Hi Paul,
First off, AltAnalyze seems to have a fairly high true positive prediction rate, based on ours and others analyses:
http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1000553
http://www.altanalyze.org/help.htm#evaluationhttp://code.google.com/p/altanalyze/wiki/CitingArticles
Can you tell me a little more about the method used to assess alternative exon expression used in house and other filters? How many total genes were predicted from AltAnalyze as being alternatively expressed? What parameters in AltAnalyze did you use (e.g., splicing-index versus FIRMA, constitutive versus core probesets for gene expression, expression/DABG cutoffs).
You can always change the filtering parameters of AltAnalyze to determine if it is too strict. For example, change the expression cutoff from 70 to 1. See:
http://www.altanalyze.org/help_main.htm
http://code.google.com/p/altanalyze/wiki/Constitutive_vs_allUltimately, I recommend choosing the option "
Export
all normalized intensities" and looking at the expression values for a few of those probesets in the files:
1) ExpressionInput/exp.YourDataset.txt
2) ExpressionInput/stats.YourDataset.txt
3) AltExpression/ExonArray/Hs/YourComparison
4) AlternativeOutput/AltResults/RawSpliceData/Hs/splicing-index/YourComparison
5) AlternativeOutput/DomainGraph/YourComparison
The first will show the probeset RMA expression values, the second the DABG p-value, third the expression values after filtering (for those that align to Ensembl genes and that meet your expression filtering options), fourth the normalized intensities for each probeset and five the splicing-index or FIRMA scores along with associated p-values for all probesets. This will help you track down what is going on.
Best,
Nathan