LEGAL ACTION TAKEN - NOTICE
DGVREIMAN
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
I have been asked by this same law firm to not reveal nor discuss the
specific actions they have initiated this time on USENET. However, if
anyone is interested in these legal specific actions, their legal
representative may contact me at legal...@comcast.net for further
information in this regard.
I received a very extensive and comprehensive package from the said
law firm that includes hundreds of gang USENET and other smears/hate
posts and publications, along with my rebuttals, and copies of the
legal action they have recently initiated.
The said law firm (which practices in several states) has completed a
very extensive and independent investigation of the facts in respect
to the smear/hate campaign Nigel Brooks and his smear/hate con gang
members have been waging against me for years, and have concluded that
legal causes of action are warranted against several members of the
said smear/hate gang.
I have been advised to provide the following information:
1. If you believe you may be involved in these legal proceedings,
please immediately contact or retain legal counsel.
2. If you have in the past repeated, furthered, or posted any
information that could be construed by me as defaming or false light
misrepresentations, you are strongly advised to cease and desist
referencing me in any manner, by name, nick name or any other
reference that others will assume or know is me, in any defamatory
manner, veiled or otherwise, on USENET, Web Sites, or any other public
forum, newsgroup or publication.
3. If you believe you may be involved in the said legal action -
then please provide this notice to your legal counsel.
4. Please be advised everything you post in any public or private
forum, or send to me, or send to others about me, could be used
against you or against others in a legal proceeding.
5. Please be advised your participation with a hate/smear and con
gang like the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang could make you
legally culpable for everything your fellow gang members do or have
done, past, present or in the future.
6. Please be advised that if you incite hated against one of Nigel
Brooks targeted smear victims, and that person is threatened or
suffers injury, (injury defined in many different ways depending upon
your state or the victim's state of residence) you could be arrested
and tried for a crime.
7. Please be advised that anonymous cyberstalking and unlawful
harassment (anonymous or otherwise) and invasion of privacy,
trafficking in information illegally removed from Government
computers, could represent in many cases criminal acts.
8. Please be advised that criminal statutes, and their applicable
statutes of limitations can be also used in a civil action, which is
common once criminal administrative remedies have been exhausted.
9. If you are a member of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang,
or you wish to facilitate the common purpose of defamation and false
light members of that said gang have been using against me for years,
and you wish to continue to participate with that gang in respect to
defamation, smears, hate, false light, cyberstalking, unlawful
harassment, please be advised that you should contact your mortgage
company, home owners insurance, business insurance, or any lenders,
and inform them you have been advised that a legal action has been (or
will be) initiated against you. If your lender, or legal
representative wishes to know if you have been named specifically in
the said existing legal action, please have your legal representative
contact me at legal...@comcast.net. Copies of the said legal action
taken will be provided to the legal representative of all those
involved.
10. Please be advised that if you knowingly lie to any investigator
that act can be and probably will be used against you. If you repeat
what gang members have lied about in my regard, regardless of the fact
they are maliciously lying by key omission, that repeated lie can be
considered the same as a direct lie by you. Repeating fraud and lies
from others will not normally protect you from charges of perjury.
This tactic is a well-known smear and hate gang tactic - I assure all
the investigators and the lawyers are more than well-aware of this
hate gang tactic.
11. For those gang members that are residents of Washington State,
the above information may or may not apply, as I have been informed
that separate legal actions will probably be initiated in that case.
12. For those gang members that are residents of nations other than
the USA, and are residents of Nations that have participated in the
International Copyright agreements, then a legal action naming you
will be filed in the nation of your residence and in the USA.
13. For those gang members that own or participate in the Nigel
Brooks smear/hate and con Google web site, or any other web site
maintained by gang members, please be advised those web sites and/or
newsgroups must be removed from the Internet immediately as they
clearly violate my registered copyrights, contained fraud and false
light defamation, and that fact has been confirmed by an extensive
legal investigation. The owners and operators of those web sites or
newsgroups have one week from this date to completely remove anything
referencing my copyrighted materials and any and all defamation posted
about me from the entire Internet or any other public forum, or face
applicable legal actions and/or possible criminal charges under Title
14. Please be advised that I and my counsel will consider any and all
future published defamation, fraud, lies, false light
misrepresentations, and key lies by omission, including such that
exists on other Newsgroups and web sites about me, which have not been
removed as so directed, as deliberate and malicious acts by all those
involved.
15. Please be advised you should inform all third parties you have
provided information about me that this legal action has been
initiated, and it could include them as well. This would include all
web hosts, or any other business entity or persons that have been
provided information about me in any manner. Such information will be
determined in total during discovery.
16. Please be advised that libel, libel per se, hate speech,
defamation, false light vilifications, obloquy, are normally NOT
considered protected free speech.
17. Please be advised that I am not a lawyer, and I am not providing
any legal information nor advice in any manner. I am simply repeating
what I have been told by lawyers about this issue. To determine if
any of the statements contained herein apply to you, or even apply in
general to anything, please consult with your legal counsel.
Douglas Reiman (a.k.a. Doug Grant, a.k.a Doogie, a.k.a any other
reference or nick name the said smear gang uses to reference me).
Le Janitor
"DGVREIMAN" <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:eaSdnRtdxdtogOrX...@giganews.com...
> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>
> TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>
>
> I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they have
> initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel Brooks
> smear/hate and con gang.
>
> Douglas Reiman (a.k.a. Doug Grant, a.k.a Doogie, a.k.a any other reference
> or nick name the said smear gang uses to reference me).
>
>
I assume you are claiming to be a lawyer now? that's a no-no ya
know.....
Jeff George
news:eaSdnRtdxdtogOrX...@giganews.com:
> I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
> have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
> Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
You're a fucking retard.
--
JG, former Quarterback and Lt. General SWIFT (Socialist Workers
Infiltrating Federal Targets)
Soy el Diablo Gringo Supremo
Nigel Brooks
"Le Janitor" <awrli...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:h57d6e$kvb$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Sounds like BS to me.
1. There is not now and never has been a "Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang"
2. If indeed a law firm were to initiate legal action against anyone who
has seen fit to challenge Douglas Reiman on his past usenet claims, then
they are in for a very tough time of it. It seems to me that due diligence
on their part would be:
a. Review all of Mr. Reimans postings on these newsgroups.
b. Compare his claims to the actual historical record
c. Make an evaluation as to the veracity of his explanations for his
postings
d. Investigate his usenet reputation for honesty
e. Investigate his past litigious conduct against his detractors
f. Investigate his decade long history of threats of litigation against
anyone who challenges him
g. Investigate his continual usenet harassment of folks who stand up to
him
h. Question why an individual who claims to be represented by counsel in a
pending litigation would continue to engage potential defendants in any kind
of communication
I. Review Reimans defamatory and libelous google group -
namesofcyberstalkers - and investigate why Google saw fit to ban Reimans
usenet account from posting to that group.
3. In the event that I personally receive any communication directly from
Reiman or anyone acting on his behalf, my response will be "Arkell v.
Pressdram.
Nigel Brooks
Superfluous newsgroups removed
Dai Uy
> "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:eaSdnRtdxdtogOrX...@giganews.com...
> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>
> > TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>
> > I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they have
> > initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel Brooks
> > smear/hate and con gang.
Keep in mind Mr. Reiman's oft repeated ex post facto
disclaimers...
He has stated that he NEVER posts the truth. I believe him. The
Google archive stands as testimony.
"Please be advised further this article (the same as ALL of my
past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person."
If you buy that, then this will apply as well...
"If you actually believe someone that is telling you up front
that he is lying to you, what would best describe you: (1) a moron (2)
a drooling moron (3) a member of the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang -
or perhaps all three?"
"When other beings, especially those who hold a grudge against
you, abuse and harm you out of envy, you should not abandon them, but
hold them as objects of your greatest compassion and take care of
them." -His Holiness, the Dalai Lama
http://en.allexperts.com/e/f/fo/formosa's_law.htm
Formosa's law
Formosa's law is an unofficial rule of Usenet groups, coined by
David Formosa, that states, "The truly insane have enough on their
plates without us adding to it." That is, flaming someone with an
obvious mental problem can't make it any better. Mr Formosa first came
up with this rule for the net abuse newsgroups, which had many trolls
and spammers, but also many people who got into trouble for not
understanding or being able to deal with others effectively.
It is common, both on the Internet and in real life, to seek
amusement by ridiculing people who spout bogus nonsense or engage in
silly behavior, on the basis that they have effectively invited this
ridicule by their own overt behavior, usually some combination of
stupidity, hypocrisy, and pomposity, but in any case behavior that
they presumably have control over. However, in some cases, the
behavior is the result of actual mental illness or dysfunction, rather
than mere boneheadedness or intentional misconduct. Formosa's law
states that if someone's weird behavior is caused by an actual
pathology, it is inappropriate for others to increase their suffering
by adding ridicule. Instead, ridicule should be reserved for people
who know better than to engage in their improper conduct.
This law is most often used as an explanation for not engaging a
legitimately mentally-disturbed individual in a flamewar or hostile
discussion, or encouraging such actions. It is often cited on
alt.usenet.kooks as a reason not to issue a "Kook-of-the-Month Award",
and is also often cited as a companion to Godwin's Law.
-Dai Uy sends
***
alt.politics, alt.military, alt.military.retired, and alt.news-media
deleted to protect the innocent.
Dewey, Tricham and Howe
"Le Janitor" <awrli...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:h57d6e$kvb$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
much, could give a shit less. you get the picture
DGVREIMAN
I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
Douglas Reiman (a.k.a. Doug Grant, a.k.a Doogie, a.k.a any other
reference or nick name the said smear gang uses to reference me).
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7dovptF...@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "Le Janitor" <awrli...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:h57d6e$kvb$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> "DGVREIMAN" <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:eaSdnRtdxdtogOrX...@giganews.com...
>>> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>>>
>>> TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>>>
>>>
>>> I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>>> have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>>> Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
>>>
>> <snippeth away duh-g poo>
>>> Douglas Reiman (a.k.a. Doug Grant, a.k.a Doogie, a.k.a any other
>>> reference or nick name the said smear gang uses to reference me).
>>>
>>>
>> since you are using the comcast ID mailto:legal...@comcast.net
>> I assume you are claiming to be a lawyer now? that's a no-no ya
>> know.....
>
> Sounds like BS to me.Nigel Brooks incredible sophomoric and
> desperate reply to help incite his gang to continue Brook's "I have
> appointed myself Judge over you" arrogant smear and defamation
> campaign. I will rebut his preposterous claims and statements about
> this issue below:
> 1. There is not now and never has been a "Nigel Brooks smear/hate
> gang"
Doug Says: Of course there is and I am prepared to prove that fact in
a court of law.
Mr. Brooks you and I both know that all I need to do to prove a
conspiracy is to prove that two or more individuals engaged in the
same common purpose activity under any cause of action. Proving you
operate within and incite a gang of fellow conspirators to defame me
is a "slam dunk" based upon the *volumes* of evidence I have gathered
in that regard.
>
> 2. If indeed a law firm were to initiate legal action against anyone
> who has seen fit to challenge Douglas Reiman on his past usenet
> claims, then they are in for a very tough time of it. It seems to me
> that due diligence on their part would be:
>
> a. Review all of Mr. Reimans postings on these newsgroups.
> b. Compare his claims to the actual historical record
Mr. Brooks statements are absurd: The legal action *has* already
been filed, obviously the law firm completed *months* of investigation
and analysis of both Mr. Brooks posts, his gang's claims, and my
rebuttals, and they already have concluded that legal action should be
taken against key members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang!
The firm's name is already on the line and in back of the legal action
they have already filed.
Moreover, this litigation has nothing to do about challenging me on
anything I wrote in the past.
This litigation is, in part, about defamation, harassment, malicious
libel, fraudulent false light claims, incitement to threaten with
violence and death, libel in respect to stating I am a pedophile, that
I deal in child porno and show the same to children, false statements
about my military service and my honorable discharges for the purpose
of false light defamation and vilification, volumes of false criminal
charges, the illegal accessing of my personal medical and other
information about me and my Wife, and the trafficking of same within
several third parties and in public forums, the establishment of
several web sites and forums for the purpose of copyright violations,
defamation, and malicious libel and obloquy, just to mention a *few*
issues and causes of action (there are many more).
Professed mind reading abilities is not a defense Mr. Brooks.
Further Mr. Brooks, attempting to determine USENET posts for accuracy
has nothing to do with libel, hate, smears, false accusations, con man
jargon, obloquy, unlawful harassment, and or libel per se. We all know
that confirming USENET posts is not the issue and never has been and
it is impossible to confirm any USENET articles without first knowing
the intent of the author.
You nor anyone cannot automatically assume everyone posts nothing but
non-fiction on USENET and then attack a person for not doing so,
WITHOUT or AFTER consulting with the author about the true context,
intent and meaning of anything he wrote or posted!
Accusing someone of lying on USENET is akin to accusing someone of
lying when he wrote a Broadway play or a Hollywood script! USENET is
*not* a personal web site, it is not designed to provide
autobiographical non-fiction!
What rational person would believe your preposterous claim that
everything that anyone ever writes on USENET is and was intended to be
non-fiction and/or autobiographical fact? Considering that you nor
your gang members comply with that preposterous claim, do you really
expect to convince a Judge and Jury or an investigator of such pure
and utter nonsense?
Anything other than due diligence in respect to first consulting with
an author is clearly malicious and designed defamation - not to
mention forging, distorting by adding or subtracting words from past
posts so as to give them a different meaning, and then using your own
distortion, con, forgery and false representation as a means to defame
your targeted victim.
Your desperation to keep your gang defaming is amazing! Read the above
notice. And I strongly suggest you check with or hire a lawyer. Any
lawyer representing any member of your gang that contacts me at
legal...@comcast.net will receive a copy of the legal action that
has already been filed.
The legal action has already been initiated. And be assured this is
only the beginning. And your "speculation" as to what I might have
been thinking when I wrote something, I assure you, is not admissible
nor is even applicable to the legal charges.
> c. Make an evaluation as to the veracity of his explanations for his
> postings
Doug Says: The above is simply not applicable in any manner. Who is
Nigel Brooks to judge the veracity of what I write, or the intended
context, or the meaning or intent? Is Nigel Brooks a mind reader that
can determine what no one else on this planet can determine? Is that
going to be his and his gang's defense?
We all know only the author can know his intent, meaning and context
of something he writes.
NO ONE can determine what a person was thinking at the time he wrote
something, nor in what context he wrote something, be it fiction,
non-fiction, autobiographical fact or fiction, or just plain ol
hyperbole. In fact any claims to the contrary are not even admissible
as it calls for pure speculation! Moreover, if an author tells you
his context of a particular quip or writing, and despite that
knowledge, you claim his context was something other than what he told
you it was for the obvious purpose of defamation, false light, and
general obloquy, then your purpose for *thousands* of such
publications, in a gang and obviously conspired pattern, incited by
gang leaders, is obvious to any lawyer, and will be just as obvious to
a Judge and Jury.
How many posts did Nigel Brooks and his gang post in contradiction to
my stated context, meaning and intent of my post quips for the
purpose of harassment, defamation, false light vilification, to incite
hatred, and general obloquy? I count *thousands!*
It doesn't matter if a person is being vainglorious about his past or
not, that act does not excuse nor warrant libel, fraud, false light
defamation, and the litany of other overt acts that have been
perpetrated against me.
> d. Investigate his usenet reputation for honesty
Mr. Brooks, USENET is not the vehicle to determine honesty. USENET is
by its very nature dishonest as it does not abide by the rules of
evidence when smear and con gangs conspire to bully or defame a
victim. Your claim that a USENET smear and con gang can determine or
decide about one of their targeted victims "reputation for honesty" is
beyond the realm of even sheer stupidity. You cannot be serious with
such child like statements. These lawyers are going to eat you alive
(rhetorically speaking of course - considering the gang's past
cannibal claims about me).
> e. Investigate his past litigious conduct against his detractors
Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, what is a "litigious conduct?"
Is that when a person sues another for libel, fraud and defamation
and wins the lawsuit?
Or sues an industry for malicious interfering with his business?
Is that not what the courts are for Mr. Brooks?
Has any Judge ever thrown out any claims that I have ever made in my
life that were not reinstated by the US Court of Appeals? Of course
not.
Have I ever been sanctioned or admonished by any Judge for filing
frivolous or baseless lawsuit claims? Of course not.
Have I won all legal actions I filed or participated in either by
settlement or judgement save one, and that one that was dismissed was
due to an expired statute of limititations which meant the law firm
that failed to file such legal action then became culpable and
accordingly provided a cash settlement?
And this is what you claim should in some way make me appear
"litigious?"
You have been spewing that false light fraud for so long apparently
you have convinced yourself and your gang. I cannot wait until you
and/or your smear con and hate gang members start spewing your lies
about this issue and others under oath.
> f. Investigate his decade long history of threats of litigation
> against anyone who challenges him
Mr. Brooks, informing con men and smear/hate gang members they will
face legal action if they continue with their defaming fraud and false
accusations is a requirement in many states prior to actually taking
legal action. I have given you and your smear and con/hate gang every
opportunity to cease and desist your obvious smear and harassment
campaign against me. There is more than ample evidence to prove I
attempted to avoid legal action in every way possible.
> g. Investigate his continual usenet harassment of folks who stand up
> to him
Mr. Brooks rebutting your fraud, false accusations, forgeries, obloquy
and gang hate harassment is not harassment, it is defending myself.
I simply rebut false accusations and defamation, which is my legal
right, and I will continue to do so as long as I see your fraud and
false accusations published about me - and this includes during, after
litigation, and forever thereafter as long as you and your smear and
hate gang continue your smear campaigns against me.
> h. Question why an individual who claims to be represented by
> counsel in a pending litigation would continue to engage potential
> defendants in any kind of communication
Doug Says: Mr. Brooks, I have been advised by legal counsel I have a
duty and a right to defend myself from your defamation, fraud and
libel. I will continue to do so. I have been given free reign to
defend myself by more than one lawyer, and it is the considered
opinion of experts on smear and con gangs that it is essential to
defend yourself from their fraud as rational readers can easily
determine who is telling the truth and who is lying. Your serial
lying, fraud, false accusations and general con man attacks have been
rebutted, and will continue to be rebutted with truthful evidence of
your fraud and false accusations.
> I. Review Reimans defamatory and libelous google group -
> namesofcyberstalkers - and investigate why Google saw fit to ban
> Reimans usenet account from posting to that group.
Doug's Rebuttal: There is nothing defamatory nor libelous on that
google group - my rebuttals are true and I will prove them all in a
court of law.
Google has temporarily restricted my access to that group, but has not
banned it, due to the action of a gang of smear merchants and hate
mongers sending lies and false statements to Google. However, this
matter I assume will be resolved out of court, or in it, whatever it
takes.
Moreover, Mr. Brooks, if you read my disclaimer, which you have read
hundreds of times, you will note that I offer anyone that believes I
have libeled him in any way to present to me, with specificity, his
claims of libel, and any evidence substantiating such alleged libel.
I will then investigate his claims, and perhaps consult my legal
counsel, and if I have made a mistake, I will immediately retract,
remove and apologize.
I have no intention of libeling anyone, I do not need to use libel to
rebut your fraud, obloquy, harassment and false accusations. So if
you are claiming libel, be specific, and I will address your claims -
but so far you have not claimed anything specific I have said about
you is libelous - in fact you duck and run each time I offer an
independent legal review of such issues.
>
> 3. In the event that I personally receive any communication directly
> from Reiman or anyone acting on his behalf, my response will be
> "Arkell v. Pressdram.
Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks your arrogance is amazing. I doubt
seriously if that is going to be your reply. In fact I cannot wait for
you and your gang to state the same about me under oath or to an
investigator as you have been fraudulently stating on USENET -
sometimes the perjury becomes more important than the original
charges.
At least your response indicates you have read the above notice - and
considering one of your associates claims to own 15000 buildings, I am
sure you and your gang can afford at least a single lawyer to
represent you.
Doug Reiman
>
>
> Nigel Brooks
> Superfluous newsgroups removed
The newsgroups Mr. Brooks tried to hide this notice and rebuttal from
have been replaced.
dino
>
>LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>
>TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>
>
>I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
If you need legal assistance send all your money to me. I am not a lawyer. I
have not even dated a lawyer... although I have been fucked by one...
Mac
wrote:
>LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>
>TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>
>
>I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
>
>I have been asked by this same law firm to not reveal nor discuss the
>specific actions they have initiated this time on USENET.
======================================
Wonder if these "alleged attorneys" also suggested that you NOT
post further.... ??
So, legal action is to be initiated.
How interesting.
Any time-frame ??
Perhaps sometime PRIOR to the ending of the Universe??
After all, you have the location of several of those challenging your
embellishments.
-Mac, the Medic
Mac
wrote:
>LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>
>TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>
>
>I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You stated that you shot the little girl.
You did NOT claim you were shooting AROUND that little girl.
You stated --- (( HEADERS provided... ))
Note the Date, the HEADERS, and the Subject and the Groups.
ALSO note that nowhere does he hint that this is what he is now
desperately claiming it to be: "fiction".
Draw your own conclusions as to the mental make-up of the person who
would spew forth the following in a debate/conversation with another
person.
=============
From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net
Newsgroups:
alt.news-media,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.usa.congress,alt.security.terrorism
References:
<Dflp8.13307$se.13...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
<uabpeks...@corp.supernews.com
<4hmp8.13400$se.13...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
<3CA62E0D...@exploratoire.ch
<IYtp8.14415$Eb5.1...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
<3CA82636...@exploratoire.ch
Subject: Re: Arafat Refuses Land Back
Lines: 300
Message-ID:
<g80q8.17599$se.16...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 16:45:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.82.130.222
X-Complaints-To: ab...@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1017679500 12.82.130.222
(Mon, 01 Apr 2002 16:45:00 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 16:45:00 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Doug Says:
Colin, you have not seen such films unless they were produced for
propaganda purposes.
When I was in Vietnam little children were given toe poppers (small
mines) hidden in cigarette packages, then they were told by the
Communists to give this nice gift to the American GI's as they passed
by their village.
I will never forget the day when a little smiling girl no more than 4
or 5 years old started walking towards me trying to give me a pack of
cigarettes.
I was forced to shoot her.
**********************************
It is nice to know that you have never forgotten the day when you shot
that little girl !!
NOTE the differences.
In APRIL, 2002 you clearly state:
"I was forced to shoot her."
Once you have been challenged on the above bullshit, on June 6th,
2009, you now desperately try claiming:
"... about shooting around a little girl in
Vietnam to make a point about how the
Commie Vietnamese used little children
to murder..."
SEVEN years later you try to insert that little preposition of
"around" --- instead of your former declarative statement that you
had been "...forced to shoot her."
So, when are you proceeding with that lawsuit?
You know, the one you have been threatening everyone with for YEARS
and YEARS....
-Mac, the Medic
Mac
wrote:
>LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>
>TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>
>
>I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
**************************************************
DOUG GRANT and his statement regarding a Purple Heart....
===============================================
Here is a copy of your ORIGINAL POST in that thread.
I've included the DATE, the SUBJECT, the groups... so others can
find this and verify what you originally posted in your attempt to
belittle Chip.
I believe that he and you for this conversation were #16 AND #17 in
this thread...
=========== ===========
Newsgroups: alt.news-media, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa,
alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.security.terrorism
From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:22:46 GMT
Local: Sun, Feb 16 2003 2:22�pm
Subject: Re: Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:56:03 GMT, �DGVREIMAN allegedly wrote...
Doug Says: �We declared war on terrorism. �Saddam is
supporting, financing, arming, training, aiding and harboring
terrorists.
Duh. �I suspect that you do not have clue about what you are
talking about, and I further suspect you have never seen a
shot fired in anger in your life.
CHIP STATED:
> I have a Purple Heart and a CAR that proves you wrong, Dougie.
> There are other countries, some that are our allies, who are
much more active in supporting and arming terrorists...yet you want
to go after Iraq because you don't have the will to go after them.
That, to me is cowardice.
Doug Says: �
I have a Purple Heart also, and I received �mine in a
real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
never fought in a war. �About the only place you could have
received a purple heart was in Lebanon, and that was not a
shooting war, just a bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of
Marine officers. �In respect to deposing Saddam, I am the one
advocating removing Saddam, you are the one advocating cowering,
hiding, and doing nothing. �It is pretty clear who the coward is
around here. �BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart not received in
combat is about as cowardly as it gets.
*************** *************
And, after you were challenged, after you were reported to STOLEN
VALOR, years later, here is what you posted...
Newsgroups: alt.news
From: "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:55:23 -0700
Local: Wed, Jun 11 2008 10:55�am
Subject: Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel
Doug Says: I have a Purple Heart Card also, and I received mine in a
real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have never
fought in a war. About the only place you could have received a purple
heart card was in Lebanon, and that was not a shooting war, just a
bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of Marine officers. In respect
to deposing Saddam, I am the one advocating removing Saddam, you are
the
one advocating cowering, hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear
who the coward is around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart Card
not received in combat is about as cowardly as it gets.
Note: A purple heart medal cannot be awarded other than in combat.
Consequently, Chip must be talking about a Purple Heart VA ID card. My
purple heart card reference in my reply is not about the medal, but is
only referencing a purple heart ID card provided by the Veterans'
Administration for service connected disabilities which I have.
Mac
wrote:
>LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>
>TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
Here DOUG GRANT claims he had THIRTY YEARS in the military.
However, that is NOT what his military records indicate.
GOOGLE Osama is not a "Mastermind".
The date: January 6, 2002
===== ====
Newsgroups: alt.news-media, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa,
alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.security.terrorism
From: "DOUGLAS G.V. REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:35:19 -0800
Local: Sun, Jan 6 2002 11:35 pm
Subject: Re: Osama is not a "Mastermind."
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original |
Report this message | Find messages by this author
"Orval Fairbairn" <orfairba...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:orfairbairn-06...@sdn-ar-001flhhilp306.dialsprint
.net...
> In article <dd093fb0.0201061232.75309...@posting.google.com>,
> topcatu...@hotmail.com (Mike) wrote:
> A long and mostly correct post. You have clearly made a
career, or at least hobby, out of all this. A few things, though....
> (snip)
> And now you facetiously want to comment about coordinating
air support....like you think all countries do the same air
> coordination support training as American troops. You are
of course very wrong. In fact, the Russian ground control
systems are completely different than the American air control
systems.
> Close support is much different in the two armies, and I
would suspect, because of your Harriers, the Brit support is
somewhat different also. (At least it seemed that way to me in the
> Falklands.)
> I did not suggest that America is the gold standard, which
every army emulates. My point was that air support isn't a new idea...
and the Falkland isles was a case in point of poor air support, but
those 12 harriers still managed to take down a huge airforce by
themselves.
*******************
HERE IS THE REPLY DOUG GRANT MADE:
I spent 30 years in the Military. First the US Marine Corps,
then the United States Army. My last command was a MI command.
What I watched (on TV) in respect to the Falklands was a
conspicuous absence of close air support. But there is no
denying the Harriers did their job admirably.
> .... WITH the help of the latest (at the time) AIM-9L
Sidewinders, which gave them 90 deg deflection shot capability.
> I have it on good authority that an American AF officer could
not buy his own drink in RAF Officers' Clubs after the Falklands war
-- the RAF guys INSISTED on pucking up the tab!
> The Argies suffered from POOR leadership. Hell, the Argies even
drafted executive jets for rcon duties and were promptly shot down by
the Brits.
It was a turkey shoot as I was told. Only because of the
superior Brits and their Harriers. Here is to the next "turkey
shoot."
Doug Grant (Tm)
Mac
wrote:
>LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>
>TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Here is an event DOUG GRANT claimed he witnessed, MONTHS prior to
his arriving in Vietnam....
Back in OCTOBER, 2006 this Doug Grant claimed he observed the
following attack on CanTho... with "ambulances";
A slight problem.
The attack with ambulances took place MONTHS before he arrived in
Vietnam.
The airfield was again attacked in January, 1969 but without the
ambulances.
By that time he was in Vietnam.
Newsgroups: alt.security.terrorism, alt.terrorism.world-trade-center
From: "DOUGLAS G.V. REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 22:14:01 GMT
Local: Sat, Oct 6 2001 3:14�pm
Subject: TERROR FIGHTS BACK
When I was in Vietnam, stationed in Can Tho, I witnessed two
ambulances drive through our main gate, calmly drive to our
airport, drive on the tarmac and while driving down the tarmac
Viet Cong contained in the ambulances shot each plane on the
tarmac with a M-79 grenade launcher. �Then when they were
through, they simply drove out the back gate and down the road.
This was a "drive-by" on an airport!
�These six or seven Viet Cong, equipped with simple weapons (that
look like big shotguns) destroyed an entire American Army air
base in about five minutes!
..... SNIP ....
The Viet Cong were also experts with mortars. �They would steal
trucks, and while driving down a road fire several mortar rounds
from those moving trucks all at different altitudes. �By firing
in this manner the mortar rounds would all fall in the same
general area within about ten seconds of each other. �
...SNIP .........
Doug Grant (Tm)
--
De Oppresso Liber
Happy Birthday
--
De Oppresso Liber
Happy Birthday
****************************** ***************
The above described event took place in December of 1967.
Doug Grant was NOT in Vietnam in any part of 1967 ---although he
claims to have �witnessed� the above event.
The ambulances were employed in that December, 1967 attack.
HOWEVER, in January of 1969 the air field was again attacked --- but
NOT with ambulances and certainly NOT in the manner which Doug Grant
claimed above.
Nigel Brooks
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:cfjf75d4n74hvjlad...@4ax.com...
There is no way in the world that any competent attorney would allow his
client to engage in continued discourse with persons whom he seeks to sue.
Reiman is lying
Nigel Brooks
Mac
wrote:
>
>
>"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
>news:cfjf75d4n74hvjlad...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:27:16 -0700, "DGVREIMAN" <dgvr...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>>>
>>>TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>>>
>>>
>>>I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>>>have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>>>Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
>>>
>>>I have been asked by this same law firm to not reveal nor discuss the
>>>specific actions they have initiated this time on USENET.
>>
>> ======================================
>> Wonder if these "alleged attorneys" also suggested that you NOT
>> post further.... ??
>>
>> So, legal action is to be initiated.
>> How interesting.
>> Any time-frame ??
>> Perhaps sometime PRIOR to the ending of the Universe??
>>
>> After all, you have the location of several of those challenging your
>> embellishments.
>> -Mac, the Medic
***************************************
>There is no way in the world that any competent attorney would allow his
>client to engage in continued discourse with persons whom he seeks to sue.
>Reiman is lying
>Nigel Brooks
=================
What ?!?
Doug Grant lying ?
I am shocked. Just shocked at that revelation.
-Mac, the Medic
John Agosta
>
Get some help. And I ain't talking legal help.
Get a life. Find a hobby. Enjoy things. Dogs are good. Even if you're an
ass, they still love you !
Maybe get a heavy bag. Put a picture of Brooks on it. Punch ! Punch ! Get
out your anger,
and let out your agression. It's very good cardiovascular, better than most
realize, and good for strength, too !
Maybe find a girlfriend ? Maybe you could use a little TLC ? Come on, buddy.
You're a good guy,
and you shouldn't be spending your life obsessing over usenet bullshit. Let
it go.
It's summer time, man. Go to the fair. There's lots of them going on right
now. If you leave your house
and leave the computer alone, you'd see a whole bunch of FUN things to be
doing !
You can get yourself some cotton candy ! C'mon, bro, when was the last
time you had yourself a good
solid cone of cotton candy ??? I bet it's been a while. Go out ! Live it up
!! Don't spend your life
getting pissed off and angry over fabrications and nonsense. It's not worth
it. We all know that
you really didn't know General Clark when you said "I know General Clark,"
and even HE would
probably dismiss that as another dime-a-dozen usenet 'quip'. Hell, usenet is
full of 'quips'.
I'm sure the good General realizes this. He is, after all a smart man.
Dougie, we all love you, and don't want to see you drown in a pool
of.......of........of...
Heck, I don't know what kind of pool it is, but man, you're drowning in it.
Go outside. Get a dog. He'll be a loyal friend. I reccommend a "flat coated
retriever."
He will keep you on your toes for many years, and will retain his puppy-like
exhuberance well into old age.
You'll like that ! Maybe learn to fly a sports kite ! You can go to
www.intothewind.com and find some really
nice two-lined sports kites. It may sound boring, but when you get the hang
of it, flying these things really
is quite exciting. Like driving a sports car. Really ! You'll get a rush out
of it. Sounds crazy, but you'll get a rush
out of it. You're close to Vegas right? Or at least frequent the place ?
It gets windy there. Check it out. And if you're close to Vegas, you could
probably find a girlfreind, too. Probably pretty cheap, with the economy the
way it is.
Hey, brother, drop the persecution thing. You're a good guy.
You're just full of 'quips,' that's all. Not such a bad thing. We all got
issues. Me, I'm full of shit most of the time.
I know it, my friends know it, my wife knows it, but that doesn't make me a
bad person - not at all !
Recognize your issues. It's a healing thing.
You'll feel better. I swear, you'll feel better. And come on --- it's summer
time. Go out and do something.
Doesn't have to be any of my suggestions, but just go OUT and do something.
You know, the cotton candy is great.
And you may even be able to find something called a "corn dog" if you look
hard enough.
And, i bet you won't have to look hard at all, either.
Go PLAY, and leave your computer alone.
Love,
Johnny
tankfixer
dgvr...@comcast.net says...
>
> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>
> TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>
>
> I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
> have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
> Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
Uh huh, sure...
>
> I have been asked by this same law firm to not reveal nor discuss the
> specific actions they have initiated this time on USENET. However, if
> anyone is interested in these legal specific actions, their legal
> representative may contact me at legal...@comcast.net for further
> information in this regard.
Then I shall keep this post and give them a copy if and when they
actually contact me.
I am sure they will be much surprised you disregarded their
instructions.
Do you have a good backup law firm ?
Might be prudent to look for one when the current one drops you.
>
> I received a very extensive and comprehensive package from the said
> law firm that includes hundreds of gang USENET and other smears/hate
> posts and publications, along with my rebuttals, and copies of the
> legal action they have recently initiated.
Uh huh, sure you did.
>
> The said law firm (which practices in several states) has completed a
> very extensive and independent investigation of the facts in respect
> to the smear/hate campaign Nigel Brooks and his smear/hate con gang
> members have been waging against me for years, and have concluded that
> legal causes of action are warranted against several members of the
> said smear/hate gang.
If they reached that conclusion then they are either;
a) idiots
or
b) going to milk you for legal fees and then drop the case.
>
>
> I have been advised to provide the following information:
>
> 1. If you believe you may be involved in these legal proceedings,
> please immediately contact or retain legal counsel.
Actually you were informed and I quote,
"> I have been asked by this same law firm to not reveal nor discuss the
> specific actions they have initiated this time on USENET."
>
> 2. If you have in the past repeated, furthered, or posted any
> information that could be construed by me as defaming or false light
> misrepresentations, you are strongly advised to cease and desist
> referencing me in any manner, by name, nick name or any other
> reference that others will assume or know is me, in any defamatory
> manner, veiled or otherwise, on USENET, Web Sites, or any other public
> forum, newsgroup or publication.
Odd that your "law firm" can't issue that warning..
>
> 3. If you believe you may be involved in the said legal action -
> then please provide this notice to your legal counsel.
I am certain he has plenty of toilet paper.
>
>
> 4. Please be advised everything you post in any public or private
> forum, or send to me, or send to others about me, could be used
> against you or against others in a legal proceeding.
Even my correspondence with the law enforcement community ?
BTW, does' that "law firm" you retained handle criminal matters ?
Just asking..
>
> 5. Please be advised your participation with a hate/smear and con
> gang like the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang could make you
> legally culpable for everything your fellow gang members do or have
> done, past, present or in the future.
brouhaha
Right...
>
> 6. Please be advised that if you incite hated against one of Nigel
> Brooks targeted smear victims, and that person is threatened or
> suffers injury, (injury defined in many different ways depending upon
> your state or the victim's state of residence) you could be arrested
> and tried for a crime.
What are the penalties for fraud in Washington state ?
You might check up on that Doug.
>
> 7. Please be advised that anonymous cyberstalking and unlawful
> harassment (anonymous or otherwise) and invasion of privacy,
> trafficking in information illegally removed from Government
> computers, could represent in many cases criminal acts.
So is making false charges..
>
> 8. Please be advised that criminal statutes, and their applicable
> statutes of limitations can be also used in a civil action, which is
> common once criminal administrative remedies have been exhausted.
Yet there is no criminal case, none, nada..
>
> 9. If you are a member of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang,
> or you wish to facilitate the common purpose of defamation and false
> light members of that said gang have been using against me for years,
> and you wish to continue to participate with that gang in respect to
> defamation, smears, hate, false light, cyberstalking, unlawful
> harassment, please be advised that you should contact your mortgage
> company, home owners insurance, business insurance, or any lenders,
> and inform them you have been advised that a legal action has been (or
> will be) initiated against you. If your lender, or legal
> representative wishes to know if you have been named specifically in
> the said existing legal action, please have your legal representative
> contact me at legal...@comcast.net. Copies of the said legal action
> taken will be provided to the legal representative of all those
> involved.
Again, what are the penialties for committing fraud in Washington Doug ?
Or in fact in any of the states or countries any of those you think you
are going to sue happen to live in ?
More to the point your "law firm" is the onlyperson who should be
contacted, not some fake lawyerish email address that no doubt belongs
to you.
Fraud Doug, fraud..
>
> 10. Please be advised that if you knowingly lie to any investigator
> that act can be and probably will be used against you. If you repeat
> what gang members have lied about in my regard, regardless of the fact
> they are maliciously lying by key omission, that repeated lie can be
> considered the same as a direct lie by you. Repeating fraud and lies
> from others will not normally protect you from charges of perjury.
> This tactic is a well-known smear and hate gang tactic - I assure all
> the investigators and the lawyers are more than well-aware of this
> hate gang tactic.
I need the name of your law firm Doug.
I want to report a crime...
>
> 11. For those gang members that are residents of Washington State,
> the above information may or may not apply, as I have been informed
> that separate legal actions will probably be initiated in that case.
So you DO have a criminal defense attorney lined up, good..
>
> 12. For those gang members that are residents of nations other than
> the USA, and are residents of Nations that have participated in the
> International Copyright agreements, then a legal action naming you
> will be filed in the nation of your residence and in the USA.
hahahahahahahahahaahaaaa....
>
> 13. For those gang members that own or participate in the Nigel
> Brooks smear/hate and con Google web site, or any other web site
> maintained by gang members, please be advised those web sites and/or
> newsgroups must be removed from the Internet immediately as they
> clearly violate my registered copyrights, contained fraud and false
> light defamation, and that fact has been confirmed by an extensive
> legal investigation. The owners and operators of those web sites or
> newsgroups have one week from this date to completely remove anything
> referencing my copyrighted materials and any and all defamation posted
> about me from the entire Internet or any other public forum, or face
> applicable legal actions and/or possible criminal charges under Title
Oh my Doug, you intend to sue Google ?
That wil be fun to watch...
>
> 14. Please be advised that I and my counsel will consider any and all
> future published defamation, fraud, lies, false light
> misrepresentations, and key lies by omission, including such that
> exists on other Newsgroups and web sites about me, which have not been
> removed as so directed, as deliberate and malicious acts by all those
> involved.
IF you had counsel he would have told you to STFU.
>
> 15. Please be advised you should inform all third parties you have
> provided information about me that this legal action has been
> initiated, and it could include them as well. This would include all
> web hosts, or any other business entity or persons that have been
> provided information about me in any manner. Such information will be
> determined in total during discovery.
You best name them in your legal action too.
In fact name the owner of the companies..
Bill Gates is a Washington resident...
Don't leave him out.
>
> 16. Please be advised that libel, libel per se, hate speech,
> defamation, false light vilifications, obloquy, are normally NOT
> considered protected free speech.
Then you should stop Doug..
>
> 17. Please be advised that I am not a lawyer, and I am not providing
> any legal information nor advice in any manner. I am simply repeating
> what I have been told by lawyers about this issue. To determine if
> any of the statements contained herein apply to you, or even apply in
> general to anything, please consult with your legal counsel.
Name the law frim or STFU Doug..
>
>
> Douglas Reiman (a.k.a. Doug Grant, a.k.a Doogie, a.k.a any other
> reference or nick name the said smear gang uses to reference me).
AKA Asshat Reiman...
tankfixer
Leon...@sistine.va says...
>
> After being the group's biggest liar, Doogie want to commit felonies now.
>
>
> Is one post to one group one count of criminal activity or since this is cross
> posted to 5 groups, would that make it 5 counts of DOOGIE Fraud®?
5 counts in each state that a reader of those news groups reside in...
The counts rack up perty fast...
tankfixer
dgvr...@comcast.net says...
>
> At least your response indicates you have read the above notice - and
> considering one of your associates claims to own 15000 buildings, I am
> sure you and your gang can afford at least a single lawyer to
> represent you.
>
>
Does ther term "ton of bricks" mean anything to you ?
tankfixer
antic...@heaven.com says...
>
> "DGVREIMAN" <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:eaSdnRtdxdtogOrX...@giganews.com:
>
> > I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
> > have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
> > Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
>
> You're a fucking retard.
God I hope he isn't.. he might breed.. !
tankfixer
If a lawyer claiming to represent Rieman contacts me I wil mearly send
him back, by registered mail, a copy of the "notice Reiman posted at the
begining of this thread..
Pepperoni
>> Douglas Reiman (a.k.a. Doug Grant, a.k.a Doogie, a.k.a any other
>> reference or nick name the said smear gang uses to reference me).
>
Is that "Doug Grant" the Comic Commie Killer? "Doug Grant, Secret
Agent"?? "Doug Grant" the Butterbar? Lieutenant "Doug Grant"? Captain
"Doug Grant"?
!Jones
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
Oh, shit! The proverbial jig is up.
Jones
Jeff George
posted on Usenet.
"John Agosta" <jag...@wideopenwest.com> wrote in
news:oA6em.120675$eS5....@newsfe25.iad:
--
tankfixer
sws...@hotmail.com says...
Oh jones..
Now he will accuse you of racial profiling !
Nigel Brooks
"John Agosta" <jag...@wideopenwest.com> wrote in message
news:oA6em.120675$eS5....@newsfe25.iad...
My photo on a punching bag - how aggressive.
I was thinking more of a plain old sing along
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6Ag_HweZ8E
Nigel Brooks
La N
Have you been caught up in that dragnet, Jonesy? I'd hate to be. I look
terrible in horizontal stripes.
- nilita
DGVREIMAN
I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
I have been asked by this same law firm to not reveal nor discuss the
specific actions they have initiated this time on USENET. However, if
anyone is interested in these legal specific actions, their legal
representative may contact me at legal...@comcast.net for further
information in this regard.
I received a very extensive and comprehensive package from the said
law firm that includes hundreds of gang USENET and other smears/hate
posts and publications, along with my rebuttals, and copies of the
legal action they have recently initiated.
The said law firm (which practices in several states) has completed a
very extensive and independent investigation of the facts in respect
to the smear/hate campaign Nigel Brooks and his smear/hate con gang
members have been waging against me for years, and have concluded that
legal causes of action are warranted against several members of the
said smear/hate gang.
I have been advised to provide the following information:
1. If you believe you may be involved in these legal proceedings,
please immediately contact or retain legal counsel.
2. If you have in the past repeated, furthered, or posted any
information that could be construed by me as defaming or false light
misrepresentations, you are strongly advised to cease and desist
referencing me in any manner, by name, nick name or any other
reference that others will assume or know is me, in any defamatory
manner, veiled or otherwise, on USENET, Web Sites, or any other public
forum, newsgroup or publication.
3. If you believe you may be involved in the said legal action - then
please provide this notice to your legal counsel.
4. Please be advised everything you post in any public or private
forum, or send to me, or send to others about me, could be used
against you or against others in a legal proceeding.
5. Please be advised your participation with a hate/smear and con gang
like the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang could make you legally
culpable for everything your fellow gang members do or have done,
past, present or in the future.
6. Please be advised that if you incite hated against one of Nigel
Brooks targeted smear victims, and that person is threatened or
suffers injury, (injury defined in many different ways depending upon
your state or the victim's state of residence) you could be arrested
and tried for a crime.
7. Please be advised that anonymous cyberstalking and unlawful
harassment (anonymous or otherwise) and invasion of privacy,
trafficking in information illegally removed from Government
computers, could represent in many cases criminal acts.
8. Please be advised that criminal statutes, and their applicable
statutes of limitations can be also used in a civil action, which is
common once criminal administrative remedies have been exhausted.
9. If you are a member of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang, or
you wish to facilitate the common purpose of defamation and false
light members of that said gang have been using against me for years,
and you wish to continue to participate with that gang in respect to
defamation, smears, hate, false light, cyberstalking, unlawful
harassment, please be advised that you should contact your mortgage
company, home owners insurance, business insurance, or any lenders,
and inform them you have been advised that a legal action has been (or
will be) initiated against you. If your lender, or legal
representative wishes to know if you have been named specifically in
the said existing legal action, please have your legal representative
contact me at legal...@comcast.net. Copies of the said legal action
taken will be provided to the legal representative of all those
involved.
10. Please be advised that if you knowingly lie to any investigator
that act can be and probably will be used against you. If you repeat
what gang members have lied about in my regard, regardless of the fact
they are maliciously lying by key omission, that repeated lie can be
considered the same as a direct lie by you. Repeating fraud and lies
from others will not normally protect you from charges of perjury.
This tactic is a well-known smear and hate gang tactic - I assure all
the investigators and the lawyers are more than well-aware of this
hate gang tactic.
11. For those gang members that are residents of Washington State, the
above information may or may not apply, as I have been informed that
separate legal actions will probably be initiated in that case.
12. For those gang members that are residents of nations other than
the USA, and are residents of Nations that have participated in the
International Copyright agreements, then a legal action naming you
will be filed in the nation of your residence and in the USA.
13. For those gang members that own or participate in the Nigel Brooks
smear/hate and con Google web site, or any other web site maintained
by gang members, please be advised those web sites and/or newsgroups
must be removed from the Internet immediately as they clearly violate
my registered copyrights, contained fraud and false light defamation,
and that fact has been confirmed by an extensive legal investigation.
The owners and operators of those web sites or newsgroups have one
week from this date to completely remove anything referencing my
copyrighted materials and any and all defamation posted about me from
the entire Internet or any other public forum, or face applicable
legal actions and/or possible criminal charges under Title
14. Please be advised that I and my counsel will consider any and all
future published defamation, fraud, lies, false light
misrepresentations, and key lies by omission, including such that
exists on other Newsgroups and web sites about me, which have not been
removed as so directed, as deliberate and malicious acts by all those
involved.
15. Please be advised you should inform all third parties you have
provided information about me that this legal action has been
initiated, and it could include them as well. This would include all
web hosts, or any other business entity or persons that have been
provided information about me in any manner. Such information will be
determined in total during discovery.
16. Please be advised that libel, libel per se, hate speech,
defamation, false light vilifications, obloquy, are normally NOT
considered protected free speech.
17. Please be advised that I am not a lawyer, and I am not providing
any legal information nor advice in any manner. I am simply repeating
what I have been told by lawyers about this issue. To determine if any
of the statements contained herein apply to you, or even apply in
general to anything, please consult with your legal counsel.
Douglas Reiman (a.k.a. Doug Grant, a.k.a Doogie, a.k.a any other
reference or nick name the said smear gang uses to reference me).
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7dovptF...@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "Le Janitor" <awrli...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:h57d6e$kvb$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> "DGVREIMAN" <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:eaSdnRtdxdtogOrX...@giganews.com...
>>> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>>>
>>> TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>>>
>>>
>>> I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>>> have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>>> Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
>>>
>> <snippeth away duh-g poo>
>>> Douglas Reiman (a.k.a. Doug Grant, a.k.a Doogie, a.k.a any other
>>> reference or nick name the said smear gang uses to reference me).
>>>
>>>
>> since you are using the comcast ID mailto:legal...@comcast.net
>> I assume you are claiming to be a lawyer now? that's a no-no ya
>> know.....
>
The firm's name is already on the line and in back of the legal action
they have already filed.
hundreds of times, you will note that I offer anyone that believes I
have libeled him in any way to present to me, with specificity, his
claims of libel, and any evidence substantiating such alleged libel.
I will then investigate his claims, and perhaps consult my legal
counsel, and if I have made a mistake, I will immediately retract,
remove and apologize.
I have no intention of libeling anyone, I do not need to use libel to
rebut your fraud, obloquy, harassment and false accusations. So if
you are claiming libel, be specific, and I will address your claims -
but so far you have not claimed anything specific I have said about
you is libelous - in fact you duck and run each time I offer an
independent legal review of such issues.
>
> 3. In the event that I personally receive any communication directly
> from Reiman or anyone acting on his behalf, my response will be
> "Arkell v. Pressdram.
Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks your arrogance is amazing. I doubt
seriously if that is going to be your reply. In fact I cannot wait for
you and your gang to state the same about me under oath or to an
investigator as you have been fraudulently stating on USENET -
sometimes the perjury becomes more important than the original
charges.
At least your response indicates you have read the above notice - and
considering one of your associates claims to own 15000 buildings, I am
sure you and your gang can afford at least a single lawyer to
represent you.
Doug Reiman
>
>
> Nigel Brooks
> Superfluous newsgroups removed
The newsgroups Mr. Brooks tried to hide this notice and rebuttal from
have been replaced.
"Dai Uy" <Dai...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:ff35dfcb-a627-4f5c...@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 3, 9:10 am, "Le Janitor" <awrlibr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:eaSdnRtdxdtogOrX...@giganews.com...
> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>
> > TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>
> > I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
> > have
> > initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
> > Brooks
> > smear/hate and con gang.
Keep in mind Mr. Reiman's oft repeated ex post facto
disclaimers...
He has stated that he NEVER posts the truth. I believe him. The
Google archive stands as testimony.
"Please be advised further this article (the same as ALL of my
past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person."
Mr. Rau left out the part where I say you must contact me to determine
my context. Another example of Mr. Rau's deception.
If you buy that, then this will apply as well...
"If you actually believe someone that is telling you up front
that he is lying to you, what would best describe you: (1) a moron (2)
a drooling moron (3) a member of the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang -
or perhaps all three?"
Doug Says: Mr. Rau failed to mention the above was about his fellow
gang members self-describing themselves as "Trolls" which we all know
are liars and smear merchants. Since his gang members have actually
admitted they are Trolls and thereby liars and con men, then who in
their right mind would believe any member of the Nigel Brooks
smear/hate and con gang? Which is the point I am making in the above
paragraph - which of course Mr. Rau is deceptively, as usual, hiding.
"When other beings, especially those who hold a grudge against
you, abuse and harm you out of envy, you should not abandon them, but
hold them as objects of your greatest compassion and take care of
them." -His Holiness, the Dalai Lama
No one I know would ever envy con men, hate mongers and smear
merchants.
Mr. Rau's deception rebutted once again.
At least Mr. Rau has responded to and acknowledged the above Notice,
albiet he just could not help from lying some more when he did.
Absolutely pathetic.
Doug Grant (Tm)
!Jones
Yupper-doodle... busted colder 'en a frog, I say. We set 'em up, Doug
knocks 'em down! I hope I get a cute cell-mate.
Jones
Richard Greene
d8SdnRFvD_r_OuTX...@giganews.com, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
> 1. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>
> I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
> have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
> Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
> I have been asked by this same law firm to not reveal nor discuss the
> specific actions they have initiated this time on USENET. However, if
> anyone is interested in these legal specific actions, their legal
> representative may contact me at legal...@comcast.net for further
> information in this regard.
> I received a very extensive and comprehensive package from the said
> law firm that includes hundreds of gang USENET and other smears/hate
> posts and publications, along with my rebuttals, and copies of the
> legal action they have recently initiated.
> The said law firm (which practices in several states) has completed a
> very extensive and independent investigation of the facts in respect
> to the smear/hate campaign Nigel Brooks and his smear/hate con gang
> members have been waging against me for years, and have concluded that
Oh shit, does this mean the VAPR gang's jig is up?? Turn in all ID cards
fellas. Well at least I won't have to worry about Pussy Hunt calling my
local police department on me anymore. He's probably in bed with Doug.
Rich
DGVREIMAN
I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
I have been asked by this same law firm to not reveal nor discuss the
specific actions they have initiated this time on USENET. However, if
anyone is interested in these legal specific actions, their legal
representative may contact me at legal...@comcast.net for further
information in this regard.
I received a very extensive and comprehensive package from the said
law firm that includes hundreds of gang USENET and other smears/hate
posts and publications, along with my rebuttals, and copies of the
legal action they have recently initiated.
The said law firm (which practices in several states) has completed a
very extensive and independent investigation of the facts in respect
to the smear/hate campaign Nigel Brooks and his smear/hate con gang
members have been waging against me for years, and have concluded that
>>> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>>>
>>> TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>>>
>>>
>>> I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>>> have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>>> Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
>>>
> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>
> > TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>
> > I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
> > have
> > initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
> > Brooks
> > smear/hate and con gang.
Keep in mind Mr. Reiman's oft repeated ex post facto
disclaimers...
He has stated that he NEVER posts the truth. I believe him. The
Google archive stands as testimony.
"Please be advised further this article (the same as ALL of my
past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person."
Mr. Rau left out the part where I say you must contact me to determine
my context. Another example of Mr. Rau's deception.
If you buy that, then this will apply as well...
"If you actually believe someone that is telling you up front
that he is lying to you, what would best describe you: (1) a moron (2)
a drooling moron (3) a member of the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang -
or perhaps all three?"
Doug Says: Mr. Rau failed to mention the above was about his fellow
gang members self-describing themselves as "Trolls" which we all know
are liars and smear merchants. Since his gang members have actually
admitted they are Trolls and thereby liars and con men, then who in
their right mind would believe any member of the Nigel Brooks
smear/hate and con gang? Which is the point I am making in the above
paragraph - which of course Mr. Rau is deceptively, as usual, hiding.
"When other beings, especially those who hold a grudge against
you, abuse and harm you out of envy, you should not abandon them, but
hold them as objects of your greatest compassion and take care of
them." -His Holiness, the Dalai Lama
No one I know would ever envy con men, hate mongers and smear
merchants.
Mr. Rau's deception rebutted once again.
At least Mr. Rau has responded to and acknowledged the above Notice,
albiet he just could not help from lying some more when he did.
Absolutely pathetic.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7dr1kbF...@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
> news:cfjf75d4n74hvjlad...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:27:16 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
>> <dgvr...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>>>
>>>TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>>>
>>>
>>>I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>>>have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>>>Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
>>>
>>>I have been asked by this same law firm to not reveal nor discuss
>>>the
>>>specific actions they have initiated this time on USENET.
>>
>> ======================================
>> Wonder if these "alleged attorneys" also suggested that you NOT
>> post further.... ??
Doug Says: See above. The policy of all lawyers today (that I have
consulted) which have clients that are being smeared by con and hate
gangs on the Internet is to defend themselves with truthful rebuttals
on the same forums. No lawyer is going to allow the fraud and cons
about his client to stand when they can be rebutted with the truth.
The position of Nigel Brooks that no lawyer would allow me to post my
truthful rebuttals is about as idiotic as a typical Nigel Brooks con -
quite the contrary. And if Brooks or any gang member doubts the legal
action this law firm is undertaking then simply have a lawyer
representing any member of the Brooks gang, or all members, email me
at legal...@comcast.net and I will then provide to that lawyer a
copy of the documents I have received from my lawyer thus far.
I have made this offer several times, yet it appears the gang members
are afraid to have their lawyer contact me in this regard. Pathetic.
I will say if I were them I would have my lawyer contact me
immediately.
Doug Grant (Tm)
>>
DGVREIMAN
CON MEN -WANNABE'S -LIARS AND FAKERS
Smear Merchant Disclaimer
I have better things to do than rebut the fraud and false accusations
made by members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
However, unlike the gang's other smear victims, I will defend myself
from the gang's obloquy and fraud in each case. You would think these
pathetic souls would find something to do other than spread their
fraud, hate and smears about people that disagree with them, but alas,
this has become their "pathetic life."
Please be advised further this article (the same as all of my past
articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
annoying, abusive, offensive, defaming or otherwise disturbing,
please notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net.
If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract.
My intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please also note that defending myself from
harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a "lawful
and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal.
Please also note that I intend to notify any and all ISP's and web
hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site or other similar
entity about me after I give the offender an opportunity to retract,
apologize and remove said post from the Google archive.
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots' inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary's
definition's of simple terms, such as "we" "estimated" "involved"
"retired from" and "not representing any biographical claim" are all
incorrect, and only their "special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang's
standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that (1) I
was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let God sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlisle War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.
I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.
Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question. (Note although the above
statement is as clear as it can be - some smear merchants have
deliberately *averted their eyes* from this key disclaimer paragraph
for years - and ridiculously attempted to claim did not include all
past, present and future posts in this disclaimer - which of course
clearly is a lie. But for their fraudulent benefit - I *again*
reiterate this disclaimer applies to all of my posts, exchanges and
USENET writings, past, present and future. I further reserve the
right to use any type of fiction, non-fiction, hyperbole,
autobiographical fiction, embellishments and quips in my writings as I
see fit, whenever I wish, and I will not be censored by smear/hate and
con gangs).
As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years' long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.
In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveal them for what they really are.
The gang's lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang' preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow "sinister" and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash).
And regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found in my waste
basket that were thrown there because of an error or typist
misstatement by one of our typist's, I have posted about two dozen
times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other than
an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence proving such was scanned and posted years
ago.
Also, in response to the smear gang's et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:
http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS' GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang's glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.
http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con/hate and smear gang is all about.
http://tinyurl.com/bu3dwb Those that Label Others KOOKS suffer a
psychosis named EID say psychologists - and that so-called "Kook"
votes never occur outside of the smear gang.
http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks' lies about receiving medals
he never received, and lies about serving in war campaigns and in
reactionary forces long after he had already left active duty.
http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks and many of his
smear/hate and con gang lied about my military service and my military
records. (This read is important as the gang is claiming that my
military records disproved or prove various things they have
fraudulently claimed about me. However, in truth we find those gang
accusations and claims to be nothing more than outright cons and
fraud. Brooks and Rau and other gang members have been lying about
the contents of my records for years. Above represents clear and
irrefutable proof of their fraud and false accusations.
http://tinyurl.com/ddogy4 Proof of just a few of Nigel Brooks
outright forgeries which he has used to fraudulently defame and smear
me - yes *forgeries* - fraud and deception from Nigel Brooks running
rampant.
Purple Heart Defamation from the gang revealed and rebutted.
Irrefutable proof the gang has been using outright fraud, defamation
and forgeries to smear and defame in respect to this issue.
http://tinyurl.com/pomzo7 05/21/09
YET ANOTHER Investigator confirms the smear/hate gang lied about
Purple Heart medal claims. Also, all those times I said I did not
have a PH Medal, which the gang has been maliciously hiding.
Http://tinyurl.com/q6pk56 The smear/hate gang's fraudulent
accusation "I said I was a Hero" proved the fraud and lie it is: In
fact - I said the *exact opposite* as these several past posts clearly
prove. Once again the gang has been exposed lying about something
they have been forging and lying about for years. Hate and smear
gangs always attempt to paint their smear victims in a false and
defaming light - this is clearly the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con
gang's purpose and mantra.
Here Nigel Brooks admits that he is not claiming I claimed I had a
purple heart medal - which contradicts not only Nigel Brooks
subsequent false accusations numbering in the hundreds, but including
his gang's fraud on this issue, it also contradicts similar fraud and
false accusations numbering in the *thousands!*
I said as the following URL clearly proves:
1http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9 In this post I make it clear that I
referenced a Purple Heart Card and not a Purple Heart Medal - and the
difference between the two.
Nigel Brooks said:
2http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9
In the above URL, Mr. Brooks also provided the following very clear
statement about this issue:
"He's doing the same now - by trying to insert the word "medal" into
the argument. Well no-one is accusing him of claiming to have had a
"Purple Heart Medal" - but the record shows he has claimed to have had
a Purple Heart **(VA service connected ID card)** and that he
received it in a real war. " (Emphasis added).
Obviously, Nigel Brooks above agreed and confirmed that I never said I
had a purple heart medal. Strange Nigel and his gang would
conveniently "forget" Nigel's conclusion about this issue after I
started proving they had lied about this issue all along - as the
above posts clearly prove?
Gang Preposterously Claims "Fiction" is "Lying."
When Brooks read my "shoot around little girl" or "shoot little girl"
post (for about the tenth time and counting) he said the following:
http://tinyurl.com/q9r9to May 22, 2009
"I would hazard a guess that the story is complete bullshit and that
Reiman never shot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese girl, otherwise
such an admission made in a public forum is astounding.
>>>> Nigel Brooks "
Then *after* I responded to Brooks (see URL above) and told him that
of course it was pure fiction just like my disclaimer states hundreds
of times. Brooks then reversed himself and wrote:
" he was in fact claiming that whilst he was in Vietnam he was >
forced to shoot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese child, who he claims was
attempting to kill him or his compatriots with an explosive device
concealed in a package of cigarettes.
>
> Now that is the logical interpretation of his post. In that post he
> says
> nothing about it being a fictional account or a debating method. The
> post
> stands by itself."
Nigel Brooks"
http://tinyurl.com/madq65 In this post I point out that I have told
Nigel Brooks and his hate/con smear gang members *more than a thousand
times* (evidenced by Google archives) that I *DO NOT* post
autobiographical statements of fact on USENET - and if someone wants
to know whether what I post is Fiction, Non-Fiction, or whatever, they
*must contact me* and ask for more details.
I also posted that I DO NOT post autobiographical statements of facts
about myself on USENET as far back as 2001, and repeated that general
disclaimer statement in early 2003. Nigel Brooks and his smear/hate
con gang did not start their smear campaign against me until 2005,
*and Nigel Brooks and his gang even referenced and mentioned the post
in 2003 when I said I do not post autobiographical facts about me on
USENET - so they *knew* all along they were lying about the context
and meaning of quips they removed from my posts.
When an Author tells you MORE THAN A THOUSAND TIMES he is NOT posting
exclusively non-fiction on USENET, you would think that statement by
the author would resonate into even the pea brains of con men, smear
merchants and hate group leaders. Which of course it did as they
acknowledged this statement (Tom Rau whined and confirmed he read my
disclaimer more than 270 times) - but this fact had to be hidden by
such people so they could further their obviously fraudulent smear and
con defamation campaigns.
SELF ADMITTED AND SELF ACCLAIMED "TROLLS" OPERATE NIGEL BROOKS SMEAR
GANG'S MOST UNETHICAL FRAUD, SERIAL LYING AND CON MAN FALSE
ACCUSATIONS!
Many of the most vociferous and deceptive Nigel Brooks' key smear
gang members self-describe themselves as "Trolls."
These self-acclaimed and self-described *Trolls* have posted
hundreds of defaming statements and libel about me under those very
revealing Troll self-descriptions. (See alt.war.Vietnam troll
section - you will find ALL of the self-described Trolls are connected
to Nigel Brooks and his gang's defamation and smear campaigns).
As just one example, here is the latest FBI forgery direct from a
Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang member that self-describes himself as a
"Troll." Note the gang member is again fraudulently using the name
of the FBI to smear and defame - which as we all know is a criminal
act.
It is obvious these Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang members will resort
to and use criminal acts to further the gang's smear and vilification
campaigns:
"Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.alt.net
From: Troll #351 <Leon...@sistine.va>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.politics,alt.news-media,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: That Second FBI Phone Transcript betwixt Mr.Doug Grant-tm
and the FBI
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:55:46 -0700"
Considering the self-description of these gang members as "Trolls" and
their propensity to use criminal acts (using the name of the FBI for
nefarious purposes is a criminal act - Federal and Brooks knows it)
to defame Nigel Brook's targeted hate/smear victim, can anyone out
there actually believe anything Nigel Brooks or any of his gang
members say about anyone?
If you do then you are admitting that you are de facto stating that
you believe people that are *telling you up front they are liars and
con men!* BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Question:
If you actually believe someone that is telling you up front that he
is lying to you, what would best describe you: (1) a moron (2) a
drooling moron (3) a member of the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang -
or perhaps all three?
Lawyers Speak "again"
All should know and be hereby informed that hate messages of any kind,
serial lying, fraud, libel, (which of course includes intentional and
malicious defamation and libel by omitting key facts) and other
publications of any kind will be recorded and used against the
perpetrator in a legal action. This is especially true for those
owners and participants in smear/hate web sites and hate newsgroups
which are used to further and facilitate hate and smear campaigns
against individuals.
End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
Doug's Rebuttal:
Although I agree the dregs that lie about their military service,
such as claiming or implying they were combat medics when they were
not, or claiming they served in the US Army under "different names"
and participated in Tank crews without any Tank training and also
wore "brass" on their Jungle Fatigues (who also claims he owned 15000
buildings and has an FBI agent living with him for the past 20 years
but has forgot that agent's last name) or claiming or implying that
"Airborne" was better than other branches, or claiming there was only
ONE special forces in Vietnam and that special forces was the Green
Berets, or claiming they experienced combat more than others and then
being forced to admit their initial Vietnam location *never
experienced a single attack* during their entire tour at that
location, should most defiantly be exposed for what they are.
Con Men and Hate Gangs Should Also Be Exposed
I also agree we *real War Veterans* should of course further expose
people receiving US Army disability pay although they repeatedly boast
about "hiking mountains and performing hard labor to remove brush from
those mountains" and expose those who also accuse Agent Orange
victims of being "obese slugs" while they draw their "disability" pay
each month although they clearly are not disabled (physically at
least) or those fakers and wannabe's that fraudulently claim they
participated in the 1968 Tet offensive or counter offensive months,
and/or also fraudulently claim they participated in Reactionary
Force duty during the Tet offensive, and/or also fraudulently claim
Vietnam campaign or other medals they did not receive, or incredibly
and *repeatedly* claim combat ribbons and purple heart medals they
never received, should of course be exposed for what posers and
frauds they are.
Not to mention exposing the real names of those that are not even
Veterans that post on Veteran's newsgroups so as to defame and paint
in a false light real Veterans. (Does anyone know the real name of
the hate gang member that goes by the name of SteveL that denies his
real name is Steve Leyland? Let me know if you really know who this
person is as officers of the court are most defiantly interested).
Not to mention those that entered Vet forums to call our Marines
"murderers" and railed against our war on terror in post after post. .
.
No doubt I agree those people mentioned above (which of course
represent key members of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear/con and fraud
gang) should be exposed for the wannabe's, posers, and frauds they
clearly are - not to mention exposing people that never even went to
Vietnam nor experienced any combat yet post fraud and libel against
those that did experience combat on a Vietnam forum. . . what kind of
pathetic dreg who never experienced any combat in his pathetic life
would demean real combat vets in respect to issues about combat?
Yep, I agree those "people" are the scum of the Earth and should be
exposed for what they really are in rebuttal to their fraud.
MEDALS FOR VALOR FRAUDS ABOUNDING - BUT TOM RAU NEVER MENTIONS THEM???
I am very suspicious of the true motive of this Nigel Brooks
hate/smear gang to "expose" frauds in respect to their military
service. I believe this gang has an ulterior motive because (1) they
NEVER mention members of their own gang which have lied profusely
about their own military service, and (2) they NEVER mention,
"especially Tom Rau ducks" the greatest medal for valor fraud of all
time in Vietnam - which were medals issued based upon fraudulent
After Action Reports as was testified in front of Congress *by the
very authors (officers and enlisted) of those After Action Reports and
newspaper articles!*
Do you know how many officers received medals due to those now
admitted lies and fraud?
1. I can only guess, but I would estimate TENS OF THOUSANDS received
medals due to fraudulent reports, or reports the officers' themselves
helped to write up or wrote up - especially when they received medals
for writing up their own reports...
Yet not a word, hint nor mention of this tremendous fraud perpetrated
by most of the units during the Vietnam war - not a word.
http://tinyurl.com/msajux FALSE MEDALS - REBUTTAL - May 17, 2009
But What About Scum/Hate Gangs that Fraudulently Accuse to Bully or
Demonize Others?
However, I also believe it is important to also note that hate/smear
and con gangs regularly falsely accuse their smear victims of such
fraud, then they maliciously juxtapose their con man frauds with
actual real frauds so as to add fraudulent and false credibility to
the hate group's cons and smears about their targeted victims.
I believe there should be some kind of exposure and penalty for those
hate and con groups that falsely accuse Veterans of lying about their
service, such as the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang and the hate
gang that was headed by the James von Brunn hate monger - it appears
that most if not all "hate gangs" operate precisely the same way as
the Nigel Brooks hate gang does. Perhaps I should write my
Congressman about introducing new laws that penalize such hate groups
that defame real Veterans with lies, fraud, hate, false light lies,
and general obloquy?
As just one an example consider the cons and fraud Tom Rau (Dai Uy)
and members of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang have posted on
USENET about me - which have long been exposed as outright lies,
obloquy, con man distortions and/or false and malicious fraudulent
accusations:
Tom Rau (Dai Uy) posted on this forum that I lied about going to
Vietnam - he said I "dodged" Vietnam. Then after that Tom Rau con was
exposed for the con it is, Tom Rau then started lying about my actual
duties while I was in the US Army, such as fraudulently claiming that
one's MOS dictated "all" duties performed in a combat zone - and when
independent military experts laughed that Tom Rau con down, Mr. Rau
proceeded with his next con claiming that I had posted "amazing feats
of bravado" on USENET, which of course we all know is yet another con
and further know I have posted multiple posts to the contrary, then
Mr. Rau tried to con the readers that my RVN training had nothing to
do with me going into combat, and when that con was exposed, Tom Rau
then conned the group and claimed I never was a SFC E-7 in Vietnam,
and when that Tom Rau con was exposed for the con it is, Tom Rau then
attempted to claim the unit I was initially assigned to in Vietnam
(1/27th) had a position for Personnel Sergeant and I performed such
duties while with that unit, and when that outrageous con was even
contradicted by several other members of that same unit, Tom Rau
attempted to cover his con by changing the Unit name he said had a
personnel office, then he and Nigel Brooks attempted to con the
readers into fraudulently believing that I had a bad discharge, then
when that Tom Rau and gang con was exposed Mr. Rau and his key
"non-veteran" gang members started using false FBI reports to con the
readers some more about me and to paint me and my past in a false
light, and then when that Tom Rau con was exposed Mr. Rau started
lying about my CBR training, then when that Tom Rau con was exposed,
Mr. Rau and gang started conning the readers about what my military
records proved or did not prove, and when that con was dismissed and
proved a con by other independent military experts (and the National
Personnel Records center web site) then Mr. Rau fraudulently claimed
that I attended a War College *before I was even born* - and when that
ridiculous con was exposed, then Mr. Rau started to lie about my
copyrights, and when that Tom Rau con was exposed, Tom Rau then
started to con and lie about my duties in Vietnam and elsewhere, and
he started FORGING false contexts and distorted meanings to my posts
by FORGING and altering key words and statements within them, then
when that Tom Rau con was exposed, Mr. Rau then tried to con and
claim that I never was in combat in Vietnam, and if I was I should
have received the CIB, and when that Tom Rau con was exposed via a
letter from the US Army, then Mr. Rau went into high con about a reply
from one of my typist's to the Chip gang member about VA Purple
Heart ID cards, (a member of Mr. Rau's smear/hate and con gang
actually retrieved that slightly ambiguous post from my waste basket)
and Tom Rau repeatedly ignored the true and remedied context which
was explained to him dozens of times, and then he posted *hundreds* of
hate filled and false accusations that I had claimed a purple heart
medal while knowing full well I had posted the exact opposite of that
claim dozens of times, and had even stated the VA ID card post in
question (within 60 days after it was posted) was about VA ID cards
and not medals, and when that extremely malicious Tom Rau con was
exposed, and when Military experts also agreed that my VA card context
was correct in the post in question, Tom Rau then called the military
experts "liars" and started a new con that I had withheld showing a VA
purple Heart ID card to the said military expert, but when the
military expert responded and said that he *never asked me to see any
such card because he had already seen one* and when the VA itself
acknowledged the existence of such an Purple Heart VA ID card, and so
did the DAV, and when I posted references to other members of this
forum referencing the very VA service connected ID card the same as I
did, then Tom Rau's and his gang's thousand post con on this issue
alone was revealed for the fraud and con it clearly was - and then Mr.
Rau started lying and conning the readers that some Federal Judge had
addressed me personally and had admonished me personally about a
lawsuit I was once involved in, and when that Tom Rau con was exposed
then Tom Rau started claiming that everything I had ever said about
anything on USENET was a lie, and when that Tom Rau con was exposed
Tom Rau then conned the readers by "altering" and "adding" new terms
and words and contexts to my past post so as to make them appear like
I was saying something that I did not, and when that con from Tom Rau
was exposed, then Tom Rau started to use repeated libel and fraud by
claiming I was insane, not to mention Tom Rau's fraudulent con that I
dealt in Child Porno and showed that Child Porno to children, or his
gang's common purpose outrageous and fraudulent accusations that I
said I personally killed 1803 enemy in Vietnam and feasted on some of
their bodies, and that same gang spewed the con that I was a rapist, a
murderer, a war criminal, a rapist, a member of the Mi Lai massacre, a
let us not forget the cons that I am a wife beater and a car thief,
and the outrageous pedophile fraud and cons posted by members of the
Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang, and the preposterous claims that
I described an attack in Can Tho when I was *not* there, while not
ever even mentioning a much larger attack that occurred when even the
con gang admits I *was* assigned to Can Tho, and of course the latest
claim by this hate/smear gang that "everything everyone posts on
USENET is automatically supposed to be non-fiction or autobiographical
facts, EXCEPT, THE POSTS THE GANG POSTS! Apparently the gang is
"excluded" from that preposterous and downright goofy
misrepresentation about all USENET posts ever posted by all authors
*in the world* (except Nigel Brooks gang members of course)!
(I have been told that anyone that would resort to posting forged FBI
reports, and posting false Child Porno accusations about someone as
Tom Rau did, would be instantly deemed libeling "with a malicious
intent" by any court in the land. Libel per se ( a victim of libel
with a malicious intent does not need to prove damages in a libel
suit).
To add to the above, members of this Nigel Brooks hate smear and con
gang have threatened me with violence and death *scores of times* and
further incited hated and threats from Muslim organizations to be sent
to me via email, and incited other third parties to hate me by
maliciously infecting them with their malicious cons and fraud about
me. .
Members of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang also conspired to
and did file completely bogus and false criminal charges against me,
which were dismissed by the DA for "nonexistent evidence" to support
the gang's fraudulent claims, and after Nigel Brooks called for his
gang to file fraudulent and completely malicious false criminal
charges against me with the VA, one key member of the Nigel Brooks
hate/smear gang broke into my VA Government computer medical records,
removed key documents from those records so as to make it appear I
lied to the VA, and further sabotaged my health care, and further
published some of my personal medical information on USENET, while
providing that stolen personal information to other members of the
smear and con gang, and to other third parties. Note the key member
of the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang that broke into my VA records
was caught by the VA illegally accessing my records, and he was fired
from his job for doing so - and I have received correspondence from
Federal Investigators (through my lawyers) indicating that this issue
has not even become close to being resolved. I may be required to
file a civil lawsuit to force prosecution, and I am prepared to do
precisely that if I am forced by this gang's continued harassment and
defamation.
I HAVE NOT even mentioned a host of other outrageous and complete
frauds and cons this gang has perpetrated against me that are so
beyond the pale for a rational person I must seriously wonder what
kind of perverse dregs and pathetic fools compose this hate/smear and
con gang that Mr. Rau regularly supports and conspires with?
If anyone associates themselves with this hate and smear gang they
should read my notice listed below:
http://tinyurl.com/lbnkw2 Legal Action Taken - NOTICE!
The Gang Members are "Self-Admitted" Liars, Smear Merchants and Con
Men (see above for their "Troll" confessions):
So in addition to Mr. Rau's own smear/hate and con gang clearly lying
about their military service and being posers, wannabe's and fakers,
they also are clearly con men, and many of them have boasted about
being "Trolls" which of course is a self admission of being a fraud,
smear merchant and con man. Yes I agree - *THEY ARE THE TROLLS THEY
CLAIM TO BE!*
Malicious Miss Association is a Classic Hate/Smear Gang Mantra
Keep in mind that when con men and hate mongers attempt to miss
associate honest people like me that have simply told the truth about
their past, regardless of how vainglorious it might appear to be, to
actual military frauds and fakers, it is just another hate gang con,
and the con and miss association is deliberate and malicious.
So what should be the penalty for such gangs of con and hate merchants
like the Nigel Brooks hate gang and of course the James Von Brunn hate
and smear gang as well? Both of these hate gangs operate in the same
manner - they demonize their targeted victims with fraud, lies, false
accusations and general con man obloquy. I suspect the penalty for
such outrageous fraud should be the same as the penalty for lying
about their military service as many of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear
and con gang members have done.
I Will Back Up *Everything* I have said in This Post With Proof!
Although I am willing to back up everything I have said about these
gang members with hard evidence, I have *yet* to see any evidence
produced by the gang that proves that I lied about anything! Since I
do not lie (we all know that Fiction, typos, errors, deliberate
hyperbole and embellishments and similar are not "lies") I hereby
challenge any gang member to back up with *proof* that I lied about
anything this gang has claimed I lied about! (We all know that NO ONE
always posts non-fiction on USENET - no one is stupid enough to
believe that smear gang con).
I have made this challenge dozens of times and the gang members run,
hide, cower, duck, dodge, and bluster, and hide this challenge at
every opportunity and NEVER NEVER post any proof - do you want to know
why? Because they are the ones that are lying and they DO NOT HAVE
any proof to back up their fraud, just like the D.A. said; "no
evidence" to prove their charges against me! So when you have lawyers
and a District Attorney stating these gang members did not have
evidence to substantiate their fraudulent charges against me, then
what else do you need to know about these gang members alleged
"veracity" and their volumes of boasts that I was arrested, jailed and
was facing charges for crimes they *knew* were bogus, a complete
fraud, and a flagrant abuse of process! (Note that the gang member
that filed bogus criminal charges against me and boasted about doing
so dozens of times on USENET actually submitted a post from Tom Rau
about me as "evidence" I cyberstalked him! This gang member clearly
attempted to use false evidence to smear and defame me with the DA,
and I have recently sent the DA a letter in that regard pointing out
his false evidence and his obvious malicious intent - obviously Tom
Rau was involved in this fraud as well or he would not have allowed
his post to be used by other gang members to file bogus charges
against me).
Note everything I said about Mr. Tom Rau and about members of the
Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang above in rebuttal to their
repeated fraud about me, I am more than willing to prove in a court of
law, or in binding Arbitration, or to any law enforcement
investigator.
Moreover, if the American Association of Arbitrators state that I said
anything false about Mr. Rau or his gang above, then I will pay for
their arbitration and apologize, and if Mr. Rau wants to take this
challenge and if this prestigious legal body agrees I have proof
backing up every statement about Mr. Rau and the gang I posted above,
then Mr. Rau pays for the Arbitration and apologizes not only to me,
but to all Vietnam Veterans which he has demeaned by fraudulently
attacking me, and by calling other Vets that clearly experienced more
combat than he ever did "Rear Echelon Motherfuckers" - and by calling
Agent Orange victims "Obese Slugs" and by calling the entire Vietnam
NCO corps "incompetent and malingering."
So how about it Mr. Rau, care to start posting the names of your gang
that have been lying about their military service for years? Care to
explain how you have been receiving US Army disability pay yet you
also repeatedly boast about hiking, climbing high mountains, and
performing hard labor by removing brush from those mountains with a
brush removing team in Hawaii?
Mr. Rau, care to start mentioning who "really" are the wannabe's,
posers, fakers, liars, government manipulators and con men around
here?
Also, is there any gang member or other interested party that would
like to see my proof to my rebuttal allegations above? Or, do you
want to avert your eyes from the truth?
Doug Grant (Tm)
"Dai Uy" <Dai...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:7f4939cd-d971-48d3...@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
X-URL:
http://www.starnewsonline.com/article/20090802/ZNYT02/908023006/-1/HURRICANE0802?Title=In-Ranks-of-Heroes-Finding-the-Fakes
or http://tinyurl.com/ls6n4r
In Ranks of Heroes, Finding the Fakes
IAN URBINA
Published: Sunday, August 2, 2009 at 5:10 a.m.
Last Modified: Sunday, August 2, 2009 at 5:10 a.m.
Last August, the Texas Department of Transportation started asking
applicants for more documentation after discovering that at least 11
of the 67 Legion of Merit license plates on the roads had been issued
to people who never earned the medal.
See above.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7dthf7F...@mid.individual.net...
Doug Says: I am not angry at anyone - and who is the youtube smear
suppose to represent? Nigel Brooks? Sounds just like him, and the
Bullshit detector is certainly applicable, but I don't know what he
looks like so I guess it could be him. Anyone know who this is
supposed to be? Or is it just a collection of the fraud and cons
Nigel Brooks has previously posted about someone? Or could it be
designed to paint a Nigel Brooks hate/con gang victim in yet another
false light to incite hatred and loathing? Strange that my lawyers
are real interested in these youtube depictions, they say it proves
something very special - go figure!
BTW, are there any more of these youtube depictions that are being
associated with who again? Apparently, my lawyers had found a couple
others they were very interested in - some new law or something that
has something to do with such hate and fraud cons that are being used
in this manner - don't ask me - they are the lawyers - but using such
fraud, smears and hate are classic hate/smear and con gang tactics
which of course are employed by the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con
gang - and of course Mr. Brooks.
The objective of a con/hate smear gang is to (1) avoid truthful
rebuttals as they know they cannot refute the truth and the fact they
have been caught in mid con smearing one of their victims, and (2) try
their fraudulent best to paint their victim in a false and defaming
light so as to incite ridicule and hatred, while hiding the truth and
facts about the issue. This is classic fascism, right out of the
Joseph Goebbels handbook, and I for one am not surprised that a
fascist hate/smear and con gang like the one Nigel Brooks uses would
use this well-know hate and smear tactic - he knows he cannot refute
the truth I am posting about his cons - so what else can he do but
play child like songs about those that are exposing his fraud?
Pathetic.
Doug Grant (Tm)
>
Le Janitor
oh yeah....I think you omitted "hucksters" in your rant
Mac
<awrli...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"DGVREIMAN" <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:XcWdnVPpHf6s1ObX...@giganews.com...
>>
>> CON MEN -WANNABE'S -LIARS AND FAKERS
>>
>> Smear Merchant Disclaimer
>>
>> I have better things to do than rebut the fraud and false accusations
>> made by members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
>> However, unlike the gang's other smear victims, I will defend myself
>> from the gang's obloquy and fraud in each case.
===============================================
Well, you CLAIM that you have alleged attorneys.
You claim that these alleged attorneys have "initiated legal action".
And yet, with that, those alleged attorneys "encourage" to continue
spewing forth... ??
Amazing.
You claim you have alleged attorneys --- they are supposed to defend
you.
Let them do the work for which you are paying them.
Even if you refuse to name these alleged attorneys and their general
location...
-Mac, the Medic
La N
Will you be getting one of those little teardrop tattoos, then? Cool.
- nilita
SteveL
wrote:
>Not to mention exposing the real names of those that are not even
>Veterans that post on Veteran's newsgroups so as to defame and paint
>in a false light real Veterans
Since when is alt.politics a "veteran's newsgroup"? Or did you mean
alt.war.vietnam? Well that's not a "veteran's newsgroup" either
(unlike alt.vietnam.veterans)
> (Does anyone know the real name of
>the hate gang member that goes by the name of SteveL
I do.
> that denies his
>real name is Steve Leyland?
It still isn't.
> Let me know if you really know who this
>person is as officers of the court are most defiantly interested).
"Defiantly" interested? Illiterate kook.
They have my permission to email me.
>
>Not to mention those that entered Vet forums to call our Marines
>"murderers" and railed against our war on terror in post after post. .
>.
Strange that you can never produce a single example of that. Fucking
liar.
Pepperoni
HXnZ2dnUV...@giganews.com:
> Strange that you can never produce a single example of that. Fucking
> liar.
>
Duh-g never lets facts get in the way of a rant. If facts don't jibe with
his slander, he makes something up.
Mac
wrote:
>
>Not to mention exposing the real names of those that are not even
>Veterans that post on Veteran's newsgroups so as to defame and paint
>in a false light real Veterans
REPLY:
Gee, now to whom would you be referring?
On whom would you be trying so hard to heap another helping of
dismissal?
>
> (Does anyone know the real name of
>the hate gang member that goes by the name of SteveL
REPLY:
Sure.
Quite a few people.
Easily those who know even a little about computers.
>
> that denies his
>real name is Steve Leyland?
REPLY:
After more than a year, and your lies about him, you still haven'et
figured out that the name you are printing is NOT his?
Boy! Are you a slow learner.
>
> Let me know if you really know who this
>person is as officers of the court are most defiantly interested).
REPLY:
Why: Don't you remember, at least a half-dozen veterans came forward
and challenged you regarding this.
They felt you were acting as a Gate-Keeper; that you were making an
effort to Obstruct Justice.
You claimed that you had filed a complaint against SteveL and that
there was a specific law enforcement office looking for him...
Remember??
Several veterans responded to you and stated that you should name the
specific officer in charge of the investigation AND the location of
that specific office. They also stated that they would furnish the
appropriate information DIRECTLY to that person.
Of course, they also stated that they would most likely furnish copies
of some of your attacks upon SteveL....
Do you remember your refusal to furnish the name of the officer and
the name of the local Law Enforcement Office which, YOU CLAIMED, was
looking for SteveL ??
Well, don't worry, I am sure that your "alleged Attorneys" having
undertaken their "legal actions against those challenging you" will
soon have several names for consideration....
Can hardly wait.
Wonder if one should appraise them of the above little story ???
-Mac, the Medic
Sharky
<mercy snip of yet another disjointed Doogie Rant(tm)>
see:<XcWdnVPpHf6s1ObX...@giganews.com>
>Not to mention exposing the real names of those that are not even
>Veterans that post on Veteran's newsgroups so as to defame and paint
>in a false light real Veterans. (Does anyone know the real name of
>the hate gang member that goes by the name of SteveL that denies his
>real name is Steve Leyland? Let me know if you really know who this
>person is as officers of the court are most defiantly interested).
Steve Leyland; You've been *served* in another Doogie Grant "Usenet
Lawyer"(tm) Ko0kS0oT.
How the hell did that happen?
I just hope you're happy with yourself now, you cyber-stalking web
name! [1]
--
Cheers,
Sharky
[1] Doogie Rant(tm)'s Ko0kSiT3
http://groups.google.com/group/namesofcyberstalkers?hl=en
Doogie was banned from his own group by Google but it remains as a
testiment to Doogies awsome legal mind ...mheh.
Nigel Brooks
"Sharky" <sh...@he11sgates.org> wrote in message
news:4a7cc286....@news.free.fr...
I Nigel Brooks do hereby affirm that I do indeed know the true legal name of
the poster Mr. Reiman is referring to.
It seems to me that we went through all of this last year when Reiman
claimed that law enforcement officers were looking for him
http://tinyurl.com/5u04s9.
At that time I offered my complete cooperation and told Reiman to provide my
contact details to the "law enforcement" officers.
Well that was May 25, 2008 - and as of right now, no-one has contacted me.
It's just another Doogie lie - in other words :
http://bsmeter.bravehost.com/statement_evaluation_tool.htm
Nigel Brooks
Sharky
Well, there you go Steve, you're absolutely fjcked!
The leader of the Nigel Brooks smear...blah, cyber, blah...stalker
gang has linked you to the Ko0s0ot with Usernet SITES!
Be prepared to send all your material wealth to Doug Grant (tm)
<legal...@comcast.net> or prepare for the consequence.
You don't want to be rebutted by Doogie...believe me.
SteveL
wrote:
>DGVREIMAN wrote:
>
><mercy snip of yet another disjointed Doogie Rant(tm)>
>see:<XcWdnVPpHf6s1ObX...@giganews.com>
>
>>Not to mention exposing the real names of those that are not even
>>Veterans that post on Veteran's newsgroups so as to defame and paint
>>in a false light real Veterans. (Does anyone know the real name of
>>the hate gang member that goes by the name of SteveL that denies his
>>real name is Steve Leyland? Let me know if you really know who this
>>person is as officers of the court are most defiantly interested).
>
>Steve Leyland; You've been *served* in another Doogie Grant "Usenet
>Lawyer"(tm) Ko0kS0oT.
For some reason I haven't figured out yet Doug Grant seems to really
*really* want me to be named Steve Leyland (whoever he is), and
mentions this guys name whenever he mentions mine - as if he *knows*
something (nudge nudge wink wink).
For those of us who *do* know it just confirms once again that he
knows *nothing* and is an idiot for loudly advertizing that fact again
and again.
Maybe it's a "really smart" (tm) tactic to goad me into "My name's not
Leyland you moron, its <real name>!!!!!"
I'm sure it makes sense to him.
>
>How the hell did that happen?
I proved Doug Grant (who denies he is a child molester) to be a liar
once again.
(see? anyone can do it!)
>
>I just hope you're happy with yourself now, you cyber-stalking web
>name! [1]
Nope. They got me working away in London 5 days a week at the moment.
Pain in the ass.
DGVREIMAN
Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, you know, the group knows, the world
knows that I told you everal times that if your lawyer contacted me I
would provide the law enforcement agency that I contacted about the
anonymous yberstalker SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland). Since
the issue is not in the hands of the lawyers, and the lawyers were the
ones doing the contacting, your lawyer needs to be involved.
Moreover, I do not believe that someone with the delusions you seem
to have about mind reading and soothsaying is intelligent enough to be
contacted by anyone without legal representation.
Moreover, your pathetic and child like bsmeter is simply a fraud, as
you know I have offered you and the \SteveL anonymous cyberstalker
(who denies being Steve Leyland) the opportunity to receive that
information several times - which you hide from, and then use child
like school yard nonsense to try and deflect the fact you have been
hiding from the name of the law enforcement agency I contacted about
SteveL for more than a year now.
Walk the walk Brooks - no one believes your childish nonsense. Have
your lawyer contact me - or SteveL's lawyer or any lawyer representing
you or the group, if you can find one stupid enough to do so.
Doug Grant (Tm)
>
DGVREIMAN
>
>
> "Le Janitor" <awrli...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:h57d6e$kvb$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>>> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>>> Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
>>>
>>> Douglas Reiman (a.k.a. Doug Grant, a.k.a Doogie, a.k.a any other
>>> reference or nick name the said smear gang uses to reference me).
>>>
>>>
>> since you are using the comcast ID mailto:legal...@comcast.net
>> I assume you are claiming to be a lawyer now? that's a no-no ya
>> know.....
>
> Sounds like BS to me.
>
> gang"
>
> 2. If indeed a law firm were to initiate legal action against
> anyone who has seen fit to challenge Douglas Reiman on his past
> seems to me that due diligence on their part would be:
>
> a. Review all of Mr. Reimans postings on these newsgroups.
> c. Make an evaluation as to the veracity of his explanations for
> his postings
> against anyone who challenges him
> up to him
> counsel in a pending litigation would continue to engage potential
> defendants in any kind of communication
> namesofcyberstalkers - and investigate why Google saw fit to ban
> Reimans usenet account from posting to that group.
>
> directly from Reiman or anyone acting on his behalf, my response
> will be "Arkell v. Pressdram.
>
>
> Superfluous newsgroups removed
More mind reading from Nigel Brooks: See below:
NIGEL BROOKS - MIND READING BRAGGADOCIO - REBUTTAL
Smear Merchant Disclaimer
I have better things to do than rebut the fraud and false accusations
made by members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
However, unlike the gang's other smear victims, I will defend myself
Nigel Brooks said:
>>>> Nigel Brooks "
Nigel Brooks"
revealing Troll self-descriptions. (See alt.war.vietnam troll
Question:
Lawyers Speak "again"
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
Nigel Brooks said on Aug 6, 2009:
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7drapgF...@mid.individual.net...
>>> "I don't need an "independent" university or legal department to
>>> tell me what I already know as fact -that Reiman is a serial
>>> liar, and
>>> that his frenzied attempts to portray his unmasked lies as being
>>> "typos, errors. fiction, mistakes by his secretary etc etc etc are
>>> the
>>> pathetic motions of a man who is tangled in his own web of
>>> deceit."
Nigel Brooks above is claiming above that he can tell when any author
was (1) making a mistake or not making a mistake (2) making a typo or
not making a typo (3) lying, (4) using Fiction (5) using Non-Fiction,
(6) using autobiographical fiction (7) using autobiographical
non-fiction!
So I must ask all the following question:
If you believe Nigel Brooks then tell me why we have courts, and
lawyers, and polygraph machines, and cops? WE DON'T NEED THEM! NIGEL
BROOKS IS HERE!
Even in warfare think about how valuable Nigel Brooks and his
*absolutely amazing* mind reading, soothsaying, clairvoyance, psychic,
voodoo, witchcraft, Swami, "mind reading" capabilities would work on a
battlefield!
NIGEL'S TIN FOIL POINTY HAT AND HIS SECRET SQUIRREL CODE BOOK IS A
SECRET WEAPON!
WE WOULD NEVER EVEN NEED GENERALS WITH OL NIGEL AROUND! Just send ol
Nigel Brooks out there *with his tin foil hat and his secret squirell
book in hand* and he will tell us what the enemy is thinking and what
the enemy is going to do before he does it!
Somebody call Obama quick! Tell him we have a secret weapon and its
name is "Nigel Brooks the Amazing Swami Mind Reader!"
Based upon Nigel Brook's mind reading, clairvoyance and incredible
soothsaying self-acclaimed abilities (which he obtains, I suspect, by
killing chickens or something similar, but I am not really sure) Nigel
Brooks also can solve ALL crimes in America!
We no longer will need courts or lawyers to determine what is real
evidence or is just con man fraud and hype? We will just trot out Ol
Nigel to tell us who is lying, who is not, who made a typo in his loan
application and who was really lying, as ol Nigel can tell the
difference *without ever even meeting the suspect!* We would never
need discovery in any lawsuit to determine truth, and as Nigel says,
he doesn't need any stinking Universities to tell him anything either!
Could anything be more *amazing* than Nigel Brooks incredible and
super human mental abilities?? I wonder, does he also have "x-ray
vision???"
Nigel must be the richest man in the world (right next to his
Pepperoni (Tom Huxton) gang member that claims he owned 15000
buildings - because Nigel must know what every poker player in the
world is thinking, what every stock broker is thinking, and let us not
forget what every Woman is thinking as well! WOW! Nigel must be a
super zillionaire right along with his gang member Pepperoni!
Hell, Nigel Brook's mind reading capabilities are so fucking amazing
he also claims he knew what I was thinking when I wrote USENET posts
YEARS before he even knew I was alive, or even knew anything about me!
In other words, Nigel Brooks claims that he can not only read minds
in the present, he also claims he can retroactively read minds in the
past although he does not even know the person he is reading!
This amazing mind reading claim is known better by experts as:
"Retrocognitive, Precognitive, and Intuitive Telepathy is described as
being the transfer of information, through Psi, about the past, future
or present state of an individual's mind. "
However, note what these experts say about someone that makes such
claims below - I believe it fits Nigel Brooks to a Tee.
I say "fucking amazing!" Or, just perhaps, "fucking bullshit from an
obvious con man."
Or I should better say that anyone that believes Nigel Brooks claims
above is the one that is really "fucking amazing" because NO ONE (well
almost no one as apparently some of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and
con gang actually believe his delusory and hilarious bullshit) will
believe the fantastic, ridiculous, idiotic, preposterous, and
downright child like bullshit "mind reading and psychic" postulations
from Nigel Brooks! NO ONE!
An example of Nigel Brooks mind reading:
Ol Brooks dug a long discarded and completely remedied Purple Heart
VA ID card post out of my waste basket that I did not even write, back
in 2003 or so, long before Brooks even knew who I was or knew me in
any way, and he now claims "he knew what my typist was thinking when
she wrote that exchange!" Yet he does not even know the name of my
typist, and Nigel never met her in his life, never exchanged
comments, nothing - and did not even know me or anything about me at
that time either!
So ol Nigel is claiming he does not even have to know the person
before he can read his or her mind! Wow! What utter bullshit this
con man spews - and he claims that people actually believe him?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA - there must be some *really* stupid morons
that ol Nigel can suck in with this obvious con! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Then going back to 2001 or so, Mr. Brooks claims he knows what I was
thinking when I wrote stuff back then, although he never knew me, nor
heard about me, nor exchanged anything with me, nor read anything I
wrote until YEARS LATER!
So not only is Nigel Brooks claiming he can read everyone's minds, he
is also claiming he can read minds *retroactively* and read minds of
people he has never met, nor encountered in any way, in his entire
clown like pathetic con man life!
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH.
And what is even more hilarious and preposterous, his con/hate/smear
gang members actually swear to what Nigel Brooks is saying, and they
even actually support his absolutely idiotic and bizarre mind reading
amazing claims and braggadocio!
Rational Readers Pay Attention Please
If you are a rational person, and you are reading this, please do not
believe I am making this up. You can read for yourself above what
Nigel Brooks said. He clearly is claiming soothsaying and mind
reading paranormal abilities - but what is strange is that each time I
*test Nigel on mind reading* he fails the test miserably!
Here is the offical description of Nigel Brooks fantastic mind reading
claims and what the experts say about it:
"Retrocognitive, Precognitive, and Intuitive Telepathy is described as
being the transfer of information, through Psi, about the past, future
or present state of an individual's mind. "
In the case of "Retrocognitive, Precognitive, and Intuitive
Telephathy:
The field which studies certain types of paranormal phenomena such as
telepathy is called parapsychology. Skeptics say that instances of
apparent telepathy are explained as the result of fraud, self-delusion
and/or self-deception and that telepathy does not exist as a
paranormal power.
A technique which shows statistically significant evidence of
telepathy on every occasion has yet to be discovered. This lack of
reliable reproducibility has led skeptics to argue that there is no
credible scientific evidence for the existence of telepathy at all.
Skeptics also point to historical cases in which were discovered flaws
in experimental design and occasional cases of fraud
http://tinyurl.com/qgfzt Clairvoyance
According to Roger Luckhurst
In addition, the notion of telepathy is similar to two psychological
concepts: delusions of thought insertion/removal and psychological
symbiosis.
This similarity might explain how some people have come up with the
idea of telephathy. Thought insertion/removal is a symptom of
psychosis, particularly of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
It is an idea found in the writings of early psychoanalysts, such as
Melanie Klein. It entails the belief that in the early psychological
experience of the child (during earliest infancy), the child is unable
to tell the difference between his or her own mind, on one hand, and
his or her experience of the mother/parent, on the other hand. This
state of mind is called psychological symbiosis; with development, it
ends, but, purportedly, aspects of it can still be detected in the
psychological functioning of the adult. Putatively, the experience of
either thought insertion/removal or unconscious memories of
psychological symbiosis may have led to the invention of "telepathy"
as a notion and the belief that telepathy exists. Psychiatrists and
clinical psychologists believe and empirical findings support the idea
that people with schizotypal personality disorder are particularly
likely to believe in telepathy.
According to experts , clairvoyance claims are the result of fraud,
self delusion,[4] Barnum effects, confirmatory biases, or failures to
appreciate the base rate of chance occurrences. For example, in a
scientific experiment of clairvoyance, a purported clairvoyant
participant will inevitably make correct guesses some of the time
(i.e., during some of the trials within the same experiment), simply
because of chance. Furthermore, because of the nature of the
statistical tests used by experimenters, a very small proportion of
all experiments conducted will yield an overall statistically
significant result (suggesting that clairvoyance took place at
above-chance levels), again simply because of chance.
PROCESSIONAL INVESTIGATORS SAY "FLIP A COIN" WHEN IT COMES TO
UNCOVERING LIARS!
The best Professional Investigators in the world cannot tell a liar
from a truthful person any better than they can by flipping a coin!
How many times have we heard Nigel Brooks try to add false credibility
to his delusional mind reading because he once worked for the US
Custom Service? But those that *really* did extensive criminal
investigations, openly say they cannot do better than 50% in respect
to determining who is lying and who is not - and that includes after
they meet and interrogate their suspect!
http://tinyurl.com/nanaz9 Professional Investigators might as well
flip a coin:
Excerpts from above:
"Most of us think we know the telltale signs of a liar-shifty eyes,
sweating, a long, winding story that seems highly improbable. The
stereotypes are even cross-cultural: A 2006 study done at the Texas
Christian University found that similar perceptions of liars exist in
over sixty countries.
In reality, however, there is not one behavior all liars exhibit and
some behaviors we associate with lying could mean something else
entirely. Because of this, few people are very good at spotting liars.
Even the so-called "experts"-body language professionals, customs
officials, etc.-are only right about half the time."
(Doug's Note: Brooks claims he was a "custom offical" and therefore he
can spot liars and frauds - but as we see above - that claim too is
nothing but pure bullshit and fraud, typical of Nigel Brooks. The
study above *specifically states that Custom Officals can do no better
than a coin flip in respect to determining liars - and that is AFTER
THE CUSTOM OFFICAL IS IN CLOSE CONTACT WITH THE SUSPECT - can see his
eyes, body movements, etc.
The above is also based upon the professional Investigator actually
interviewing the suspect, noting body language, eye movements,
touching the nose, etc. . . *and even then they still might as well
flip a coin becuase they can only muster about a 50% accuracy).
(Note that in my field poker players have been trying to figure out a
way to detect liars by body tells and movements - speech - anything to
give them an advantage. They are still looking for a full proof
method).
http://tinyurl.com/ny36l Psycic con men
Excerpts from the experts above follows:
All Questions And No Answers
"Have you given more than one psychic a test-drive? If so, did you
happen to notice any similarities in the way they make predictions, or
arrive at those amazing insights? For those who have gone to more than
one reader, you'll have noticed that they ask far more questions then
they answer. If you doubt this, then secretly tape-record your next
session with your gifted reader and make a list of questions versus
answers. Once you discover the truth of this observation, ask yourself
why they do this. If they are tapping into your inner being, or
whatever other mystical sounding terms they use, then why don't just
get to the crux of your problems?"
(Note Nigel Brooks hides, ducks and runs from any questions - he asks
plenty, but ducks and runs each time anyone asks him the kind of
questions that he knows will prove him the con man and hate/smear
merchant I know he is. The above explains why these con men and self
acclaimed "mind readers and psychics" *never* answer any questions
about themselves - classic Nigel Brooks).
Excerpts from experts continues:
"No Time For Proof
"I've always found it a bit odd that these gifted people can service
their customers 24 hours a day. They appear on television programs, do
readings for the rich and famous, and seem to be unstoppable. Then,
some darn skeptic comes along and offers them a chance to prove the
existence of their special gifts under scientifically controlled
conditions. So far, those who tried have failed, and those who refuse
claim they simply can't control when their special gifts come and go.
If ever there was a clear sign of a con game in progress, then this is
a classic."
End expert excerpts about con men like Nigel Brooks:
I have yet another mind-reading test for Nigel Brooks - will he duck
this test as usual or agree to its applicability? We can even test ol
Brooks in front of a lawyer, court or a University Professor - I will
give one of the Zener cards to the independent third party - and ol
Nigel can tell us which card I provided the independent third party.
We can also complete this test in another manner. I will contact an
independent lawyer and tell him which card I am thinking about and
Brooks can inform the lawyer which card I am thinking about! Easy
test! Will Brooks do it? Never in a million years will this con man
agree to this simple, easy and confirming test of his "fantastic mind
reading claims!"
So do you believe that Nigel Brooks has been caught in yet another one
of his fantastic cons? No shit!
However, to be fair,we can test his mind reading claims here and now
in yet a simple and instant manner:
Here is a passage from an author Nigel can tell us about:
"And when the tide was rolling, it was like being shaken in a Tea cup,
and thrown against the wall of the Cup"....
Nigel can answer the following questions:
1. Are there any errors in the above passage?
2. Are there any typos in the above passage?
3. What was the author thinking when he wrote the above passage?
4. Is the author lying?
5. Is the author using an autobiographical account or is it
autobiographical fiction?
6. Please name the author (since Nigel claims he can read minds he
can get his name from reading the mind of the author).
(Don't bother to Google the above passage - you will never find it).
So do you suppose Nigel Brooks will answer the above questions and
put all of his mind reading claims to rest or to proof? NAW! Why?
"Because as the experts explain, these con men do not answer questions
that will prove them the con men they are." They duck and run from
any independent review, and NEVER NEVER answer any questions that
prove their fraud and cons for what we all know them to be - absolute
fraud!
http://tinyurl.com/l6rl8q Gang stalking and con men like Nigel
Brooks.
http://tinyurl.com/nwddgc Gang's using fascism and Stasi Tactics -
such as the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang uses to smear their
targeted victims.
Excerpts from above:
"We must be wary of the Serial Liar -- for no reality exists for that
sort of fibber and they are rarely aware of the fact that every word
flowing from their lips is not true.
You recognize the Serial Liar by the tawdry friends they keep and the
dismally dissociative associates they curry.
Serial Liars feed upon the weak and maul the good and exploit the
want-to-be-liked. Serial Liars know -- on some hidden, internal,
level -- that the truth doesn't matter to their sycophants . only
telling them what they want to hear matters most."
http://tinyurl.com/ncnkpm How to Spot a Con Man like Nigel Brooks and
some of his Hate/Smear and con gang members:
"The clever con artist is a good actor who disarms his victims with an
affable 'nice guy' approach. But behind this friendly exterior is a
shrewd psychologist who can isolate potential victims and break down
their resistance to his proposals. Each conquest is part of a game in
which he must 'best' his fellow man. The typical con artist is
amoral-but seldom violent, and mobile, with an excellent sense of
timing. He sincerely believes his victims deserve their fate. And, if
caught, he'll probably strike again later. Con artists are seldom
rehabilitated."
End excerpts:
"Con Artists are seldom rehabilitated."
The above says it all about Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/con and
smear gang members.
Doug Grant (Tm)
>
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
===========================
>I should also mention that one of my lawyers has already furnished key
>members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang written cease and
>desist notices - which of course they have ignored.
"In the case of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang, a legal
>action has been initiated by my lawyers""
Sooooo.... ? ? ?
-Mac, the Medic
Mac
Mac
wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:27:16 -0700, "DGVREIMAN" <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>>
>>TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>>
>>
>>I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>>snip DOOGIE SPOOGE�
************************************************
>We're waiting. Still waiting...
======================================
Doug Grant spewed forth the following:
>I should also mention that one of my lawyers has already furnished key
>members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang written cease and
>desist notices - which of course they have ignored.
"In the case of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang, a legal
>action has been initiated by my lawyers""
Still NOTHING from his alleged attorneys...
-Mac, the Medic
tankfixer
dgvr...@comcast.net says...
>
> Walk the walk Brooks - no one believes your childish nonsense. Have
> your lawyer contact me - or SteveL's lawyer or any lawyer representing
> you or the group, if you can find one stupid enough to do so.
Oh my but what will the Court think of Mr Reiman attempting to obscturct
justice...
Mac
wrote:
>LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>1. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>
>I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
>I have been asked by this same law firm to not reveal nor discuss the
>specific actions they have initiated this time on USENET.
=====================================
Mac
wrote:
> CON MEN -WANNABE'S -LIARS AND FAKERS
LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
1. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
tankfixer
tras...@hotmail.com says...
>
> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:MPG.24ea68b...@news.bytemine.net:
> "legal...@comcast.net" and his threats. I was notified to be ready
> to go to federal court tomorrow. I don't trust their timing, but when
> it *does* come down, the military will be waiting to fly me out for my
> retirement processing.
The AG might just be interesed in the con Doug is trying to pull..
Pepperoni
news:MPG.24ee735...@news.bytemine.net:
>> > Oh my but what will the Court think of Mr Reiman attempting to
>> > obscturct justice...
>>
>>
>> I think that tomorrow, I'll ask the Acting AG what she thinks about
>> "legal...@comcast.net" and his threats. I was notified to be
>> ready to go to federal court tomorrow. I don't trust their timing,
>> but when it *does* come down, the military will be waiting to fly me
>> out for my retirement processing.
>
> The AG might just be interesed in the con Doug is trying to pull..
>
>
Unfortunately, the AAG had a medical problem just before they were to
pick me up. BO was even in town. Hopefully things will pop soon. I'll
be collecting my loot and be formally retired in a few days. (unless
there is *another* delay) I'll have some good pictures to share. Don't
believe everything they say on the tvnews; some of that jive makes me
blush. heh, heh
Pepperoni
<< an Artillery Corporal in "disguise">>
SteveL
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, you know, the group knows, the world
>knows that I told you everal times that if your lawyer contacted me I
>would provide the law enforcement agency that I contacted about the
>anonymous yberstalker SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland).
Doug. You claimed I was being *sought* by law enforcement. Actively
*sought*. It was in that context that you were expected to (presumably
*eagerly*) take up the request to provide their contact details in the
interests of justice.
That you may have kookily approached some agency and were rebuffed is
of no interest - except for your ridiculous attempt to parlay that
into the above libellous accusation. But that only means you are a
reprehensible cunt - which we knew all along.
Nigel Brooks
"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:ft-dnUjgNMuRWhjX...@giganews.com...
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:20:06 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, you know, the group knows, the world
>>knows that I told you everal times that if your lawyer contacted me I
>>would provide the law enforcement agency that I contacted about the
>>anonymous yberstalker SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland).
>
> Doug. But that only means you are a reprehensible cunt - which we knew
> all along.
Nice to see that you have practically fully embraced the language and
culture of my former home
:-)
I approve of this post.
Nigel Brooks
DGVREIMAN
Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, you know, the group knows, the world
knows that I told you everal times that if your lawyer contacted me I
would provide the law enforcement agency that I contacted about the
anonymous yberstalker SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland). Since
the issue is not in the hands of the lawyers, and the lawyers were the
ones doing the contacting, your lawyer needs to be involved.
Moreover, I do not believe that someone with the delusions you seem
to have about mind reading and soothsaying is intelligent enough to be
contacted by anyone without legal representation.
Moreover, your pathetic and child like bsmeter is simply a fraud, as
you know I have offered you and the \SteveL anonymous cyberstalker
(who denies being Steve Leyland) the opportunity to receive that
information several times - which you hide from, and then use child
like school yard nonsense to try and deflect the fact you have been
hiding from the name of the law enforcement agency I contacted about
SteveL for more than a year now.
Walk the walk Brooks - no one believes your childish nonsense. Have
your lawyer contact me - or SteveL's lawyer or any lawyer representing
you or the group, if you can find one stupid enough to do so.
Doug Grant (Tm)
>
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7em2anF...@mid.individual.net...
Doug's Rebuttal to Nigel Brooks:
Mr. Brooks, inciting your gang member (who is NOT a veteran yet
attacks and defames veterans and denies he is Steve Leyland) to call
me playground names, and then post a support of such childish and
brainless attacks, because you know you have been caught in mid con
yet again, is more than typical of your "smear and attack the
messenger" tactics whenever one of your frauds have been exposed as I
did above.
You and your SteveL gang member (who denies being Steve Leyland)
should return to the 5th grade, and take some more lessons from the
kids.
Here is what SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland) and Nigel Brooks
are trying their best to hide:
Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, you know, the group knows, the world
knows that I told you everal times that if your lawyer contacted me I
would provide the law enforcement agency that I contacted about the
anonymous yberstalker SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland). Since
the issue is not in the hands of the lawyers, and the lawyers were the
ones doing the contacting, your lawyer needs to be involved.
Moreover, I do not believe that someone with the delusions you seem
to have about mind reading and soothsaying is intelligent enough to be
contacted by anyone without legal representation.
Moreover, your pathetic and child like bsmeter is simply a fraud, as
you know I have offered you and the \SteveL anonymous cyberstalker
(who denies being Steve Leyland) the opportunity to receive that
information several times - which you hide from, and then use child
like school yard nonsense to try and deflect the fact you have been
hiding from the name of the law enforcement agency I contacted about
SteveL for more than a year now.
Walk the walk Brooks - no one believes your childish nonsense. Have
your lawyer contact me - or SteveL's lawyer or any lawyer representing
you or the group, if you can find one stupid enough to do so.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Doug Grant (Tm)
>
Pepperoni
news:4bCdndRkjegNFxXX...@giganews.com:
> Walk the walk Brooks - no one believes your childish nonsense. Have
> your lawyer contact me - or SteveL's lawyer or any lawyer representing
> you or the group, if you can find one stupid enough to do so.
>
You can't find one stupid enough to play your game; what makes you think
someone else could find one stupid enough to play your game?
Pepperoni
Nigel Brooks
"Pepperoni" <tras...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9C69BF1086E40t...@74.209.136.98...
Demands demands - "have your lawyer contact me", " I demand arbitration"
No competent attorney would bother to devote one second to contacting Reiman
no matter how much he demands it.
If indeed Reiman has initiated a legal action against anyone, it is my
considered opinion that such legal action would be promptly dismissed on
motion for a summary judgment relatively quickly. It is also my considered
opinion that the only way to deter future frivolous filings by Reiman would
be to have him declared a vexatious litigant and have him required to get
the permission of the court prior to any future filings.
What a complete and total bozo the man truly is.
Standard answer to Mr. Reiman
"Arkell v. Pressdram"
Nigel Brooks
Pepperoni
>>
>> You can't find one stupid enough to play your game; what makes you
>> think someone else could find one stupid enough to play your game?
>>
>>
>> Pepperoni
>
> Demands demands - "have your lawyer contact me", " I demand
> arbitration"
>
> No competent attorney would bother to devote one second to contacting
> Reiman no matter how much he demands it.
>
> If indeed Reiman has initiated a legal action against anyone, it is my
> considered opinion that such legal action would be promptly dismissed
> on motion for a summary judgment relatively quickly. It is also my
> considered opinion that the only way to deter future frivolous filings
> by Reiman would be to have him declared a vexatious litigant and have
> him required to get the permission of the court prior to any future
> filings.
>
> What a complete and total bozo the man truly is.
>
> Standard answer to Mr. Reiman
>
> "Arkell v. Pressdram"
>
> Nigel Brooks
>
For all his claims of legal experience, it seems odd that he doesn't
understand the proper delivery of Legal Notice.
For a "Pro" Gambler, he doesn't seem to have figured the odds of anyone
actually playing his rigged game.
tankfixer
dgvr...@comcast.net says...
> Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, you know, the group knows, the world
> knows that I told you everal times that if your lawyer contacted me I
> would provide the law enforcement agency that I contacted about the
> anonymous yberstalker SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland). Since
> the issue is not in the hands of the lawyers, and the lawyers were the
> ones doing the contacting, your lawyer needs to be involved.
>
That sure sounds like an admission that Doug is hindering prosecution..
Pepperoni
@news.bytemine.net:
>
> That sure sounds like an admission that Doug is hindering prosecution..
>
Wasn't it Doug who complained that the Casinos didn't always play the
"full deck"?
Ironic, ain't it?
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote the following:
=================================
LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
1. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
I have been asked by this same law firm to not reveal nor discuss the
specific actions they have initiated this time on USENET.
(((((((((((((((((((( )))))))))))))))))))))))
-Mac, the Medic
....the_pc_jellllybean!!.!!!!.
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:lp9i85pnjbv0uqtqq...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:39:10 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote the following:
>
> =================================
> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
> 1. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>
> I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
> have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
> Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
Super!
Mac
==================
>Super!
***********************
The above claim is from the infamous DOUG GRANT.
He claims that he has, once again, contacted alleged attorneys.
He claims that, in this case, on or before 2nd AUGUST, "legal action"
has been initiated....
Today is now 17th AUGUST.
As of this date no one has been the recipient of any "legal action".
Draw your own conclusions about the bluster of Doug Grant, especially
when he is challenged regarding his military embellishments.
-Mac, the Medic
Le Janitor
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
I got a rash but it didn't come from duh-g
....the_pc_jellllybean!!.!!!!.
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:06:01 -0700, <.... tHe_PC_JelLlLy BeAn!! .!
> !!! .> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
>>news:lp9i85pnjbv0uqtqq...@4ax.com...
>
>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:39:10 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
>> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote the following:
>>
>> =================================
>> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>> 1. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>>
>> I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>> have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>> Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
> ==================
>>Super!
>
> ***********************
> The above claim is from the infamous DOUG GRANT.
> He claims that he has, once again, contacted alleged attorneys.
> He claims that, in this case, on or before 2nd AUGUST, "legal action"
> has been initiated....
> Today is now 17th AUGUST.
heh, I love usenet loons, especially when they either threaten to "come over
and beat the shit out of you" or claim to have filed suit.
LOL!
tankfixer
tras...@hotmail.com says...
Nah, just that they would shuffle the deck when he wasn't paying
attention....
>
> Ironic, ain't it?
And pathetic...
Pepperoni
@news.bytemine.net:
>> Wasn't it Doug who complained that the Casinos didn't always play the
>> "full deck"?
>>
>
> Nah, just that they would shuffle the deck when he wasn't paying
> attention....
>
>>
>> Ironic, ain't it?
>
> And pathetic...
>
The Judge, in his wisdom, essentially said: "If you don't like the game,
you need not play."
Doug wasn't listening. When it is *his* deck and *his* rules, he can't
fill a chair. No comps, no floor show. It is quiet in the Reimanworld�
Casino. The bingo joint across the street is packed.
DGVREIMAN
Doug's Rebuttal to Nigel Brooks latest con: Mr. Brooks, your wild,
child-like and ridiclous and fraudulent accusations will not
intimidate me from pursuing this issue in a legal arena as you have
forced me to do.
As you have been notified, a legal action has already started against
you and key members of your hate gang via my lawyers.
Once we receive a reply from the people my lawyers have contacted
about you and your smear and hate gang, we will then proceed with more
legal action if necessary.
Moreover, considering your latest con is that I have filed frivolous
legal actions against people in the past, I hereby demand that you
either provide evidence of "any frivolous" legal action on my part, or
apologize and retract this latest con immediately. Failure to do so
will just be more evidence that you are using fraud, con man serial
lying, and outright false accusations in a false and fraudulent
attempt to vilify me and destroy my reputation.
If you want to know what legal action has been already filed, and by
whom, have your lawyer contact me. Or, if you prefer, have a lawyer
representing one of your gang members to contact me. And if you
cannot find a lawyer that will represent you or your gang, which seems
to be the case, then I suggest that you have the FBI agent that lives
with Tom Huxton contact me instead. (That is if Mr. Huxton can
finally remember that agent's last name).
Do you really believe that posting such threats above will even deter
me from defending myself in respect to legal action for the slightest
moment? If you do you are in for a big surprise.
Doug Grant (Tm)
DGVREIMAN
"Dai Uy" <Dai...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:ff35dfcb-a627-4f5c...@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 3, 9:10 am, "Le Janitor" <awrlibr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:eaSdnRtdxdtogOrX...@giganews.com...
> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>
>
> > I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
> > have
> > initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
> > Brooks
> > smear/hate and con gang.
Keep in mind Mr. Reiman's oft repeated ex post facto
disclaimers...
He has stated that he NEVER posts the truth. I believe him. The
Google archive stands as testimony.
Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Rau, you and the world knows the above statement
is a complete and total lie. I have never posted anything even
remotely stating the con and fraud you are attributing to me above.
Retract and apologize at once. And the Google archive simply proves
you have been using fraud, serial lying, outright cons, false
accusations, pretexts and obloquy to smear me for years and ongoing
with this very post.
Are you willing to back up your accusations about me in a legal arena
Mr. Rau? Or are you going to run and hide again?
Doug Grant (Tm)
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>If you want to know what legal action has been already filed, and by
>whom, have your lawyer contact me. Or, if you prefer, have a lawyer
>representing one of your gang members to contact me. And if you
>cannot find a lawyer that will represent you or your gang, which seems
>to be the case, then I suggest that you have the FBI agent that lives
>with Tom Huxton contact me instead. (That is if Mr. Huxton can
>finally remember that agent's last name).
************************
Why?
Should not the attorney contact your alleged attorneys who have,
allegedly, implemented the legal matter ?
Why should an attorney contact you?
Should not she directly contact your alleged attorneys?
Oh, that's right, you have chosen NOT to indicate who such are ----
just as you have refused to notify people of the SPECIFIC "law
Enforcement Office" and the specific law enforcement "officer"
seeking SteveL......
Jeez, what a maroon!
-Mac, the Medic
Nigel Brooks
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:uhf4955f56cph0p9o...@4ax.com...
As previously observed, why would anyone in their right mind (legal counsel
included), wish to engage Reiman in any kind of communication outside of the
legal arena.
It is quite evident that if one were so foolish as to contact Reiman
directly, he would mischaracterize the communication. The man has zero
credibility, and is not to be trusted. His last filing in federal court in
the State of Washington (since dismissed) consisted of in excess of a
hundred pages of mischaracterizations and outright lies.
Nigel Brooks
tankfixer
dgvr...@comcast.net says...
> As you have been notified, a legal action has already started against
> you and key members of your hate gang via my lawyers.
Your "lawyers" have contacted no one.
>
> Once we receive a reply from the people my lawyers have contacted
> about you and your smear and hate gang, we will then proceed with more
> legal action if necessary.
Any contact by you Mr Reiman or any party acting as your agent with
third parties about myself will be considered harassment on your part
and will be delt with in such manner that I chose.
Now hows them apples biotch..
DGVREIMAN
Doug's Rebuttal to Nigel Brooks: Nigel Brooks is claiming that a
written communication from a lawyer can be "mischaracterized"
BHWHAHAHAHAHA. What a pathetic lying fool this con man is!
It is clear that Nigel Brooks is desperate to make up any lie he can
to avoid any lawyer from contacting me and then being referred to my
lawyer. Brooks is desperate to hide the fact that I have offered him
a way to determine the legal action my lawyers have already started as
my notice stated - and he does not want his gang members to stop
supporting his cons and fraud out of fear of any legal action - so he
has arrived in high con to try to duck and dodge my offer to reveal
all that is going on when a lawyer representing him or his gang
contacts me. (If you are a reader you must wonder why Brooks is so
desperate to stop any lawyer from talking with my lawyer - Brooks is
afraid of any legal review of his actions being presented to his gang
members as they will run like rats from a sinking ship when they hear
the truth).
If you are associated with Nigel Brooks in any way, then have your
lawyer, or even a lawyer or law professor from a University to contact
me at legal...@comcast.net and I will then provide my lawyer's
contact information. It is a simple procedure. The issue is in the
hands of the lawyers, and I cannot directly deal with anyone on these
legal issues. Your lawyer will be then provided the name of my law
firm and all subsequent direct contact should be conducted between the
lawyers.
Now why should Nigel Brooks be afraid of lawyers?
My lawyer does not wish to converse or deal with con men, smear/hate
and con gang leaders, and fraud merchants like Nigel Brooks directly.
Who would? And since legal action has already been filed, and is
pending outcome, then considering that one of Nigel Brooks gang
members claims he owns 15000 buildings and has a "team" of lawyers
(Tom Huxton) all I need is an email from one of those lawyers stating
they wish to contact my lawyer - which will then be immediately
provided.
Here is a sample of what Nigel Brooks laughingly claims can be
"mischaracterized" by me:
Dear Mr. Reiman:
"My name is XYZ and I am a lawyer and member of the bar in the State
of XYZ. I represent Nigel Brooks, Tom Huxton, (or any other person
involved) and I wish to determine what legal action your lawyers have
initiated in respect to my client(s). Please advise.
Thank You
Lawyer's name."
And Nigel Brooks claims the above can be "mischaracterized" by me in
some way??? AND THAT IS NIGEL BROOK'S PATHETIC EXCUSE FOR NOT HAVING
HIS LAWYER CONTACT ME???BWHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHYAHAHAHYHA
WHAT A CON MAN!
Moreover, I never filed any Federal lawsuit against anyone in
Washington State, not to mention one that contains lies and
mischaracterizations. (A lawsuit is filed against a Defendant when
that lawsuit (1) names an alive or real defendant, and (2) that alive
or real defendant is served). That con is yet another outright fraud
from Nigel Brooks.
I suspect Brooks is pathetically referencing a John Doe lawsuit I
filed to determine the names of some defendants, and one that I asked
the court to dismiss so as to give me more time to do so, and then
enable me to refile it when I wish, which the Federal court granted.
I can find nothing in that John Doe lawsuit that is false, not to
mention an "outright lie."
In fact, I cannot wait for Nigel Brooks to file one of his fantastic
and child like counter claims he has threatened in a real court of
law, considering I will ask for legal fees for everyone of those false
claims I need to defend. (Ask Brooks to provide some evidence of his
false "outright lies" con, and watch him run for his sewer).
My causes of action stated in the John Doe lawsuit were reviewed by
not less than TWO law firms - and each cause of action is provable and
will be proved in a court of law if I decide they are necessary to be
a part of any future legal action my lawyers wish to pursue.
At this point my lawyers have already started a legal action process
in respect to this issue, and I will do what they advise me to do in
the future in that respect. (I have been advised this process is a
step by step process and I may even need to list some entities in a
civil lawsuit (along with defamation and libel perpetrators) to force
prosecution of alleged crimes a Nigel Brooks gang member has been
caught allegedly perpetrating against me -including all those that
were involved in those alleged crimes.
Also note that a key member of the Nigel Brooks smear gang has been
contacted by a Federal Investigator via telephone several times - each
time he left a message for the gang member to call him back - yet the
gang member is too frightened to do so. So when Nigel Brooks claims
he does not know nor believe my lawyers have started any legal action
then ask him why his gang member is too afraid to return calls to
Federal Investigators? - Obviously Nigel Brooks has been caught lying
again - he knows what is going on and he also knows why). Apparently,
the gang members are smart enough to know that if they spew their hate
and lies to a Federal Investigator about me, they could then find
themselves in even more trouble than they are already in.
If you are in any way associated with the Nigel Brooks hate/smear/con
gang, please be advised of the following notice - and PLEASE hire a
lawyer! DO NOT take any legal advise from anyone, this is especially
true from Nigel Brooks. Talk to your *own* lawyer and do NOT allow
yourself to become the scope goat for Nigel Brooks and some of his key
gang members.
http://tinyurl.com/knf9y7 Legal Action Taken - NOTICE
Doug Grant (Tm)
tankfixer
dgvr...@comcast.net says...
> My lawyer does not wish to converse or deal with con men
Yet they took you on as a client...
How very odd..
DGVREIMAN
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell:
First, I am not infamous. Simply because a gang targeted me for
smears and fraud does not make me infamous. The gang I suspect is
the infamous one. Second, of course I initiated legal action. It is
still pending - soon Mr. Brooks will be reading some of it. Third,
what "challenge" regarding any military embellishments? I asked Nigel
Brooks to name a single document in my records that disproved any
statement of fact I have ever made about my military service, and he
is still pissing running and pissing his panties. Obviously, Nigel
Brooks has been lying about this issue for years.
You are hereby advised to cease and desist your harassment and false
accusations about me immediately, and apologize, or face further legal
action in regards to libel, harassment and defamation.
Douglas Reiman
DGVREIMAN
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell:
Rebuttal:
If you have a lawyer please provide the name and contact number and I
will have my lawyers contact her, him, whatever. You lied when you
said your lawyer sent me a cease and desist notice prior to you filing
false and abusive false charges against me, so I must assume you are
lying again. I do not believe you have a lawyer. There is no lawyer
in the world that would condone your false accusations, libel and and
harassment.
You are hereby advised to cease and desist your harassment and false
accusations about me immediately, and apologize, or face further legal
action.
Douglas Reiman
Mac
>I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
**************************************************
DOUG GRANT and his statement regarding a Purple Heart....
===============================================
Here is a copy of your ORIGINAL POST in that thread.
I've included the DATE, the SUBJECT, the groups... so others can
find this and verify what you originally posted in your attempt to
belittle Chip.
I believe that he and you for this conversation were #16 AND #17 in
this thread...
=========== ===========
Newsgroups: alt.news-media, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa,
alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.security.terrorism
From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:22:46 GMT
Local: Sun, Feb 16 2003 2:22�pm
Subject: Re: Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:56:03 GMT, �DGVREIMAN allegedly wrote...
Doug Says: �We declared war on terrorism. �Saddam is
supporting, financing, arming, training, aiding and harboring
terrorists.
Duh. �I suspect that you do not have clue about what you are
talking about, and I further suspect you have never seen a
shot fired in anger in your life.
CHIP STATED:
> I have a Purple Heart and a CAR that proves you wrong, Dougie.
> There are other countries, some that are our allies, who are
much more active in supporting and arming terrorists...yet you want
to go after Iraq because you don't have the will to go after them.
That, to me is cowardice.
Doug Says: �
I have a Purple Heart also, and I received �mine in a
real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
never fought in a war. �About the only place you could have
received a purple heart was in Lebanon, and that was not a
shooting war, just a bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of
Marine officers. �In respect to deposing Saddam, I am the one
advocating removing Saddam, you are the one advocating cowering,
hiding, and doing nothing. �It is pretty clear who the coward is
around here. �BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart not received in
combat is about as cowardly as it gets.
*************** *************
And, after you were challenged, after you were reported to STOLEN
VALOR, years later, here is what you posted...
Newsgroups: alt.news
From: "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:55:23 -0700
Local: Wed, Jun 11 2008 10:55�am
Subject: Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel
Doug Says: I have a Purple Heart Card also, and I received mine in a
real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have never
fought in a war. About the only place you could have received a purple
heart card was in Lebanon, and that was not a shooting war, just a
bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of Marine officers. In respect
to deposing Saddam, I am the one advocating removing Saddam, you are
the
one advocating cowering, hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear
who the coward is around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart Card
not received in combat is about as cowardly as it gets.
Note: A purple heart medal cannot be awarded other than in combat.
Consequently, Chip must be talking about a Purple Heart VA ID card. My
purple heart card reference in my reply is not about the medal, but is
only referencing a purple heart ID card provided by the Veterans'
Administration for service connected disabilities which I have.
Conrad Harkness
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
Getting lonely Doug? You're responding to a post that was made on Mon, 24
Aug 2009. Just so you don't have to take off your shoes to figure it out,
that was just under 3 months ago. Either you read usenet r-e-e-e-a-l
s-l-o-w, or you're just starving for attention again.
Which is it?
DGVREIMAN
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
>
>>I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>>have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>>Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
>
> **************************************************
> DOUG GRANT and his statement regarding a Purple Heart....
Doug Says: Mr. McDonnell you are hiding the true context of the post
again - we both know that the context was about Purple Heart VA ID
cards as all evidence provides. Hiding the context to imply I was
talking about something you know I was not is nothing more than
malcious harassment. Once again, here are the facts:
PURPLE HEART DEFAMATION CONTINUES - REBUTTAL
http://tinyurl.com/otvaph Purple Heart Defamation from gang revealed
and rebutted. Irrefutable proof the gang has been using outright
fraud, defamation and forgeries to smear and defame in respect to this
issue.
>REPEATING PURPLE HEART CARDS?- A rebuttal
SNIP over 2,500 lines of Doug Grant Codswallop
Note that Mr. McDonnell likes to snip out the facts, irrefutable proof
that he is lying, so he can continue to lie. No wonder he snips out
those truthful posts. See below for what he is so desperately trying
to hide.
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections
reasonable (considering the "reasonable person" doctrine and case law)
we will then remove this post, or the offending passages contained
therein, from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My
intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment
and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a "lawful and
legitimate" publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP's and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web
site or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots' inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary's
definitions of simple terms, such as "we" "estimated" "involved"
"retired from" and "not representing any biographical claim" are all
incorrect, and only their "special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the gang's
standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that (1) I
was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.
I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.
Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.
As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years' long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.
In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.
The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang' preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow "sinister" and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist's, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)
Also, in response to the smear gang's et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:
http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS' GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang's glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.
http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con and smear gang is all about.
http://tinyurl.com/bu3dwb Those that Label Others KOOK suffer
psychosis named EID say psychologists - and that Kook votes never
occur outside of the smear gang.
http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks lies about receiving medals he
never received, and serving in war campaigns long after he had already
left active duty.
http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks lied about my
military service and my military records. (This read is important as
the gang is claiming that my military records disproved or prove
various things, but we find those claims to be nothing more than
outright cons and fraud from the gang. Brooks and Rau and other gang
members have been lying about the contents of my records for years.
Above is just some of the proof of that fact.
http://tinyurl.com/ddogy4 Proof of just a few of Nigel Brooks
outright forgeries which he has used to fraudulently defame and smear
me - yes *forgeries* - fraud and deception from Nigel Brooks.
End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
Dennis M. McDonnell wrote:
************************************
The following post from Doug Grant, dated FEBRUARY 16, 2003, and
claiming he has a Purple Heart, has been copied and sent onward to
STOLEN VALOR...
**************************************
Doug's Rebuttal:
Why on Earth would Mr. McDonnell want to send "STOLEN VALOR" a post
he knows I did not write nor post, which had nothing to do with
medals, and was about Purple Heart VA ID cards and those designations
on the VA record Jackets? Which of course I possessed at the time I
said I did? And why did Mr. McDonnell deliberately and clearly
maliciously "omit" "hide" the term "Card" after the Purple Heart
statement above? Why did he hide something he clearly knows and has
acknowledged dozens of times? Obviously, Mr. McDonnell wants to use
fraud and false accusations to paint me in a false and misleading
light with various third parties, which BTW, he has done before such
as visiting Muslim Mosques about me and inciting them to hate me,
which of course they did and they sent me death threats to boot.
I would *love* to talk to Stolen Valor about this issue, but it seems
that Mr. McDonnell *suddenly* has had a lapse of memory in respect to
who he sent his fraud to in this respect.
Is Mr. McDonnell deliberately and maliciously deceiving and using
fraud and false claims sent to Stolen Valor for the purpose of
harassment, malicious libel, and general obloquy?
Perhaps Mr. McDonnell would share with us a copy of what he claims he
sent that organization?
Naw - don't hold your breath -he knows he has been caught lying again
and he will hide his lies as much as he can. No doubt if Mr. Dennis
M. McDonnell (MAC the Medic) actually believed what he is posting
about me he would certainly jump at the chance to have his claims
vetted and examined for accuracy and truthfulness.
No wonder he hides what he sends to third parties so as to incite
hatred and ridicule against those he has chosen to smear and defame -
he already knows he is lying - which says a lot about his intent.
(Also note that Mr. McDonnell ducks and runs from my Arbitration loser
pay offer as well as Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau - see my disclaimer
above. Of course they know they will be the ones paying which can be
the only reason to hide from this offer).
Gang Lied About Military Service - OFTEN AND IN GREAT VOLUME - ignored
by the hypocrites composing the Nigel Brooks gang.
I should also mention this "Chip" character who Mr. McDonnell
constantly references, and who was a gang member associate of one of
the Nigel Brooks key gang members, an anonymous cyberstalker that goes
by the name of SteveL, has been caught lying dozens of times about
having purple heart medals, purple heart VA ID cards and combat action
ribbons. But because he is a former gang member, nothing is ever
mentioned about his glaring and flagrant fraud. The gang says zero,
zip, about this person's voluminous outrageous lies!
I wonder if the word "hypocrisy" means anything to Nigel Brooks and
his gang members?
I also cannot understand why Mr. McDonnell has not contacted Stolen
Valor about all of those lies Mr. Nigel Brooks has told about his
military service? False medals, false participation in famous
offensives, false claims of participating in famous battles long after
Mr. Brooks had left active service. Whew! As the following URL
clearly proves, and which I should also point out, Mr. Brooks *does
not deny!* (Also there is much more Mr. Brooks lied about, along with
many more lies I have found from other members of his gang - but I am
saving those for another time).
http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks lies about receiving medals he
never received, and serving in war campaigns long after he had already
left active duty.
Also, why would someone claim to be a Medic when he was really only a
Ward Attendant?
Is that also a matter for Stolen Valor?
I asked Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell about this issue and he did not deny
that he was a Ward Attendant in Vietnam - in fact it appears to me
he admitted it. So why does he sign his name "MAC the Medic" instead
of "MAC the Ward Attendant?"
According to the smear and fraud merchant Tom Rau such false claims
represents stealing the valor and honor from all of those *real*
Combat Medics. (Of course Tom Rau's opinions are not worth a fart in
the wind - but I must ask, Mr. McDonnell, were you a Ward Attendant
or a Medic? And if you were a Ward Attendant why not sign your name
"MAC the Ward Attendant?" There is nothing to be ashamed of being a
Ward Attendant - someone had to perform that duty, bed pans, and such.
Of course if you performed the duties of a Medic from time to time
(more than once) then you might mention that your primary MOS was that
of a Ward Attendant, but you did perform duties outside of your MOS
from time to time - NO WAIT A MINUTE! You "cannot" make that claim
because according to Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau NO ONE EVER performs
duties outside of their MOS! (If you ask any Veteran that actually
served in Vietnam the truth about serving outside of ones MOS on a
regular basis they ALL (with the exception of Nigel Brooks and Tom
Rau) will tell you such was commonplace in Vietnam, and even the 25th
Infantry Division Archives mentions this fact - so much for the
veracity of Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau - the lies are so glaring and
preposterous they deserve to be rebutted).
How about a non vet (the Stevel gang member) (or a vet for that
matter) that maliciously goes to Veteran groups to lie about and
attack real Veterans? Is that not also a matter for Stolen Valor?
How about a gang member (Tom Huxton a.k.a. Pepperoni) that claims the
wore brass on his jungle fatigues, (I never saw that in my 2&1/2 tours
in Vietnam - not once) and further claims to be the Domino Pizza King,
but then also says he served in the US Army under a different name.
He also claimed that he operated in a tank crew with no tank training,
and when pressed he claims he changed his name after he left the US
Army so no one can confirm his claims of military service. (This guy
also claimed to own 15000 buildings and other preposterous fantastic
claims - and we all know the Domino Pizza King was NEVER IN THE US
ARMY! This gang member also claims that an FBI agent has been living
with him in his house for more than twenty years - but when asked he
cannot remember the last name of the agent - only the first name!
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA).
So why is Mr. Dennis M. MCDONNELL and his fraternity fellows not
howling and barking about all these obvious frauds instead of forging
the context of posts they dug out of my waste basket?
Hypocrisy I suspect.. . but you can never be sure when it comes to
people like this guy.
Newsgroups: alt.news-media, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa,
alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.security.terrorism
From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:22:46 GMT
Local: Sun, Feb 16 2003 2:22 pm
Subject: Re: Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:56:03 GMT, DGVREIMAN allegedly wrote...
Doug Says: We declared war on terrorism. Saddam is
supporting, financing, arming, training, aiding and harboring
terrorists.
Duh. I suspect that you do not have clue about what you are
talking about, and I further suspect you have never seen a
shot fired in anger in your life.
CHIP STATED:
> I have a Purple Heart and a CAR that proves you wrong, Dougie.
> There are other countries, some that are our allies, who are
much more active in supporting and arming terrorists...yet you want
to go after Iraq because you don't have the will to go after them.
That, to me is cowardice.
Doug Says:
I have a Purple Heart Card also, card and I received mine in a
real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
never fought in a war. About the only place you could have
received a purple heart was in Lebanon, and that was not a
shooting war, just a bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of
Marine officers. In respect to deposing Saddam, I am the one
advocating removing Saddam, you are the one advocating cowering,
hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear who the coward is
around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart not received in
combat is about as cowardly as it gets.
*************** *************
AND here is the June, 2008 post...
Newsgroups: alt.news
From: "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:55:23 -0700
Local: Wed, Jun 11 2008 10:55 am
Subject: Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel
Doug Says: I have a Purple Heart Card also, and I received mine in a
real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have never
fought in a war. About the only place you could have received a purple
heart card was in Lebanon, and that was not a shooting war, just a
bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of Marine officers. In respect
to deposing Saddam, I am the one advocating removing Saddam, you are
the
one advocating cowering, hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear
who the coward is around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart Card
not received in combat is about as cowardly as it gets.
Note: A purple heart medal cannot be awarded other than in combat.
Consequently, Chip must be talking about a Purple Heart VA ID card. My
purple heart card reference in my reply is not about the medal, but is
only referencing a purple heart ID card provided by the Veterans'
Administration for service connected disabilities which I have.
======================
-Mac, the Medic
1. Note the fact that Mr. McDonnell is lying and defaming by
malicious omission:
A. He maliciously and deliberately omits the fact that although he
knows and has acknowledged (several times) the Feb 2003 post he tries
to copy above was long removed from the Google archive before he or
any of the Nigel Brooks gang members ever said a word about it, and
that removal automatically remedied anyone dumb enough not to know
that Purple Heart Medals MUST be awarded during combat, which the
typist clearly stated in her last sentence was NOT what she was
referencing.
B. Here is her key last sentence which tells it all:
"BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart not received in combat is about
as cowardly as it gets. "
Clearly, she was talking about something Chip had received NOT
during combat - which of course could only be the Purple Heart VA ID
card that denoted service connected disabilities regardless of combat.
(She read his reference of "CAR" to mean "Card" as she (nor I at that
time) had a clue what the term "CAR" might also mean).
C. Regardless, because one of the smear merchants tried to distort
the true context of her post back in 2003, (Jim Mculloch) I ordered
the post destroyed and removed permanently from Google, and Google
certified in writing that the post was in fact permanently removed -
which means it no longer existed and certainly no longer had anything
to do with me, my typist or one of my old accounts.
A. Ambiguous and erred posts are often permanently removed from the
Google archive by tens of thousands of different USENET posters. This
removal service offered by Google for that express purpose clearly
remedied any ambiguity contained that Feb 2003 post, especially when
you consider that I had posted at least a half dozen times that I DID
NOT have a Purple Heart medal, before and after the Feb 2003 post. So
clearly this slight ambiguity which was clearly removed from Google no
longer was of any concern to me whatsoever - it had been simply
discarded and destroyed.
B. I certainly did not concern myself with known erred writings that
I had thrown throw away - who would? And I certainly did not expect
some unethical con man and fraud merchant to dig around in my waste
basket searching for discarded errors he intended to re-post on USENET
and fraudulently misrepresent those posts were intentionally posted by
me, and that they meant something they clearly did not mean. I had
concerned myself with such fraudulent and unethical practices that is
until I ran into the Nigel Brooks smear gang. And then those that
were unethical enough to perpetrate such fraud (and worse fraud and
privacy invasions) seemed to come out of the woodwork.
D. When "people" like the members of the Nigel Brooks smear and
defamation gang dig up discarded items from your waste basket, and
then try to pan them off as something you intended to post, that
obvious lack of ethics and fraud is so flagrant it smacks of absolute
malice and a contrived malicious design to fraudulently defame and
smear someone. (Which is why Juries award punitive damages - malice).
D. For some dishonest and unethical smear merchant to dig around in
my waste basket and claim that a post I clearly threw away and removed
from the archive was intentional, and further claim that I re-posted
it long after it was discarded, is beyond preposterous, it is clearly
fraudulent and also clearly malicious.)
Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell Knows I neither wrote nor posted the post he
claims I did write and post. He hid that fact from Stolen Valor -
deliberately.
2. Mr. McDonnell is also claiming the Feb 2003 post came from Doug
Grant - while not mentioning that post was *not* originally written
nor posted by me, Douglas Reiman and the resurrected version has
*absolutely nothing to do with me nor with anyone I know!* (Other than
one of the gang members of course).
3. Mr. McDonnell's reference to the Feb 2003 post above is a
reference to a post one of the members of the infamous Nigel Brooks
smear gang retrieved from Google's waste basket, and the gang member
posted it back on USENET and Google without my knowledge or approval.
4. Mr. McDonnell hides the fact that I did not approve nor agree nor
want nor EVER post the Feb 2003 post he references above as coming
from "Doug Grant." That post came from a Nigel Brooks smear gang
member, and certainly not me. So did Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell mention
this very important fact in his posts or in his contact with Stolen
Valor? No of course not - if he told the truth he would have then had
to admit he has been flagrantly lying about this issue for years.
5. Mr. McDonnell also hides the fact the original Feb 2003 post was
removed and remedied long before he or Nigel Brooks ever said a word
about it - due to the slight ambiguity that only people not involved
with the military would misinterpret, or smear types, who would
deliberately misinterpret. Why did Mr. McDonnell hide that fact as
well?
True Intent Hidden by Mr. McDonnell
6. Mr. McDonnell further presented the post dated Feb 2003 (which one
of the smear gang members found in Google's waste basket) as
something I intended or wanted to post on USENET. This
misrepresentation is also outright fraud and libel. I have a
written certification from Google that confirms my typist's Feb 2003
post was removed years ago. Once a post is removed it no longer is
associated with the original author or account. It simply no longer
exists, so the post that "suddenly reappeared" on USENET came from a
member of the Nigel Brooks gang and certainly not from me.
Mr. McDonnell is claiming I posted the Feb 2003 dated post above, he
is clearly lying.
6. An easy way to prove Mr. McDonnell is lying is to complete a
Google search on my old account name (which one of the gang members
has added to the post Mr. McDonnell provides above) and the terms
"purple heart." You will NOT find the Feb 2003 post associated with
me nor any account I had ever used - why? Because Google removed it
from my old account long ago. The "replacement" on USENET came from
the Nigel Brooks gang and not from me - which of course Mr. McDonnell
"fails to mention."
7. Mr. McDonnell also omits the fact that I did not need to clarify
nor disambiguate the typist's original Feb 2003 post until a member of
the Nigel Brooks smear gang retrieved that long discarded post from my
waste basket, and then fraudulently attempted to claim (1) I wrote
or posted the new post in question, and, (2) I intended for the
forged and fraudulent context of medals to be presented in that post
and not the true and correct context of VA ID cards.
A. Ergo, the gang's preposterous claim that although I removed a post
from the Google archive, it was my intention to later resurrect that
long discarded and removed post and re-post it so I could claim
something completely opposite of what I have stated in at least a
half -dozen other posts, is so obviously fraudulent, misleading,
deceptive and false, that Mr. McDonnell's repeating this fraud as
often as he has can only represent a deliberate and malicious attempt
to paint me and my life in a false light, and defame me, and use out
right fraud to hold me up for public ridicule, which he has done often
before on other issues.
8. I should also mention that Mr. McDonnell is hiding the fact that
within 60 days of the original typist's Feb 2003 post, (April 2003)
and during a conversation with the same person as was involved with
the Feb 2003 post (Chip) *I* wrote an exchange that clearly stated my
reference to the Purple Heart Card was about the VA purple heart
designation that was placed on those cards and on the VA records
jacket (at that time) to denote service connected disabilities. Why
did Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell hide that very important post and google
archive reference from Stolen Valor? Obviously, had he included that
within 60 day clairification, he would then be required to admit that
he was malciously lying to Stolen Valor so as to fraudulently create
hatred against me - for something he knows I never said nor did. But
this is the way Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell works, and how he has worked
in the past.
I cannot explain why people gain their perverse pleasure from lying
and defaming others, only to point it out when it occurs, and it
occurs often.
Cease and Desist Mr. McDonnell, retract and apologize:
I must inform Mr. McDonnell, and all others, if they continue with
such obvious and malicious defamation and libel, and/or refuse to
retract and apologize for their obvious malicious defamation and
harassment, I will be forced to take legal action against them. (It
appears that Mr. McDonnell alone has posted his fraud about this issue
dozens of times - for what purpose? Obviously, to maliciously defame
and smear).
The following very comprehensive post provides more detail and
irrefutable proof of the true context of the post in question:
http://tinyurl.com/pvqbxb Repeating Purple Heart Cards - Gang Fraud
Exposed.
Please expect this rebuttal to be posted each time anyone attempts
further the fraud and fantastic lies I have exposed above. I can only
hope and pray that when Mr. McDonnell and others like him are asked to
make their statements under oath, they lie as much as they have in the
past.
>
> ===============================================
> Here is a copy of your ORIGINAL POST in that thread.
> I've included the DATE, the SUBJECT, the groups... so others can
> find this and verify what you originally posted in your attempt to
> belittle Chip.
>
> I believe that he and you for this conversation were #16 AND #17 in
> this thread...
>
> =========== ===========
> Newsgroups: alt.news-media, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa,
> alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.security.terrorism
> From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:22:46 GMT
> Local: Sun, Feb 16 2003 2:22 pm
> Subject: Re: Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel
>
>> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:56:03 GMT, DGVREIMAN allegedly wrote...
> Doug Says: We declared war on terrorism. Saddam is
> supporting, financing, arming, training, aiding and harboring
> terrorists.
> Duh. I suspect that you do not have clue about what you are
> talking about, and I further suspect you have never seen a
> shot fired in anger in your life.
> CHIP STATED:
>> I have a Purple Heart and a CAR(d) that proves you wrong, Dougie.
>> There are other countries, some that are our allies, who are
> much more active in supporting and arming terrorists...yet you want
> to go after Iraq because you don't have the will to go after them.
> That, to me is cowardice.
>
> Doug Says:
> I have a Purple Heart card also, and I received mine in a
> real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
> never fought in a war. About the only place you could have
> received a purple heart card was in Lebanon, and that was not a
> shooting war, just a bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of
> Marine officers. In respect to deposing Saddam, I am the one
> advocating removing Saddam, you are the one advocating cowering,
> hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear who the coward is
> around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart card not received in
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
>news:7e02g5lqqmkdmk8eo...@4ax.com...
>>
>>>I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>>>have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>>>Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
>>
>> **************************************************
>> DOUG GRANT and his statement regarding a Purple Heart....
>
>Doug Says: Mr. McDonnell you are hiding the true context of the post
>again - we both know that the context was about Purple Heart VA ID
>cards as all evidence provides.
===================================
No we don't.
I posted your original posting wherein you tried to claim that you had
a Purple Heart.
You even claimed to Chip that you had it from "...a real war."
I believe that the true context is that you were trying to claim is an
award to which you were not entitled.
That is why I have asked STOLEN VALOR and several local veterans
groups to take a look at your original posting in that message.
Not to take my word for it.
But, to read your exact words.
For that I have furnished them the date, the SUBJECT, the position of
those messages in that list ( #16 and #17 ).
I have asked them to read what you posted.
I have asked them what a normal person would attempt to imply, using
the wording you did on that message....
I also have asked them to look at your claim that you were wounded by
the VC, almost lost your life, and had that PURPLE HEART.
I posted your exact words.
And then mentioned how you reacted when challenged.
And you lame excuse about the alleged Purple Heart Card.
I hope to let you know when I hear back from VETERANS of FOREIGN WARS
and also the DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS.
-Mac, the Medic
DGVREIMAN
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:09:05 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
>>news:7e02g5lqqmkdmk8eo...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>>>>have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>>>>Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
>>>
>>> **************************************************
>>> DOUG GRANT and his statement regarding a Purple Heart....
>>
>>Doug Says: Mr. McDonnell you are hiding the true context of the
>>post
>>again - we both know that the context was about Purple Heart VA ID
>>cards as all evidence provides.
>
> ===================================
> No we don't.
> I posted your original posting wherein you tried to claim that you
> had
> a Purple Heart.
> You even claimed to Chip that you had it from "...a real war."
> >
> I also have asked them to look at your claim that you were wounded
> by
> the VC, almost lost your life, and had that PURPLE HEART.
> I posted your exact words.
> And then mentioned how you reacted when challenged.
> And you lame excuse about the alleged Purple Heart Card.
> I hope to let you know when I hear back from VETERANS of FOREIGN
> WARS
> and also the DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS.
> -Mac, the Medic
Mr. McDonnell, you know (1) the post was removed from the Google
archives by me and was therefore remedied and clarified as not my
intent. (2) you know that you are using a post that was resurrected
from my error waste basket and altering the true context of the post,
as was verified several times by (3) a conversation with Chip within
90 days of the discarded post you keep lying about, and (4) I have
posted several times (and you have acknowledged several times) that I
do not have a purple heart medal. Also the last sentence of the post
you keep referencing states the context was about something issued in
a non-combat situation, which obviously cannot be a purple heart
medal.
If you keep using known discards that contained known typos, errors
and ambiguities and those errors, typos and ambiguities were remedied
due to their removal from the Google archives, then YOU are publishing
this post and not me, and further, you are forging the original and
true context for the purpose of defamation, fraud and harassment.
I demand you cease this fraud and libel at once, and stop claiming I
published something *after I had clearly discarded it to remedy any
error, typo or ambiguity." You know that a member of your hate gang
retrieved those posts from my waste basket, and for you to claim that
something dug out of my waste basket was something I intended to say,
especially when it contradicts dozens of other posts, is beyond
malicious, it is clearly a designed smear and frame campaign that you
are perpetrating against me.
Here is some more information about this issue that proves the true
context, which has been confirmed by more than one military expert:
INVESTIGATOR -GANG PH CLAIMS FALSE! - REBUTTAL
all, I went to the Carlisle War College to study WWII tactics even
Purple Heart Defamation from gang revealed and rebutted. Irrefutable
proof the gang has been using outright fraud, defamation and forgeries
to smear and defame in respect to this issue.
End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
I recently received information from a Federal Investigator that works
for the Veterans Administration he has officially concluded the
accusations some of the gang members maliciously filed about me in
respect to their fraudulently purple heart medal claims have been
deemed "false." I was told on the telephone, that it "appears that
some members of the gang have filed false reports to the US Government
for the purpose of defaming and smearing me" and I was asked if I was
going to add this issue to a list of complaints for a court action,
and if I did, they would be very interested in the results of that
action.
I have also received information from my lawyers they too have
concluded the gang has maliciously used deceit, fraud and false
accusations in respect to this issue to further their smear campaign
against me, and have recommended they be authorized to contact the US
Attorney over this and several other fraudulent statements and claims
members of this gang have made to law enforcement and government
agencies, not to mention criminal copyright violations.
If you are wondering why all of those experts and lawyers have
concluded the smear gang has been lying about this purple heart issue
for years, you might want to read some of the information the gang has
been hiding, which of course, I did provide to those said experts.
See below for the voluminous proof that Nigel Brooks, and his gaggle
of smear merchants that repeated this fraud, have been *maliciously
and knowingly* lying and deceiving not only the readers of these
forums, but key third parties as well, FOR YEARS!
You will find, among several other posts, statements from me going
back as far as the year 2000 stating I DID NOT have a purple heart
medal, and further, statements from key members of the gang
acknowledging that I had said I DID NOT have that medal long before
they dug a long discarded typist post out of my waste basket and
fraudulently tried to pan it off as something it was not. Proof
positive these gang members knew they were lying before they posted
*thousands* of post furthering the lie and con about this issue -
which means they also deliberately lied to the US Government as well.
Aren't you glad you are not a part of this gang? Add the fact that
one of the key Nigel Brooks gang members was recently caught
illegally accessing and sabotaging my VA Government records *not less
than three times* - and and he was fired from the VA for doing so,
(after he posted some of that information he stole on the Internet and
to *other third parties* which will be revealed during court) when
all of this ends up in court you will be absolutely overjoyed about
your decision to stay away from, out of, and as far away as possible
from Nigel Brooks and his smear and con gang.
The following information provides *irrefutable* proof that Nigel
Brooks and some members of his smear gang have been lying about this
purple heart medal issue for years:
http://tinyurl.com/dahu36 Jan 9, 2004: The Political Truth - Purple
Heart's for wounds I received - I clearly stated that I did not
believe we should receive Purple Heart Medals for "Scratches" we
received in Vietnam like John Kerry did.
"If I or any of my men in Vietnam claimed a purple heart for every
"scratch" we received in the Jungle or on patrol, or during an enemy
attack back at base camp, we all would have received dozens of "Purple
Hearts" and all 500,000 men that went to Vietnam would have been able
to return early, just like Hanoi John Kerry did, due to some "Jungle
Scratches." Nevertheless, Hanoi John wants us to remember his "Vietnam
Service" but to selectively not remember
what he did when he returned from Vietnam:"
(Note the above post stating I did not have a purple heart medal was
posted in January 9, 2004. This post is YEARS before Nigel Brooks
said a word, in any respect, about my typist's Feb 2003 post, in which
he and his gang fraudulently attempted to insert the term Medal in
place of the true context of Purple Heart VA ID Cards. So if I was
claiming I had a purple heart medal in Feb 2003 like Brooks is
fraudulently claiming, then why would I (all of those times before
Brooks and gang said a word about my typists long removed and
discarded post they dug out of my waste basket) state I said something
in that Feb 2003 post that *directly contradicted* ALL of my other
posts on this issue - which were posted long before Brooks ever said a
word about my long removed and discarded typist's Feb 2003 post?
No wonder Nigel Brooks hides all of those posts *I* did write and post
that clearly state I *do NOT* have a purple heart medal. He knows
that all those posts prove irrefutably that long before Brooks and his
gang started posting their fraudulent and libelous accusation about
this issue, I had already posted several times the exact opposite of
what Brooks fraudulently is claiming I intended to say in my typist's
Feb 2003 post.
According to Nigel Brooks and gang, some ambiguous post not written
nor posted by me that clearly is not about medals (as the last
sentence proves) represents my *intentional* claim about purple heart
medals, and all of those posts *I* DID POST AND WRITE prior to that
long discarded and slightly ambiguous post does not represent my true
intent? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Obviously, Nigel Brooks and his gang
members have been caught yet again lying about this issue, and the
proof they lied is overwhelming, as you are about to see:
Gang Hides Posts For a Reason
The reason Nigel Brooks smear and con gang repeatedly hides the
dozens of times I posted that I did NOT have a Purple Heart Medal
(See below for the URL's) is because they know it would be impossible
for them to forge the term "medals" in place of "cards" in an slightly
ambiguous post they have retrieved from my waste basket and
subsequently forged.
The mere fact they have deliberately hidden all of the times I said I
did NOT have a purple heart medal in their posts about this issue, and
further hid all of the times I referenced Purple Heart VA ID cards
long before they forged the context of a long discarded post, clearly
and unmistakably confirms the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang are
maliciously and deliberately deceiving and fraudulently
misrepresenting facts so as to further their smear, defamation
campaign against me, and to deceive and defraud the US Government and
law enforcement, and other third parties they have contacted about
this issue.
http://tinyurl.com/6z2thj Another collection of posts in which I said
I DID not have any Purple Heart Medals, which Nigel Brooks and his
gang members acknowledge. These posts occurred *before* they started
their smear and lie campaign about a post they knew was not written by
me and that they knew had long been discarded due to an ambiguity.
A listing of the all the times I said I DID NOT have a Purple Heart
Medal, which of course Nigel Brooks and his gang is desperate to hide,
and *always* hides when they post their false accusations about this
issue:
There are at least a dozen more posts in which I clearly state that I
do not have a Purple Heart medal, and that I never said I did, and
here are a few of them:
http://tinyurl.com/yy37ss August 23, 2005, long before Nigel Brooks
said a word about my Typist's long removed and discarded slightly
ambiguous post that he and his gang members dug out of my waste
basket, forged, and then used to fraudulently defame and smear me over
this issue:
"What claims for a purple heart medal? I never claimed I had a purple
heart medal. That claim is a lie.. . I never received a purple heart
medal nor claimed I did. Any claim otherwise is false or is a forgery.
"
Doug Grant (Tm)
http://tinyurl.com/thqxs June 12, 2006
Doug Says: It would be very easy to do to determine who removed a post
and who wrote it if in fact it ever existed - but it did not! I have a
list of all posts approved for removal by various
authors or typists connected to my group and there is no post about
any Purple Heart Medal in any of those removed posts." (Obviously
the post removed which Brooks keeps lying about was not about
"medals" - it was, as Google was told when it was removed, about "VA
ID Purple Heart Cards).
In the same URL above, I said I DID NOT have a Purple Heart Medal in
the year 2000, LONG BEFORE the typist's Feb 2003 post the gang dug out
of my waste basket THEY claim contradicts everything I have ever said
about this issue before and after this date - obviously Nigel Brooks
and his gang are lying:
"I should also mention that during my lawsuit against the Casinos the
lawyers asked me to file a statement about my military service. I
filed that statement under oath, and it was taken directly from my
existing DD 214 and my Board of Correction letter dated in 1996,
(which does not include, as I am told all of the medals I am entitled
to) but certainly DOES NOT state that I have a Purple Heart Medal.
Moreover, that sworn statement indicated above was delivered to
Lawyer Altschuler on or around the year 2000, LONG BEFORE any forged
statements fraudulently attributed to me were posted on the internet
about my medals. "(Note that all Plaintiff's in the case also saw this
document and there are about 60 of them that can be subpoenaed).
SO "FOUR YEARS" BEFORE THE TYPIST'S FEB 2003 POST THE GANG DUG OUT OF
MY WASTE BASKET AND LIED ABOUT, I CLEARLY STATED I "DID NOT" HAVE A
PURPLE HEART MEDAL!
(In this post members of the Nigel Brooks smear gang even admit they
know I never said I had the Purple Heart Medal and they claim that I
should have had one due to my claims of injuries).
http://tinyurl.com/gxnnw March 30, 2006
"Doug Says: First, you do not have all of my records to review, you
are lying when you claim you can complete a "thorough review" of them-
that is just a bald face lie. (This fact was later confirmed by
independent military experts, see above). Second, I did not whine for
a purple heart medal each time I received a scratch in Vietnam or in
Korea - and you are right about one thing, I never received a Purple
Heart simply because I never asked for one - and I left Vietnam on
Emergency leave and my records did not follow me - or I think I might
have asked for
one before I was discharged."
Here is a statement below by MAC the Medic (Dennis M. McDonnell) on
January 25, 2006 in which he clearly admits he knows I did not ever
say I had a Purple Heart Medal, never said I did, but he claims I
"should have one" according to his logic.
(Yet we see this same smear merchant recently claim or imply
*hundreds of times* that I said prior to January 25, 2006 that I had a
Purple Heart medal! He clearly is contradicting his own previous
statements about this issue! Obviously, he is lying.
MAC said:
"You should have a Purple Heart.
" http://tinyurl.com/ybfklw Jan 25, 2006
I respond by saying that I was probably was not entitled to receive
any purple heart medal:
"Doug Says: Really? I did not know you had the authority to issue
those medals? Please provide the nature of my injury and tell us why
it qualifies for the Purple Heart medal, and while you are at it,
please provide the forms my commander sent in requesting that medal.
.It seems the Board of Corrections could not find them. If my
commander did not believe I was entitled to the Purple Heart, then I
was not entitled to it. Period. End of Story. I did not make claims
for a "purple heart" for every injury and minor scratch I received in
Vietnam, like Hanoi John Kerry did. "
http://tinyurl.com/holfh December 14, 2005.
1. Red Jacket said:
"Shit boy at least Brooks has a Victoria Cross ! I hear you > ain't
got even > a Purple Heart. >"
"Doug Says: Brooks said he had three Victoria Crosses - AND that he
received Vietnam campaign medals even *after* he was discharged from
the US Army, and you are right, I do not have a Purple Heart Medal.
You should really read what else BS Brooks is lying about."
http://tinyurl.com/kb8qj (Sept 23, 2005).
Above is irrefutable evidence that Tom Rau (Dai Uy) and Nigel
Brooks, are both admitting I *do not* have a Purple Heart medal, and
never said I did, and Nigel Brooks is even offering to help me get
one! Strange they would suddenly change their stories about this
issue a year later - I guess they thought I would not remember all of
their previous posts about this issue - which clearly, and
irrefutably, prove both Nigel Brook, Tom Rau, and Dennis M. McDonnell
are lying about this issue.
Dai Uy (Tom Rau) said:
"And Nigel has offered his investigatory expertise to
help you get that Purple Heart. "
1. "Doug Says: There would be no reason to call Schofield
Barracks, as it would take either my congressperson and the Board of
Military Records (Corrections) to provide me with that medal - if I
want it. (I have asked the NARA for morning reports from the Hospital
I was
located in Vietnam and in Korea, - and those reports might help me if
I want to pursue this matter).
3. Understand Rau, that if my CO in Vietnam or Korea did not
believe I deserved the PHM then as far as I am concerned that is the
end of the matter. I asked the Board of Corrections if he (my Vietnam
Can Tho CO) submitted a request for that medal after I left Vietnam,
and they said
he did not. So either he forgot, did not care since I was already gone
(I left suddenly on emergency leave although I was close to my DEROS
and already had my assignment) or did not believe I deserved it. I
believe I do, and I believe the regulations support me. But I will
need to take the time and effort to pander for that medal, and like I
said, I do not like pandering for medals, I preferred stripes instead
of medals. " (Note that no doubt the top Brooks Brownie has every
medal imaginable - like a Russian Colonel - including awards from the
defunct RVN - hapless stone age Yard medals (two crossed finger bones
over a monkey's head) bribed out Aussie medals, (give me medals or I
will stop the steaks and Fosters' beer) and worthless ARVN medals that
tinkle and jingle when he walks because they are made out of worthless
tin and are really lost signs of a cowardly army long gone into
oblivion).
http://tinyurl.com/ylxrd6 August 26, 2005
Another note. If you were injured to near the point of death,
"> that implies medical evacuation and treatment. The award of
> the Purple Heart would have been practically automatic. "
1. > -- > Dave Thompson
"Doug Says: Nope. First, injured to the near point of death? Where did
you get that? I said "I was wounded in a war (and I was) AND I nearly
lost my life." I *nearly* lost my life several times in Vietnam and in
Korea, and if you were in Vietnam in any type of combat I would say
that statement would apply to you as well.
Taking statements out of context and then trying to use your own
forgeries to put words into my
mouth is a typical Brooks gang tactic...you should not be so obvious
in your fraudulent attempts.
Your conclusion that all wounds/injuries are automatically provided a
purple heart is wrong. There must be a paper process first. (Note
also the poster "Bear" (a.k.a. Alfred Snyder) who happened to serve in
the same Division as I did but much later, also said he was wounded
but he *also* did not receive the Purple Heart Medal).
http://tinyurl.com/w2kgu Here is the post from Mr. Snyder (Bear)
that states that he and many others in his unit were wounded but also
did not receive any Purple Heart medal. I am sure that Mr. Snyder
(Bear) can prove his wounds as well as I can, and I am sure he can
certainly name all those other members of his platoon that were also
wounded but did not receive their purple heart medals as well. (If
not him then his CO Cpt. Bergston can, or his later CO, Cpt. Ayres
certainly can.)
BTW, here is the statement from the Brooks gang member, Alfred
Snyder..(Isn't it strange that
Brooks nor any of his gang members challenged this guy about not
having a purple heart medal although he said he was wounded???
Big Bear" <bigbear1. ....@nativeweb.net> wrote in message
news:qNOdnaVziYJ...@comcast.com...
> No Purple Heart. It was merely a scratch from shrapnel. Nothing
> to write home
> about. Many others in my platoon received the same kind of
> wounds w/o
> receiving Purple Hearts.
Alfred Snyder (Bear).
1. Doug Says: Wow! There are others here that say that claim is a
complete and total lie! MAC and Red Jacket said that was impossible!
They said that every time you received a wound
(scratch or not) it was "automatic" that you also received a purple
heart medal! Are you calling all these guys liars? And now you are
saying "others" in your platoon also received wounds
but did not receive their Purple Heart medals also???
http://tinyurl.com/yns8p4 April 14, 2006:
(Update to the above: I am now being told the Army is not sure that
my records ever left Vietnam. Moreover, the Army recently told me
that my CO could have recommended me for more decorations, but since I
had already left the unit on emergency leave close to my DEROS date I
was thereby immediately reassigned and I was off the books of my old
Vietnam unit. Since I was legally already assigned to a new unit the
minute I left Vietnam, all my Vietnam CO could have done was place his
recommendations in my records for final processing at my next unit of
assignment. However, my records never arrived at my next unit. In
fact, according to the Army, they never arrived back in the USA.
Since my CO in Can Tho (a Lt. Col) had pulled all kinds of strings to
get me promoted to SFC E-7 with all maximum waivers and such, and he
knew I went to the hospital in Vietnam and was med-evacuated out of
Can Tho, my Can Tho Colonel probably also recommended me for other
decorations but I will never know as my records have been missing for
about 40 years. After I left Vietnam, at first , the Vietnam
personnel office held up my records due to a DEROS date error (made
by them) and when that error was resolved in my favor they were
supposed to send my records to my new duty station in the States.
Nevertheless, my records never arrived before my discharge date some
ten months later, and since that date I have written many letters
trying to find them over the years. The last I was told was my
records were destroyed in a fire somewhere in Vietnam. Congressman
Andrews was able to secure some copies of my medical records from the
various medical facilities that I attended, and of course the Pentagon
had some copies of some orders and such,
but so far that is about it).
As of this date I am waiting for Morning Report records from the
hospital I was admitted to in Vietnam. My other previous injury due
to an Artillery/Rocket/Mortar/Sonic Boom (no one really knew which)
explosion is well documented in the medical records Congressman
Andrews found for me in 1993). Also note it is up to the Army to
determine if I am eligible for the Purple Heart Medal and not me or my
Congressman. Sometimes the Army Board of Corrections considers the
evidence submitted for a medal is sufficient, sometimes not. So
although *I* believe I am eligible, and so the Brooksmearease gang
does not deliberately misinterpret what I am saying here, I am NOT
claiming any official eligibility, desirability, deservedness, merited
nor earned for any decoration including but not limited to the Purple
Heart Medal. That will be up to the US Army Board of Corrections to
decide not me.)
DOUG'S UPDATE: Thanks to a very enterprising clerk from the National
Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, MO, I have received the
Morning Report evidence that I was admitted to the 36th Medical Evac
Hospital in Vietnam, and further evidence that I was in that Hospital
for about a month. I also received documents showing I was
med-evacuated from Can Tho to Vung Tau, where that Hospital was
located. Due to the same error that made all of these records "go
missing" for forty years or so, I still have not received all of the
medical history documents nor the med-evac records. But I am still
sending out inquiries, and now that I have the actual dates of
admission and I know about the error, I can (hopefully) back-track to
find the med-evac orders out of Can Tho. The *error* involved in
these records has been devastating for all past searches, and even my
Congressman could not locate these records for about a forty year
period due to those errors).
http://tinyurl.com/yarjnk May 17, 2006:
Here is yet another clear statement I do not have a Purple Heart
Medal. I also am, much to the chagrin of Nigel Brooks (no wonder he
and his gang hide these posts) CLEARLY stating the differences between
a Purple Heart VA ID card and the Purple Heart Medal. So the next
time some smear merchant posts some long discarded post they dug out
of my waste basket and try to lie about its context, ask them why they
hid all of these posts that proves they were lying?
B. "Hospitals and Doctor offices must be mandated to contact the local
foreign workers' registration office to determine legal status prior
to administering any health care, same for schools, welfare, etc. All
Government services must be required to first verify legal status
prior to administering any Government services. I am an American
Veteran, and when I arrive at the VA I am forced to show my Purple
Heart card ID before they will even talk to me (note before the
cyberstalkers start to wail and howl about what I just said be assured
that I am not saying possession of a Purple Heart card indicates that
I have a "Purple Heart Medal" I do not have that medal - and that is
just the old slang for the card as it used to contain the image of a
purple V -the newer ones have an American flag background on them).
Nevertheless, if as an American Veteran I must show proper
identification prior to receiving VA services, why not foreign workers
and their families as well? Are illegals above showing their
entitlement identification but American Veterans are not?
Below is Mr. Rau, acknowledging as far back as May 9, 2006 that I had
said I DID NOT have a Purple Heart Medal. Strange how he suddenly
changed his tune when Nigel Brooks started lying about this issue:
Dai Uy (Tom Rau) said: http://tinyurl.com/yhwpxp
(May 9, 2006).
> "Did you query Mr. Tillman about your Purple Heart(s)?"
Dai Uy
1. "Doug Says: First, I have never claimed to have any "Purple Hearts"
- in fact I have stated the opposite several times. So that is just
another incredible attempt to lie and defame for the purpose of
cyberstalking."
2. Doug's Note: This above false accusation by Dai Uy (Tom Rau) is
especially
interesting as he has proved himself and Nigel Brooks liars with his
own post:
If you read Tom Rau's statements
http://tinyurl.com/kb8qj
(Sept
23, 2005).
He says that Nigel Brooks has offered to help me obtain a
Purple Heart medal.
3. It is obvious that he nor Nigel would have ever made that offer to
obtain a purple heart medal if they really believed I had already
said I had a Purple Heart Medal! Yet for both of them to come back a
year later and then suddenly claim that I had been saying I already
had the Purple Heart Medal all along is an obvious, and
incontrovertible admission they are lying, they know they are lying,
and they are lying for the purpose of malicious defamation and
harassment, and to incite or file false and malicious statements about
me.
http://tinyurl.com/y4l523 August 25, 2005
This is Nigel Brooks offer to "help me" qualify for a Purple Heart
Medal. (Then later he claims I had been claiming all along that I
already had one - obviously Brooks has been
caught in another lie).
So why would Nigel and Dai Uy (Tom Rau) state they want to "help" me
try to obtain a Purple Heart Medal if they really believed I was
claiming I already had one? They knew then and now the only "Purple
Heart" I ever referenced was a "Purple Heart Card" that the VA used to
issue.
Yet even after Nigel Brooks and Dai Uy and other gang members stated
that I did not have a purple heart, and never said I did therefore
they were willing to help me obtain one, the Nigel Brooks gang
suddenly and repeatedly attempted to claim that a long discarded post
that was long removed for its slight ambiguity actually, in secret
squirrel Nigel Brooks code, said the exact OPPOSITE of what I had said
about Purple Heart Medals, dozens of times, prior to and subsequent to
the post the gang is lying about!
That particular Doug Grant account post was also removed from Google
archives very soon after it was erroneously posted by one of our
typists as it clearly contained an error - removing it from Google
automatically remedied the ambiguity/error. And that specific error
was explained to Google when it was requested to be removed. Once
Google was notified of the error, Google agreed it should be removed
and subsequently authorized its removal due to that said error.
(Google must approve all requests for post archive removal and a
reason must
be provided for the request to remove). Then Google *certified in
writing* the post the gang dug out of my waste basket was "permanently
removed forever from the Google archive."
Everyone knows that errors will be made in posts especially when
typists are being used to post extemporaneous dictation, and those
errors should be removed or otherwise remedied as soon as they are
identified. Which of course I have done each time I notice an error
or an ambiguity.
Moreover, what my typist said in the context Nigel Brooks and his gang
are claiming is clearly not true, moreover Brooks knows I did not post
it nor write the post in question (which the gang also hides). So the
gang's reliance on posting "forged copies" to try and falsely
misrepresent that I made one single claim to have a Purple Heart
Medal, which is something I clearly *did not* say, and in fact I said
the exact opposite dozens of times (before and after the copied
forgery the Brook's gang is using to defame) represents clear and
unmistakable malicious fraud, false accusations and obloquy for the
deliberate purpose of harassment, defamation and stalking, and to
deliberately cause me extreme emotional distress, which is clearly the
Brooks' gang's objective. .
If you add all of the irrefutable evidence the following URL's also
provide to this issue, then not only is the evidence overwhelming that
Nigel Brooks and his gang members conspired together to find a way to
use fraud, forgeries and false accusations to fraudulently smear and
defame me, and hold me up in a false light to my peers, but also they
operated together with a common purpose (as a gang) to do so. Their
fraud was and is clearly wide spread, and just as clearly exchanged
between gang members.
***Moreover, if someone was claiming he had a Purple Heart Medal there
would be many more posts than just a single ambiguous and poorly
written post, that was written and posted by someone other than me, to
prove it. ***
Even Inspector Cluso knows about "corroboration" - but the only
corroboration that exists in respect to this matter is all those
posts in which I say I did NOT have a Purple Heart Medal - and dozens
of those no Purple Heart Medal posts exist including a written history
of my military records submitted to the courts and our lawyers which
was completed long before Nigel Brooks even knew my name, and LONG
BEFORE the Feb 2003 post was posted by my typist, and removed for its
obvious ambiguity, and then later clarified and disambiguated.
(Note that Nigel Brooks and his Brownies all carefully avoid
mentioning all of those posts in which *I* did write, before and after
the Chip post they claim I wrote and not clearly the
person that appears as the name on the post, that states I DID NOT
have a Purple Heart Medal...Why do they avoid all of that overwhelming
evidence? Because they know it will prove them the smear and fraud
merchants I know they are. It seems that providing incomplete,
slanted, biased and fraudulent "evidence" is something that Mr. Brooks
does well, and I cannot help but wonder how many times he has done it
before?
So for the last time, I do not have the Purple Heart Medal, never said
I did, and I also do not have three Victoria Crosses like Nigel Brooks
said he had won in Vietnam, and I also do not have Vietnam Campaign
Medals that Nigel Brooks said he won - but were awarded long after
Nigel Brooks left the US Army, and I also do not have the Silver Star
for being a Ward Attendant/ Medic and for simply helping wounded men
like I was supposed to do, and I do not have the Medal of Honor, nor
the French L�gion d'Honneur, nor the German Iron Cross either, and I
"especially" do not have the Vietnam Cross of Stupidity and
Corruption".
So once again, I demand that Nigel Brooks and his gang members cease
and desist their false accusations and ridiculous defaming
harassment in respect to this issue and others immediately, or face
severe legal action over this issue.
Failure to comply with my cease and dismiss demand can only mean the
Brooks gang is determined to continue to use fraud, false accusations
and outright obloquy for the purpose to cause me extreme emotional
distress, invade my privacy, use false accusations and outright fraud
to defame and demonize me, and hold me up in a false light to my
peers.
Here are other URL's that add volumes of other evidence to this issue
that proves Nigel Brooks and his smear and con gang have been lying
about this issue for years.
http://tinyurl.com/o5lw6w Purple Heart Defamation Continues from Gang
http://tinyurl.com/ocxmux Gang Repeating Purple Heart Cards post for
obvious purpose of harassment and defamation, and implying or stating
a completely fraudulent context.
http://tinyurl.com/oefrua Purple Heart Smear Gang Fraud - Rebutted.
http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau caught lying about
the contents of my military records - Experts and even a US Government
Web Site confirm!
http://tinyurl.com/q6pk56 Smear Gang "I said I was a Hero lie" - In
fact - I said the *exact opposite* as these several past posts clearly
prove - once again the gang has been caught lying about something they
have been forging and lying about for years.
There is more evidence that proves the gang has been knowingly lying
about this issue, but I need to save some for court. But as you see,
just the evidence presented herein is overwhelming that Nigel Brooks
and his gang members have been caught lying and deceiving the readers,
and other third parties, deliberately and maliciously about this
issue, FOR YEARS!
Doug Grant (Tm)
>