Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Google nudity policies question. Is our content approvable or not?

Received: by 10.66.72.73 with SMTP id b9mr4333682pav.9.1346862413399;
        Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.116.38 with SMTP id jt6ls2572815pbb.8.gmail; Wed, 05 Sep
 2012 09:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.86.72 with SMTP id n8mr4743653paz.24.1346862254384;
        Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.86.72 with SMTP id n8mr4743652paz.24.1346862254365;
        Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <magouyaw...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com (mail-pb0-f42.google.com [209.85.160.42])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p7si1088856pby.0.2012.09.05.09.24.14
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of magouyaw...@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.42;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of magouyaw...@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=magouyaw...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id rp8so1989352pbb.1
        for <android-developers@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=WmqN9+/WIMGSOek7KBKifQEhZlPwRAMY3vyzT/JWeWE=;
        b=tw+qvW5CJZw5qSA3Ph+0iVARLs3PkzlzeE2ZTWUlkqliCpcYFHtRG6TivVcexYfcoT
         enEZ8ZaJzHwZfcVl5QkhzftB3Inu11x83UJDorRpEGhJK3UC3gQJASf9Td7cA2sNdIzI
         GWwzp6HZKGmNp4tqoBLU8H2GugJ3Mfz28ebxIKXJTFOGxpg52RliFxwNV3lvIMw2YjVj
         RMzS/YY7h42+pX+NQWxj/zpXYWmR9XSxCdvKEf+fEzc870LpxbR1B0bU/lDw6wjm4u0p
         bbjVZFqqHO3tejRA9xZllTXaMYhs/AxJcXEAUTvJNNo5kt+AFeRw7FrSBrdBOgH2SKB1
         KlIA==
Received: by 10.68.240.7 with SMTP id vw7mr55229730pbc.152.1346862254195; Wed,
 05 Sep 2012 09:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.193.225 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 09:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2dc8bff8-9a35-41ae-b014-0bf83a8e6bb0@googlegroups.com>
References: <92a174b2-b2a8-460c-9ecc-c3a8e09cdb39@googlegroups.com>
 <7f178f14-60c3-49af-9a64-c08794033f25@googlegroups.com> <CAOq06s9EAvj=8VY01_7DsmtJaX1bs4qtrHUvvKrCT+d3TEL...@mail.gmail.com>
 <2dc8bff8-9a35-41ae-b014-0bf83a8e6bb0@googlegroups.com>
From: Justin Anderson <magouyaw...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:23:53 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOq06s8r22GJ=9OzL_Xka13xGYz5Y-jnTZOO69rq_SJGARB...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [android-developers] Re: Google nudity policies question. Is our
 content approvable or not?
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3395a93902bd04c8f6ce57

--047d7b3395a93902bd04c8f6ce57
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>
> I think he was asking if "art" nudity would be accepted in the Play Store,
> then just regular porn-like nudity, which is why he showed an example, but,
> I agree, that this isn't the correct forum for a question like that.
>

Regardless of whether it is classified as "art" nudity or "porn" nudity
there are still underage kids that develop android apps and monitor this
forum and I am still monitoring this forum at work.

In both cases nudity is nudity.  13 year old kids don't care whether they
are looking at art or porn... In both cases it is a picture of a naked
women.  Likewise, my workplace doesn't distinguish between art nudity and
porn nudity.  If someone walked by my desk while that picture was briefly
displayed on my screen and reported it to HR I would have been in just as
much trouble regardless of the type of nudity.

Just the fact that this is a public forum should be enough for the OP to
have shown some constraint...

Thanks,
Justin Anderson
MagouyaWare Developer
http://sites.google.com/site/magouyaware


On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:11 AM, FiltrSoft <kri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think he was asking if "art" nudity would be accepted in the Play Store,
> then just regular porn-like nudity, which is why he showed an example, but,
> I agree, that this isn't the correct forum for a question like that.

--047d7b3395a93902bd04c8f6ce57
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<blockquote style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204=
,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote">I think he was asking if =
&quot;art&quot; nudity would be accepted in the Play=20
Store, then just regular porn-like nudity, which is why he showed an=20
example, but, I agree, that this isn&#39;t the correct forum for a question=
=20
like that.<br></blockquote><br>Regardless of whether it is classified as &q=
uot;art&quot; nudity or &quot;porn&quot; nudity there are still underage ki=
ds that develop android apps and monitor this forum and I am still monitori=
ng this forum at work.<br>

<br>In both cases nudity is nudity.=A0 13 year old kids don&#39;t care whet=
her they are looking at art or porn... In both cases it is a picture of a n=
aked women.=A0 Likewise, my workplace doesn&#39;t distinguish between art n=
udity and porn nudity.=A0 If someone walked by my desk while that picture w=
as briefly displayed on my screen and reported it to HR I would have been i=
n just as much trouble regardless of the type of nudity.<br>

<br>Just the fact that this is a public forum should be enough for the OP t=
o have shown some constraint... <br><br clear=3D"all">
Thanks,<br>
Justin Anderson<br>
MagouyaWare Developer<br>
<a href=3D"http://sites.google.com/site/magouyaware" target=3D"_blank">http=
://sites.google.com/site/magouyaware</a><br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:11 AM, FiltrSo=
ft <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:kri...@gmail.com" target=3D"_bla=
nk">kri...@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_qu=
ote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex=
">

I think he was asking if &quot;art&quot; nudity would be accepted in the Pl=
ay Store, then just regular porn-like nudity, which is why he showed an exa=
mple, but, I agree, that this isn&#39;t the correct forum for a question li=
ke that.</blockquote>

</div><br>

--047d7b3395a93902bd04c8f6ce57--