ULTERIOR MOTIVES -REBUTTAL
DGVREIMAN
GANG IS CONNECTING AND JUXTAPOSING REAL MILITARY FRAUDS WITH THEIR
FRAUD, LIES, SMEARS AND FALSE ACCUSATIONS ABOUT REAL VETS TO CREATE
FRAUDULENT CREDIBILITY FOR THEIR CONS AND FRAUD.
The above is a well-known hate/smear/con group tactic:
Nothing could be worse than stealing the valor and honorable service
from a real Veteran by a hate/smear/con gang via that gang posting
thousands of lies, false accusations, outright cons, and fraudulent
"military records" information about one of their targeted Veterans.
No wonder one of the key gang members "SteveL" said that our Marines
were murderers - and Nigel Brooks said that Stevel (who denies being
Steve Leyland) never lies. What is the true agenda of this gang? To
attack and smear Veterans?
Smear Merchant Disclaimer
I have better things to do than rebut the fraud and false accusations
made by members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
However, unlike the gang's other smear victims, I will defend myself
from the gang's obloquy and fraud in each case. You would think these
pathetic souls would find something to do other than spread their
fraud, hate and smears about people that disagree with them, but alas,
this has become their "pathetic life."
Note first that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang
members maintain a web site and a Google Newsgroup designed to defame
me with fraud, serial lying, outright con man fraud, and of course
libel, which forces me to rebut their fraud with these truthful
rebuttals.
I have offered Nigel Brooks (and/or any of his con/hate/smear gang
members) the opportunity to take their fraud and false accusations to
the American Association of Arbitrators, or to any legal department of
any University they select, and if either of those entities agree with
Nigel Brooks in respect to his accusations about me, I will pay for
their services. HOWEVER, if those legal experts agree that my
rebuttals are correct and accurate, then Nigel Brooks and/or his
smear/hate/con gang members pay for the independent legal analysis.
Nigel Brooks and his gang members run, duck, hide, cower, piss their
pants, and snivel pathetic excuse after pathetic excuse to hide from
and refuse my hundreds of offers to take this issue to independent
legal experts. . . and the reason is obvious - they know they are
lying.
ALSO NOTE THAT I CHALLENGED NIGEL BROOKS TO JUST *NAME* OR PRODUCE ANY
DOCUMENT HE CLAIMS EXISTS IN MY MILITARY RECORDS THAT DISPROVES ANY
STATEMENT OF FACT I HAVE POSTED ABOUT MY MILITARY SERVICE - AND YET
AFTER YEARS OF BROOK'S CLAIMING SUCH A DOCUMENT EXISTS IN MY RECORDS -
HE RUNS, HIDES AND PISSES HIS PANTIES EACH TIME I ISSUE OR POST THIS
CHALLENGE!
Obviously, Nigel Brooks and his other gang members that have
referenced my military records in any manner have been conning, and
using serial lying and fraud about this issue for years - and if you
do not believe Nigel Brooks is a con man and fraud merchant by now
you need to wake up and smell the cons and bullshit burning that comes
from these dregs and clowns.
http://tinyurl.com/lwelno My disclaimer and more information about
Nigel Brooks cons and fraud can be found in the above URL. My
standard disclaimer applies to this post and all of my other USENET
posts, past, present or future.
(Note that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
maintain web sites and a Google Newsgroup designed specifically to
defame me with fraud, serial lying, outright con man fraud, and of
course libel, which forces me to rebut their fraud with these truthful
rebuttals.
I have offered Nigel Brooks (and/or any of his con/hate/smear gang
members) the opportunity to take their fraud and false accusations to
the American Association of Arbitrators, or to any legal department of
any University they select, and if either of those entities agree with
Nigel Brooks in respect to his accusations about me, I will pay for
their services. HOWEVER, if those legal experts agree that my
rebuttals are correct and accurate, then Nigel Brooks and/or his
smear/hate/con gang members pay for the independent legal analysis.
Nigel Brooks and his gang members run, duck, hide, cower, piss their
pants, and snivel pathetic excuse after pathetic excuse to hide from
and refuse my hundreds of offers to take this issue to independent
legal experts. . . and the reason is obvious - they know they are
lying.
Please be advised further this article (the same as all of my past
articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
annoying, abusive, offensive, defaming or otherwise disturbing,
please notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net.
If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract.
My intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please also note that defending myself from
harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a "lawful
and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal.
Please also note that I intend to notify any and all ISP's and web
hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site or other similar
entity about me after I give the offender an opportunity to retract,
apologize and remove said post from the Google archive.
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots' inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary's
definition's of simple terms, such as "we" "estimated" "involved"
"retired from" and "not representing any biographical claim" are all
incorrect, and only their "special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the gang's
standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that (1) I
was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let God sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlisle War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.
I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.
Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question. (Note although the above
statement is as clear as it can be - some smear merchants have
deliberately *averted their eyes* from this key disclaimer paragraph
for years - and ridiculously attempted to claim did not include all
past, present and future posts in this disclaimer - which of course
clearly is a lie. But for their fraudulent benefit - I *again*
reiterate this disclaimer applies to all of my posts, exchanges and
USENET writings, past, present and future. I further reserve the
right to use any type of fiction, non-fiction, hyperbole,
autobiographical fiction, embellishments and quips in my writings as I
see fit, whenever I wish, and I will not be censored by smear/hate and
con gangs).
As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years' long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.
In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveal them for what they really are.
The gang's lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang' preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow "sinister" and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash).
And regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found in my waste
basket that were thrown there because of an error or typist
misstatement by one of our typist's, I have posted about two dozen
times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other than
an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence proving such was scanned and posted years
ago.
Also, in response to the smear gang's et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:
http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS' GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang's glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.
http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con/hate and smear gang is all about.
http://tinyurl.com/bu3dwb Those that Label Others KOOKS suffer a
psychosis named EID say psychologists - and that so-called "Kook"
votes never occur outside of the smear gang.
http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks' lies about receiving medals
he never received, and lies about serving in war campaigns and in
reactionary forces long after he had already left active duty.
http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks and many of his
smear/hate and con gang lied about my military service and my military
records. (This read is important as the gang is claiming that my
military records disproved or prove various things they have
fraudulently claimed about me. However, in truth we find those gang
accusations and claims to be nothing more than outright cons and
fraud. Brooks and Rau and other gang members have been lying about
the contents of my records for years. Above represents clear and
irrefutable proof of their fraud and false accusations.
http://tinyurl.com/ddogy4 Proof of just a few of Nigel Brooks
outright forgeries which he has used to fraudulently defame and smear
me - yes *forgeries* - fraud and deception from Nigel Brooks running
rampant.
Purple Heart Defamation from the gang revealed and rebutted.
Irrefutable proof the gang has been using outright fraud, defamation
and forgeries to smear and defame in respect to this issue.
http://tinyurl.com/pomzo7 05/21/09
YET ANOTHER Investigator confirms the smear/hate gang lied about
Purple Heart medal claims. Also, all those times I said I did not
have a PH Medal, which the gang has been maliciously hiding.
Http://tinyurl.com/q6pk56 The smear/hate gang's fraudulent
accusation "I said I was a Hero" proved the fraud and lie it is: In
fact - I said the *exact opposite* as these several past posts clearly
prove. Once again the gang has been exposed lying about something
they have been forging and lying about for years. Hate and smear
gangs always attempt to paint their smear victims in a false and
defaming light - this is clearly the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con
gang's purpose and mantra.
Here Nigel Brooks admits that he is not claiming I claimed I had a
purple heart medal - which contradicts not only Nigel Brooks
subsequent false accusations numbering in the hundreds, but including
his gang's fraud on this issue, it also contradicts similar fraud and
false accusations numbering in the *thousands!*
I said as the following URL clearly proves:
1http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9 In this post I make it clear that I
referenced a Purple Heart Card and not a Purple Heart Medal - and the
difference between the two.
Nigel Brooks said:
2http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9
In the above URL, Mr. Brooks also provided the following very clear
statement about this issue:
"He's doing the same now - by trying to insert the word "medal" into
the argument. Well no-one is accusing him of claiming to have had a
"Purple Heart Medal" - but the record shows he has claimed to have had
a Purple Heart **(VA service connected ID card)** and that he
received it in a real war. " (Emphasis added).
Obviously, Nigel Brooks above agreed and confirmed that I never said I
had a purple heart medal. Strange Nigel and his gang would
conveniently "forget" Nigel's conclusion about this issue after I
started proving they had lied about this issue all along - as the
above posts clearly prove?
Gang Preposterously Claims "Fiction" is "Lying."
When Brooks read my "shoot around little girl" or "shoot little girl"
post (for about the tenth time and counting) he said the following:
http://tinyurl.com/q9r9to May 22, 2009
"I would hazard a guess that the story is complete bullshit and that
Reiman never shot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese girl, otherwise
such an admission made in a public forum is astounding.
>>>> Nigel Brooks "
Then *after* I responded to Brooks (see URL above) and told him that
of course it was pure fiction just like my disclaimer states hundreds
of times. Brooks then reversed himself and wrote:
" he was in fact claiming that whilst he was in Vietnam he was >
forced to shoot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese child, who he claims was
attempting to kill him or his compatriots with an explosive device
concealed in a package of cigarettes.
>
> Now that is the logical interpretation of his post. In that post he
> says
> nothing about it being a fictional account or a debating method. The
> post
> stands by itself."
Nigel Brooks"
We all know, the WORLD knows, that when Fiction is used in any article
or prose it is NEVER identified as Fiction! Mark Twain even said
that Fiction has to be more believable than non-fiction or it loses
its effectiveness! According to Brainless Brooks, each time an author
uses Fiction to embellish or add interest to a story, he must tell
the reader in that same article he is using Fiction! This claim by BB
is about the most ridiculous, idiotic statement I have ever heard
about the use of Fiction, and it directly contradicts ALL authors,
prose instruction, and journalism 101 in every University in the
World!
So once again we have another Nigel Brooks arrogant first, now he is
claiming he knows more about writing Fiction than Mark Twain and all
Universities in the world!
I cannot decide if Nigel Brooks is arrogantly stupid, or just
arrogant? Or perhaps both? I will leave that decision up to the
readers.
http://tinyurl.com/madq65 In this post I point out that I have told
Nigel Brooks and his hate/con smear gang members *more than a thousand
times* (evidenced by Google archives) that I *DO NOT* post
autobiographical statements of fact on USENET - and if someone wants
to know whether what I post is Fiction, Non-Fiction, or whatever, they
*must contact me* and ask for more details.
I also posted that I DO NOT post autobiographical statements of facts
about myself on USENET as far back as 2001, and repeated that general
disclaimer statement in early 2003. Nigel Brooks and his smear/hate
con gang did not start their smear campaign against me until 2005,
*and Nigel Brooks and his gang even referenced and mentioned the post
in 2003 when I said I do not post autobiographical facts about me on
USENET - so they *knew* all along they were lying about the context
and meaning of quips they removed from my posts.
When an Author tells you MORE THAN A THOUSAND TIMES he is NOT posting
exclusively non-fiction on USENET, you would think that statement by
the author would resonate into even the pea brains of con men, smear
merchants and hate group leaders. Which of course it did as they
acknowledged this statement (Tom Rau whined and confirmed he read my
disclaimer more than 270 times) - but this fact had to be hidden by
such people so they could further their obviously fraudulent smear and
con defamation campaigns.
SELF ADMITTED AND SELF ACCLAIMED "TROLLS" OPERATE NIGEL BROOKS SMEAR
GANG'S MOST UNETHICAL FRAUD, SERIAL LYING AND CON MAN FALSE
ACCUSATIONS!
Many of the most vociferous and deceptive Nigel Brooks' key smear
gang members self-describe themselves as "Trolls."
These self-acclaimed and self-described *Trolls* have posted
hundreds of defaming statements and libel about me under those very
revealing Troll self-descriptions. (See alt.war.vietnam troll
section - you will find ALL of the self-described Trolls are connected
to Nigel Brooks and his gang's defamation and smear campaigns).
As just one example, here is the latest FBI forgery direct from a
Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang member that self-describes himself as a
"Troll." Note the gang member is again fraudulently using the name
of the FBI to smear and defame - which as we all know is a criminal
act.
It is obvious these Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang members will resort
to and use criminal acts to further the gang's smear and vilification
campaigns:
"Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.alt.net
From: Troll #351 <Leon...@sistine.va>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.politics,alt.news-media,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: That Second FBI Phone Transcript betwixt Mr.Doug Grant-tm
and the FBI
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:55:46 -0700"
Considering the self-description of these gang members as "Trolls" and
their propensity to use criminal acts (using the name of the FBI for
nefarious purposes is a criminal act - Federal and Brooks knows it)
to defame Nigel Brook's targeted hate/smear victim, can anyone out
there actually believe anything Nigel Brooks or any of his gang
members say about anyone?
If you do then you are admitting that you are de facto stating that
you believe people that are *telling you up front they are liars and
con men!* BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Question:
If you actually believe someone that is telling you up front that he
is lying to you, what would best describe you: (1) a moron (2) a
drooling moron (3) a member of the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang -
or perhaps all three?
Lawyers Speak "again"
All should know and be hereby informed that hate messages of any kind,
serial lying, fraud, libel, (which of course includes intentional and
malicious defamation and libel by omitting key facts) and other
publications of any kind will be recorded and used against the
perpetrator in a legal action. This is especially true for those
owners and participants in smear/hate web sites and hate newsgroups
which are used to further and facilitate hate and smear campaigns
against individuals.
Nigel Brooks Admits Gang Conspiracy to Smear/Hate/Con and Defame
From Nigel Brooks post dated: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:21:49 -0800
Jack:
"I just realized that you've been left off the listserv and you
probably were not aware that at the last general meeting the majority
decided that unless there was extreme provocation, it would
be our policy that no-one would respond to his diatribes anymore
(SerbonianBogGroupMeeting ByLaw IV(b)(1) adopted November 12, 2009).
Any individual wishing to respond should preface the response with
the phrase "SBG ByLaw ExemptionIV(b)(1)"
> Nigel Brooks
Doug's Rebuttal: Nigel Brooks and his hate/smear/con gang have posted
not less than eight thousand fraudulent, false, misleading, deceptive,
defaming and false light posts about me. I have just started to rebut
Mr. Brooks and his hate gang's fraud with only a few hundred
rebuttals. Nigel Brooks knows he cannot refute the truth, and he
pisses his panties each time I offer him the opportunity for any
independent Arbitration or University Law Department legal analysis of
what he has posted about me, and my rebuttals, in respect to the truth
of the issue, loser pays.
Mr. Brooks realizes that if his gang responds to my rebuttals that
will expand them, and the *last thing* a con man like Nigel Brooks
wants is the truth to be expanded so the readers will learn the truth
about him and his hate gang.
End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
"Nigel Brooks" <1.nb...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7meg8bF...@mid.individual.net...
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!bolzen.all.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.politics,alt.news-media
Subject: Re: Tom Rau Hypocrisy(was : Bogus 'Hero' dies...
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:31:37 -0600
Doug's Rebuttal:
More FBI forgeries from Nigel Brooks and his hate/con/ smear gang. The
smear and con gang is back forging FBI reports to help them smear and
defame their targeted victims.
Is there any doubt members of the Nigel Brooks con/smear and hate
gang will resort to any unethical tactic and fraud and con to smear
their victims - while ducking, running and hiding from my truthful
rebuttals as they know they cannot refute the truth?
This idiot actually forged my post to make it appear that I posted the
forged FBI report - what a con man!
Obviously, Nigel and his cabal of frauds and smear merchants know they
cannot refute anything I say in my rebuttals to Nigel Brooks serial
lying and cons, so they resort to such unethical tactics as forging
FBI reports and similar frauds:
Like I said, this hate gang will resort to any kind of fraud to smear
and defame.
Yet also note that Tom Rau ducked and hid from the following facts
and that he clearly uses juxtaposing and confluence to smear and con
readers that he is only interested in exposing fake military types.
This fraud tactic is a well-known con and fraud, and we have seen
Nigel Brooks use the same con on his web sites for profit (cons for
profit - a new Internet scam apparently):
What smear merchants and con men do is juxtapose or confluence some
real fakes and frauds with those innocent victims the con men wish to
smear and defame. This adds credibility to their fraud and cons they
post about their targeted smear victim, and actually makes some
readers believe some of their outrageous fraud, false accusations and
serial lying they post about other Vets. This fraud is a well known
con man mantra, and one that is apparently being used by both Nigel
Brooks and Tom Rau.
I was first told about this well-known con and fraud by my lawyer
Peter Shaver who had encountered the same con tactic being used by
other and similar hate/con and smear gangs like the Nigel Brooks
hate/con/and smear gang. The Von Brunn hate gang used the same kind of
fraud tactics as just one example:
Tom Rau also never mentions another member of his hate gang that has
spent 30 years in the US Military, never been able to achieve a rank
above Junior NCO, never went to Vietnam, never been in combat, never
saw a shot fired in anger in his life, yet posts on a Vietnam Vet
forum - talk about a wannabe! But Rau never mentions this clown
because he too is a gang member. See below for the other gang member's
Rau "hypocritically fails to mention" when he conjures up someone to
falsely accuse.
If Rau was genuine in his whines and wails about fake military types
stealing the valor of real vets he would do the following:
1. He would never falsely accuse other vets of lying about their
military service. Which he does regularly.
2. He would mention the outrageous frauds and lies and wannabe
bullshit his fellow hate gang members have posted about their military
service - especially Nigel Brooks who has lied profusely about his
service.
3. He would at least mention the fact the officers that wrote up news
artices and after action reports in Vietnam testified (under oath)
before congress they were ordered to lie in those reports. These
reports were used to provide medals to officers and hospital workers
and others in Vietnam. This fraud apparently, according to the very
officers and NCO's that wrote the reports, was rampant, wide-spread,
and used often. How many Vietnam officers received medals based upon
fake after action reports? Or how many officers received medals based
upon after action reports they or their chums wrote up - similar to
the John Kerry after action reports?
Rau NEVER mentions the above - therefore his claims to be exposing
those that are stealing the valor of real vets is obviously
disingenuous.
Rau also must know and realize that people like he and his hate gang
that lie or defame real veteran's honorable service are the ones that
are guilty of stealing valor from those they defame, smear, and lie
about.
So if Tom Rau is looking for someone that is stealing the valor of
Vietnam Vets, he should start with his hall mirror.
Doug Grant (Tm)
>
>
> "tankfixer" <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.256b9a4...@news.bytemine.net...
>> In article <pqKdndBl9tGfLZzW...@giganews.com>,
>> stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com says...
>>>
>>> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:10:35 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
>>> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >"Dai Uy" <Dai...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> >news:199d8662-67f0-4aec...@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>>> >
>>> > ">>> >
>>> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>> >smear merchant disclaimer below applies:
>>> >
>>> >Doug Says: Mr. Rau, I agree that those that lie about their
>>> >military
>>> >service should be exposed;
>>> >
>>> >Above is an example of Nigel Brooks lying about his medals and
>>> >his
>>> >participation in the 1968 Tet offensive, which the US Army says
>>> >he was
>>> >not even on active duty at the time! (See Above).
>>> >
>>> >Also, did you ask your fellow hate gang member, Mr. Tom Huxton
>>> >about
>>> >his military service? He claims that he was wearing brass on his
>>> >Jungle fatigues, and that he worked in a tank without any tank
>>> >training. He also claimed that he served under another name other
>>> >than Tom Huxton (a.k.a. Pepperoni) so that no one can check on
>>> >his
>>> >"military claims" he also claims to be someone that served in the
>>> >US
>>> >Marine corps, but he said he was in the US Army?
>>> >
>>> >How about checking on someone that calls himself a medic but was
>>> >really only a ward attendant in a hospital unit?
>>> > How about the
>>> >anonymous cyberstalker SteveL that works with you and Brooks in
>>> >posting fake FBI reports and goes from forum to forum attacking
>>> >real
>>> >vets, and fraudulently claiming they lied about their military
>>> >service?
>>>
Doug Grant (Tm)
Independent Third Party
>
> http://tinyurl.com/pomzo7 05/21/09
> YET ANOTHER Investigator confirms the smear/hate gang lied about Purple
> Heart medal claims. Also, all those times I said I did not have a PH
> Medal, which the gang has been maliciously hiding.
Sir,
We have thoroughly examined each of your usenet posts for the last
seven years and confirm that you have told the truth about your
Purple Heart Card (which you obtained in a real war).
Old Sarge
On 11/22/09 5:41 PM, in article
UaCdnXe_qPbaUZTW...@supernews.com, "Independent Third Party"
<dr...@coldine.edu> wrote:
NEVER believe anything you read on Usenet. NEVER. It's all bullshit and
people lie all the time.
Daryl Hunt
That is the first time I have noticed that you actually told the truth.
Yes, you do lie all the time.