Hey Glen Wall, You Don't Get It, Do You, Even Yet?
Scrutinizing Inquisitor
>Charles A. Hall <FinalJ...@prodigy.net> wrote in message
>news:83mdai$2qoo$1...@newssvr04-int.news.prodigy.com...
>> Society for the Protection of Bale-Screwing a/k/a one of Sheila's many
>> personalities (does she really have as many as Cybil?)
Wow, poor Charles (cross-dressing as 'Diane') doesn't
even know the difference between a pen name and a
personality. That's rather sad, but it indicates that it's
not remarkable that it also can't differentiate between
good horsecare and pulling on a horse's mouth until
sore, or keeping horses in conditions of neglect.
It's not even sure if it's a lawyer or not.
>> > The really sad thing about poor Trashy is that she not only can't
>> > understand why she's an abuser so as to learn to do better, she
>> > can't even fathom what it really means when someone else has
>> > done, at a much younger age and with much greater insight,
>> > that which she can not yet do, ie the learning process.
>>
>> Hey, Glen Wall, can you provide the English translation to this for the rest
>> of us?
Speak for yourself. Others understood it easily,
and may even have enjoyed the ironies.
>You did such a good job on the other one,
How would you know? You're the one who can't
even get your own name right, and are begging
for a translation, remember?
>> > snip<
>
>Well Charles,
> To tell you the truth,
Define that.
>this one just about stretches
>my cryptographical skills to the limit!
No biggie there.
>I think...
Your substantiation for that would be _?_
>I'm not getting any respectful attention in this newsgroup and being ignored
>and considered beneath contempt makes me boil over with rage!
Get well soon, 'Glen'.
>... There's
>no way I can compete with their knowledge and experience, so I'll get
>attention in the only way I know how - by being rude and obnoxious and
>endlessly repeating the same unsubstantiated accusations against a few
>people to whom I've taken a particular dislike. Of course, all the attention
>I attract will be negative, but I'm so desperate for ANY kind of attention
>that even the negative kind is better than nothing...
I hope you get over your problem and figure out
that you're not the subject here.
It's horses. Ever squinted sideways at one?
>
>So long as I keep accusing people of things - no matter how ridiculous the
>allegations - a few of them will naturally be outraged and reply to my posts
>defending themselves. In this way I can convince myself that I'm engaging in
>some sort of a dialogue with other human beings. You see, the truth is that
>I'm a very sad and lonely woman. I'm so angry and embittered that no-one
>will have anything to do with me in real life. Sometimes I even begin to
>doubt my own existence. When that happens, I fire off a vicious post
Too bad you don't bother thinking instead.
>accusing Ms Meisenbach or someone else I dislike of being cruel to horses.
Do you claim, glen, that she was not cruel to a horse
when she pulled on its bit until sore?
Why do you suppose she tried to lie about it?
Would you like help with finding and perusing archives?
>When I get an answer, I feel a bit more alive and real somehow. Also, I know
>deep down that there's such terrible anger and cruelty in my own hate-filled
>heart, that the only way I can deal with it is to project it out onto other
>people and pretend to myself that THEY'RE the ones who are cruel and
>sadistic. If had to face up to the seething mass of hatred inside myself it
>would finish me, so I look and around me and try to imagine that the cruelty
>is in everyone else.
Sorry to hear about your many problems.
I've never been able to work up any hate,
what's it like?
You hate horses, too?
>Really I am.
You're still irrelevant.
Can't you tell?
Be like that with horses, they step on you alot,
especially those of you too stupid to stay out
of their way.
>Hope that helped Charles!
>
>Glen.
It helped prove you helpless.
May you do better.
Can't answer the question, Tracy? Bit or no bit?
Princess Plagiarist Missingboat, aka Trashy Tracy Meisenbach, has this
pathetic usenet history of telling lies, getting caught
in them, and then only telling more lies.
Look carefully at what you read, because the deceitful
losers like Tracy do try to hide their prevarications,
particularly when they dimly perceive they're caught.
Those who read carefully and for comprehension, however,
won't be fooled by the dishonesty of such as this:
"TrinityApp" <trini...@lynchburg.net> wrote this in
Message-ID: <vokt3.1262$1B5....@monger.newsread.com>:
>... his rider insisted on this big
>eggbutt that would not control him ...
You have now changed your story a =second= time.
Let's look at Tracy Meisenbach getting caught
in yet another lie, by her own false words:
>>From: "TrinityApp" <spell...@texoma.net>
>>Message-ID: <770fss$j...@enews4.newsguy.com>
>>References: ... <IOMk2.287$l03....@news.sgi.net>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Can you actually find a passage that states a bit was used? No? Well let
>>me help you ... ^^
Sure, Tracy, why don't you help me understand
why you try to justify yanking on a horse's
bit and then try to backpedal like a total
poltroon and claim there were somehow no
bit involved. Go right ahead.
Are you going to try to claim, in yet another
example of your sleazy dishonesty and personal
irresponsibility, that you didn't post that in
response to a reference to your abuse of that
poor horse you pulled upon until sore?
Rather than cause you to dishonor yourself so
pathetically, yet again, I'll save you the time.
I've included the article to which your response
was made, complete with the reference info from
the headers. The fact that your lie followed
my comment, below, is also to be clearly seen
in the archived thread at http://www.deja.com.
>>>From: lo...@the.sig.for.author.id (Muleskinner)
>>>Subject: Re: Tracy Meisenbach who hurts horses that did and didn't belong to
>>>her and then calls them names
>>>Message-ID: <IOMk2.287$l03....@news.sgi.net>
>>>Do you think someone who pulled on a horse's mouth until her
>>>arms were sore was not using a bit as a weapon?
Oh, and while you're so busy being exposed for
being completely full of shit and abusive to
horses because you won't learn any better,
let's have another look at your original
'version' of your descriptions of abuses:
>>>>From: "TrinityApp" <spell...@texoma.net>
>>>>Subject: Re: Identity Crisis
>>>>Date: 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 GMT
>>>>Message-ID: <7341ik$b...@enews2.newsguy.com>
>>>>[...]
>>>> I have a dressage horse that won't tolerate contact. He's a total wimp
>>>>and if you pull on his face he almost dies.
So you try to accuse the horse of being a wimp
for your clueless crude abuse of the bridle
reins, ie, your "pull on his face" method.
Perhaps you advocate breeding horses for the
ability to tolerate being yanked and jerked
in the mouth by unbalanced wannabes such as
yourself, as for the ability to tolerate
confinement, bad diet, and perhaps even
ill-fitted saddles and hollowness.
Why don't you like actual horses as they are?
>>>>[blahblahblah] a bit with more mouth control
Don't you understand that bitting up is merely
bad, abusive misuse of a horse, not good training?
>>>>[blahblahblah] I rode a friend's dressage horse the other day and came off after
>>>>15 minutes with my back and shoulders screaming, I don't know how people
>>>>stand that lugging contact every second of a ride. You sound like you've hit
>>>>a rut ...
You're saying that to anyone =else=? You're so
deep in your gutter, Gutterball, that you can't
even see up and out at all. You're pitiable,
but not as much as any horse you touch.
Scrutinizing Inquisitor
>... incomprehensible abuse and illiterate ravings ...
You could do better if you'd read the newusers info, determine
the actual subjects on the newsgroups, and read their contents
for comprehension rather than pollute them with your drivel.
Horses don't respect ambivalent wavering wusses, so it's a
good thing you've naught to do with them, eh?
>[SI]:
>> Do you claim... that she was not cruel to a horse
>> when she pulled on its bit until sore?
>
>Plainly this is your interpretation of what Ms. Meisenbach wrote.
Well, you can interpret for yourself if you read it for yourself.
> ... completely incapable of writing English I see no reason...
>simmering away in...own poisonous mind...
You aren't the subject, here.
The topic is the fact that if a person pulls on a bit until their
muscles are sore, using reins and a bit, the horse upon whom
these not-so-tender ministrations were bestowed is not going
to be in better shape than when they started, but in worse.
>Let's just suppose for a moment that one of the people whom you take such
>delight in accusing of assorted cruelties actually HAD abused a horse. Is
>is really likely that they would boast about their crime by posting an
>account of it in a newsgroup dedicated to horse lovers?
Sure: the major factor eluding your awareness, among so
much else, is the ignorance leading to such abuses, and
how it also readily leads to such advertisements thereof.
>Can anything more
>absurd be imagined? I may not know much ...
You may not even know how irrelevant your knowledge
of the absurd would happen to be in some venues.
>...I know about
>people - my living comes from observing them and writing about what I see...
Non sequitur.
>... so contrary to both common sense and every known
>variant of human behaviour, that if I didn't know I was l... the
>ravings of a madwoman, I would suspect ... wild accusations were part
>of some elaborate private joke which I was not party to...
The jokes to which you are not party are not the subject
here, for, lo, usenet itself weren't large enough to contain
all of them.
>As I said in my previous post
You haven't had anything to say, yet.
>... desperately in
>need of psychiatric help, and I would urge .... Hatred ... a terrible thing and
>... physically ill ...seek help as a
>matter of urgency.
>Glen.
I hope you have a good insurance plan, there, bub.
This is to entertain and not for those who want to be abused/harassed.
This is to encourage at most only lawful/legal and pragmatic actions.
This is to respond to/on a precedent topic not advertise commerce.
This is to expect only appropriate resource use in response.
This is to add that if you don't like that, well, tough shit.
This is Sheila Green in Freedom (as if it mattered).
Scrutinizing Inquisitor
>Scrutinizing Inquisitor:
>> "Glen Wall" <glen...@freenet.co.uk> wrote:
>> >... incomprehensible abuse and illiterate ravings ...
>> You could do better if you'd read the newusers info, determine
>> the actual subjects on the newsgroups, and read their contents
>> for comprehension rather than pollute them with your drivel.
>
>... frequent
>alt.accusations.unsubstantiated, where I'm ... received with considerably more enthusiasm than...
>... in req.eq.
But enough about you, you're no one and
not the subject here. I did stand up for you,
they said you were hostile and I responded
that no, you claimed you wanted to get it
hoss-style, as you bent over in rec.eq.
The subject there is horses, and how some
people who are confused about them will
insist on absurdities such as that they'd
be spiteful. Their writings lack the
authenticity of clear perspectives.
Such people may very well neglect and
abuse horses because of their mistaken
belief that the equid were somehow evil.
>... More illiterate, repetitious, wild and unsubstantiated allegations ....
At least you have the one skill, although
you seem entirely ignorant of the fact that
you still aren't the subject.
No proponent's personality would be, were
you honest.
Personality isn't the best of terms to apply
to horses, either.
>> >Can anything more
>> >absurd be imagined? I may not know much ...
>
>> You may not even know how irrelevant your knowledge
>> of the absurd would happen to be in some venues.
>
>I see
Your substantiation for that would be _?_
Hint: you're blind to the subject, among
so much else.
Would you personally use all your strength
to hurt an animal's mouth for a quarter of an
hour, until you were tired and gave up?
>... haven't yet taken up my ... remedial English lessons
Will you get your money back if they don't take?
>> >...I know about
>> >people - my living comes from observing them and writing about what I
>see...
>>
>> Non sequitur.
>
>... Peppering ...puerile prose ...I .... I said ... I
>... I ... I
>... I ... severely limited powers of understanding.
It's still not about you, although you are
quite predictable, albeit unaware.
>...s monumentally inept and illiterate,
>... I'm ...
>> >... desperately in
>> >need of psychiatric help, and I would urge .... Hatred ... a terrible
>thing and
>> >... physically ill ...seek help as a
>> >matter of urgency.
>> >Glen.
>>
>> I hope you have a good insurance plan, there, bub.
>
>I've been kind enough to recommend that you seek treatment
That's not you being kind, that's you being
a lame, stupid pretender.
You just plain aren't qualified, but want to
imagine you could come off as otherwise.
Kinda like someone who'd claim to be a
rider but actually pulls on horses' heads,
such as Trashy Tracy Meisenbach ...
It would seem your devotion to her is not
shared by any but those incapable of thought,
and she's inspired the same disgust elsewhere:
From: "Reinhold (Rey) Aman" <am...@sonic.net>
Subject: Sick Traci [Was: Re: Reinhold is sick, Tracy is gorgeous [Was: Re: Hope
floats]]
Date: 03 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <38483D...@sonic.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <h2114.1052$5Z3....@monger.newsread.com>
<19991201071507...@ng-ca1.aol.com>
<J%c14.67$%46....@monger.newsread.com> <3845FA...@sonic.net>
<YGS14.856$%46.5...@monger.newsread.com>
Organization: The International Maledicta Society
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.writing
X-Complaints-To: news...@supernews.com
The *totally insane* vulgar slut TrinityApp (Trashy Traci) wrote:
First off, you unethical cunt, the Subject of the post you responded to
was "Sick Traci [Was: Re: Hope floats]," not the one you falsified.
Horse peddlers like you are known for their lack of ethics.
> Reinhold, ever in the grip of didymalgia, wrote:
> --
> > This stupid trailer-trash slut now adds to her other imaginary
> > achievements: she's allegedly a gallery-level pastel artist and a
> > pentaglot!
> Reyhole, get out more. You know nothing about me,
> and yes I do have equine art in several galleries.
Tacky pastels of horse cocks (your favorite lollipops) and of horses'
asses (self-portrait of Trashy Traci) no doubt.
> > Jesus fuckin' Christ, Trashy Traci, you ignorant cunt, you can't even
> > effectively use your mother tongue, English! Plus, you sick fuck,
> > copying a few words and phrases from a travel guide does not mean
> > you *speak* that language, you monolingual moron.
> Tedious. For a word master you're limited to about seven sentences
You dumb cunt used to claim I was limited to seven *words*. Can't you
bleedin' arsehole tell the difference between simple words like
"sentence" and "word"?
> and have the imagination of a damp sponge.
Great metaphor! Keep using it, stupid, but don't be surprised when
intellectuals like me sneer at your banal imagery.
> You are, in essence, the height of banality.
"Banal" is your middle name, Trashy. You're banal and vulgar. Besides,
you did not respond to my statement above where I exposed you as the
monolingual braggart that you are. You are a *pathological* braggart
and bullshit artist. Your zero-level self-esteem causes such
insanities.
> > Just shut the fuck up, you bragging, vulgar, attention-hungry nutsoid.
> Sorry, you aren't my master and you have no power over anyone.
> Talk about attention seeking! You write your own reviews and try to
> pass them off as being from real critics.
As said, you are one sick fuck, Trashy. You have absolutely no proof of
your continued *libelous* claims regarding the glowing reviews *all* my
books have received. Put up or shut your fuckin' lying snout, you sick
and jealous nobody.
> The only review you ever got was after Snake Eyes
> Levant bent you over the sink and rode you like a rented mule.
> He said you were too loose for his taste.
That's the *totally insane* and *totally irrational* bitch Trashy
Meisenbrain everyone knows. She never argues intelligently but reverts
to her true nature: a stupid, ignorant, vulgar, foul-mouthed
trailer-trash-queen has-been.
> > P.S. Do try to get over your obsession with me, asshole. The other
> > people in this NG have written thousands of posts without mentioning
> > "Reinhold."
> Obsession? You're nothing but a joke. Nobody mentions you
> because you are not worthy of mention. I only mention you in
> connection with Prince Dicky, the other half of the dipshit twins.
That's *obsession*, you psychotic maniac. Go ask your 7-year-old
ghastly daughter to explain to Mommy Dearest what "obsession" means.
Besides, you are a fuckin' liar, Trashy. You compulsively *have* to say
something nasty about "Reinhold" in almost every post to Glen Wall, too.
Have you noticed that this entire newsgroup ignores you? Just Glen,
Prince Richard and I rip your ass open on a regular basis. You are too
foul and vulgar for the others.
Oh, yeah: as almost everyone shuns you, you foul bitch, you have now
sunk so low that you try to bully my sweet Hana, a 15-year-old smart
young lady, who makes you look like the vulgar fool that you are.
Whom are you going to argue with next? Who's left? Perhaps dizzy Lori
"All you need is a good fuck" Crews?
> P.S. You're still fat, ugly and pop-eyed.
Have I mentioned that you're a sick fuck, Trashy?
--
Reinhold ("Doc") Aman, Editor
MALEDICTA: The International Journal of Verbal Aggression
Santa Rosa, CA 95402, USA
http://www.sonic.net/maledicta/
Opinicus
"Scrutinizing Inquisitor" <h**e...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:881cop$6b4$0...@208.231.48.186...Plonk.
Sigh.
Where do these weirdos come from? Are they bred in some kind of
secret government laboratory or something?
JetCity
> Where do these weirdos come from?
He's a buddy of trashy's so that means he comes from the Land of Nod(ding
off to sleep from ennui).
>Are they bred in some kind of
> secret government laboratory or something?
Maybe
They must have combined the genetics of the ten most boring people in
history to make Glen.
The ObHorsies find glen boring, too
--
We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will
eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare.
Now, thanks to alt.writing, we know this isn't true.
JetCity
> Wow, poor Charles (cross-dressing as 'Diane') doesn't
> even know the difference between a pen name and a
> personality.
That's because she don't know shit from shinola. (and her with a "pen" name
herself)
> That's rather sad, but it indicates that it's
> not remarkable that it also can't differentiate between
> good horsecare
Why *should* she know about good horsecare? She doesn't even own a horse.
> It's not even sure if it's a lawyer or not.
Just a low bitch on the totem pole office clerk is more likely.
> Speak for yourself. Others understood it easily,
> and may even have enjoyed the ironies.
clueless diane doesn't understand much at all. She clearly does not know
time zones and how to post. She surely doesn't know how to read. Did you
perchance catch her dozen or so posts about how I had "said" one thing, when
I had clearly said nearly the opposite? She went so far as to accuse me of
changing my post, but never did explain how the time of my post was before
any of the replies to it, nor *how* I could have possibly put my words, in
HER and another loser's replies, quoted Exactly How I Said They Were to
begin with.
> >this one just about stretches
> >my cryptographical skills to the limit!
glen and diane get *lost* when reading the Dick and Jane Series......
> >Really I am.
> You're still irrelevant.
> Can't you tell?
All his lover's (all *one* of them, a crack whore in desperate need of a
fix) could tell.
Ultraviolet
[a bunch of deadly dull dross]
Hey, Jet, instead of writing your own stuff (which is awful, no offense) try
reposting more of Glen's old posts. They're much more entertaining!
>We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will
>eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare.
>Now, thanks to alt.writing, we know this isn't true.
Making fun of Jocko & Co. already? Nothing wrong with that! ;-)
Paula
TrinityApp
> Hey, Jet, instead of writing your own stuff (which is awful, no offense)
try
> reposting more of Glen's old posts. They're much more entertaining!
Its deadly. You haven't even begun to see the morass of stupidity this
androgynous being drags around with it.
> >We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters
will
> >eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare.
> >Now, thanks to alt.writing, we know this isn't true.
>
> Making fun of Jocko & Co. already? Nothing wrong with that! ;-)
>
Jet is the ultimate monkey. Sheila puts a nickel in her and she pounds her
little tambourines to whatever beat Sheila dictates. Sad relationship, but
then Jet has that *bitch* look about her. Plus she's too afraid of Sheila to
ever take her on.
Now we have a whole clan of monkeys, someone get a barrel.
--
Tracy Meisenbach
>
>
> Paula