Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion An experiment: Sony Xperia S and AOSP
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
jerpelea alin  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options Aug 16 2012, 9:01 am
From: jerpelea alin <jerpe...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 06:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Aug 16 2012 9:01 am
Subject: Re: [android-building] Re: An experiment: Sony Xperia S and AOSP

Hy JBQ
i have prepared localy device tree
i will push ASAP
thanks
Alin

On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 6:18:23 PM UTC+3, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote:

> Hi Andreas,

> I've submitted my skeleton, with the caveat that it's very bare.

> Beware that there's no actual kernel (I've put an empty file in its
> place). My next step is to get the real kernel sources in AOSP and to
> build my own kernel.

> I think the other urgent step is to get a proper BoardConfig.mk in
> there. You probably have something suitable.

> I'm not incredibly worried about recovery (yet). I guess I'm biased,
> since I only work on devices with unlocked bootloaders, so I'm used to
> relying solely on fastboot.

> JBQ

> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Andreas Makris
> <andreas...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote:
> > Hey JBQ,

> > nice challenge you put up here :D
> > I am one of the guys maintaining Sony Devices on CM tree. So this device
> is
> > very common to me. OFC it is a powerful device, but it has some tricky
> stuff
> > in it.
> > For example the recovery is not this useable than a recovery on a Nexus
> > device, so we trigger the recovery boot from boot.img and not from
> > bootloader itself.
> > Some more special stuff is going on here, but all is possible to handle
> ;)

> > So start the skeleton, I am happy to help getting this up and running on
> > AOSP.

> > Best Regards
> > Andreas aka. Bin4ry

> > Am Dienstag, 14. August 2012 22:11:45 UTC+2 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Queru:

> >> TL;DR: For a long while this'll probably only be useful for low-level
> >> engineering, but won't be usable as a daily driver.

> >> In theory, AOSP is designed such that it should be possible to plug in
> >> the files related to additional hardware targets. In practice, that
> >> has never happened.

> >> The short-term goal is to investigate the difference between theory
> >> and practice, on a favorable real-world example, and to see whether
> >> the result is worth the effort. The long-term goal is to try to
> >> eliminate whatever hurdles we find, both the expected and the
> >> unexpected ones.

> >> I expect that we'll need at least a few iterations before that can
> >> become usable as a day-to-day phone, and it's unclear whether that'll
> >> ever happen. There's a reasonable chance that it could be useful for
> >> people working at a lower level, literally several layers below the UI
> >> and applications that everyone is familiar with. If you've seen the
> >> classic Android Architecture diagram, we're going to be in the kernel
> >> and just above it.

> >> I don't want to use the word "supported" because there's no way to
> >> agree on a single unambiguous definition.

> >> JBQ

> >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Artem Russakovskii
> >> <arch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Fantastic. So what's the high level goal here, in layman's terms?
> Does
> >> > the
> >> > future hold direct support in AOSP for building more than just Nexus
> >> > devices? Are you thinking of targeting only a certain subset of
> devices
> >> > (say, ones that satisfy a list of parameters - GSM, unlockable
> >> > bootloader,
> >> > etc)? What about the lack of proprietary drivers (though even the
> Nexus
> >> > phones have this problem, and they're supported by AOSP)?

> >> > On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 12:35:38 PM UTC-7, Jean-Baptiste Queru
> >> > wrote:

> >> >> I'm going to try an experiment.

> >> >> Over time, AOSP has added files related to various hardware targets.
> >> >> We started with just a few scripts on a web page (1.0), then we had
> a
> >> >> git project (Cupcake), then we released some of the exact source
> files
> >> >> that were used on retail flagship devices (Froyo), then distributed
> >> >> proprietary binaries (Gingerbread), then we were able to run on
> >> >> PandaBoard (Ice Cream Sandwich).

> >> >> For a new challenge, I'd like to try to go one step further, and to
> >> >> target some hardware beyond the usual categories. I've added a git
> >> >> project for the Sony LT26, i.e. Xperia S. This seems like a good
> >> >> target: it's a powerful current GSM device, with an unlockable
> >> >> bootloader, from a manufacturer that has always been very friendly
> to
> >> >> AOSP.

> >> >> That git project is currently empty. I'm open to suggestions about
> the
> >> >> best way to populate it. I think I'll start by putting together a
> >> >> skeleton set of makefiles, followed by a kernel. Contributions are
> >> >> strongly encouraged, and there should be more freedom than usual to
> >> >> submit experimental changes since that won't impact the devices that
> >> >> Google is most directly involved in.

> >> >> I don't know how far that'll go, and there are so many unknowns that
> >> >> the only way to know is to try it.

> >> >> As usual, please be very careful about handling any proprietary
> files,
> >> >> for Xperia S or any other device. Don't copy them, use them, or
> >> >> distribute them without an appropriate license. Obviously, don't
> >> >> upload them to AOSP if you don't own them. When in doubt, please ask
> >> >> ahead of time, it's easier to answer an email than to fix things in
> an
> >> >> emergency.

> >> >> JBQ

> >> >> --
> >> >> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> >> >> Technical Lead, Android Open Source Project, Google.

> >> >> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> >> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no
> further
> >> >> warning.

> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Android
> >> > Building" mailing list.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to android-...@googlegroups.com
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > android-buildi...@googlegroups.com
> >> > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/android-building?hl=en

> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> >> Technical Lead, Android Open Source Project, Google.

> >> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> >> warning.

> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Android
> > Building" mailing list.
> > To post to this group, send email to android-...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > android-buildi...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/android-building?hl=en

> --
> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> Technical Lead, Android Open Source Project, Google.

> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> warning.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.