Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Are Macs safer than PCs?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Hot-Text

unread,
Apr 11, 2012, 9:11:44 PM4/11/12
to
"MotoFox" <confucius-say@enlightenment!to!him!lead!it!for!bangpath!follow!man!wise.UUCP> wrote in message
news:jm56mt$73t$1...@motofox-rules.dont-email.me...
> And it came to pass that Sycho delivered the following message unto the
> people, saying~
>
>> This just in to the alt.2600 news room. On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:44:46 -0500
>> it was announced to all in a public briefing,
>>>> made the following declaration and shocked the
>> world when the following was announced:
>>
>>>"Sycho" <sp...@sucks2bu.gov> wrote in message
>>>news:4f850880....@wouldyoulikefrieswitdat.com...
>>>> This just in to the alt.2600 news room. On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:16:31
>>>> -0500 it was announced to all in a public briefingmade the following declaration and >>>>shocked the
>>>> world when the following was announced:
>>>>
>>>>>"Char Jackson" <no...@none.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>news:lfu9o798glt5hbmuv...@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Sycho" <sp...@sucks2bu.gov> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:4f84c504....@wouldyoulikefrieswitdat.com...
>>>>>>>>> This just in to the alt.2600 news room. On Tue, 10 Apr 2012
>>>>>>>>> 17:57:41 -0500 it was announced to all in a public briefing,
>>>>>>>>> made the following declaration
>>>>>>>>> and shocked the world when the following was announced:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hot-Text wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> [....]
>>>>>>>>>>>> This was wrote by a UNIX lover,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Who so in the pass, when it came to Windows, For Windows is not
>>>>>>>>>>>> a DOS systems..
>>>>>>>>>>>> nor is Apple Macs..
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The true is question: How secure is UNIX..
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For the Flashback Trojan,
>>>>>>>>>>>> run's best on Fire Fox Systems...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> that backdoor Trojan can, and will embedded it's self; inside a
>>>>>>>>>>>> HTML documents in the Sand-Box, successfully that running a
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fire-Fox Systems.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But able to rewrite itself to: a windows word documents that
>>>>>>>>>>>> can be run on Macs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And able to rewrite itself to: in Windows as a Registry
>>>>>>>>>>>> Booster.. if you run a Registry Cleaner,
>>>>>>>>>>>> will move and rewrite itself and a Systems file.. turning it
>>>>>>>>>>>> self off and on and always on the move.. looking for a Net
>>>>>>>>>>>> Diver to call he's own..
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>> web browser,
>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaScript,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Java,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sand-Box..
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I won't put Windows on my iMac! :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>But you would put a Firefox on your iMac.. For iMac have it's on
>>>>>>>>>>web browser..
>>>>>>>>>>Call Safari....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you're putting Mozilla Firefox in the same class as an OS, then
>>>>>>>>> that would be like saying Netscape Communicator/Navigator (which
>>>>>>>>> ended up being bought out by AOL then promptly killed off) and
>>>>>>>>> Internet Explorer are an OS too.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You'd be a lot better off sticking to things you actually know
>>>>>>>>> about.. like.. rock collecting or making mud pies. That seems more
>>>>>>>>> your speed,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>For Netscape system is not the same as a Fire-Fox Systems Nor is it
>>>>>>>the same as the Microsoft Windows Internet Explorer, operating
>>>>>>>Web-Browser system..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Web-Browser system ..
>>>>>>>< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_operating_system >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It seems to be over your Head, Psycho Sycho..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're unbelievably confused, man.
>>>>>
>>>>>Where at show me?
>>>>
>>>> This should prove entertaining.
>>>>
>>>> /me grabs popcorn to watch HT once again insert foot in mouth
>>>
>>>get you some beer too!
>>>
>>>Cut: answer at:: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,
>>
>> I've already got beer.
>
> Need some melted butter (or preferrably, margarine) and salt?
>


MotoFox why you not at windowsxp.general..
you lost....you...UNIX......love....you....

Message has been deleted

Hot-Text

unread,
Apr 15, 2012, 3:36:33 PM4/15/12
to
"MotoFox" <confucius-say@enlightenment!to!him!lead!it!for!bangpath!follow!man!wise.UUCP> wrote in message
news:jmdnu1$orm$2...@motofox-rules.dont-email.me...
> And it came to pass that Hot-Text delivered the following message unto the
> people, saying~
>
>> MotoFox why you not at windowsxp.general..
>> you lost....you...UNIX......love....you....
>
> alt.2600? You mean *that* old shithole of a group is still kicking around?
>
> I'd have rmgroup'd it years ago.....
>
> (And PLEASE get off the crack. Your last "sentence" made even less sense
> than otherwise usually do coming from you.)
>

MotoFox
that group is up and running..
it been about 3 year go Mmm

Your friend David H. Lipman is there...........

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

David_B

unread,
May 30, 2012, 2:58:07 AM5/30/12
to
MotoFox wrote:
> And it came to pass that Hot-Text delivered the following message unto the
> people, saying~
>
>> Your friend David H. Lipman is there...........
>
> Who the hell is "David H. Lipman"? Never heard of him.
>
> (Still not going to answer that in reasonable English grammar, are you?)

You'll find him in this newsgroup ---> alt.privacy.spyware

Like you, I'd like to know who he really is!

98 Guy

unread,
May 30, 2012, 7:46:01 AM5/30/12
to
MotoFox wrote:

> > Your friend David H. Lipman is there...........
>
> Who the hell is "David H. Lipman"? Never heard of him.

What kind of bone-head are you?

What motivated you to respond to a 6-week-old post?

98 Guy

unread,
May 30, 2012, 7:49:54 AM5/30/12
to
David_B wrote:

> >> Your friend David H. Lipman is there...........
> >
> > Who the hell is "David H. Lipman"? Never heard of him.

> You'll find him in this newsgroup ---> alt.privacy.spyware
>
> Like you, I'd like to know who he really is!

Lipman is heavy into the anti-virus / trojan / malware scene (as a
white-hat, that is).

Anyone who's frequented most of the PC comp/OS or security/malware
newsgroups would have seen his posts.

He's had some sort of relationship with MBAM (Malware Bytes - the
software company / software) as either an employee or consultant.

Dustin

unread,
May 30, 2012, 9:02:44 AM5/30/12
to
David_B <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:jq4gdr$gem$2...@dont-email.me:

> Like you, I'd like to know who he really is!

Nosy prick. He's David Lipman.
Author of the Multi-AV tool.


--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

BurfordTJustice

unread,
May 30, 2012, 9:21:48 AM5/30/12
to

"98 Guy" <9...@Guy.com> wrote in message news:4FC60879...@Guy.com...
David Brooks does that all the time, he will respond to months/years old
postings
especially if he did not see the result he wanted.

Aardvark

unread,
May 30, 2012, 3:31:20 PM5/30/12
to
On Wed, 30 May 2012 13:02:44 +0000, Dustin wrote:

> David_B <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
> news:jq4gdr$gem$2...@dont-email.me:
>
>> Like you, I'd like to know who he really is!
>
> Nosy prick. He's David Lipman.
> Author of the Multi-AV tool.

That's all that matters. Why the fuck is the slimy cunt so interested in
knowing the stuff that doesn't matter, I wonder?



--
"Tell me, truthfully, do *you* download music from The Pirate Bay for
your personal use and listening pleasure?"
Clever guy BD in post <gLidnTjP2tgGPy7S...@bt.com>

Aardvark

unread,
May 30, 2012, 4:02:23 PM5/30/12
to
On Wed, 30 May 2012 07:58:07 +0100, David_B wrote:

> MotoFox wrote:

>> Who the hell is "David H. Lipman"? Never heard of him.
>>
>>
>
> You'll find him in this newsgroup ---> alt.privacy.spyware
>
> Like you, I'd like to know who he really is!

Why do you have this pathological need to know irrelevant details about
people, cunt? Who anyone on usenet really is doesn't matter. All that
matters is what they have to say.

Max Wachtel

unread,
May 30, 2012, 6:57:13 PM5/30/12
to
On Wed, 30 May 2012 02:58:07 -0400, David_B <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:

> You'll find him in this newsgroup ---> alt.privacy.spyware
>
> Like you, I'd like to know who he really is!

you should mind your own fucking business

98 Guy

unread,
May 30, 2012, 9:18:11 PM5/30/12
to
BurfordTJustice wrote:

> > What motivated you to respond to a 6-week-old post?
>
> David Brooks does that all the time

Who is David Brooks?

Are you saying Motofox = David Brooks?

FromTheRafters

unread,
May 30, 2012, 9:46:50 PM5/30/12
to
More like BurfordTJustice = Bullwinkle.

David_B

unread,
May 31, 2012, 3:06:09 AM5/31/12
to
Why do you feel that way, Max?

BurfordTJustice

unread,
May 31, 2012, 3:43:01 AM5/31/12
to

"FromTheRafters" <err...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:jq6iib$v4l$1...@dont-email.me...
Most likely Eagle=Bullwinkle
Did you fill in when he was sick?

Max Wachtel

unread,
May 31, 2012, 6:28:44 AM5/31/12
to
because you have a way of twisting everything
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

98 Guy

unread,
Jun 7, 2012, 7:23:18 PM6/7/12
to
ScrotumFaux wrote:

> And it's funny how 98 Troll is actually responding to one of my
> posts, considering that (1) it has absolutely nothing to do with
> him and

That shows just how stupid you are.

You asked who David Lipman is. That's an open question - directed at
no-one in particular. A concept that's apparently over your head.

> (2) he reportedly plonked me way back when.

I plonk you (or - shit all over you) all the time. Because you deserve
it.

And I never said I kill-filed you. Or maybe you don't know the
difference.

> Of course, if he were smart enough to get off AIOE and on a real
> news server

Ah, the real reason why Moto-shit stuck his head out of the toilet.

It just grinds your gears to see a popular open-access like aioe -
doesn't it?

> with a longer retention time

Lame. That's the best you got?

You think it's cool to reply to posts that are months old?

Anyone stupid enough to reply to posts that are months old shouldn't be
on usenet - let alone think it's a flaw that a server has "only" a
40-day retention time.

Any post older than that is not worth reading - and certainly not worth
replying to.
Message has been deleted

98 Guy

unread,
Jun 8, 2012, 8:18:49 AM6/8/12
to
MotoFox wrote:

> to deliver the following meaningless diatribe unto nobody else
> who really could give a shit one way or the other,

Except for you. What I say about you is obviously very important.

So pay attention miscreant.

And I expect you to keep replying to my posts - you puppet.

> > And I never said I kill-filed you. Or maybe you don't know the
> > difference.
>
> You think I'm stupid, yet you don't realise that "plonking" means
> to put one on one's killfile.

And where exactly did I ever use the term "plonk" in connection with one
of your spews?

> F.Y.I., just as a general rule of thumb, only shit-for-brains
> trolls, n00bz and dickheads publicly plonk people or publicly
> admit they do so.

Oh, that's good to know - because I've never used that term before in a
public post.

> Yet you think it's k00lz0rz

I have no idea what that "word" is. Must be something that you
pre-teens use quite a bit.

> to use an NNTP server well associated with spammerz trolls,
> n00bz and dickheads.

Shows you what you know.

You're talking about google's usenet server.

What happened to your sig?

...!i84w!exit210!304senye!motofox

For others reading this, this is where Moto-Cocks lives:

MotoFox
Red Lion Hotel
304 SE Nye Ave
(541)276-6111

I-84 Exit 210
Pendleton, OR 97801

Now go back and play your kiddy video games and leave the adults alone.
0 new messages