Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Windows XP x64 probably has bug in IPv6 Stack relating to ICMPv6.
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Skybuck Flying  
View profile  
 More options Aug 29 2008, 7:33 am
Newsgroups: alt.winsock.programming, comp.protocols.tcp-ip, microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general, microsoft.public.windows.networking.firewall
From: "Skybuck Flying" <BloodySh...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:33:09 +0200
Local: Fri, Aug 29 2008 7:33 am
Subject: Windows XP x64 probably has bug in IPv6 Stack relating to ICMPv6.
Hello,

I want to update my UDP Speed Test 3 to include ICMP reporters.

The ICMPv4 Reporter for IPv4 is working fine.

The ICMPv6 Reporter for IPv6 seems to malfunction:

The situation is as follows:

1. Family: AF_INET6
2. Sock type: SOCK_RAW
3. Protocol: IPPROTO_ICMPV6

4. Any IPv6 Address or some specified address.

5. Open Socket.
6. Bind Socket.
7. ReceiveFrom.

Delphi/The Console suddenly prints:

GetAdapterList: IP_UNIDIRECTIONAL_ADAPTER_ADDRESS resource failure= 8

It seems this message is coming from some drivers or the IP stack itself ?!

Other symptoms: GUI fails to redraw, response slowly, or doesn't react.

(GUI+Console app)

Bye,
  Skybuck.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Skybuck Flying  
View profile  
 More options Aug 29 2008, 7:39 am
Newsgroups: alt.winsock.programming, comp.protocols.tcp-ip, microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general, microsoft.public.windows.networking.firewall
From: "Skybuck Flying" <BloodySh...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:39:35 +0200
Local: Fri, Aug 29 2008 7:39 am
Subject: Re: Windows XP x64 probably has bug in IPv6 Stack relating to ICMPv6.
Hmm,

Maybe I just had a gui bug :)

So far the icmpv6 reporter doesn't seem to be working either.

Me go look further into it.

Bye,
  Skybuck.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Skybuck Flying  
View profile  
 More options Aug 29 2008, 7:46 am
Newsgroups: alt.winsock.programming, comp.protocols.tcp-ip, microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general, microsoft.public.windows.networking.firewall
From: "Skybuck Flying" <BloodySh...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:46:48 +0200
Local: Fri, Aug 29 2008 7:46 am
Subject: Re: Windows XP x64 probably has bug in IPv6 Stack relating to ICMPv6.
Situation is as follows:

1. Not a gui bug from my part.
2. ICMPv6 stats weren't updating because no gui code yet.
3. ICMPv6 reporter not receiving anything.
4. Ethereal is showing ICMPv6 error reports... but these are encapsulated
inside IPv4 packets. (Tunneling ?!?)
5. GUI bugs caused by stack/drivers ?

I wonder if encapsulated has anything to do with it... later I test a
simpler example/code to see if it can receive icmpv6's at all ;)

Bye,
  Skybuck.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Skybuck Flying  
View profile  
 More options Aug 29 2008, 7:51 am
Newsgroups: alt.winsock.programming, comp.protocols.tcp-ip, microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general, microsoft.public.windows.networking.firewall
From: "Skybuck Flying" <BloodySh...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:51:42 +0200
Local: Fri, Aug 29 2008 7:51 am
Subject: Re: Windows XP x64 probably has bug in IPv6 Stack relating to ICMPv6.
Ok,

I tried a simple icmpv6 receiver test...

It can't receive the tunneling icmp errors.

I have no idea how to receive those at the moment.

Maybe Windows XP x64 doesn't support it or something...

Bye,
  Skybuck.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Skybuck Flying  
View profile  
 More options Aug 29 2008, 7:58 am
Newsgroups: alt.winsock.programming, comp.protocols.tcp-ip, microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general, microsoft.public.windows.networking.firewall
From: "Skybuck Flying" <BloodySh...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:58:11 +0200
Local: Fri, Aug 29 2008 7:58 am
Subject: Re: Windows XP x64 probably has bug in IPv6 Stack relating to ICMPv6.
Windows seems to have some issue's with this:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/944135

"
The recvfrom function stops responding when you use the sendto function in
the IPv6 raw socket to send an ICMP packet and then use the recvfrom
function to receive ICMP responses on a Windows Server 2003-based computer
"

(I am not sending any IPv6 raw stuff or so... just normal IPv6 stuff)

Probably more buggies in there ! ;)

Bye,
  Skybuck.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »