A couple of days back, I created a very simple logo for our group
(it's the one that @amsrb is currently using as an avatar... go to
http://twitter.com/amsrb and click on the avatar in see it in full
size) and I know that some people liked it.
After this, I've also received a proposal from @gabim (here his
proposal: http://gaw.in/amsrb.png) and that made me realize we should
define our logo together.
So... I want you to give your opinion about the existing proposals or
even propose something and let's decide which is the best logo that
will represent us from now on!!!
> A couple of days back, I created a very simple logo for our group
> (it's the one that @amsrb is currently using as an avatar... go to
> http://twitter.com/amsrb and click on the avatar in see it in full
> size) and I know that some people liked it.
> After this, I've also received a proposal from @gabim (here his
> proposal: http://gaw.in/amsrb.png) and that made me realize we should
> define our logo together.
> So... I want you to give your opinion about the existing proposals or
> even propose something and let's decide which is the best logo that
> will represent us from now on!!!
> Op 1 jul 2009, om 11:39 heeft Julio Javier Cicchelli het volgende
> geschreven:
>> Hi there everybody!
>> A couple of days back, I created a very simple logo for our group
>> (it's the one that @amsrb is currently using as an avatar... go to
>> http://twitter.com/amsrb and click on the avatar in see it in full
>> size) and I know that some people liked it.
>> After this, I've also received a proposal from @gabim (here his
>> proposal: http://gaw.in/amsrb.png) and that made me realize we should
>> define our logo together.
>> So... I want you to give your opinion about the existing proposals or
>> even propose something and let's decide which is the best logo that
>> will represent us from now on!!!
> With a draft like this:
> http://gaw.in/amsrb2.png (work in progress, still need to draw the
> lions etc)
> But I think all the gold stuff and lions etc might be a little bit to
> much.
> ow, and it's @gawin ;-)
> Gawin
> On 1 Jul 2009, at 11:47, Klaas Jan Wierenga wrote:
> > +1 for @gabim's avatar!
> > Op 1 jul 2009, om 11:39 heeft Julio Javier Cicchelli het volgende
> > geschreven:
> >> Hi there everybody!
> >> A couple of days back, I created a very simple logo for our group
> >> (it's the one that @amsrb is currently using as an avatar... go to
> >> http://twitter.com/amsrb and click on the avatar in see it in full
> >> size) and I know that some people liked it.
> >> After this, I've also received a proposal from @gabim (here his
> >> proposal: http://gaw.in/amsrb.png) and that made me realize we should
> >> define our logo together.
> >> So... I want you to give your opinion about the existing proposals or
> >> even propose something and let's decide which is the best logo that
> >> will represent us from now on!!!
Thanks for the logo suggestion. I like the draft one better. The ruby
belongs in the logo :)
I'm looking forward to seeing the result of your work in progress.
>> With a draft like this:
>> http://gaw.in/amsrb2.png (work in progress, still need to draw the
>> lions etc)
>> But I think all the gold stuff and lions etc might be a little bit to
>> much.
>> ow, and it's @gawin ;-)
>> Gawin
>> On 1 Jul 2009, at 11:47, Klaas Jan Wierenga wrote:
>> > +1 for @gabim's avatar!
>> > Op 1 jul 2009, om 11:39 heeft Julio Javier Cicchelli het volgende
>> > geschreven:
>> >> Hi there everybody!
>> >> A couple of days back, I created a very simple logo for our group
>> >> (it's the one that @amsrb is currently using as an avatar... go to
>> >> http://twitter.com/amsrb and click on the avatar in see it in full
>> >> size) and I know that some people liked it.
>> >> After this, I've also received a proposal from @gabim (here his
>> >> proposal: http://gaw.in/amsrb.png) and that made me realize we should
>> >> define our logo together.
>> >> So... I want you to give your opinion about the existing proposals or
>> >> even propose something and let's decide which is the best logo that
>> >> will represent us from now on!!!
> Thanks for the logo suggestion. I like the draft one better. The ruby
> belongs in the logo :)
> I'm looking forward to seeing the result of your work in progress.
> Cheers,
> Wes
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Julio Javier
> Cicchelli<javier.cicche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi there!
>> Gawin, I'm so sorry I wrote your twitter account incorrectly.
>> By the way, I like the second one so far. I can imagine with the lions...
>> magnanimous! ;)
>>> With a draft like this:
>>> http://gaw.in/amsrb2.png (work in progress, still need to draw the
>>> lions etc)
>>> But I think all the gold stuff and lions etc might be a little bit to
>>> much.
>>> ow, and it's @gawin ;-)
>>> Gawin
>>> On 1 Jul 2009, at 11:47, Klaas Jan Wierenga wrote:
>>> > +1 for @gabim's avatar!
>>> > Op 1 jul 2009, om 11:39 heeft Julio Javier Cicchelli het volgende
>>> > geschreven:
>>> >> Hi there everybody!
>>> >> A couple of days back, I created a very simple logo for our group
>>> >> (it's the one that @amsrb is currently using as an avatar... go to
>>> >> http://twitter.com/amsrb and click on the avatar in see it in full
>>> >> size) and I know that some people liked it.
>>> >> After this, I've also received a proposal from @gabim (here his
>>> >> proposal: http://gaw.in/amsrb.png) and that made me realize we should
>>> >> define our logo together.
>>> >> So... I want you to give your opinion about the existing proposals or
>>> >> even propose something and let's decide which is the best logo that
>>> >> will represent us from now on!!!
Thx, totally agree with the gold gradient feedback (it doesn't have a
real gold feeling yet)
Perhaps I should check if other materials (aluminium alloy, wood etc)
work better.
>> Thanks for the logo suggestion. I like the draft one better. The ruby
>> belongs in the logo :)
>> I'm looking forward to seeing the result of your work in progress.
>> Cheers,
>> Wes
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Julio Javier
>> Cicchelli<javier.cicche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi there!
>>> Gawin, I'm so sorry I wrote your twitter account incorrectly.
>>> By the way, I like the second one so far. I can imagine with the
>>> lions...
>>> magnanimous! ;)
>>>> With a draft like this:
>>>> http://gaw.in/amsrb2.png (work in progress, still need to draw the
>>>> lions etc)
>>>> But I think all the gold stuff and lions etc might be a little
>>>> bit to
>>>> much.
>>>> ow, and it's @gawin ;-)
>>>> Gawin
>>>> On 1 Jul 2009, at 11:47, Klaas Jan Wierenga wrote:
>>>>> +1 for @gabim's avatar!
>>>>> Op 1 jul 2009, om 11:39 heeft Julio Javier Cicchelli het volgende
>>>>> geschreven:
>>>>>> Hi there everybody!
>>>>>> A couple of days back, I created a very simple logo for our group
>>>>>> (it's the one that @amsrb is currently using as an avatar... go
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/amsrb and click on the avatar in see it in
>>>>>> full
>>>>>> size) and I know that some people liked it.
>>>>>> After this, I've also received a proposal from @gabim (here his
>>>>>> proposal: http://gaw.in/amsrb.png) and that made me realize we
>>>>>> should
>>>>>> define our logo together.
>>>>>> So... I want you to give your opinion about the existing
>>>>>> proposals or
>>>>>> even propose something and let's decide which is the best logo
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> will represent us from now on!!!
> Thx, totally agree with the gold gradient feedback (it doesn't have a
> real gold feeling yet)
> Perhaps I should check if other materials (aluminium alloy, wood etc)
> work better.
> On 1 Jul 2009, at 13:22, FiXato wrote:
>> Hi Gawin,
>> I definitely like http://gaw.in/amsrb2.png !
>> Although the shield's (gold) gradient does not quite match the style
>> of the ruby itself.
>>> Thanks for the logo suggestion. I like the draft one better. The ruby
>>> belongs in the logo :)
>>> I'm looking forward to seeing the result of your work in progress.
>>> Cheers,
>>> Wes
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Julio Javier
>>> Cicchelli<javier.cicche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi there!
>>>> Gawin, I'm so sorry I wrote your twitter account incorrectly.
>>>> By the way, I like the second one so far. I can imagine with the
>>>> lions...
>>>> magnanimous! ;)
>>>>> With a draft like this:
>>>>> http://gaw.in/amsrb2.png (work in progress, still need to draw the
>>>>> lions etc)
>>>>> But I think all the gold stuff and lions etc might be a little
>>>>> bit to
>>>>> much.
>>>>> ow, and it's @gawin ;-)
>>>>> Gawin
>>>>> On 1 Jul 2009, at 11:47, Klaas Jan Wierenga wrote:
>>>>>> +1 for @gabim's avatar!
>>>>>> Op 1 jul 2009, om 11:39 heeft Julio Javier Cicchelli het volgende
>>>>>> geschreven:
>>>>>>> Hi there everybody!
>>>>>>> A couple of days back, I created a very simple logo for our group
>>>>>>> (it's the one that @amsrb is currently using as an avatar... go
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/amsrb and click on the avatar in see it in
>>>>>>> full
>>>>>>> size) and I know that some people liked it.
>>>>>>> After this, I've also received a proposal from @gabim (here his
>>>>>>> proposal: http://gaw.in/amsrb.png) and that made me realize we
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>> define our logo together.
>>>>>>> So... I want you to give your opinion about the existing
>>>>>>> proposals or
>>>>>>> even propose something and let's decide which is the best logo
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> will represent us from now on!!!
> > Thx, totally agree with the gold gradient feedback (it doesn't have a
> > real gold feeling yet)
> > Perhaps I should check if other materials (aluminium alloy, wood etc)
> > work better.
> > On 1 Jul 2009, at 13:22, FiXato wrote:
> >> Hi Gawin,
> >> I definitely like http://gaw.in/amsrb2.png !
> >> Although the shield's (gold) gradient does not quite match the style
> >> of the ruby itself.
> >>> Thanks for the logo suggestion. I like the draft one better. The ruby
> >>> belongs in the logo :)
> >>> I'm looking forward to seeing the result of your work in progress.
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Wes
> >>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Julio Javier
> >>> Cicchelli<javier.cicche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi there!
> >>>> Gawin, I'm so sorry I wrote your twitter account incorrectly.
> >>>> By the way, I like the second one so far. I can imagine with the
> >>>> lions...
> >>>> magnanimous! ;)
> >>>>> With a draft like this:
> >>>>> http://gaw.in/amsrb2.png (work in progress, still need to draw the
> >>>>> lions etc)
> >>>>> But I think all the gold stuff and lions etc might be a little
> >>>>> bit to
> >>>>> much.
> >>>>> ow, and it's @gawin ;-)
> >>>>> Gawin
> >>>>> On 1 Jul 2009, at 11:47, Klaas Jan Wierenga wrote:
> >>>>>> +1 for @gabim's avatar!
> >>>>>> Op 1 jul 2009, om 11:39 heeft Julio Javier Cicchelli het volgende
> >>>>>> geschreven:
> >>>>>>> Hi there everybody!
> >>>>>>> A couple of days back, I created a very simple logo for our group
> >>>>>>> (it's the one that @amsrb is currently using as an avatar... go
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> http://twitter.com/amsrb and click on the avatar in see it in
> >>>>>>> full
> >>>>>>> size) and I know that some people liked it.
> >>>>>>> After this, I've also received a proposal from @gabim (here his
> >>>>>>> proposal: http://gaw.in/amsrb.png) and that made me realize we
> >>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>> define our logo together.
> >>>>>>> So... I want you to give your opinion about the existing
> >>>>>>> proposals or
> >>>>>>> even propose something and let's decide which is the best logo
> >>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>> will represent us from now on!!!
|
