Message from discussion
Software patents have taken their toll, but what's Google doing?
Received: by 10.68.222.225 with SMTP id qp1mr4164222pbc.8.1346808163418;
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: android-discuss@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.116.38 with SMTP id jt6ls159478pbb.8.gmail; Tue, 04 Sep
2012 18:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.85.135 with SMTP id h7mr3758591paz.41.1346808150119;
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.85.135 with SMTP id h7mr3758590paz.41.1346808150093;
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <tim.men...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com (mail-pb0-f45.google.com [209.85.160.45])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vw9si86198pbc.2.2012.09.04.18.22.30
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of tim.men...@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.45 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.45;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of tim.men...@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=tim.men...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by pbbjt11 with SMTP id jt11so77814pbb.4
for <android-discuss@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type;
bh=FwEeXm7JvHL6OTcXw/HSUQUVm37KhVEGmHrCbv3OBJs=;
b=Ni+G7jbBdOSTcY0KGfeHKHqiKqgNg88uFkFC2msOr7YdCBMwQxqqD02+6aTKhRjoDF
sKG2oY+c+qILQi+ZSglGhFzPWQztZTYmBSxAn+eq/ET+b/b0Mp6hzj8TSv7LcUT2MAfm
vs3JX0QYDcPNg/PRDX7679IHno/Sl003FweiLVFkycVxdRYJ+pq4/sEjwUvaJOOnkPm1
BL2TRKyjUPwHZ6QohTX5AmBH3qjM6aLLvUpneyUxqO/oHpTe9KuMB7gyCG9zVxgT3W/G
doNXH2Z4e8hxgnwB2OywoOJSUnIYU5UpGNwCDso+Kat36n2Y82R9HqeMl5geA/fN5REw
QkrQ==
Received: by 10.66.74.3 with SMTP id p3mr44993626pav.49.1346808149943;
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <tim.men...@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.0.103] (c-98-245-200-5.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [98.245.200.5])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vh7sm226265pbc.22.2012.09.04.18.22.27
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5046A97A.9080...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:23:06 -0600
From: Tim Mensch <tim.men...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Tim Mensch <tim.men...@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: android-discuss@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [android-discuss] Software patents have taken their toll, but
what's Google doing?
References: <65c5bd80-6369-4c1e-b37d-399b0dd06d2f@googlegroups.com> <503F940F.2050...@gmail.com> <62aea4b9-9f56-429e-baad-e409c28a306f@googlegroups.com> <3f97653f-fc69-49df-b359-24ee0cd17bb3@googlegroups.com> <4d6d098b-f2d2-4516-a0c3-7059fd6554af@googlegroups.com> <5044CE5C.7040...@gmail.com> <37e7e3a4-75b8-44dc-895e-1c9af31899d0@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <37e7e3a4-75b8-44dc-895e-1c9af31899d0@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------050909070007030009060104"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050909070007030009060104
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 9/4/2012 8:45 AM, dE wrote:
> On Monday, September 3, 2012 9:05:32 PM UTC+5:30, Tim in Boulder wrote:
>
> Honestly that "differentiation" was mostly awful, but it was what
> they WANTED from a phone OS, and so they chose Android (except
> Nokia, R.I.P. [1]).
>
>
> What customization? Extra apps, a bit different UI, extra
> shortcuts/widgets on the desktops and extra buttons?
Completely custom hardware features. Extra custom APIs for that
hardware. They DISCOURAGE manufacturers from doing that, but that
doesn't mean that they don't.
> Linux market share has remained constant for a long time.
You might be right. But (other than Android) Linux isn't taking over the
world any time soon.
> The primary reason why people use Linux cause it's GPLd software,
that's the primary driving force.
And yet, almost every web/start-up developer I know is using an OS X
laptop. SOME installed Linux on them, but most don't.
> Developers who code for opensource software, have interest in coding;
> it's not about money, it's about the topic. As a result, you get high
> quality code and a lot of them. When you hire people who develop
> solely for money (your average closed source software developer
> working for a company without no contribution or interest in doing
> so), you get stuff like Windows and various other MS products.
And I still use Windows, despite hating the fact that I use Windows,
because it's easier to use and it has software that has features I need.
Free alternatives -- because there's no profit motive -- typically (with
a few notable exceptions) satisfy the developers' needs minimally, and
that's it. If I need something different, or with more sophisticated
features, I'm stuck with the Windows ecosystem.
Tim
--------------050909070007030009060104
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/4/2012 8:45 AM, dE wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:37e7e3a4-75b8-44dc-895e-1c9af31899d0@googlegroups.com"
type="cite">On Monday, September 3, 2012 9:05:32 PM UTC+5:30, Tim
in Boulder wrote:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left:
0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Honestly that
"differentiation" was mostly awful, but it was what they
WANTED from a phone OS, and so they chose Android (except
Nokia, R.I.P. [1]).<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
What customization? Extra apps, a bit different UI, extra
shortcuts/widgets on the desktops and extra buttons?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Completely custom hardware features. Extra custom APIs for that
hardware. They DISCOURAGE manufacturers from doing that, but that
doesn't mean that they don't.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:37e7e3a4-75b8-44dc-895e-1c9af31899d0@googlegroups.com"
type="cite">
<div>Linux market share has remained constant for a long time.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
You might be right. But (other than Android) Linux isn't taking over
the world any time soon.<br>
<br>
> The primary reason why people use Linux cause it's GPLd
software, that's the primary driving force.<br>
<br>
And yet, almost every web/start-up developer I know is using an OS X
laptop. SOME installed Linux on them, but most don't.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:37e7e3a4-75b8-44dc-895e-1c9af31899d0@googlegroups.com"
type="cite">Developers who code for opensource software, have
interest in coding; it's not about money, it's about the topic. As
a result, you get high quality code and a lot of them. When you
hire people who develop solely for money (your average closed
source software developer working for a company without no
contribution or interest in doing so), you get stuff like Windows
and various other MS products.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
And I still use Windows, despite hating the fact that I use Windows,
because it's easier to use and it has software that has features I
need. Free alternatives -- because there's no profit motive --
typically (with a few notable exceptions) satisfy the developers'
needs minimally, and that's it. If I need something different, or
with more sophisticated features, I'm stuck with the Windows
ecosystem.<br>
<br>
Tim<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------050909070007030009060104--