"Cupcake" was the code-name for a development milestone, as well as the name
for the source code branch corresponding to that milestone. Our naming
convention is currently tasty, delicious desserts, similar to how Ubuntu
uses Hardy Heron, Gutsy Gibbon, and the like as their code names.
We didn't think people would find this as amusing as they have, and it got
picked up by the press more widely than we expected. Regardless, "Cupcake"
is now a defunct name, since that milestone is past. Android 1.5 is the
actual name+version for the current Android platform release.
You may also see references to "donut", which is simply the next (current)
milestone.
- Dan
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM, admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com <
Is the next milestone a mayor version, (2.0) or something between? Just
wondering since mayor version releases usually are more feature rich than
bug fixing related.
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Dan Morrill <morri...@google.com> wrote:
> "Cupcake" was the code-name for a development milestone, as well as the
> name for the source code branch corresponding to that milestone. Our naming
> convention is currently tasty, delicious desserts, similar to how Ubuntu
> uses Hardy Heron, Gutsy Gibbon, and the like as their code names.
> We didn't think people would find this as amusing as they have, and it got
> picked up by the press more widely than we expected. Regardless, "Cupcake"
> is now a defunct name, since that milestone is past. Android 1.5 is the
> actual name+version for the current Android platform release.
> You may also see references to "donut", which is simply the next (current)
> milestone.
> - Dan
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM, admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com <
> admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Ivan Soto <ivanso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the next milestone a mayor version, (2.0) or something between? Just
> wondering since mayor version releases usually are more feature rich than
> bug fixing related.
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Dan Morrill <morri...@google.com> wrote:
>> "Cupcake" was the code-name for a development milestone, as well as the
>> name for the source code branch corresponding to that milestone. Our naming
>> convention is currently tasty, delicious desserts, similar to how Ubuntu
>> uses Hardy Heron, Gutsy Gibbon, and the like as their code names.
>> We didn't think people would find this as amusing as they have, and it got
>> picked up by the press more widely than we expected. Regardless, "Cupcake"
>> is now a defunct name, since that milestone is past. Android 1.5 is the
>> actual name+version for the current Android platform release.
>> You may also see references to "donut", which is simply the next (current)
>> milestone.
>> - Dan
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM, admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com <
>> admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> My wife can't take me seriously when I say it.
> It's still early in the cycle for the next milestone, and so a version
> number hasn't yet been assigned.
> - Dan
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Ivan Soto <ivanso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is the next milestone a mayor version, (2.0) or something between? Just
> > wondering since mayor version releases usually are more feature rich than
> > bug fixing related.
> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Dan Morrill <morri...@google.com> wrote:
> >> "Cupcake" was the code-name for a development milestone, as well as the
> >> name for the source code branch corresponding to that milestone. Our naming
> >> convention is currently tasty, delicious desserts, similar to how Ubuntu
> >> uses Hardy Heron, Gutsy Gibbon, and the like as their code names.
> >> We didn't think people would find this as amusing as they have, and it got
> >> picked up by the press more widely than we expected. Regardless, "Cupcake"
> >> is now a defunct name, since that milestone is past. Android 1.5 is the
> >> actual name+version for the current Android platform release.
> >> You may also see references to "donut", which is simply the next (current)
> >> milestone.
> >> - Dan
> >> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM, admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com <
> >> admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>> My wife can't take me seriously when I say it.
> It's still early in the cycle for the next milestone, and so a version
> number hasn't yet been assigned.
> - Dan
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Ivan Soto <ivanso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is the next milestone a mayor version, (2.0) or something between? Just
> > wondering since mayor version releases usually are more feature rich than
> > bug fixing related.
> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Dan Morrill <morri...@google.com> wrote:
> >> "Cupcake" was the code-name for a development milestone, as well as the
> >> name for the source code branch corresponding to that milestone. Our naming
> >> convention is currently tasty, delicious desserts, similar to how Ubuntu
> >> uses Hardy Heron, Gutsy Gibbon, and the like as their code names.
> >> We didn't think people would find this as amusing as they have, and it got
> >> picked up by the press more widely than we expected. Regardless, "Cupcake"
> >> is now a defunct name, since that milestone is past. Android 1.5 is the
> >> actual name+version for the current Android platform release.
> >> You may also see references to "donut", which is simply the next (current)
> >> milestone.
> >> - Dan
> >> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM, admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com <
> >> admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>> My wife can't take me seriously when I say it.
Leaked? I don't think that word means what you think it means.
The tags are in the open source project. Googlers routinely talk about donut
being the next dev tree. The crap about it being 2.0 is unsubstantiated, but
otherwise its public. (Of course, there is still no roadmap - letting the
open source contributors know what the goals are would be cheating. Or
something.)
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:56 AM, MrChaz <mrchazmob...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> The leaked roadmap stuff seem to have donut down as 2.0.
> Out of curiosity are we talking iced or jam? :)
> On May 12, 12:19 am, Dan Morrill <morri...@google.com> wrote:
> > It's still early in the cycle for the next milestone, and so a version
> > number hasn't yet been assigned.
> > - Dan
> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Ivan Soto <ivanso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Is the next milestone a mayor version, (2.0) or something between? Just
> > > wondering since mayor version releases usually are more feature rich
> than
> > > bug fixing related.
> > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Dan Morrill <morri...@google.com>
> wrote:
> > >> "Cupcake" was the code-name for a development milestone, as well as
> the
> > >> name for the source code branch corresponding to that milestone. Our
> naming
> > >> convention is currently tasty, delicious desserts, similar to how
> Ubuntu
> > >> uses Hardy Heron, Gutsy Gibbon, and the like as their code names.
> > >> We didn't think people would find this as amusing as they have, and it
> got
> > >> picked up by the press more widely than we expected. Regardless,
> "Cupcake"
> > >> is now a defunct name, since that milestone is past. Android 1.5 is
> the
> > >> actual name+version for the current Android platform release.
> > >> You may also see references to "donut", which is simply the next
> (current)
> > >> milestone.
> > >> - Dan
> > >> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM, admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com <
> > >> admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >>> My wife can't take me seriously when I say it.
> "Cupcake" was the code-name for a development milestone, as well as the name
> for the source code branch corresponding to that milestone. Our naming
> convention is currently tasty, delicious desserts, similar to how Ubuntu
> uses Hardy Heron, Gutsy Gibbon, and the like as their code names.
> We didn't think people would find this as amusing as they have, and it got
> picked up by the press more widely than we expected. Regardless, "Cupcake"
> is now a defunct name, since that milestone is past. Android 1.5 is the
> actual name+version for the current Android platform release.
> You may also see references to "donut", which is simply the next (current)
> milestone.
> - Dan
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM, admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com <
> "Cupcake" was the code-name for a development milestone, as well as the name
> for the source code branch corresponding to that milestone. Our naming
> convention is currently tasty, delicious desserts, similar to how Ubuntu
> uses Hardy Heron, Gutsy Gibbon, and the like as their code names.
> We didn't think people would find this as amusing as they have, and it got
> picked up by the press more widely than we expected. Regardless, "Cupcake"
> is now a defunct name, since that milestone is past. Android 1.5 is the
> actual name+version for the current Android platform release.
> You may also see references to "donut", which is simply the next (current)
> milestone.
> - Dan
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM, admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com <
> That's sooo American... confusing sweet and fatty with tasty and
> delicious.
> YA
> On May 12, 1:46 am, Dan Morrill <morri...@google.com> wrote:
> > "Cupcake" was the code-name for a development milestone, as well as the
> name
> > for the source code branch corresponding to that milestone. Our naming
> > convention is currently tasty, delicious desserts, similar to how Ubuntu
> > uses Hardy Heron, Gutsy Gibbon, and the like as their code names.
> > We didn't think people would find this as amusing as they have, and it
> got
> > picked up by the press more widely than we expected. Regardless,
> "Cupcake"
> > is now a defunct name, since that milestone is past. Android 1.5 is the
> > actual name+version for the current Android platform release.
> > You may also see references to "donut", which is simply the next
> (current)
> > milestone.
> > - Dan
> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM, admin.androidsl...@googlemail.com <
