> I submitted a patch for this some time ago:
>>> https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 >>> But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
>>> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
>>> also be compiled from source.
>>> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Dont you need to add
>>> > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So which
>>> > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it is
>>> > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear this
>>> > > up.
>>> > > Thanks for all your help
>>> > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
>>> > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
>>> > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't
>>> > > > work
>>> > > > right.
>>> > > > JBQ
>>> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste
>>> > > Queru<j...@android.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
>>> > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
>>> > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary
>>> > > > > projects
>>> > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
>>> > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
>>> > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
>>> > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
>>> > > > > make
>>> > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate the
>>> > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the instructions
>>> > > > > on
>>> > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
>>> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
>>> > > > > private
>>> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
>>> > > > > further
>>> > > > > warning.
>>> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>>> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
>>> > > > further
>>> > > > warning.
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka<danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > without any changes ..
> > the following build error on cupcake ..
> > make: *** No rule to make target
> > `vendor/htc/dream-open/proprietary/libOmxCore.so', needed by
> > `out/target/product/dream-open/obj/lib/libOmxCore.so'. Stop.
> > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c: In function
> > 'btk_DCR_assignImageROI':
> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:238: warning: signed
> and
> > unsigned type in conditional expression
> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:239: warning: signed
> and
> > unsigned type in conditional expression
> > -Dan
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> hmm .. isn't all public commits to be made against master only ??
> >> -Dan
> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Johan de Koning <ikbennu...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
> >>> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
> >>> complete.
> >>> I submitted a patch for this some time ago:
> >>> https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 > >>> But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
> >>> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
> >>> also be compiled from source.
> >>> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Dont you need to add
> >>> > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So
> which
> >>> > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it
> is
> >>> > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear
> this
> >>> > > up.
> >>> > > Thanks for all your help
> >>> > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> >>> > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
> >>> > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't
> >>> > > > work
> >>> > > > right.
> >>> > > > JBQ
> >>> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste
> >>> > > Queru<j...@android.com>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> >>> > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
> >>> > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary
> >>> > > > > projects
> >>> > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
> >>> > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
> >>> > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
> >>> > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
> >>> > > > > make
> >>> > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate
> the
> >>> > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the
> instructions
> >>> > > > > on
> >>> > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> >>> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
> >>> > > > > private
> >>> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
> >>> > > > > further
> >>> > > > > warning.
> >>> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
> private
> >>> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
> >>> > > > further
> >>> > > > warning.
> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> warning.
Yeah, looks like those were extracted with an older version of the
script (more than 3 months old), going back to the time when
libOmxCore.so wasn't being extracted.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:57 PM, dan raaka<danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> well not quite, but I just copied over the files that I had extracted a
> while ago.
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com>
> wrote:
>> Did you run extract-files.sh ?
>> JBQ
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka<danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > without any changes ..
>> > the following build error on cupcake ..
>> > make: *** No rule to make target
>> > `vendor/htc/dream-open/proprietary/libOmxCore.so', needed by
>> > `out/target/product/dream-open/obj/lib/libOmxCore.so'. Stop.
>> > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c: In function
>> > 'btk_DCR_assignImageROI':
>> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:238: warning: signed
>> > and
>> > unsigned type in conditional expression
>> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:239: warning: signed
>> > and
>> > unsigned type in conditional expression
>> > -Dan
>> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> hmm .. isn't all public commits to be made against master only ??
>> >> -Dan
>> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Johan de Koning <ikbennu...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
>> >>> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
>> >>> complete.
>> >>> I submitted a patch for this some time ago:
>> >>> https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 >> >>> But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is not
>> >>> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
>> >>> also be compiled from source.
>> >>> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > Dont you need to add
>> >>> > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So
>> >>> > > which
>> >>> > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake it
>> >>> > > is
>> >>> > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear
>> >>> > > this
>> >>> > > up.
>> >>> > > Thanks for all your help
>> >>> > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
>> >>> > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
>> >>> > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something doesn't
>> >>> > > > work
>> >>> > > > right.
>> >>> > > > JBQ
>> >>> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste
>> >>> > > Queru<j...@android.com>
>> >>> > > wrote:
>> >>> > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
>> >>> > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
>> >>> > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary
>> >>> > > > > projects
>> >>> > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
>> >>> > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
>> >>> > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
>> >>> > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
>> >>> > > > > make
>> >>> > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll replicate
>> >>> > > > > the
>> >>> > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the
>> >>> > > > > instructions
>> >>> > > > > on
>> >>> > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
>> >>> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
>> >>> > > > > private
>> >>> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
>> >>> > > > > further
>> >>> > > > > warning.
>> >>> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
>> >>> > > > private
>> >>> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
>> >>> > > > further
>> >>> > > > warning.
>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> warning.
> Yeah, looks like those were extracted with an older version of the
> script (more than 3 months old), going back to the time when
> libOmxCore.so wasn't being extracted.
> JBQ
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:57 PM, dan raaka<danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > well not quite, but I just copied over the files that I had extracted a
> > while ago.
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com>
> > wrote:
> >> Did you run extract-files.sh ?
> >> JBQ
> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka<danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > without any changes ..
> >> > the following build error on cupcake ..
> >> > make: *** No rule to make target
> >> > `vendor/htc/dream-open/proprietary/libOmxCore.so', needed by
> >> > `out/target/product/dream-open/obj/lib/libOmxCore.so'. Stop.
> >> > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> >> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c: In function
> >> > 'btk_DCR_assignImageROI':
> >> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:238: warning: signed
> >> > and
> >> > unsigned type in conditional expression
> >> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:239: warning: signed
> >> > and
> >> > unsigned type in conditional expression
> >> > -Dan
> >> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> hmm .. isn't all public commits to be made against master only ??
> >> >> -Dan
> >> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Johan de Koning <
> ikbennu...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the extract-
> >> >>> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
> >> >>> complete.
> >> >>> I submitted a patch for this some time ago:
> >> >>> https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 > >> >>> But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is
> not
> >> >>> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
> >> >>> also be compiled from source.
> >> >>> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > Dont you need to add
> >> >>> > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So
> >> >>> > > which
> >> >>> > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake
> it
> >> >>> > > is
> >> >>> > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can clear
> >> >>> > > this
> >> >>> > > up.
> >> >>> > > Thanks for all your help
> >> >>> > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
> >> >>> > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something
> doesn't
> >> >>> > > > work
> >> >>> > > > right.
> >> >>> > > > JBQ
> >> >>> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste
> >> >>> > > Queru<j...@android.com>
> >> >>> > > wrote:
> >> >>> > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> >> >>> > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
> >> >>> > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the necessary
> >> >>> > > > > projects
> >> >>> > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
> >> >>> > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
> >> >>> > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
> >> >>> > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
> >> >>> > > > > make
> >> >>> > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll
> replicate
> >> >>> > > > > the
> >> >>> > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the
> >> >>> > > > > instructions
> >> >>> > > > > on
> >> >>> > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> >> >>> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
> >> >>> > > > > private
> >> >>> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with
> no
> >> >>> > > > > further
> >> >>> > > > > warning.
> >> >>> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
> >> >>> > > > private
> >> >>> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
> >> >>> > > > further
> >> >>> > > > warning.
> >> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> >> warning.
> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> warning.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:18 PM, dan raaka<danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hoping someone will post those missing file for me to download ..!!
> -Dan
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com>
> wrote:
>> Yeah, looks like those were extracted with an older version of the
>> script (more than 3 months old), going back to the time when
>> libOmxCore.so wasn't being extracted.
>> JBQ
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:57 PM, dan raaka<danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > well not quite, but I just copied over the files that I had extracted a
>> > while ago.
>> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Did you run extract-files.sh ?
>> >> JBQ
>> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka<danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > without any changes ..
>> >> > the following build error on cupcake ..
>> >> > make: *** No rule to make target
>> >> > `vendor/htc/dream-open/proprietary/libOmxCore.so', needed by
>> >> > `out/target/product/dream-open/obj/lib/libOmxCore.so'. Stop.
>> >> > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> >> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c: In function
>> >> > 'btk_DCR_assignImageROI':
>> >> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:238: warning:
>> >> > signed
>> >> > and
>> >> > unsigned type in conditional expression
>> >> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:239: warning:
>> >> > signed
>> >> > and
>> >> > unsigned type in conditional expression
>> >> > -Dan
>> >> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> hmm .. isn't all public commits to be made against master only ??
>> >> >> -Dan
>> >> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Johan de Koning
>> >> >> <ikbennu...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the
>> >> >>> extract-
>> >> >>> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
>> >> >>> complete.
>> >> >>> I submitted a patch for this some time ago:
>> >> >>> https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 >> >> >>> But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which is
>> >> >>> not
>> >> >>> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and can
>> >> >>> also be compiled from source.
>> >> >>> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> > Dont you need to add
>> >> >>> > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project. So
>> >> >>> > > which
>> >> >>> > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is cupcake
>> >> >>> > > it
>> >> >>> > > is
>> >> >>> > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can
>> >> >>> > > clear
>> >> >>> > > this
>> >> >>> > > up.
>> >> >>> > > Thanks for all your help
>> >> >>> > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
>> >> >>> > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something
>> >> >>> > > > doesn't
>> >> >>> > > > work
>> >> >>> > > > right.
>> >> >>> > > > JBQ
>> >> >>> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste
>> >> >>> > > Queru<j...@android.com>
>> >> >>> > > wrote:
>> >> >>> > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
>> >> >>> > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
>> >> >>> > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the
>> >> >>> > > > > necessary
>> >> >>> > > > > projects
>> >> >>> > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
>> >> >>> > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
>> >> >>> > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
>> >> >>> > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
>> >> >>> > > > > make
>> >> >>> > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll
>> >> >>> > > > > replicate
>> >> >>> > > > > the
>> >> >>> > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the
>> >> >>> > > > > instructions
>> >> >>> > > > > on
>> >> >>> > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
>> >> >>> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
>> >> >>> > > > > private
>> >> >>> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with
>> >> >>> > > > > no
>> >> >>> > > > > further
>> >> >>> > > > > warning.
>> >> >>> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
>> >> >>> > > > private
>> >> >>> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with
>> >> >>> > > > no
>> >> >>> > > > further
>> >> >>> > > > warning.
>> >> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> >> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> >> warning.
>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> warning.
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:18 PM, dan raaka<danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I hoping someone will post those missing file for me to download ..!!
> > -Dan
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com>
> > wrote:
> >> Yeah, looks like those were extracted with an older version of the
> >> script (more than 3 months old), going back to the time when
> >> libOmxCore.so wasn't being extracted.
> >> JBQ
> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:57 PM, dan raaka<danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > well not quite, but I just copied over the files that I had extracted
> a
> >> > while ago.
> >> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> Did you run extract-files.sh ?
> >> >> JBQ
> >> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka<danra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> > without any changes ..
> >> >> > the following build error on cupcake ..
> >> >> > make: *** No rule to make target
> >> >> > `vendor/htc/dream-open/proprietary/libOmxCore.so', needed by
> >> >> > `out/target/product/dream-open/obj/lib/libOmxCore.so'. Stop.
> >> >> > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> >> >> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c: In function
> >> >> > 'btk_DCR_assignImageROI':
> >> >> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:238: warning:
> >> >> > signed
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > unsigned type in conditional expression
> >> >> > external/neven/FaceRecEm/common/src/b_FDSDK/DCR.c:239: warning:
> >> >> > signed
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > unsigned type in conditional expression
> >> >> > -Dan
> >> >> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> hmm .. isn't all public commits to be made against master only ??
> >> >> >> -Dan
> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Johan de Koning
> >> >> >> <ikbennu...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> You are right. Not all the proprietary files are inside the
> >> >> >>> extract-
> >> >> >>> files.sh script. That means that the AndroidBoard.mk is also not
> >> >> >>> complete.
> >> >> >>> I submitted a patch for this some time ago:
> >> >> >>> https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,10501 > >> >> >>> But this patch also downloads the wlan.ko from the device which
> is
> >> >> >>> not
> >> >> >>> needed because it is already part of the dream-open project and
> can
> >> >> >>> also be compiled from source.
> >> >> >>> On 23 jul, 23:02, dan raaka <danra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> > Dont you need to add
> >> >> >>> > > But this release does get the vendor/htc/dream-open project.
> So
> >> >> >>> > > which
> >> >> >>> > > branch to use? Should I use cupcake instead? When it is
> cupcake
> >> >> >>> > > it
> >> >> >>> > > is
> >> >> >>> > > not the same as told in the other discussion. Hope you can
> >> >> >>> > > clear
> >> >> >>> > > this
> >> >> >>> > > up.
> >> >> >>> > > Thanks for all your help
> >> >> >>> > > On 23 jul, 20:25, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> >>> > > > The change has been propagated to donut and master, and the
> >> >> >>> > > > instructions have been updated. Let me know if something
> >> >> >>> > > > doesn't
> >> >> >>> > > > work
> >> >> >>> > > > right.
> >> >> >>> > > > JBQ
> >> >> >>> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste
> >> >> >>> > > Queru<j...@android.com>
> >> >> >>> > > wrote:
> >> >> >>> > > > > I've made some progress to build cupcake for dream.
> >> >> >>> > > > > Steps (I hope I have them right):
> >> >> >>> > > > > sync cupcake (with no local_manifest.xml - all the
> >> >> >>> > > > > necessary
> >> >> >>> > > > > projects
> >> >> >>> > > > > are now included in the default manifest)
> >> >> >>> > > > > in vendor/htc/dream-open, run ./extract-files.sh
> >> >> >>> > > > > . build/envsetup.sh
> >> >> >>> > > > > lunch htc_dream-eng
> >> >> >>> > > > > make
> >> >> >>> > > > > At the moment, this is only valid for cupcake, I'll
> >> >> >>> > > > > replicate
> >> >> >>> > > > > the
> >> >> >>> > > > > setup across to donut and master and I'll update the
> >> >> >>> > > > > instructions
> >> >> >>> > > > > on
> >> >> >>> > > > > the web site as soon as I get a chance.
> >> >> >>> > > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for
> being
> >> >> >>> > > > > private
> >> >> >>> > > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum
> with
> >> >> >>> > > > > no
> >> >> >>> > > > > further
> >> >> >>> > > > > warning.
> >> >> >>> > > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
> >> >> >>> > > > private
> >> >> >>> > > > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with
> >> >> >>> > > > no
> >> >> >>> > > > further
> >> >> >>> > > > warning.
> >> >> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> >> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
> further
> >> >> warning.
> >> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> >> warning.
> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> warning.
