Static AudioTrack vs Native OpenSL
166 views
Skip to first unread message
Stefan Alder
Jun 13, 2011, 5:36:13 PM6/13/11
to andro...@googlegroups.com
Hoping someone familiar with how AudioTrack and OpenSL are implemented
can help-- I'm wondering if it is possible to get as low or lower
latency with native OpenSL as with AudioTrack in static mode.
can help-- I'm wondering if it is possible to get as low or lower
latency with native OpenSL as with AudioTrack in static mode.
Based on my initial experimentation on a Nexus One, static AudioTrack
has lower latency than OpenSL with a simple buffer queue and 1024
sample buffer. I'm using mono 44.1 kHz 16-bit PCM.
Thanks for any info.
Stefan Alder
Jun 15, 2011, 11:38:22 PM6/15/11
to andro...@googlegroups.com
Can anyone confirm that static AudioTrack is faster than native Open
SL simple buffer queue?
SL simple buffer queue?
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages