Received: by 10.216.142.92 with SMTP id h70mr265479wej.0.1307894785273;
        Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: altnet-hispano@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.227.9.96 with SMTP id k32ls1589582wbk.2.gmail; Sun, 12 Jun
 2011 09:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.127.212 with SMTP id h20mr293611wbs.7.1307894784201;
        Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.127.212 with SMTP id h20mr293610wbs.7.1307894784164;
        Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <jfromanie...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wy0-f180.google.com (mail-wy0-f180.google.com [74.125.82.180])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fv20si5107709wbb.2.2011.06.12.09.06.24
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jfromanie...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.180;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jfromanie...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jfromanie...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-wy0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 26so4443620wyj.39
        for <altnet-hispano@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=HgJZA6xJ1arD1ZCmuEs7EZzEwSTw4fuooOtdUdf53ps=;
        b=QwRZQ7/koia8JuWnurvBO5+zWCTl4ncZWdwgKLd7LTqi4bY05S4a8E+SdEpTLhA8f3
         bIpR0O5pZNywHGYTXRgLYRhT3xK97dyMEFLa4uBsSafEmTVJas9IstgnooQVgUhFjKHk
         32CZ6CJtMvAT//wY8pZtRI8rg0MhnD1WST0qI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=NetLODludxFo+/oZQzRIHNN5AEYiQZ8ggyvOCgOoMf6v5Oqu3AA85dl7SEAWd6UNDJ
         k0scycS5+93/DR7vUHiTR1YUOnsnwrJllpzhEz/jDBlon2h8H865b+h/CjfIwARaGCcq
         0B0nvtUANjQSvg/STHdyKnzHYlI24DbQPRKG4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.229.82 with SMTP id g60mr1668927weq.70.1307894782598; Sun,
 12 Jun 2011 09:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.2.85 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin3tp2nEwE0rToMOnRQ3Ku16ET...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinjDHAR7zS-331hoBNWU40=FmR...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTim92HxmgX3s-z1Q3Sh4734ODu-...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTimASQvycH50Bh6-jT3PAzTg0nK...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikRGXxxCQ7z-HLxGq6bt3MoL1W...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=AS33RGnGDEkQLM4jgEQ+HeBJ...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTik26mBrJQJCP_F-qkZSY_FmhYX...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=qc14SPhU83h8SBVQPMS7kuiM...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikrzxCaWhYU9a6c+AnDce464Oi...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTimqaVC=EakcjYcPD=SnsaLMWXk...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=OOJFT1ynSYWKw5pD=wvk_JeM...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=xb=xTQZrAHNGexiUVYAhpgQJ...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTin3tp2nEwE0rToMOnRQ3Ku16ET...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:06:22 -0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTinzP2nTSevg6gcXB4SA9F0+Hyp...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [altnet-hispano] Stored procedures o queries?
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_F=2E_Romaniello?= <jfromanie...@gmail.com>
To: altnet-hispano@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65ae1d6eb9cec04a585fb5d

--0016e65ae1d6eb9cec04a585fb5d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

El 12 de junio de 2011 12:13, Daniel Cazzulino <dan...@cazzulino.com>escrib=
i=F3:

> Asumo q unit tests corres en ambos casos, asi q no deberia ser ese un
> motivo principal para elegir uno u otro approach.


En los proyectos que tuve el lujo de ver que se tocan SPs en producci=F3n..=
.
puedo asegurarte que no hab=EDa unit tests para eso

--0016e65ae1d6eb9cec04a585fb5d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">El 12 de junio de 2011 12:13, Daniel Cazzulino <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:dan...@cazzulino.com">daniel@cazzuli=
no.com</a>&gt;</span> escribi=F3:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Asumo q unit tests corres en ambos casos, asi q no deberia ser ese un motiv=
o principal para elegir uno u otro approach.</blockquote></div><br><div>En =
los proyectos que tuve el lujo de ver que se tocan SPs en producci=F3n... p=
uedo asegurarte que no hab=EDa unit tests para eso</div>

--0016e65ae1d6eb9cec04a585fb5d--