NIGEL BROOKS FORGERIES - PROOF AND REBUTTAL
DGVREIMAN
NIGEL BROOKS FORGERIES REVEALED - PROOF
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article (nor in any of my past posts) represents in any manner
any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is about, directed toward
or against any particular person - other than those specifically
mentioned herein. This article is being posted for entertainment
purposes only. If any person finds this post personally annoying,
abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please notify me of your
specific reasons for annoyance via email at 1. 1.
legal...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections reasonable
(considering the "reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will
then remove this post, or the offending passages contained therein,
from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My intent is
to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers prior to
publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse, humiliate,
or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on USENET or
elsewhere.
Please note that defending myself from harassment and obloquy with
rebuttal posts has been deemed a "lawful and legitimate" publication
by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked, libeled, defamed or
harassed, or my copyrighted articles not interrupted nor infringed
upon, I clearly do not have a reason to respond with a rebuttal.
Please also note that I intend to notify any and all ISP's and web
hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site or other similar
entity about me after I give the offender an opportunity to retract,
apologize and remove said post from the Google archive).
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots' inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary's
definitions of simple terms, such as "we" "estimated" "involved"
"retired from" and "not representing any biographical claim" are all
wrong and only their "special interpretations of the English language
can apply to all English terms, and the gang's standard nonsensical
mind reading claims) that (1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that
sniper killed Ho Chi Minh, HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803
enemy soldiers in Vietnam and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3)
that I was a secret member of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them
out) that I hunted down and murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir
boy) (4) that I was trained by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have
green blood, and retractable fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo"
was copied after my deeds in Vietnam and I still live in caves in the
northwest (6) and best of all, I went to the Carlise War College to
study WWII tactics even before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA are of
course, not true. No more than the gang' preposterous and goofy fraud
that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I
have posted on USENET dozens of times I did not receive a Purple Heart
Medal and the post the gang tries to distort was clearly talking about
cards as the last sentence proves) (8) Nor that removing hundreds of
typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found so far in
about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under accounts I used,
and then replacing the errors with the true intended context and
meaning by the author is somehow "sinister" and the original discarded
post was the correct intended post and the corrected version is false!
(Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And of course this includes the fact I have received
notice from Google stating that several of the posts the gang has used
to defame me "did not originate from any account I used at the time."
Which is of course something we (not less than 60 people swore to this
fact under oath that our accounts had been hacked) stated in our
lawsuit against the casino agents when we complained about them
forging posts under our account names - this is of course something on
the public record that is always ignored by the present smear gang,
but not for long I suspect.
Moreover, giggle, Google is NOT reading my posts (nor anyone else's)
and determining which posts to keep and which to discard like one of
the smear gang leader's recently preposterously whined and barked -
and no, soldiers in Vietnam that knew how to call in Artillery
strikes, Air strikes, and knew how to set trip wires and Claymores are
NOT "phonies" just because they knew how to do those simple and common
things while serving in a combat zone during a time when there really
was combat. (Of course this does not include those that were in
Vietnam to just guard lonely borders, play S-3, or to ride around in
stolen jeeps while playing Village Rat).
End of Disclaimer:
NIGEL BROOKS FRAUD AND FORGERIES REVEALED - PROOF
In my humble opinion:
When a person considers the veracity of statements and
representations from anyone, they must first consider the known past
performance of such an individual in respect to background, general
veracity and ethics.
I doubt seriously, and believe many will agree, that someone born,
raised and "educated" in the East London slums, and trained in the
art of deception and fraud as a young man by Vietnamese whores, and
then taught to learn the only definition of an English term possible
is "the most defaming definition that can distorted" is worthy of any
consideration whatsoever as to honesty, or veracity, not to mention
anything ethical. This clown is about as American as Borsht. What do
the Korean's call these village rats that shack up all their pathetic
lives with whores? They have a very special word for these pathetic
souls, which I will not mention as I certainly do not wish to
embarrass anyone.
Do I have respect for such people? Obviously not, especially when
they have proved time and time again they are serial liars, fraud
merchants, smear gang leaders, con men and an assortment of other
nefarious and psychopathic disorders that only a team of doctors from
really good medical centers could list, which would of course take
hundreds of pages.
Why am I forced to post my opined conclusion in respect to the above?
Because such people are posting volumes of fraud and false accusations
about me for the malicious purpose of defamation and obloquy, and they
are forcing me to rebut their fraud with the truth and the facts about
their background, which lends to the fact they are no-doubt serial
liars and smear merchants.
Here are a few applicable past posts that pertain to Nigel Brooks
that need to be understood by all readers that have read his fraud and
false accusations he has repeatedly posted about me:
We start off of course by providing Mr. Brooks hypocritical plethora
of lies and fraud about his own military service. Including his
claiming medals he never received, claiming participation in the 1968
Tet Offensive in Reactionary Forces that he did not participate in,
lying about not less than ten Vietnam campaigns he could not have
possibly participated in because he was already out of the service,
and his outrageous lying about receiving Vietnam campaign medals long
after he had left the active service:
http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks lies about receiving medals he
never received, and serving in war campaigns long after he had already
left active duty.
So we start out on this odyssey of investigation by first knowing
Nigel Brooks is perhaps one of the most flagrant, arrogant and
hypocritical liars about military service that has ever posted on
USENET - with the exception of perhaps other members of his "smear
gang."
We also know that Mr. Nigel Brooks, after Web Manager independent
investigations, has suffered the humiliation and con man exposure of
experiencing the forcing down of not less than ELEVEN web sites that
Mr. Brooks created due to violations of the Web Host's terms of
service in respect to defamation or fraud or false accusations, which
of course provided a *PROFIT* to Mr. Brooks and to the Web Managers
due to such fraud.
Profiting from fraud, false accusations and obloquy is perhaps a new
Internet scam, and clearly Nigel Brooks knows how to work that scam.
Or he did, until one of his smear for profit victims started to
complain, which has infuriated him and his gang against that victim,
and of course I am that particular victim, and I have just started to
defend myself in earnest.
So right out of the gate we know we are dealing with a con man, fraud
merchant, smear for profit huckster, and a complete well defined
serial liar, and here is more proof of that opined conclusion:
1. http://tinyurl.com/5jq6wo Nigel Says: " I have never forged
anything
in my life Mr. Reiman."
BWHAHAHAHAHA
A short list of Mr. Brooks more infamous forgeries:
http://tinyurl.com/5zjrxb
Here is where Brooks forged the context of a Judge's statements in
respect to claiming the Judge was addressing me personally, and that I
wrote the complaint in question although my group paid a lawyer tens
of thousands of dollars to write the complaint, and that I
represented 60 plaintiffs and several corporations in an US District
Court although I am not a lawyer.
http://tinyurl.com/64kkux Nigel Brooks Butter Bar forgery, where he
ADDED the terms (2nd Lieutenant) into the narrative of my post so as
to change the context of the post fragment he used to fraudulently
claim I was claiming to be a 2nd Lieutenant in Vietnam
"Note that Brooks forged my post and added the terms "(2nd
Lieutenant)" even *after* I told him I was referencing a Platoon
Leader that was a SFC in absence of a commissioned officer - so much
for "honesty" in the Brooks gang)."
http://tinyurl.com/6pt875 In this post Mr. Brooks states: "My
experts have concluded that in the exchange with Mr. Ciamaichella on
February 16, 2003 you were claiming to have been awarded the Purple
Heart as depicted in the following link:"
1.
http://www.purpleheart.org/Membership/Public/AboutUs/HistoryOrder.aspx
Rather than fall over laughing, they were disgusted.
--
Nigel Brooks"
Yet when challenged to produce his experts from the web site he cited,
Brooks changed his tune and said he never consulted with that agency -
so which "independent" experts were "disgusted?" Obviously another
Brooks forgery.
http://tinyurl.com/6dfrqp Brooks netsan post forgery.
http://tinyurl.com/5o6x67 Brooks PHD forgery.
http://tinyurl.com/5qfmln Brooks DrProfe is me forgery (DrProfe
before Nigel started to use that name was a handle used by Paul
Yannessa, as Paul stated openly).
http://tinyurl.com/5cwnog Brooks context of his confession he knew
others were posting under my account forgery.
http://tinyurl.com/6lloeq Brooks replacing the context of Cards with a
false context of Medals forgery.
http://tinyurl.com/59hbuj Clarified and corrected Purple Heart Card
post, as so clairified by the original author. (Note only the
author(s) could possibly know the true context of anything they
wrote - and those con men that claim mind reading skills, and crystal
balls to add terms or take them away from someone's else's post, well,
I suspect the terms "con man" fits their description about as well as
anything).
http://tinyurl.com/6buu77 Irrefutable evidence the SteveL anonymous
con man and cyberstalker and key member of the Nigel Brooks smear gang
maliciously retrieved erred posts that were long discarded in my
Google waste basket for the express purpose of malicious libel,
defamation, harassment and cyberstalking.
http://tinyurl.com/5m2xwu Irrefutable proof that Nigel Brooks
maliciously forged the term Purple Heart "Medal" into a post he knew
was about Purple Heart VA ID Cards and records that were issued by the
VA at the time of the original typist's post.
http://tinyurl.com/55xefk Nigel Brooks admitting he maliciously lied
about forging the term Medal into a post he knew was about Cards, and
his offer to retract his lie and fraud.
http://tinyurl.com/6e6d3h Purple Heart Card post provided to an
independent expert on the US Military (30 year retired) and he
confirms the post was about cards and not medals.
http://tinyurl.com/6z2thj Rebuttal to the Nigel Brooks' smear gang
fraud and false accusations about wounds and purple heart medals.
http://tinyurl.com/6syqvv Nigel Brooks - Law Dog experts will not
change their opinion based upon Nigel Brooks' forgery and false
accusation that I did not give the experts all of the information.
http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks lies about receiving medals he
never received, and serving in war campaigns long after he had already
left active duty.
http://tinyurl.com/2ah57c SteveL caught in fraud about PH Medal.
Nigel Brooks forgery and outright lie that I never said anything
about Purple Heart Cards or a Purple Heart Card being removed for
clarification.
2. http://tinyurl.com/2obwh3 In this June 2006 post I again state
the only post that was ever removed that had anything to do with
a Purple Heart was about Purple Heart Cards and was not written
nor posted by me. This post was posted more than 18 months ago,
confirming again the true context of Post 17 that was removed.
1. http://tinyurl.com/3b59wt May 17, 2006 long before Brooks started
posting his forged version of what Chip and my typist said:
In this post I again reference a Purple Heart Card that I
possessed:
Note the key passage:
1. " I am an American Veteran, and when I arrive at the VA I am
forced to show my Purple Heart card ID before they will even talk
to me (note before the cyberstalkers start to wail and howl about
what I just said be assured that I am not saying possession of a
Purple Heart card indicates that I have a "Purple Heart Medal" I
do not have that medal - and that is just the old slang for the
card as it used to contain the image of a purple V -the newer
ones have an American flag background on them)"
Strange how Brooks, Rau and gang howl and whine when the Google
archives prove them the forgers and liars I know they are . . .
And Nigel fraudulent states in the same post above:
1. "My reporting of that post was on June 10, 2006. You immediately
responded, claiming forgeries and denying authorship of the post. It
wasn't until just over a year later in 2007 that you came up with the
"Purple Heart Card" explanation.
1. Why didn't you just explain it when challenged in 2006?" Nigel
Brooks went on to say in the above post?"
Nigel Brooks
What Nigel Brooks is stating above is that because I
did not mention Purple Heart Cards when he first brought up my
discarded post in 2006, and I did not even mention the missing term
"Cards" until 2007, then I was lying about the post meaning Cards and
not Medals. Mr. Brooks is, in the alternative, is stating if I DID
bring
up the term "Cards" back when he first brought up my discarded post,
then of course that "Cards" reference would have been proof positive
that the post in question was about Cards and not Medals. Well
surprise Mr. Brooks, because I DID precisely state that post was about
Cards when you first brought up my discarded post, and I also stated
clearly way back then that someone else had typed and posted the post
in question:
Here are my Google archived Purple Heart URL's that not only prove Mr.
Brooks claim that I never mentioned "Cards" before 2007 an outright
forgery, lie and fraud, and because I *did* mention precisely what
he claims I
should have said, Brooks has now openly admitted he was wrong and the
true
context of the post was Cards and not Medals, just like I said it was:
Purple heart card Google references:
http://tinyurl.com/yxkndv June 12, 2006: Victoria Crosses and purple
hearts posts where I again state clearly "Purple Heart Card" I
state:
"(The only post removed by Google that contained the terms "Purple
Heart" associated with the dggrant universal account used by dozens of
other people was a post typed by EH that was talking about a "Purple
Heart Card" in a follow up conversation about VA benefits.)"
(Note the date of my post. Brooks said he first mentioned the
discarded purple heart post on June 10th, and Brooks said I did not
reply with any "Card" reference to his post until 2007, and Brooks
also stated *that had I replied right away about the "Card" issue then
myt prompt reply would have represented proof positive that the
intended topic of the discarded post was Cards and not Medals* . YET
THAT PROMPT REPLY IS PRECISELY WHAT I SAID AND DID ON JUNE 12, 2006,
IN REPLY TO BROOKS JUNE 10, 2006 POST AS THE ABOVE GOOGLE ARCHIVE
CLEARLY PROVES! Brooks has now confirmed that he has been lying
about this Purple Heart Card post all along, and he has used his own
stated "necessary evidence" to prove his fraud. This is tantamount to
a confession from Nigel Brooks that he has been lying about this issue
all along.
Here is the paragraph I stated on June 12, 2006 TWO DAYS after Mr.
Brooks started his BS about this long discarded post, as the above URL
from Google clearly proves:
From my June 12, 2006 Post:
"And what "post" is BS Brooks talking about above? I never made any
claim for any medal that I did not receive. Not once, ever. If BS
Brooks claims otherwise then let's see it along with proper
Message ID's and evidence that it was posted by me. (The only post
removed by Google that contained the terms "Purple Heart" associated
with the dggrant universal account used by dozens of other people was
a post typed by EH that was talking about a "Purple Heart Card" in a
follow up conversation about VA benefits.)"
Apparently, this pesky Google archive alone proves Mr. Brooks lied
about
when I first said anything about removing a post about Purple Heart
Cards. In fact this post even mentions that someone else other than
me wrote the post! According to Brooks, since I DID mention Cards at
the very time he started to question me about this post, the topic was
clearly Cards and not Medals. No wonder Mr. Brooks offered to retract
his forgery that the post context was Medals - he knew he was caught
lying and the overwhelming proof was the context of the post was
Cards.
Mr. Brooks also posted the following lie:
> "The URL
http://tinyurl.com/3n7wvg which you provided, leads one to a
> post you made to your private google group just over 5 years after
> the
> initial Purple Heart post, and about 2 years after you were
> challenged
> on the initial post. It is self serving, and most certainly not
> evidence."
Nigel Brooks claims about that I never mentioned the PH post was about
Cards until TWO YEARS after I was challenged on the initial post by
him, which of course means he fraudulently claimed the topic was
Medals, which of course he denies saying below. . . again. Weooooooo.
The Victoria Crosses and Purple Hearts post URL below first proves
that Brooks has again been caught in an outright lie in his "I did not
reply with Cards until 2 years after first challenged" which also
again reverses his claim that because I did not reply my typist's
correction post was not evidence. However, since Brooks has been
caught lying, and in fact I DID reply that the topic was Cards almost
immediately after he challenged that post, then clearly the
alternative is true and my typist's corrected post DOES represent yet
more evidence that (1) the true topic of the post in question was
Cards and not Medals, and ONCE AGAIN Nigel Brooks and his gang have
been caught in mid con and lie - so what else is new?
More evidence the intended topic was Cards:
1. http://tinyurl.com/yhrpg2 In this URL I mention that I am forced to
show
my "Purple Heart Card" (May 17, 2006). Note the date, long before Mr.
Brooks said a word about this post which he says above started on June
10, 2006.
http://tinyurl.com/yxkndv June 12, 2006: Victoria Crosses and purple
hearts posts where I again state clearly "Purple Heart Card" "(The
only post removed by Google that contained the terms "Purple Heart"
associated with the dggrant universal account used by dozens of other
people was a post typed by EH that was talking about a "Purple
HeartCard" in a follow up conversation about VA benefits.)"
Here is the paragraph I stated on June 12, 2006 TWO DAYS after Mr.
Brooks started his BS about this long discarded post, as the about URL
from Google clearly proves:
"And what "post" is BS Brooks talking about above? I never made any
claim for any medal that I did not receive. Not once, ever. If BS
Brooks claims otherwise then let's see it along with proper
Message ID's and evidence that it was posted by me. (The only post
removed by Google that contained the terms "Purple Heart" associated
with the dggrant universal account used by dozens of other people was
a post typed by EH that was talking about a "Purple Heart Card" in a
follow up conversation about VA benefits.)"
Apparently, this Google archive alone proves Mr. Brooks lied about
when I first said anything about removing a post about Purple Heart
Cards, and in fact this post even mentions that someone else other
than me wrote the post! According to Brooks, since I DID mention
Cards at the very time he started to question me about this post, the
topic was clearly Cards and not Medals, and no wonder Mr. Brooks
offered to retract his forgery that it was Medals, he knew he was
caught lying and the proof was overwhelming the context was Cards.
Yet more evidence the intended PH topic was Cards:
http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9 In this post I make it clear that I
referenced a Purple Heart Card and not a Purple Heart Medal - and the
difference between the two.
NIGEL BROOKS CONFESSES THAT I NEVER SAID I HAD A PURPLE HEART MEDAL
In the above URL, Mr. Brooks also told the following lie:
"He's doing the same now - by trying to insert the word "medal" into
the argument. Well no-one is accusing him of claiming to have had a
"Purple Heart Medal" - but the record shows he has claimed to have had
a Purple Heart, and that he received it in a real war. "
Nigel Brooks
Doug Says: First Mr. Brooks says the context of my typist's post was
about medals, then he says he never said the context was about medals
and I was the only person that brought up that subject. Then he
switches back and lies and says my typist and I were talking about
medals. One lie after another, flip and flopping between lies, offers
to retract, lies about my posts about Cards, back to the lie of him
never fraudulently claiming I was talking about medals, to an outright
claim that I was.
Weeeeeeeeoooooeoeoeo - This Nigel Brooks character needs some serious
help if you ask me.
Here is the key passage from Brooks post above: "Well, no-one is
accusing him of claiming to have had a "Purple Heart Medal."
So according to Brooks I never said I had a "Purple Heart Medal."
But then after the truth about Nigels lies about his military service
surfaced, Brooks contradicted his own statement with more lies to the
contrary OF HIS OWN STATEMENTS!
Nigel Brooks next lie: "Make up your mind - you have previously denied
removing the post. In fact on June 29, 2006 you commented as follows
on the posting: "
Doug Says: I said it was a forgery, and it was as it did not reference
anywhere the term Medals as you were misrepresenting, and in fact the
last sentence of the post alone proves the context was not medals, and
I did not write it nor post it as my June 12, 2006 post referenced
above clearly proves.
Nigel Brooks next lie: (Now he is refuting his own claim above) ""You
are the one who first used the term "medal" in connection with that
post. My commentary was directly related to your use of the term. I
was observing that were playing your usual games with words. Post
number 17 said the following: " I have a Purple Heart also"
Doug Says: Brooks says my typist's reply was about medals, then he
says it wasn't, then he says he never said that it was, THEN HE SAYS I
NEVER CLAIMED TO HAVE A PURPLE HEART MEDAL IN THAT POST, then he
offers
a retraction of him saying it was about medals, then he ignores his
own retraction offer and again (is this guy incredible or what) claims
the topic of the post was about medals. . . This man lies so much and
is so convoluted he must meet
himself when he goes around corners. Like I said, trained to lie by
Vietnamese whores.
On April 20, 2008 Nigel Brooks made the following unsolicited offer to
me:
http://tinyurl.com/6zxk3y
Nigel Said:
> "I'll offer you the following - If you post the confirmation you
> received > from the US Army that Chip was telling the truth about
> him not being
> awarded any Purple Heart medals or ever being in combat or earning
> combat badges to your >
> http://groups.google.com/group/namesofcyberstalkers
> group in an appropriate format that would tend to prove its
> authenticity (a jpeg > of the document showing the US Army logo
> should be sufficient - an
> example would be the one you have previously posted to your group
> here
> http://tinyurl.com/3wymqc) - I will do the following:
> I will author and post to the forums an original posting which
> indicates that I have reviewed all of your evidence concerning the
> exchange in question and am satisified that your most recent
> revision
> of the post is supported by the evidence.
> The only proviso that I include with this offer is that I reserve
> the
> right to file an FOIA with the US Army for a copy of the
> communication
> that you claim to have received from them regarding Mr. Ciamaichella
> (" I also have since received confirmation from the US Army that
> Chip
> was telling the truth about him not being awarded any Purple Heart >
> medals or ever being in combat or earning combat badges.")
> Awaiting your reply
> Nigel Brooks"
In this post Mr. Brooks confirmed his retraction offer, his
verification that my typist's correction which includes the terms
Cards is true and correct and is "supported by the evidence." Mr.
Brooks also appointed a third party, a Mr. Henry Cook to accept the
proof he had requested and I agreed to provide:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.war.vietnam/msg/529102b2a
15528a5?
http://tinyurl.com/5j8ums
http://tinyurl.com/57bncm Defining the term forgery for Brooks, and
identifying yet another forgery.
http://tinyurl.com/566djv Brooks replacing my term "Pilots" with
"air crew" forgery.
http://tinyurl.com/6zgq68 Several other Brooks Forgeries exposed.
http://tinyurl.com/5q6zpx Lawyers identify Brooks gang forgeries.
http://tinyurl.com/6h9m7j Section Poppa - a Rebuttal to Nigel Brooks
litany of forgeries, fraud, false accusations, lies,
misrepresentations and outright deceptions:
What did Brooks say again? " I have never forged anything in my life
Mr. Reiman."
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
Brooks MOS lie:
http://tinyurl.com/ywgpar Excerpts contained herein about the duties
of NCO's were taken directly from from the US Army Official
Information Guide.
REBUTTAL - NIGEL BROOKS DUTIES FRAUD
What Mr. Sp4 Nigel Brooks and his Brownies are hiding in their
perfumed BS they are fraudulently panning off as facts about me are as
follows.
Clearly, since Mr. Sp4 draftee Nigel Brooks never achieved a rank
above Sp4, and since he was a two-year draftee that elected to take
his discharge in Vietnam (refused to extend his service) and we all
know the typical type of person that elects to take his discharge in
Vietnam, (how many of those kids did I try to convince to not fall in
love with those whores) he obviously is either ashamed of his service,
or is a screaming, idiotic, buffoon con man that does not have a clue
in respect to the duties of a Staff or Senior NCO in the US Army, nor
that of an US Army linguist.
Here is what Mr. Sp4 Nigel Brooks said about my comments in respect to
HELPING to interrogate prisoners in his latest attempt to smear and
defame me with fraud, false implied accusations and general con man
bullshit:
"I said on Sep 15, 2006
> When I was in Vietnam I had the opportunity to assist in or
> review several prisoner interrogations. The main reason I was
> afforded this opportunity was because I spoke fluent French,
> and passable Vietnamese (I scored a "4" in French in the US
> Army DPLT language test, and a "2" in the Vietnamese). I also
> was involved in a couple of interrogations due to opportunity
> and field operations. Moreover, I also was asked from time to
> time to review the taped interviews and the transcripts of
> prisoner interrogations to see if I could find any
> "irregularities."
> From a thread initiated by DGVREIMAN on September 15, 2006
> entitled "SHOULD WE TORTURE PRISONERS?"
>
> BROOKS COMMENT:
>
> Mr. Reiman was a SSG - E-6 with an MOS of 71H40 (personnel NCO)
> assigned to Co D, 1Bn 27th Infantry Regiment (Wolfhounds), 25th
> Infantry Division for an approximate five month period. He
> subsequently transferred to Can Tho Vietnam - where he was
> assigned to the 51st Maintenance Company (Lt). Nothing in the
> writer's military records indicate any expertise in interview
> techniques or the Vietnamese language. The writers DA Form-20
> indicates that on August 7, 1967 he was tested for proficiency
> in German - there is no indication on any of the released
> records that the writer has any proficiency in the French or
> Vietnamese language or that he received training in those
> areas.
Brooks' contention that all NCO's ALWAYS perform duties commensurate
with their primary MOS is about the most ridiculous, preposterous and
idiotic claim I have ever heard from anyone that actually served in
the US Army. If any NCO will back up Sp4 Brooks claim in this regard
(Brownie or not) I say come forward and be counted. It is time to
back up your gang leader regardless of how idiotic it will make you
appear, because nothing can be more idiotic that these fraudulent and
preposterous claims by Sp4 draftee Nigel Brooks.
Here again is another lie in this regard from Nigel Brooks:
ARMY COMBAT POLICY
>From 1. Rod Powers,
Your Guide to U.S. Military.
FREE Newsletter. Sign Up Now!
"It is Army policy that assignment to combat or duty in a hostile-fire
or areas must be shared equitably by all similarly qualified
Soldiers."
1. http://tinyurl.com/p7psw
B. Nigel Brooks clearly is defaming me and painting my military
service in a false light
by stating that all NCO's that did not have infantryman's MOS's never
saw any real combat. Brooks is clearly lying as the official US Army
policy above clearly proves. Why did Brooks try to claim that my
"duty" MOS was always that of a Personnel Staff NCO in Vietnam when
we all know that a good one third of all Army Personnel regularly
perform permanent duties outside of their primary MOS, and ALL NCO's
are required to perform combat duties in a hostile-fire area of
assignment? Because Nigel Brooks is a smear merchant, a liar and he is
clearly using lies, fraud and false statements to deliberately defame
and cyberstalk me. (The reasons for his actions have already been
stated and can be found at the following URL - along with evidence of
a fantastic amount of Nigel Brooks and his gang members lies, false
accusations and outright fraud.)
http://tinyurl.com/ekn97
End of this part of Nigel Brooks lies and forgeries. I have volumes
more and will continue posting them in sections if I am forced to do
so. I have better things to do than to defend myself against such
dregs and liars, and I would love to stop posting my rebuttals, but as
long as I am being attacked by con men and fraud merchants expect to
see me defend myself every time.
My defense is set up now that it will only take me a few minutes a
week to set the record straight when these con men attack. Some I
will not respond to as they are just echoes of their gang leaders, and
one in particular is going to be in court with me real soon. So his
fraud and harassment will be addressed in that arena, and then the
results of such will be brought back to this forum as further evidence
of the overt acts of some of the smear gang members. (You will not
believe what some of these gang members have been caught doing).
Doug Grant (Tm)