Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
installing MS Query tool
12 views
Skip to first unread message
Binaryx
Apr 7, 2012, 6:36:42 PM4/7/12
to
does it possible install Office 2000 additional feature without
installation program?
I want install MS Query on Office 2000 Premium, but have no Office
installation CD anymore. I have the MSQRY32.EXE file, but it need be
properly installed. I tried update office via Add/Remove program, then
modify setup, add or remove feature,select Microsoft Query and tried
update, but it requires disk or browse for .msi installer.
Is there way install it manually?
installation program?
I want install MS Query on Office 2000 Premium, but have no Office
installation CD anymore. I have the MSQRY32.EXE file, but it need be
properly installed. I tried update office via Add/Remove program, then
modify setup, add or remove feature,select Microsoft Query and tried
update, but it requires disk or browse for .msi installer.
Is there way install it manually?
98 Guy
Apr 9, 2012, 4:36:47 PM4/9/12
to
This was posted on Saturday to alt.windows98.
And again I shake my head and ask why people get off their ass and do a
little bit of leg-work to figure out what the most USEFUL newsgroup to
post to (which in this case because of a lack of traffic, is not
alt.windows98).
Binaryx wrote:
> does it possible install Office 2000 additional feature without
> installation program?
I've tried in the (distant) past to install (or do something) with
office 2k and have tried to point it to the msi file it was looking for
(install.msi? setup.msi?) but it never seemed to work.
But in the end it didn't really matter because I have the full set of
office 2k premium SR1 cd's (from 1999 through 2002 MSDN).
> I want install MS Query on Office 2000 Premium, but have no
> Office installation CD anymore.
I can upload either the msi file (you tell me which one) or the entire
office 2k premium SR1 cd to a file locker if you want to download it.
You'll have to come back here and let me know if you want it.
> Is there way install it manually?
Or someone else can post an answer to that question.
But I highly doubt that anyone here has much (or any) experience with
Office 2k.
And again I shake my head and ask why people get off their ass and do a
little bit of leg-work to figure out what the most USEFUL newsgroup to
post to (which in this case because of a lack of traffic, is not
alt.windows98).
Binaryx wrote:
> does it possible install Office 2000 additional feature without
> installation program?
office 2k and have tried to point it to the msi file it was looking for
(install.msi? setup.msi?) but it never seemed to work.
But in the end it didn't really matter because I have the full set of
office 2k premium SR1 cd's (from 1999 through 2002 MSDN).
> I want install MS Query on Office 2000 Premium, but have no
> Office installation CD anymore.
office 2k premium SR1 cd to a file locker if you want to download it.
You'll have to come back here and let me know if you want it.
> Is there way install it manually?
But I highly doubt that anyone here has much (or any) experience with
Office 2k.
J. P. Gilliver (John)
Apr 10, 2012, 3:34:24 AM4/10/12
to
In message <4F83485F...@Guy.com>, 98 Guy <9...@Guy.com> writes:
>This was posted on Saturday to alt.windows98.
>
>And again I shake my head and ask why people get off their ass and do a
>little bit of leg-work to figure out what the most USEFUL newsgroup to
>post to (which in this case because of a lack of traffic, is not
>alt.windows98).
[]
>This was posted on Saturday to alt.windows98.
>
>And again I shake my head and ask why people get off their ass and do a
>little bit of leg-work to figure out what the most USEFUL newsgroup to
>post to (which in this case because of a lack of traffic, is not
>alt.windows98).
Just out of curiosity, what would the "leg-work" entail in your opinion?
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
Old soldiers never die - only young ones
98 Guy
Apr 10, 2012, 8:18:30 AM4/10/12
to
"J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote:
> > And again I shake my head and ask why (don't) people get off
Let's say that I'm not already reading groups pertaining to widgets, so
offhand I won't know what groups exist that talk about or focus on
widgets.
In my usenet client (netscape communicator 4.78) I'll right-click on the
NNTP server I'm using and select "subscribe to new newsgroup". I'll
click on the "search" tab and enter a keyword - in this case "widgets".
I will then get a list of all newsgroups containing the word "widgets".
I'll scroll through the list and put a checkmark beside any of them that
look relevant, then hit OK. The new groups will be added to the end of
my list of currently-subscribed groups. I will then click on each group
to have my reader download the list of headers that the server has for
those groups. I will remove any group that has no posts.
Of those groups that are left, some might have a handful of posts, some
will have dozens of posts. Because the server I use only allows
cross-posting to (at most) 3 groups, if my short-list of widget groups
exceeds 3 then I'll have to decide if I want to make multiple posts of
my question and cross-post them across those groups (crossposting to 3
at a time).
If my group-name keyword search doesn't result in any useful results, I
will resort to the google-groups search interface and try to determine
what could be useful groups based on the search results. I'll then add
those groups to my netscape subscription list.
That's the strategy I use to post a question (or comment, etc) to groups
that I don't regularly follow. If the topic is sufficiently important
to me, I'll keep those new groups in my subscribed list for an extended
period of time (so I can easily see any replies) or just see what else
is posted that I might be interested in. If over time I find that I've
lost interest in the new groups, I'll remove them from my subscribed
list.
> > And again I shake my head and ask why (don't) people get off
> > their ass and do a little bit of leg-work to figure out what
> > the most USEFUL newsgroup to post to (which in this case
> > because of a lack of traffic, is not alt.windows98).
> Just out of curiosity, what would the "leg-work" entail in your
> opinion?
For example, say I want to post a question or comment about "widgets".
> > the most USEFUL newsgroup to post to (which in this case
> > because of a lack of traffic, is not alt.windows98).
> Just out of curiosity, what would the "leg-work" entail in your
> opinion?
Let's say that I'm not already reading groups pertaining to widgets, so
offhand I won't know what groups exist that talk about or focus on
widgets.
In my usenet client (netscape communicator 4.78) I'll right-click on the
NNTP server I'm using and select "subscribe to new newsgroup". I'll
click on the "search" tab and enter a keyword - in this case "widgets".
I will then get a list of all newsgroups containing the word "widgets".
I'll scroll through the list and put a checkmark beside any of them that
look relevant, then hit OK. The new groups will be added to the end of
my list of currently-subscribed groups. I will then click on each group
to have my reader download the list of headers that the server has for
those groups. I will remove any group that has no posts.
Of those groups that are left, some might have a handful of posts, some
will have dozens of posts. Because the server I use only allows
cross-posting to (at most) 3 groups, if my short-list of widget groups
exceeds 3 then I'll have to decide if I want to make multiple posts of
my question and cross-post them across those groups (crossposting to 3
at a time).
If my group-name keyword search doesn't result in any useful results, I
will resort to the google-groups search interface and try to determine
what could be useful groups based on the search results. I'll then add
those groups to my netscape subscription list.
That's the strategy I use to post a question (or comment, etc) to groups
that I don't regularly follow. If the topic is sufficiently important
to me, I'll keep those new groups in my subscribed list for an extended
period of time (so I can easily see any replies) or just see what else
is posted that I might be interested in. If over time I find that I've
lost interest in the new groups, I'll remove them from my subscribed
list.
dx...@albury.nospam.net.au
Apr 10, 2012, 9:04:51 AM4/10/12
to
98 Guy wrote:
<Snip>
> In my usenet client (netscape communicator 4.78) I'll right-click on the
<Snip>
Hey, 98 Guy, is there any particular reason that you are still using NC
4.78??
I used to use NC 4.78 on my Win98 Desktop, but then, over time, I
upgraded to Mozilla Suite and then (when Mozilla decided to go to
Firefox (browser) and Thunderbird (Mail & News)), a group of individuals
(the SeaMonkey Council), with the support of Mozilla Corp, continued the
Suite development as SeaMonkey Suite, which is currently upto version
2.8, although only versions up to version 1.1.19 are usable on Win98.
SM ver 1.1.19, which is still old, would be much more up to date than NC
4.78
Daniel
<Snip>
> In my usenet client (netscape communicator 4.78) I'll right-click on the
Hey, 98 Guy, is there any particular reason that you are still using NC
4.78??
I used to use NC 4.78 on my Win98 Desktop, but then, over time, I
upgraded to Mozilla Suite and then (when Mozilla decided to go to
Firefox (browser) and Thunderbird (Mail & News)), a group of individuals
(the SeaMonkey Council), with the support of Mozilla Corp, continued the
Suite development as SeaMonkey Suite, which is currently upto version
2.8, although only versions up to version 1.1.19 are usable on Win98.
SM ver 1.1.19, which is still old, would be much more up to date than NC
4.78
Daniel
98 Guy
Apr 10, 2012, 9:49:32 AM4/10/12
to
"Dani...@teranews.com" wrote:
> Hey, 98 Guy, is there any particular reason that you are still
> using NC 4.78??
Because it works just fine.
> Hey, 98 Guy, is there any particular reason that you are still
> using NC 4.78??
Something I've been meaning to do was try out the last version 4.x of
Netscape Communicator (4.8) which was released in 2002.
> SM ver 1.1.19, which is still old, would be much more up to date
> than NC 4.78
I'll tell you -> nothing.
I think the last version of Netscape suite that had a separate
e-mail/usenet client was version 6 or 7. That's probably the highest or
most recent usenet client I'd ever be willing to try or use.
Binaryx
Apr 11, 2012, 6:40:17 AM4/11/12
to
98 Guy <9...@Guy.com> wrote in news:4F83485F...@Guy.com:
> This was posted on Saturday to alt.windows98.
>
> And again I shake my head and ask why people get off their ass and do a
> little bit of leg-work to figure out what the most USEFUL newsgroup to
> post to (which in this case because of a lack of traffic, is not
> alt.windows98).
>
> Binaryx wrote:
>
>> does it possible install Office 2000 additional feature without
>> installation program?
>
> I've tried in the (distant) past to install (or do something) with
> office 2k and have tried to point it to the msi file it was looking for
> (install.msi? setup.msi?) but it never seemed to work.
>
> But in the end it didn't really matter because I have the full set of
> office 2k premium SR1 cd's (from 1999 through 2002 MSDN).
>
>> I want install MS Query on Office 2000 Premium, but have no
>> Office installation CD anymore.
>
> I can upload either the msi file (you tell me which one) or the entire
> office 2k premium SR1 cd to a file locker if you want to download it.
> You'll have to come back here and let me know if you want it.
>
--------------------
Yes, please upload the full Office 2k premium SR1 cd if you can. I don't
know where the MsQuery component was stored, on a separate disk or in main
package. I also tried to experiment with the installer that I had, pointing
path to the msi file, but it fails as as required files missing.
> This was posted on Saturday to alt.windows98.
>
> And again I shake my head and ask why people get off their ass and do a
> little bit of leg-work to figure out what the most USEFUL newsgroup to
> post to (which in this case because of a lack of traffic, is not
> alt.windows98).
>
> Binaryx wrote:
>
>> does it possible install Office 2000 additional feature without
>> installation program?
>
> I've tried in the (distant) past to install (or do something) with
> office 2k and have tried to point it to the msi file it was looking for
> (install.msi? setup.msi?) but it never seemed to work.
>
> But in the end it didn't really matter because I have the full set of
> office 2k premium SR1 cd's (from 1999 through 2002 MSDN).
>
>> I want install MS Query on Office 2000 Premium, but have no
>> Office installation CD anymore.
>
> I can upload either the msi file (you tell me which one) or the entire
> office 2k premium SR1 cd to a file locker if you want to download it.
> You'll have to come back here and let me know if you want it.
>
Yes, please upload the full Office 2k premium SR1 cd if you can. I don't
know where the MsQuery component was stored, on a separate disk or in main
package. I also tried to experiment with the installer that I had, pointing
path to the msi file, but it fails as as required files missing.
dx...@albury.nospam.net.au
Apr 11, 2012, 7:09:23 AM4/11/12
to
98 Guy wrote:
> "Dani...@teranews.com" wrote:
>
>> Hey, 98 Guy, is there any particular reason that you are still
>> using NC 4.78??
>
> Because it works just fine.
>
> Something I've been meaning to do was try out the last version 4.x of
> Netscape Communicator (4.8) which was released in 2002.
>
Gee, I didn't even realise that they released a NC 4.78, but they do
> "Dani...@teranews.com" wrote:
>
>> Hey, 98 Guy, is there any particular reason that you are still
>> using NC 4.78??
>
> Because it works just fine.
>
> Something I've been meaning to do was try out the last version 4.x of
> Netscape Communicator (4.8) which was released in 2002.
>
list it here :- http://sillydog.org/narchive/
>> SM ver 1.1.19, which is still old, would be much more up to date
>> than NC 4.78
>
> And what exactly do you get with a more "up-to-date" usenet client?
>
> I'll tell you -> nothing.
>
> I think the last version of Netscape suite that had a separate
> e-mail/usenet client was version 6 or 7. That's probably the highest or
> most recent usenet client I'd ever be willing to try or use.
all pretty uneventful. Just a matter of being up-to-date!
Daniel
98 Guy
Apr 11, 2012, 7:44:08 PM4/11/12
to
Binaryx wrote:
> >> I want install MS Query on Office 2000 Premium, but have no
> >> Office installation CD anymore.
> >
> > I can upload either the msi file (you tell me which one) or the
> > entire office 2k premium SR1 cd to a file locker if you want to
> > download it. You'll have to come back here and let me know if
> > you want it.
>
> --------------------
>
> Yes, please upload the full Office 2k premium SR1 cd if you can.
I'm uploading it now to a file locker. It's going to take a few hours.
> >> I want install MS Query on Office 2000 Premium, but have no
> >> Office installation CD anymore.
> >
> > I can upload either the msi file (you tell me which one) or the
> > entire office 2k premium SR1 cd to a file locker if you want to
> > download it. You'll have to come back here and let me know if
> > you want it.
>
> --------------------
>
> Yes, please upload the full Office 2k premium SR1 cd if you can.
This is going to be a set of 4 rar files (about 330 mb total).
Here's a listing of the root directory of the cd:
Volume in drive G is O9PRMCD01
Volume Serial Number is 75C6-43F3
Directory of G:\
AUTORUN INF 1,721 04-24-00 9:10a AUTORUN.INF
DATA1 MSI 2,355,200 05-17-00 12:50p DATA1.MSI
IE5 <DIR> 04-24-00 4:10p IE5
LICENSE TXT 20,596 02-24-99 1:35p LICENSE.TXT
MSI <DIR> 04-24-00 4:16p MSI
MSOWC CAB 89,913 02-14-00 4:47p MSOWC.CAB
MSOWC MSI 165,376 02-03-00 5:32p MSOWC.MSI
OFFICE1 CAB 47,606,945 02-25-00 11:27a OFFICE1.CAB
PFILES <DIR> 05-16-00 1:57p PFILES
README DOC 14,336 02-25-00 8:15p README.DOC
SETUP EXE 273,079 02-22-00 6:21p SETUP.EXE
SETUP HLP 17,610 12-10-98 1:25p SETUP.HLP
SETUP INI 2,598 04-24-00 9:10a SETUP.INI
SP <DIR> 04-24-00 4:50p SP
SQL <DIR> 04-24-00 4:50p SQL
SUPPORT <DIR> 04-24-00 4:53p SUPPORT
SYSTEM <DIR> 04-24-00 4:56p SYSTEM
SYSTEM95 <DIR> 04-24-00 4:56p SYSTEM95
SYSTEMNT <DIR> 04-24-00 4:56p SYSTEMNT
WINDOWS <DIR> 04-24-00 4:57p WINDOWS
10 file(s) 50,547,374 bytes
10 dir(s) 0 bytes free
It's disk-1 out of 4 disks for Office 2000 Premium SR1. It's from a set
of MSDN CD's with a date of January 2001 printed on the CD.
If anyone else wants this CD, stay tuned here for the download URL's. I
can upload the other 3 disks if someone really wants them.
I have a lot of other Office 2000 CD's (developer tools, etc).
98 Guy
Apr 11, 2012, 11:23:24 PM4/11/12
to
Binaryx wrote:
> Yes, please upload the full Office 2k premium SR1 cd if you can.
Ok, here it is:
> Yes, please upload the full Office 2k premium SR1 cd if you can.
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/7/19/2010382/Office2K-disk1.part1.rar
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/7/19/2010382/Office2K-disk1.part2.rar
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/7/19/2010382/Office2K-disk1.part3.rar
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/7/19/2010382/Office2K-disk1.part4.rar
Download them all to the same directory, then use winrar or (I think)
winzip and decompress the first file (part1). This will create the
entire directory structure of disk 1 of the office 2000 premium sr1.
Word, Excel, Outlook, Powerpoint, Access and FrontPage.
The rar archive is password protected. The password is "a" (no quotes).
Enjoy.
Binaryx
Apr 12, 2012, 8:49:07 AM4/12/12
to
98 Guy <9...@Guy.com> wrote in news:4F864AAC...@Guy.com:
------
Thank you very much, 98 Guy.
Thank you very much, 98 Guy.
Binaryx
Apr 28, 2012, 5:24:48 PM4/28/12
to
98 Guy <9...@Guy.com> wrote in news:4F864AAC...@Guy.com:
-----
Can you re-enable files? (file not found).
Thank you.
Can you re-enable files? (file not found).
Thank you.
98 Guy
Apr 28, 2012, 7:53:30 PM4/28/12
to
Binaryx wrote:
> Can you re-enable files? (file not found).
Why didn't you download them when they were available?
> Can you re-enable files? (file not found).
Binaryx
Apr 28, 2012, 8:23:23 PM4/28/12
to
98 Guy <9...@Guy.com> wrote in news:4F9C82FA...@Guy.com:
> Binaryx wrote:
>
>> Can you re-enable files? (file not found).
>
> Why didn't you download them when they were available?
------
I was in trip, had no Pc access for a two week.
> Binaryx wrote:
>
>> Can you re-enable files? (file not found).
>
> Why didn't you download them when they were available?
I was in trip, had no Pc access for a two week.
98 Guy
Apr 29, 2012, 2:15:41 PM4/29/12
to
Binaryx wrote:
> >> Can you re-enable files? (file not found).
www.fileden.com/files/2012/4/21/3295201/Office2K-disk1.part1.rar
> >> Can you re-enable files? (file not found).
www.fileden.com/files/2012/4/21/3295201/Office2K-disk1.part2.rar
www.fileden.com/files/2012/4/21/3295201/Office2K-disk1.part3.rar
www.fileden.com/files/2012/4/21/3295201/Office2K-disk1.part4.rar
0 new messages