On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Harri Smått <har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe someone corrects me but it's quite often the case a breakpoint does
> not work unless you have some code there. E.g adding something gibberish;
That's unnecessary, the break point will (or at least should) trigger on
the next curly brace if there is no code to stop on.
Of course, the OP did not clarify that he verified that the code is even
running (via some logging, at least), so for all we know it's his own bug.