Cool project. At the moment you have to write native code in order to use QT. It might also be interesting to get QT-jambi working, so that people can also write Java code. It would make it easier to use other android APIs without writing your own JNI bridges.
> Cool project. At the moment you have to write native code in order to > use QT. It might also be interesting to get QT-jambi working, so that > people can also write Java code. It would make it easier to use other > android APIs without writing your own JNI bridges.
Hi BogDan, I got your code and compiled. But I found you custom the NDK, in the config using QT_USE_CUSTOM_NDK. could you please open you custom change for NDK.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "android-ndk" group. > To post to this group, send email to android-ndk@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > android-ndk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<android-ndk%2Bunsubscribe@googlegr oups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-ndk?hl=en.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:53 PM, lane guo <lane....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi BogDan, > I got your code and compiled. > But I found you custom the NDK, in the config using QT_USE_CUSTOM_NDK. > could you please open you custom change for NDK.
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "android-ndk" group. >> To post to this group, send email to android-ndk@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> android-ndk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<android-ndk%2Bunsubscribe@googlegr oups.com> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/android-ndk?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "android-ndk" group. > To post to this group, send email to android-ndk@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > android-ndk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<android-ndk%2Bunsubscribe@googlegr oups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-ndk?hl=en.
> I agree. I'm very interested in the project too.
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:53 PM, lane guo <lane....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi BogDan, > > I got your code and compiled. > > But I found you custom the NDK, in the config using QT_USE_CUSTOM_NDK. > > could you please open you custom change for NDK.
> >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "android-ndk" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to android-ndk@googlegroups.com. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> android-ndk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<android-ndk%2Bunsubscribe@googlegr oups.com> > >> . > >> For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/android-ndk?hl=en.
> > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "android-ndk" group. > > To post to this group, send email to android-ndk@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > android-ndk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<android-ndk%2Bunsubscribe@googlegr oups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/android-ndk?hl=en.
I want to port the whole QT (maybe except webkik). I create a support project on google (http://code.google.com/p/android- lighthouse/) there you will find all open issues and tasks. I'll appreciate any help ;-).
Sorry, no deadlines atm.
BogDan,
On Jan 25, 7:58 am, asierra01 <asierr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At some point I will get the code and compile it. > Any open issues ? it is a core port or the whole QT-GUI will be > ported ? > Potential deadlines ?
> I will be interested if C++ libraries like POCO also support > Android. > But Android JVM is not that bad I can live with that.
> I want to port the whole QT (maybe except webkik). > I create a support project on google (http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/) there you will find all open issues and tasks. I'll > appreciate any help ;-).
> Sorry, no deadlines atm.
> BogDan,
> On Jan 25, 7:58 am, asierra01 <asierr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > At some point I will get the code and compile it. > > Any open issues ? it is a core port or the whole QT-GUI will be > > ported ? > > Potential deadlines ?
> > I will be interested if C++ libraries like POCO also support > > Android. > > But Android JVM is not that bad I can live with that.
> How can i run the examples on android emulator? I have compiled Qt > already.
> Regards, > Pasi
> On Jan 26, 8:46 am, BogDan <taipanroma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I want to port the whole QT (maybe except webkik). > > I create a support project on google (http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/) there you will find all open issues and tasks. I'll > > appreciate any help ;-).
> > Sorry, no deadlines atm.
> > BogDan,
> > On Jan 25, 7:58 am, asierra01 <asierr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > At some point I will get the code and compile it. > > > Any open issues ? it is a core port or the whole QT-GUI will be > > > ported ? > > > Potential deadlines ?
> > > I will be interested if C++ libraries like POCO also support > > > Android. > > > But Android JVM is not that bad I can live with that.
Well, I manage to compile QT 4.6.1 on WinMob and ran some of their GUI samples, and I was not impress. They have a qtGUI.dll that is like 9M. I understand if you have a big Desktop app and you want to run it on a PDA, you have no choice, but to use it.
I see the advantage of having the core ported, but the GUI ? I am not impress as they look super solid on a Desktop app. When you have a chance take a look at POCO for core functionality.
I some point I will download your port and compile it to see how it looks.
The core (witch includes QtCore, QtXml, QtNetwork, QtSvg, QtSql) is in a very good shape. Now I'm focus on QtGui and QtMultimedia. The GUI is compiling and running well, it needs a good android like style and you (and I hope not only you) will be very impressed. BTW I just finish the port of QtScript module, now I'm very close to port Declarative UI (also QtWebkit is compiling, but I didn't have time to test it).
Why I'll choose Qt GUI and not Android one? 1. The speed, Qt is more powerful and it's much more faster. 2. The features, just look at http://doc.trolltech.com/4.6/qtgui.html . 3. Declarative UI. 4. The API is very robust and stable. 5. IMHO Qt is written in a superior language. I don't like java :P. I think if you'll ask java about me it will give you the same answer :P. (Ok here I'm jocking). 6. etc.
On Feb 6, 9:17 pm, asierra01 <asierr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, I manage to compileQT4.6.1 on WinMob and ran some of their > GUI samples, and I was not impress. > They have a qtGUI.dll that is like 9M. > I understand if you have a big Desktop app and you want to run it on > a PDA, you have no choice, but to use it.
> I see the advantage of having the core ported, but the GUI ? I am not > impress as they look super solid on a Desktop app. > When you have a chance take a look at POCO for core functionality.
> I some point I will download your port and compile it to see how it > looks.
> The core (witch includes QtCore, QtXml, QtNetwork, QtSvg, QtSql) is in > a very good shape. > Now I'm focus on QtGui and QtMultimedia. The GUI is compiling and > running well, it needs a good android like style and you (and I hope > not only you) will be very impressed. BTW I just finish the port of > QtScript module, now I'm very close to port Declarative UI (also > QtWebkit is compiling, but I didn't have time to test it).
> Why I'll choose Qt GUI and not Android one? > 1. The speed, Qt is more powerful and it's much more faster. > 2. The features, just look athttp://doc.trolltech.com/4.6/qtgui.html > . > 3. Declarative UI. > 4. The API is very robust and stable. > 5. IMHO Qt is written in a superior language. I don't like java :P. I > think if you'll ask java about me it will give you the same answer :P. > (Ok here I'm jocking). > 6. etc.
> On Feb 6, 9:17 pm, asierra01 <asierr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, I manage to compileQT4.6.1 on WinMob and ran some of their > > GUI samples, and I was not impress. > > They have a qtGUI.dll that is like 9M. > > I understand if you have a big Desktop app and you want to run it on > > a PDA, you have no choice, but to use it.
> > I see the advantage of having the core ported, but the GUI ? I am not > > impress as they look super solid on a Desktop app. > > When you have a chance take a look at POCO for core functionality.
> > I some point I will download your port and compile it to see how it > > looks.
> WOW, this sounds to good to be true :) I'll definately have to try > this, thanks!
> On Feb 8, 9:06 pm, BogDan <taipanroma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The core (witch includes QtCore, QtXml, QtNetwork, QtSvg, QtSql) is in > > a very good shape. > > Now I'm focus on QtGui and QtMultimedia. The GUI is compiling and > > running well, it needs a good android like style and you (and I hope > > not only you) will be very impressed. BTW I just finish the port of > > QtScript module, now I'm very close to port Declarative UI (also > > QtWebkit is compiling, but I didn't have time to test it).
> > Why I'll choose Qt GUI and not Android one? > > 1. The speed, Qt is more powerful and it's much more faster. > > 2. The features, just look athttp://doc.trolltech.com/4.6/qtgui.html > > . > > 3. Declarative UI. > > 4. The API is very robust and stable. > > 5. IMHO Qt is written in a superior language. I don't like java :P. I > > think if you'll ask java about me it will give you the same answer :P. > > (Ok here I'm jocking). > > 6. etc.
> > On Feb 6, 9:17 pm, asierra01 <asierr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Well, I manage to compileQT4.6.1 on WinMob and ran some of their > > > GUI samples, and I was not impress. > > > They have a qtGUI.dll that is like 9M. > > > I understand if you have a big Desktop app and you want to run it on > > > a PDA, you have no choice, but to use it.
> > > I see the advantage of having the core ported, but the GUI ? I am not > > > impress as they look super solid on a Desktop app. > > > When you have a chance take a look at POCO for core functionality.
> > > I some point I will download your port and compile it to see how it > > > looks.
