http://tinyurl.com/ygy52yg Smear Merchant Disclaimer which applies to
this post:
After I posted the following proof that Nigel Brooks had been caught
lying by Google, and Google's legal team had verified that fact, Mr.
McDonnell started posting his typical defamation and false accusation
smear routine. Here is what I posted in respect to Google, which
contains nothing but the truth and the facts: (Note a copy of an
email I received from Google's legal team is included)
http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos.
For some reason having yet another independent third party confirm
that Nigel Brooks had lied about this issue several times infuriated
Mr. McDonnell. It appears that facts and truth has a tendency to
upset Mr. McDonnell when it comes to Mr. Brooks or Mr. Rau. Gosh,
could they be "working together" in some manner? Do you think?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. These gang members had lied so much about me
falsely claiming a purple heart medal that when Google confirmed they
had dug up a long discarded post that was long removed due to its
possible ambiguity for those that never served in the military and
could not understand the last sentence of the post, and after Google
confirmed the true context was about purple heart VA cards and not
medals, the gang members that had been posting their lies about this
issue became noticeably upset their fraud had been exposed - and
intensified their fraud and false accusations, and even included
extortion threats, to try and stop me from posting my rebuttals to
their fraud.
Mr. McDonnell has already posted hundreds of posts about me, with more
lies, fraud, false accusations compounding in each post to a degree I
have come to believe he is a crackpot that deludes in and actually
comes to believe his own fantastic fraud and lies. But that is
understandable because he is directly associated with Nigel Brooks -
birds of a feather and all that.
I have noticed that if I have made a typo error, or said something
that could be taken out of context with a fraudulent forged context
and meaning, the Nigel Brooks gang has found that post via malicious
intent searches, and they "frame it" often as a means of harassment,
defamation and general obloquy. Never mind most of these posts were
removed from the Google archive due to their discovered error and the
error or typos thereby remedied; this smear gang has found a way to
dig through my electronic wastebasket and retrieve "discarded and
known typo posts" and then resurrect them and re-post them and
fraudulently claim they say something they do not, or had an intent
they did not have.
Considering I and others have posted more than 40,000 posts under my
various accounts, no doubt the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang
can find a few errors, or waste basket discards they can then
fraudulently "frame" and prop up and fraudulently use to facilitate
their fraud and smears.
Of course this is what hate/smear/con gangs actually do!
I also noticed, incredibly, that one gang member actually attempted
to extort me with threats of more fraudulent criminal charges if I
dared to continue to post rebuttals to his and Nigel Brooks false
accusations, fraud, serial lying, defamation and general obloquy!
Of course they actually believe posting extortion threats is supposed
to make me stop posting my rebuttals to their false accusations and
fraud, which was the design of the first harassing false criminal
charge filed by this gang which was thrown out by my local DA - it did
not work then, will backfire today, and as long as these gang members
continue with their harassment and fraud, I will rebut their false
accusations and fraud with my rebuttals. Hence this post.
Re: Mr. McDonnell's outrageous recent false accusations below and my
rebuttal:
FIRST, what I don't understand is why this crackpot boasts and brags
so much about some medal he received in Vietnam while he was working
for a Hospital Unit as a ward attendant? (His publically available
military records do not state any duties as a combat medic regardless
of the fact he calls himself one, and combat medics are not assigned
to Hospitals, they are assigned to combat units). But that will be a
topic for another rebuttal.
However, this question surfaced again when, in true fraudulent and
false accusatory crackpot style, Mr. McDonnell posted the following
fraud in a desperate attempt to divert attention from the fact that
Google had proved him and Nigel Brooks liars, and that my lawyers had
contacted the US Attorney over a years long defamation and harassment
campaign, which included false criminal charges against me to stop me
from posting rebuttals, and a break-in (unauthorized entry), sabotage,
and subsequent trafficking of my personal VA medical records. (Not
to mention the related theft of my Wife's personal information as well
as mine from Government records).
Here is the false accusations Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell recently
posted, and here is my rebuttal:
"Mac" <1. NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:hf5mj5l8trt1kfaug...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:57:51 -0800,
I also believe that you have, for whatever pitiful reasons, decided
"> to puff up your military resume with tales, with claiming deeds
that
> you did not perform and actions in which you did not engage. "
>> I believe that you are so pitiful that, when challenged, you have
> indulged in years of blather to maintain your stories, even when the
> descrepancy between your military records and your stories were
> pointed out. "
Mac the Medic (a.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).
2. Rebuttal: A lie typical of Dennis M. McDonnel. Proof. (Note Mr.
McDonnell never posts proof, he hides when asked). I asked the gang
often to produce or even *name* a single document in my military
records that proves their false accusations, and they ran and hid from
that demand and are still hiding today. Simply stated if Mr.
McDonnell was telling the truth he would be able to simply name a
single document he claims exists in my military records that proves
his false accusations, but when I mention the word proof, it is duck
and hide time for the smear merchants.
3. Meanwhile, *independent* military experts I have contacted have
confirmed that my military records DO CONFIRM most of the statements
of fact I have posted in the past. Note also that contrary to Mr.
McDonnell's obloquy above, I posted often in the past that I was NOT
claiming I was anything special, not a hero, nor I did anything
unusual compared to what other Senior NCO's did in Vietnam and
elsewhere . . . of course these posts are always hidden by the smear
gang in a desperate attempt to further their false light vilification.
Here are a few examples of what Mr. McDonnell is hiding:
1. SMEAR GANG HERO LIES - REBUTTAL
http://tinyurl.com/yzhfypt May 2009:
19. Also please note, as usual, I am NOT claiming any special bravado
or braggadocio in respect to my combat duties in Vietnam. However, I
believe that because of the 1968 Tet Offensive and counter offensive,
and the 1969 offensive, my time in combat (under fire included) were
extensive compared to many soldiers that served in Vietnam after I
left or served before the 1968 Tet offensive - such as Sp4 Nigel
Brooks. 1968-1969 were the worst years in Vietnam, and people that
were not there at that time experienced a completely different type of
war. (Note that Sp4 Nigel Brooks was discharged in Vietnam on January
13, 1968, long before the 1968 Tet offensive began - and contrary to
several claims by Sp4 Nigel Brooks in respect to him claiming that he
served during the 1968 Tet offensive).
1. Excerpts From the offical US Army Site: http://tinyurl.com/ywgpar
Fraudulent claims of me claiming to be a hero and other false light
outright fraud - debunked once and for all: Here is what I *really*
said about heroic actions- after reading the following you need to
recount all of the times the gang has lied about this issue. As far as
the hero bunk, and other similar smear merchant claims that some of
what I posted I intended to reflect my service as "heroic" we all can
read what I have often said about this issue several times in the
past - which of course directly contradicts the bizarre and fraudulent
claims from some of the more clownish smear and fraud merchants:
http://tinyurl.com/pv7jmx
November 23, 2005
I state the following: "Second, I have never made "claims of heroic
combat" that lie is of course false... All the combat I saw in Vietnam
certainly was not heroic - it was just combat. "
http://tinyurl.com/q4yykk
November 10, 2008 I stated the following: "Here is my response to
the smear gang member Tom Rau in respect to his recently posted fraud
about me:
Doug Says: Mr. Rau, you are back to your old smear gang process of
lying, using fraudulent accusations, and attempts to con and deceive
the readers. You and I both know I have never made any heroic boasts
ever, and certainly not in Viet Nam, Korea, Cambodia and South
America.
Your fraud and libel and false accusations are nothing more than your
typical fraud, obloquy and libel that you have been posted about me
for months in conjunction with your malicious smear campaign.
I certainly have never claimed to have earned a purple heart medal,
that statement is also blatantly fraudulent and false. (In fact I have
posted the exact opposite at least a half-dozen times, and in some of
those posts Mr. Rau and his fellow gang leader Mr. Brooks, and other
gang members *responded* or added comments to those posts in which I
specifically stated in unambiguous terms that I DID NOT have a Purple
Heart Medal).
May 3, 2008: (Note before the smear merchants start to howl and dance,
I am NOT CLAIMING any special heroic action, bravado, nor Rambo type
action, nor a chest full of medals like some former reserve officers
claim- but you can bet I AM claiming combat experience, enough to last
me a life time.) Doug Grant (Tm)
http://tinyurl.com/p4mp9j
May 2008. Sp4 Olson and the Wall post: "I also am not claiming I did
anything special nor heroic, I did nothing in my opinion much
different from what everyone else was doing during that ambush -
trying to stay alive." Doug Grant (Tm)
http://tinyurl.com/o4qunt
November 14, 2007 "I did nothing in my opinion heroic nor fantastic
in my military service." Doug Grant (Tm)
http://tinyurl.com/q2bc8d
November 18, 2007 "Although I was in dangerous situations often in
Vietnam, I certainly did not perform any combat duties that were
considered special or fantastic or heroic at the time. During the time
I was in Vietnam I do not believe I did anything heroic, nothing
special, nothing fantastic, I simply did what every other NCO was
forced to do during the 1968 Tet Offensive and counteroffensive that
was assigned to a major Infantry Unit like the 25th Infantry Division,
and during the 1969 Tet Offensive and its counteroffensive while I was
assigned to Can Tho.
" Doug Grant (Tm)
http://tinyurl.com/pkvpdm
September 21, 2006 BS BROOKS GANG FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT HEROIC DEEDS,
DERRING DO, AND MY CLAIMS FOR MEDALS - REBUTTED.
July 5, 2006: "A just a few samples, the BS Brooks gang has
fraudulently and publicly accused me of the following: 1. 1. Child
Molester, Child Porno owner, Wife beater, Car thief, my lawyer and I
both criminals for having Child Porno on our computers, traitor,
having a Purple Heart, not having a Purple heart, killer of 1803 men
in Vietnam, priest murderer, cannibal that feasted on the dead bodies
of Vietnamese prisoners I tortured to death, a participant in the Mai
Li massacre, a false claimant for the Medal of Honor, someone that
files multiple frivolous lawsuits, having a fat ass, not being
wounded, being wounded, shot by VC several times, implying I was a 2nd
Lt., in Vietnam, stating I was a "commander" of a VC tactics study
group, not being a linguist, having a bad discharge, discredited by
the FBI as a forged FOIA result provided, claiming I was a decorated
hero, ( fraudulently claimed) I performed heroic deeds in Vietnam, was
assigned to units I was not assigned to, never in Vietnam, never was a
SFC E-7 in Vietnam, never was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division,
was never in Combat, never was injured nor wounded, filed fake VA
claims, washed out of OCS, , that I raped 12 year-old girls in
Vietnam, tortured prisoners in Vietnam, and many more equally
fraudulent, outrageous and defaming similar preposterous accusations
from the BS Brooks gang." Doug Grant (Tm)
January 25, 2006 From: "DGVREIMAN" <DGVREI...@COMCAST.NET>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.news.media,alt.politics,alt.security.terrorism,alt.military
References: <1137988104.742256.18...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
"Doug Says: Strange, I don't remember any "heroic" tales? You have
been caught lying again MAC. " Doug Grant (Tm)
End excerpts (there are about a half dozen more where I clearly say I
was not a hero, did nothing heroic and never claimed I did) but they
all simply repeat the same as I clearly stated above.
The purpose of the smear gang is to paint what I say in a false light
so they can use their forged false light fraud to defame me and smear
me with other Vets. But we all can see what I *really* said about
heroic actions, daring do and such, and I clearly stated, several
times, the exact opposite of what the smear gang is trying their
fraudulent best to lie about, con the readers into believing, and
spewing forth fraud and false accusations by the thousands.
These smear and hate gang members believe if they lie enough someone
is bound to believe them - but there is that pesky Google archive once
again proving they are lying.
I was never a hero in Vietnam, I never did anything fantastic, nor
exceptional ever during my entire military service - I just did what
many other NCO's did - which might seem strange and different to Sp-4
Ward Attendants or Sp-4 draftee personnel clerks, but if you were a
senior NCO in the US Army you already know precisely what I am talking
about - and you already know the gang is lying through their teeth
about this issue and many others.
I suspect those that we should respect the most are the ones that
never made it back - they were the true heroes of that war.
http://tinyurl.com/yzhfypt May 18, 2009: "I have noticed recently
some gang members have posted what they claim to be past statements
from me, and they imply or state outright these statements somehow
represents me claiming some special heroics or bravado in respect to
my military service. Of course this is a complete fraud, lie and false
light accusation.
http://tinyurl.com/ygmczmf Aug 2, 2009
We all know Mr. Rau, that USENET is not an autobiographical web site
for anyone. We all also know that NO ONE posts nothing but
autobiographical facts and non-fiction on USENET! No one is stupid
enough to believe that utter nonsense! You do not , and your gang does
not, and I cannot think of anyone that does! So your assumption out of
the gate that (1) everything everyone posts is intended to be an
autobiographical statement of fact and/or non-fiction is about as
idiotic as your claim that (2) everything everyone posts is a
fictional, fabricated and Von Munchausen adventure!
Both fantastic and moronic conclusions are so idiotic, so completely
stupid, they barely require a response. We all know better Mr. Rau,
and we all also know that if you want to ask an author what he meant,
his intent, and his context, YOU NEED TO ASK THE AUTHOR! URL:
. Doug Says: Please, Tom Rau, as the reference above clearly proves, I
stated in, 1997, 2001, 2003 and more than a *thousand times
thereafter* that I will not post personal information on USENET, see
above, and further, my disclaimers INCLUDED ALL PAST POSTS! You said
you read the disclaimers 270 times, and you clearly knew I referenced
ALL of my past posts and exchanges - now you claim you cannot read?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Your statements are so idiotic I am beginning to think you and a ward
attendant are one and the same - no two people on this planet can be
*that* stupid!
Rau said: FEEL FREE TO SUBMIT THIS POSTING TO ANYONE YOU WISH FOR
THEIR INDEPENDENT REVIEW. Thanks for playing... ***
Doug Says: There is no game to be played in your fraud, libel, false
accusations, con man hate/smears designed to paint me and my service
in a false and fraudulent light. You lied about the context of my
quips, you lied about my disclaimers, and now you are lying about
lying.
If you wish to post some basis for your amazing claims about what were
normal everyday routine duties and events for the times, rank and
positions I held while I was in the US Military - then I cannot wait
to hear them. If not, then you clearly have been caught in a malicious
con yet again. Doug Grant (Tm) "
End excerpts:
Once again:
Mr. McDonnell, please name a single document in my military records
that disproves any statement of fact I have made about my military
service. Your claim that "discrepancies" exist is nothing more than
false accusations, fraud and defamation. Retract and apologize or
face additional legal action.
Here are some of my previous comments to your numerous dredging of
long removed erred posts you and your hate gang seems to wish to
repeat:
http://tinyurl.com/ygmczmf Aug 2, 2009
Doug Grant (Tm)
If you had not inflated your resume' , you wouldn't need to spend so
much effort covering up the li.... er, ah...... fiction.
The sad part is that you've turned good military service into a pile
of crap.
http://home.comcast.net/~numbauno/thirtyyears.htm
"I spent 30 years in the Military....."
http://tinyurl.com/o7sqs7
".... I will never
forget the day when a little smiling girl no more than 4 or 5
years old started walking towards me trying to give me a pack of
cigarettes. I was forced to shoot her....."
http://home.comcast.net/~numbauno/bifocal.htm
Doug says: I have a Purple Heart also........
Pepperoni
Tucked within those 561 lines is this gem:
"Please be advised further this article (the same as all of my
past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact."
First of all, I hope everyone on alt.war.vietnam has had a Merry
Christmas, and let me wish you all a prosperous and healthy New Year.
I apologize for posting this response. No doubt Mr. Reiman will
misconstrue my intent and regard it as an insult. It is not intended
as a provocation, but as an explanation and a request for
understanding by others.
The Christmas season is traditionally a time of charity and
compassion for those less fortunate...
We've witnessed holiday meltdowns previously, not just on
Christmas eve and New Years eve. They are symptomatic of a long-
standing, deep-seated, mental illness. During what are normally happy
times for most, the mentally ill experience social isolation due to
the stigma of their having a mental illness. People naturally tend to
avoid interacting with them. The idea that everyone, in Mr. Reiman's
case imagined as hate and smear merchant gangs, is conspiring against
them, makes it harder for the the mentally ill to participate in
normal social and family activities, enjoyed by others.
Before becoming incensed by his unprovoked provocations, consider
the fact that Mr. Reiman's disclaimers have repeatedly stated --
"Nothing in this article represents in any manner any asseveration of
biographical fact." In other words, he's admitting up front that
everything he has ever posted, not just about these recent Google and
legal fantasies, but all of his many bogus military claims on usenet,
are all an elaborate fabrication.
Leave it at that. He has confessed to lying.
I've not been served by anyone, Nigel has stated that he has not
been served, I doubt that anyone has, or they would post that fact
here. If I were to be served, I would cooperate fully.
David Formosa only stated the obvious: “The truly insane have
enough on their plates without us adding to it.” That is, flaming
someone with an obvious mental problem can't make it any better.
Show a little understanding and compassion. You'll feel better
for having done so.
-Dai Uy sends
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want
to be happy, practice compassion.
-His Holiness the Dalai Lama
The spammed newsgroups alt.military, alt.military.retired, alt.news-
media and alt.politics removed.
-Dai Uy sends
well I for one was served, and a mighty fine one at that, a large canadian
bacon and mushroom pizza for lunch. the remnants of which will provide
several more meals as well. best wishes to you all and let me make this
perfectly clear...I am NOT doug....or a member of any gang (well there is
that pizza, but not THAT pizza, gang)
oh whaddafook...Happy New Years
Ecelent observation..
I shall point it out to any investigator, lawyer or judge that cares to
listen....
>
> First of all, I hope everyone on alt.war.vietnam has had a Merry
> Christmas, and let me wish you all a prosperous and healthy New Year.
>
And a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and yours also...
http://tinyurl.com/yzhfypt May 2009:
Once again:
Doug Grant (Tm)
"Mac McKinzie" <awrli...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hhin3b$s38$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
If you had not inflated your resume' , you wouldn't need to spend so
much effort covering up the li.... er, ah...... fiction.
The sad part is that you've turned good military service into a pile
of crap.
http://home.comcast.net/~numbauno/thirtyyears.htm
"I spent 30 years in the Military....."
Doug's Rebuttal: Note the reference does not come from the Google
archive. This post is a forgery. A post similar to this post which
contained a obvious typo (30) was long removed from the Google archive
and thereby remidied. Members of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con
gang found this post in my electronic waste basket and reposted it
claiming it was me that reposted it. That is not only a complete
fraud, but since it was removed, any re-posting is coming from those
that re-posted it, which of course is this gang member.
http://tinyurl.com/o7sqs7
".... I will never
forget the day when a little smiling girl no more than 4 or 5
years old started walking towards me trying to give me a pack of
cigarettes. I was forced to shoot her....."
Note the excerpts above were never taken from any resume - they are
out of context excerpts, or typos, or from posts that were long
removed for error - as the Nigel Brooks gang member Tom Huxton
(Pepperoni) clearly knows. I have never posted a military resume on
USENET in my life. (Con men need to claim their excerpts are from
some resume so that rational people will not know they really are
"framing" cuts and pasts from known typo, erred and long removed
posts).
Deception is lies by omission: What this gang member is omitting is
that he knows I have stated dozens of times that I will occasionally
use fiction in my posts and articles to embellish a point. The
context of the post was clearly about how our enemies use children to
attack and kill our troops. Hiding the fact when asked about this
post I clearly stated it was fiction, and further this gang member is
hiding the fact that I have posted in my disclaimer (see below)
THOUSANDS of times that I reserve the right to use any type of
statements or methods of writing in my posts, including fiction, and
that USENET posts are NOT to be considered ALWAYS correct, and without
fiction (only a complete moron would make that claim).
If you want to know if a statement is fiction or not, ask the author.
It really is very simple. Smear and Con gangs try to con readers that
everything posted on USENET is automatically "non-fiction" and is
further "automatically" Statements of fact, but then anyone that has
ever read the description of USENET, its terms of service, and read
extemporaneous posts and exchanges, already knows such a claim is
utterly preposterous.
http://home.comcast.net/~numbauno/bifocal.htm
Doug says: I have a Purple Heart also........
Doug's Rebuttal: There have probably been five hundred posts about
the above post that clearly prove the post was about the old VA Purple
Heart cards and not the medals. Also, note this post reference is a
forgery. The post is NOT being referenced on the Google archive, and
if you do a simple Google search you will find where (1) all military
experts said the above post was about cards and not the implied and
forged "medals" this gang member is attempting to convey, and (2) the
VA itself has confirmed the purple heart cards existed when I said
they did, and (3) once a post is removed (which this one was) and then
dug out of my waste basket and replaced on the Internet, and then my
headers forged on top of the post to HIDE the fact I long removed the
post and remidied any question about it, AND TO fraudulently add my
headers to the post so as to con the readers this post originally came
from me - well, con man fraud seems to be alive and well with this
Pepperoni clown - see below:
I have better things to do than be forced to rebut the cons, fraud,
false accusations, serial lying, forgeries, lies and deceptions by
omission, and general fraud and obloquy that Nigel Brooks and some of
his hate/smear/con gang members are repeatedly posting on the Internet
about me. But as long as they continue with their hate, harassment
and false accusations, I will continue to defend myself with rebuttals
that prove their fraud and accusations precisely what they are -
serial lying, con man forgeries, deceptions via lies by omissions, and
a host of other fraud, cons, false accusations and obloquy.
Note first that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang
members maintain a web site and a Google Newsgroup designed to
EXCLUSIVELY harass, defame me with fraud, serial lying, outright con
man fraud, and of course libel, which forces me to rebut their fraud
with these truthful rebuttals. Note that even one key gang member
has attempted recently to use extortion to try and stop me from
defending myself with my rebuttals to their fraud. So apparently,
while Mr. Brooks and Mr. Rau hide, they have incited or instructed
their gang members to continue with the hate, fraud and false
accusations, and to continue the five-year smear campaign these con
men have been waging against me. Not to mention the fact that Nigel
Brooks still maintains and updates regularly his hate group and hate
web site dedicated *exclusively* to publishing hate, fraud, smears,
harassment, lies, forgeries, deceptions and lies by omission, and
personal attacks, and to clearly and maliciously incite and direct
others to do the same, about me.
I have offered Nigel Brooks (and/or any of his con/hate/smear gang
members) the opportunity to take their fraud and false accusations to
the American Association of Arbitrators, or to any legal department of
any University they select, and if either of those entities agrees
with
Nigel Brooks in respect to his accusations about me, I will pay for
their services. HOWEVER, if those legal experts agree that my
rebuttals are correct and accurate, then Nigel Brooks and/or his
smear/hate/con gang members pay for the independent legal analysis.
Nigel Brooks and his gang members run, duck, hide, cower, piss their
pants, and snivel pathetic excuse after pathetic excuse to hide from
and refuse my hundreds of offers to take this issue to independent
legal experts . . . and the reason is obvious - they know they are
lying.
Also note that I challenged Nigel Brooks to just *name* or produce any
document he claims exists in my military records that disproves any
statement of fact I have posted about my military service. Yet after
years of Nigel Brooks' and members of his hate/smear/con gang
claiming such a document exists in my records - Nigel Brooks and all
of his gang members run, cower, hide and pisses their cowardly panties
each time I issue or post this challenge!
Obviously, Nigel Brooks and his hate/smear/con gang members that have
fraudulently referenced my military records in any negative manner
have been conning, and using serial lying and fraud about this issue
for years - and if you do not believe Nigel Brooks is a con man and
fraud merchant by now you need to wake up and smell the voluminous
cons and bullshit burning that comes from these dregs, cowards and
clowns. (More than ten thousand personal attack posts against me so
far and counting!).
http://tinyurl.com/lwelno My disclaimer and more information about
Nigel Brooks cons and fraud can be found in the above URL. My
standard disclaimer applies to this post and all of my other USENET
posts, past, present or future.
Rebuttal Begins:
In respect to the gang member Tom Huxton (a.k.a. "Pepperoni")
I am not surprised at the outright fraud, cons, lies and libel this
clown has posted in this post about me. His history of fraud, serial
lying and cons about me are well known and easily documented which I
am prepared to do in a court of law. His gang leaders have all
scurried for their sewers to hide from my truthful rebuttals to their
smears and fraud, but apparently someone forgot to take away this
clown's drool cup and crayons.
I tried to be nice to these smear merchants by simply telling them to
cease and desist their harassments and cons, and I gave them a chance
to retract and apologize for their smears, libel and fraud - but they
clearly are too stupid or too arrogant to understand a simple cease
and desist notice.
I will try again:
The above statement from you about me Mr. Huxton (a.k.a. Pepperoni)
is false, maliciously meant to harass, defame and libel, and further
represents outright fraud. I hereby demand that you immediately
retract and apologize for such outrageous fraud, and cease and desist
your obvious harassment and smear campaign against me, that is unless
you believe you can back up all of your statements about me in a court
of law. If you fail to *immediately* retract and apologize for the
above fraud, I will thereby assume that you are claiming your
statements are a statement of fact and that you believe you can
support them with evidence in a court of law.
Michigan provides statutes for precisely that action.
If you believe you can support your fraud about me, please provide me
via email at legal...@comcast.net where you can be contacted by my
legal representatives. If you fail to contact me at the above email
address about this issue, yet refuse to retract your fraud you posted
about me above, then I must assume you know you are lying, and your
intent is to use fraud and false accusations for the express purpose
of harassing, defaming and libeling me.
Time to stop hiding behind fake names or step up like a man and back
up your accusations - if not, well, I wonder, does the term "coward"
mean anything to anyone? Hiding behind fake names while posting libel
and fraud about someone is, in my opinion, an act perpetrated by a
coward and someone that knows he is using fraud and malicious false
accusations.
BTW, if you are a new reader you might want to consider the source of
these personal attacks from members of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and
con gang. They have been caught in so many cons, lies and frauds
about me their attempts to continue such serial lying and outright
cons are starting to border on the pathological in my humble opinion.
Their gang leaders have long scurried away from my truthful rebuttals
to their fraud, but apparently, there are still a few crackpots left.
Pathetic you say? Very likely. Cowards you say because they are
afraid to lend their real names to their personal attacks and fraud?
Again I agree.
The one most glaring issue about this particular fraud posted by Tom
Huxton (Pepperoni) is that this Pepperoni character is very likely
NOT a Veteran of any kind. (See below for my evidence in that
regard). Of course I could be wrong, but then why is he hiding the
name he claims he used when he was in the US Military, and some of his
claims about his service are obvious frauds and lies? Can anyone be
more pathetic than a non-veteran posting not only on a Veteran's
forum, but one that involves veterans of a war?
I know the Ste...@NTLworld.com anonymous cyberstalker and key Nigel
Brooks hate/smear/con gang member is some pathetic clown that is a
non-vet that goes around to veteran forums to smear real veterans with
his fraud and lies, but now it appears perhaps yet another pathetic
wannabe fraud is doing the same.
http://tinyurl.com/y8ws4b Thomas Monahan which is the assumed
identity and persona of the fraud merchant Thomas Huxton a.k.a.
Pepperoni.
Here is just a sample of the fraud this crackpot, and what appears to
be an apparent fake Veteran Tom Huxton has posted about this issue, as
evidence in the URL above:
"Pepperoni" <tras...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9B646EA8EEF53t...@74.209.136.82...
> "DGVREIMAN" <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:RqKdnfRAAeN3cbLU...@giganews.com:
> I really think that you should "turn me in".
>
> I have said that I will not deny being "Tom Monahan". While some
> aspects
> of this personna tend toward a "show business" endeavor, no "con"
> is
> involved. Verifyable "goods" are exchanged for any funds tendered.
>
> I will further admit to signing loan documents, trademark
> applications
> and property transfers as "Tom Monahan" as well. If you believe a
> fraud
> to be involved, it is your duty to report. Failure to report makes
> you an
> accessory, and perhaps liable to prosecution. I suggest the FBI in
> Ann
> Arbor merely due to their proximity and their familiarity with the
> matter
> at hand.
It appears that Mr. Huxton and Mr. Monahan were from the same town in
Michigan. Ypsilanti, Michigan, and true to fraud merchant tactics,
Mr. Huxton has fraudulently assumed the persona of this famous person
(Mr. Monahan of Domino Pizza fame) on the Internet and has even
claimed that he signs documents in that false name. Also, when I
asked for the name of the FBI agent Mr. Huxton claimed had been living
with him for the past 20 years, Mr. Huxton apparently "forgot that FBI
agent's last name!" BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
http://tinyurl.com/ygrqb2z Tom Huxton's (a.k.a. Pepperoni) many wild
claims revealed, including his fantastic and ridicilous fraud that
providing smear and con merchants a "cease and desist"notice is
illegal. (Analogous to claiming that if I did not report him to the
FBI that also would be illegal above- - -weeeooooooooo).
http://tinyurl.com/5bxdnv Tom Huxton's richest man in America "I own
15000 buildings" etc and other "Pepperoni" (Tom Huxton) fantastic
claims.
http://tinyurl.com/5cderk Tom Huxton's (Pepperoni's) continuing lies
about his fantastic wealth and his refusal to answer any questions nor
provide any proof of his obviously fraudulent Walter Mitty claims.
http://tinyurl.com/5r93vg Gang is dismayed and desperate. Note that
Tom Huxton claimed that he (1) worked as a tank crew member in Vietnam
without any Tank crew training (utter bullshit as no Tank commander in
the world would even let an untrained person near his Tank - and (2)
that he wore brass on his Jungle fatigues - and we all know that brass
was NEVER worn on any Jungle Fatugies in Vietnam. However, to give
Mr. Huxton the benefit of the doubt I filed a FOIA request for his
service record, and the National Personnell records center said they
had no record of Tom Huxton. Sooooo, I asked Mr. Huxton about this
issue, and he claimed that "he had changed his name since he served in
the US military!" So, of course I asked him the name he claimed he
served under during his military service, and of course, Mr. Huxton,
(a.k.a. Pepperoni) refused to answer. I wonder why?
http://tinyurl.com/6s65vf More Cons from the Con Men. Pepperoni and
other hate gang members caught in mid con.
http://tinyurl.com/5wbefe Tom Huxton - Public Figure? Here Pepperoni
(Tom Huxton) claims he is a "public figure." BWHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA. Does
the word "crackpot" come to mind?
http://tinyurl.com/68uqhg Huxton Admits Con Man Fraud 11/28/08.
http://tinyurl.com/7cf62m Huxton admits more Con Man Fraud.
Like I said, you need to consider the source when you read personal
attacks coming from the remnants of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and
con gang - and this is especially true when the leaders of that gang
have went into hiding from my irrefutable rebuttals to their cons,
fraud, false accusations and serial lying they have been spewing on
these forums about me for the past five years.
People that post mostly personal attacks, are, in my opinion, sick and
perverted cowards. When you encounter one of these smear and hate
gang crackpots, it is interesting to search back and find all the
other personal attacks against others they have posted. If you wish
some more information in that regard, do a search or email me, we are
compiling the patterns of these hate and smear gang members' repeated
personal attacks, threats, especially those that threaten to
maliciously interfere with someone's income, employment or employment,
or to contact third parties about their targeted smear victims for the
purpose of spreading hate against their victims.
In some states these acts are considered actionable threats.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Pepperoni
>
>"Pepperoni" <hux...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:56d150e5-a73c-47e5...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
>On Dec 31, 10:24 am, "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Puffing Up Military Resume Fraud - Rebutted
>>
<snip over 300 lines of personal attacks on Pepperoni to get to this
ironic classic.
>People that post mostly personal attacks, are, in my opinion, sick and
>perverted cowards.
I've been watching, Doug. Nobody has had a word to say about you for
weeks and weeks, and so back you come with about 20 identical rants
about how you're being cyberstalked. Hell the post you're responding
to here was from LAST YEAR!!!, you sick perverted coward.
"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:DKydnXxpzKbvzBnW...@giganews.com...
It's coming up on his 5th anniversary in awv, perhaps that has something to
do with it.
If you recall his allegation made last year that Google and Lycos were going
to "serve" me requiring that I provide "sworn statements". As of today, I
have received no such communication.
More Doogie caca.
doubt that was duh-g's doing but the wind was about the same intensity
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7uks1j...@mid.individual.net...
If you had not inflated your resume' , you wouldn't need to spend so
Rebuttal Begins:
I will try again:
People that post mostly personal attacks, are, in my opinion, sick and
perverted cowards. When you encounter one of these smear and hate
gang crackpots, it is interesting to search back and find all the
other personal attacks against others they have posted. If you wish
some more information in that regard, do a search or email me, we are
compiling the patterns of these hate and smear gang members' repeated
personal attacks, threats, especially those that threaten to
maliciously interfere with someone's income, employment or employment,
or to contact third parties about their targeted smear victims for the
purpose of spreading hate against their victims.
In some states these acts are considered actionable threats.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Pepperoni
"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:DKydnXxpzKbvzBnW...@giganews.com...
Mr. Con man, anonymous cyberstalker SteveL, (who denies being Steve
Leyland) (1) nothing I posted was identical (2) I am responding to
fraud and false accusations you and your fellow cowards and con men
post about me, I will not stop my rebuttals to your fraud regardless
of your threats and personal attacks. The true coward, in my opinion,
is someone like you that hides behind fake names to use personal
attacks, and further, is not a veteran but posts on Veteran forums to
smear and attack real veterans. If you were not so cowardly you would
reveal you true name so those that you attack can take legal action
against you. That is unless you are a con man, afraid of court, and
afraid of the truth about you being revealed?
Doug Grant (Tm)
>
>
>
Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, I contacted Google and they said,
incredibly, they were about seven months behind in serving such
complaints to group owners. I assume Lycos is in the same position,
but I will write Lycos another reminder. Each time you claim I did
not do something I said I did your claim has been proved an outright
fraud and lie - you would think the readers know you by now - and if
there is any "Caca" involved it is, as usual, coming from you. Be
patient. When you are served we will be in court within two weeks, if
not sooner considering the fraud and smears your gang is now posting
at your instructions.
What I suggest is that you remove your Google forum and Web sites
dedicated to smearing and lying about me if you want me to stop
rebutting them. You will be removing them soon anyway under a court
order.
Also tell your gang members that are posting harassment and defamation
from states that have statutes against such acts to read those
statutes or hire a lawyer. Also
Also, please advise as to anyone you know that provided you with any
of my personal information, or in any way trafficked in such
information? Please provide this information directly to my lawyers.
Doug Grant (Tm)
>
>I know the Ste...@NTLworld.com anonymous cyberstalker and key Nigel
>Brooks hate/smear/con gang member is some pathetic clown that is a
>non-vet that goes around to veteran forums to smear real veterans with
>his fraud and lies, but now it appears perhaps yet another pathetic
>wannabe fraud is doing the same.
==========================
Poppycock you maroon.
SteveL clearly indicated he was not a vet.
You claimed that he attacked "real veterans".
When challenged, you could not provide proof by providing the specific
message, including HEADERS.
If the above is in error, kindly provide your proof.
-Mac, the Medic
>.... I will never
>forget the day when a little smiling girl no more than 4 or 5
>years old started walking towards me trying to give me a pack of
>cigarettes. I was forced to shoot her....."
============================
No hint, no indication that this was what he later desperately claimed
---"fiction".
GOOGLE GROUPS
alt.security.terrorism
Message from discussion Arafat Refuses Land Back
View parsed - Show only message text
Path:
archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.online.be!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!wn2feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.54!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.news-media,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.usa.congress,alt.security.terrorism
References:
<Dflp8.13307$se.13...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
<uabpeks...@corp.supernews.com>
<4hmp8.13400$se.13...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
<3CA62E0D...@exploratoire.ch>
<IYtp8.14415$Eb5.1...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
<3CA82636...@exploratoire.ch>
Subject: Re: Arafat Refuses Land Back
Lines: 300
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID:
<g80q8.17599$se.16...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 16:45:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.82.130.222
X-Complaints-To: ab...@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1017679500 12.82.130.222
(Mon, 01 Apr 2002 16:45:00 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 16:45:00 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
See below Colin, and I am not posting propaganda, and I am
certainly not apologizing for anything. So you must be a poor
reader of posts.
"Colin" <boswo...@exploratoire.ch> wrote in message
news:3CA82636...@exploratoire.ch...
> Doug,
> You are a poor propagandist. Not even a very good apologist.
>
> > The Palestinians were to
> > generate their own government and police force.
>
> Trashed by Israeli F16s and tank shells.
Please Colin, Arafat did not maintain his agreements, and he used
that Police force to protect terrorists. Moreover, we both know
that Arafat refused to take the Palestinian land back when it was
offered during the Camp David accords. Arafat knew that if he
agreed to take the land back the suicide bombing would not stop.
The Muslim Council running things has sworn to destroy all Jews
and the state of Israel, land or no land.
>
> > (2) The Camp
> > David accords would have returned 97% of all the land the
> > Palestinians lost when they attacked Israel without warning
three
> > separate times.
>
> UN Security Council resolutions insist Israel withdraws to it's
pre-'67
> borders and dismantles settlements.
Doug Says:
You need to read the UN Security Council resolutions Colin. What
it says is that Israel and return the territories it wants to
return, PROVIDED it is assured of "safe and secure" borders.
Israel offered to return 97% of all land back to the Palestinians
during the Camp David accords for assurances that the terrorist
attacks would stop. Arafat refused, and thereby violated the UN
Security Council resolution conditions for the return of the
Palestinian land.
>
> > (3) The Israelis are doing nothing to the
> > Palestinians that any other country would do that suffers
> > constant and repetitive massacres of its innocent civilian
> > population.
>
> The killing of hundreds of Palestinian children is a blight on
the
> conscience of the whole Israeli people. Shame on you, Doug, for
> appeasing the IDF killing machine. Stand up for decency! Insist
that
> your forces behave with honour!
Doug Says:
First of all Colin, they are not "my" forces. I am an American,
and not even a Jew. Second, try to get this in your head Colin;
The Israelis are "retaliating" to the massacres of their innocent
civilians. The Israelis are not the aggressors, it is the
Palestinians that are sending over the suicide bombers.
Meanwhile, when Israel retaliates, the Palestinians are using
civilians as human shields to protect their arms and explosives,
and to house their terrorists. That way they can use the
collateral damage inflicted on their civilian population when the
Israelis retaliate as just more transparent and utterly
ridiculous propaganda.
>
As a case in point Colin, when the Nazis attacked Europe, and the
Allies started to retaliate with bombers, were civilians targeted
that worked in munitions factories and helped the Nazi cause? Of
course they were. Did they know they would be targeted if they
helped the Nazi war machine? Of course they did. But when a
suicide bomber attacks a 12-year-old Israeli little girl's
birthday party, or an Israeli Pizza Parlor full of teenagers,
what military value could those attacks provide? What strategy
other than vengeance is at work here?
Are the Palestinian leaders so idiotic they believe that such
attacks will change the resolve of the Israeli people to
retaliate? History proves that such attacks only strengthens the
resolve of those attacked, it prolongs the war, and infuriates
the population.
The Palestinian leaders seem to believe they can turn the
Israeli people on the Sharon Government if they massacre enough
innocent Israelis. What they clearly do not understand is those
other Israeli leaders waiting in the wings to take over the
Israeli Government are far more likely to declare open war than
Prime Minister Sharon. In either case, the Palestinians are
morons if they think such tactics will gain them anything but
more retaliation from the Israelis.
Palestinian civilians are being killed because of the Palestinian
leadership like the war criminal Arafat and the Muslim Council
that are indoctrinating the suicide bomber children. Not because
of Israeli retaliation. Israel has a right to defend itself
Colin, and if the Palestinian leadership wants to use its
civilian population as human shields, then it is sacrificing its
civilian population and is those Palestinian leaders that are
directly responsible for the deaths of Palestinian civilians, not
the Israelis.
> >
> >
> > The Israelis are retaliating and protecting themselves.
>
> The humiliation of the Palestinian people will bring death and
disaster
> to Israel and to others.
Doug Says:
What is all this talk about humiliation? Israel is not going to
die, and it is going to defend itself forever, with America's
help if necessary. Those that are bent on vengeance and blood
lust and genocide are the ones that are going to die Colin, not
the free people of the world. Moreover, if the Palestinians do
not want to be "humiliated" then they should stop massacring
Jews.
>
> > It is
> > the Palestinians that are sending terrorists to slaughter
little
> > Israeli children at their birthday parties and at pizza
parlors.
> > Where is the military objective in attacking a 12 year-old
girl's
> > birthday party, or a pizza parlor full of teenagers? Such
> > attacks are clear war crimes and blatant terrorism.
>
> I have seen film of Israeli soldiers deliberately shooting
Palestinian
> children to death. I will never forget the images of the
desperate
> father trying to protect his young son from the Israeli
snipers. Get off
> your moral high horse and understand that Israel is not the
only victim
> of barbarism.
Doug Says:
Colin, you have not seen such films unless they were produced for
propaganda purposes. When I was in Vietnam little children were
given toe poppers (small mines) hidden in cigarette packages,
then they were told by the Communists to give this nice gift to
the American GI's as they passed by their village. I will never
forget the day when a little smiling girl no more than 4 or 5
years old started walking towards me trying to give me a pack of
cigarettes. I was forced to shoot her. I am sure some Viet Cong
somewhere was filming that incident, and the many similar
incidents they forced every day by arming their innoncent
children.
SNIP
Doug Grant (Tm)
>http://home.comcast.net/~numbauno/thirtyyears.htm
>"I spent 30 years in the Military....."
>
>Doug's Rebuttal: Note the reference does not come from the Google
>archive.
=======================
REALLY?
YOU want the URL?
How about GOOGLE ??
Well, here you go.
Here is the DATE, SUBJECT, Groups, and gee, here is what Douglas G.V.
Reiman posted....
GOOGLE Osama is not a "Mastermind".
The date: January 6, 2002
===== ====
Newsgroups: alt.news-media, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa,
alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.security.terrorism
From: "DOUGLAS G.V. REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:35:19 -0800
Local: Sun, Jan 6 2002 11:35 pm
Subject: Re: Osama is not a "Mastermind."
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original |
Report this message | Find messages by this author
"Orval Fairbairn" <orfairba...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:orfairbairn-06...@sdn-ar-001flhhilp306.dialsprint
.net...
> In article <dd093fb0.0201061232.75309...@posting.google.com>,
> topcatu...@hotmail.com (Mike) wrote:
> A long and mostly correct post. You have clearly made a
career, or at least hobby, out of all this. A few things, though....
> (snip)
> And now you facetiously want to comment about coordinating
air support....like you think all countries do the same air
> coordination support training as American troops. You are
of course very wrong. In fact, the Russian ground control
systems are completely different than the American air control
systems.
> Close support is much different in the two armies, and I
would suspect, because of your Harriers, the Brit support is
somewhat different also. (At least it seemed that way to me in the
> Falklands.)
> I did not suggest that America is the gold standard, which
every army emulates. My point was that air support isn't a new idea...
and the Falkland isles was a case in point of poor air support, but
those 12 harriers still managed to take down a huge airforce by
themselves.
*******************
HERE IS THE REPLY DOUG GRANT MADE:
I spent 30 years in the Military. First the US Marine Corps,
then the United States Army. My last command was a MI command.
What I watched (on TV) in respect to the Falklands was a
conspicuous absence of close air support. But there is no
denying the Harriers did their job admirably.
> .... WITH the help of the latest (at the time) AIM-9L
Sidewinders, which gave them 90 deg deflection shot capability.
> I have it on good authority that an American AF officer could
not buy his own drink in RAF Officers' Clubs after the Falklands war
-- the RAF guys INSISTED on pucking up the tab!
> The Argies suffered from POOR leadership. Hell, the Argies even
drafted executive jets for rcon duties and were promptly shot down by
the Brits.
It was a turkey shoot as I was told. Only because of the
superior Brits and their Harriers. Here is to the next "turkey
shoot."
Doug Grant (Tm)
>>http://home.comcast.net/~numbauno/thirtyyears.htm
>>"I spent 30 years in the Military....."
>>
>>Doug's Rebuttal: Note the reference does not come from the Google
>>archive.
> =======================
> REALLY?
> YOU want the URL?
> How about GOOGLE ??
> Well, here you go.
> Here is the DATE, SUBJECT, Groups, and gee, here is what Douglas G.V.
> Reiman posted....
>
> GOOGLE Osama is not a "Mastermind".
> The date: January 6, 2002
> ===== ====
> Newsgroups: alt.news-media, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa,
> alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.security.terrorism
> From: "DOUGLAS G.V. REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
> Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:35:19 -0800
> Local: Sun, Jan 6 2002 11:35 pm
> Subject: Re: Osama is not a "Mastermind."
>
You may note that the url that Doug is whining about is a photocopy of
his original post from Google.
I find it easier than looking them up. Of course, if anyone finds an
error in the photocopy, please notify me.
Pepperoni
>Old Sarge has more disability than you and he worked all those years
>after Nam. He still have part time self employment. Yet, you claim you
>fly back and forth to Haiti and for full time strenuous volunteer
>work...
========================
Now, isn't that interesting?
Kindly document your claim that I am going to be doing "...full time
strenuous volunteer work..."
-Mac, the Medic
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:uf4ho5hka2lag474c...@4ax.com...
Here's the Google ref;
>
>"Pepperoni" <hux...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:56d150e5-a73c-47e5...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
>On Dec 31, 10:24 am, "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Puffing Up Military Resume Fraud - Rebutted
>>
>
>If you had not inflated your resume' , you wouldn't need to spend so
>much effort covering up the li.... er, ah...... fiction.
>
>The sad part is that you've turned good military service into a pile
>of crap.
>
>http://home.comcast.net/~numbauno/thirtyyears.htm
>"I spent 30 years in the Military....."
>
>Doug's Rebuttal: Note the reference does not come from the Google
>archive.
Neither do tinyurl links. What's your point?
>This post is a forgery. A post similar to this post which
>contained a obvious typo (30) was long removed from the Google archive
>and thereby remidied.
Umm not so much, no.
I think you'll agree (or SANE people will, at least) that the
following sample of Google Urls are indeed from Google, though I look
forward, in your insane case, to you again claiming that Google has
been hacked and forged posts placed there by your Usenet enemies.
***************************************************
"30 years in the military"
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.security.terrorism/msg/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.security.terrorism/msg/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.jp/group/alt.security.terrorism/msg/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.de/group/alt.security.terrorism/msg/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.fr/group/alt.security.terrorism/msg/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.no/group/alt.security.terrorism/msg/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.se/group/alt.security.terrorism/msg/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.ru/group/alt.security.terrorism/msg/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.kr/group/alt.security.terrorism/msg/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.ie/group/alt.security.terrorism/msg/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.in/group/alt.security.terrorism/msg/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.pl/group/alt.security.terrorism/msg/8e4dce25a42f229c
See post 21.
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.security.terrorism/browse_frm/thread/c85e171ef26fefa9/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.security.terrorism/browse_frm/thread/c85e171ef26fefa9/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.ru/group/alt.security.terrorism/browse_frm/thread/c85e171ef26fefa9/8e4dce25a42f229c
http://groups.google.com.br/group/alt.security.terrorism/browse_frm/thread/c85e171ef26fefa9/8e4dce25a42f229c
> Members of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con
>gang found this post in my electronic waste basket and reposted it
>claiming it was me that reposted it. That is not only a complete
>fraud, but since it was removed, any re-posting is coming from those
>that re-posted it, which of course is this gang member.
So we managed to repost it right back into the middle of the original
thread (post 21) with a time and date stamp of Jan 7 2002-06:32 and
the original post reference linkage intact (including a *reply* to
that post from your rare friend vonroach!). How very CLEVER of us,
though with that kind of hacking talent why aren't we ALL as rich as
Pepperoni !??!!
Alt.Usenet.Kooks honors
Douglas "Doogie" Grant aka DGVREIMAN
Kook of the Month, December 1998
Looney Maroon Award, September 1999
Looney Maroon Award, April 2001
Unabomber Surprise, March 2006
Busted Urinal Award, May 2007.
Richard M. Nixon Memorial "Pathological Liar" Award
(nominated Aug 2007)
Douglas Grant Medal For Historical Revisionism,
December 2007
(1st winner of award named in his honor)
Kook of the Year, 2007 (Runner Up by 3 votes)
Tony Sidaway Drama Queen Award, April 2008
Balsa Gavel, April 2008
Bolo Bolus Foam Duck, May 2008
Kook of the Year, 2008.
=======================
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:51:30 -0600, Mark
<markrealmil...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Just repeating what you said Mac. You can't be very disabled if you
>are able to fly to and from Haiti and do all that work. I don't think
>any real disabled Veteran would take you seriously. It is anti
>American to pretend to be a severely disabled Veteran to gain sympathy
>when you can obviously function and work.
>Mark
**************************
That's O.K.
I didn't think you would provide any proof.
Just more of your spewing.
Pity.
-Mac, the Medic
His meds ran out ?
Again...
>You don't even use a real email address so you are just as chicken now
>as you were back then. The Goggle newsgroup archives has proved
>everything I said and you cannot deny that. I read all of it in the
>archive so according to you that is all the proof one needs.
>
>That is the same thing you do to Doug.
*********************************
Really?
Tell you what.
Considering the accusation you just made, do you really want two or
three or more posts regarding the claims that Doug made over the years
on several newsgroups and the counter-claims??
Do you?
Will furnish the DATE, the SUBJECT, the NewsGroups, the HEADERS.
Apparently you could not locate such in those "archives" you
searched...?
So, do want that ---
-Mac, the Medic
I'll give him yours..
Since they obviously are not working
>
> Mark
******************************
Hey, how come so silent?
You claim that I brag about the Purple Heart?
You claim that I bought the Purple Heart on eBay?
You claim that I don't deserve it?
You claim that I am not disabled?
Well, you have made some accusations but rather than document such you
simply whine that you supposedly "read" such in the archives... and
you claim that ""...so according to you that is all the proof one
needs."
Nice try.
But, no cigar.
When using the archives, it helps to furnish what the person states.
Not what others have desperately accused that person of and then
provided no proof.
AS YOU HAVE SOME PROBLEMS WITH THE CONCEPT, and as you claim that such
has been done to "Doug Grant", I will repeat the offer/question
posted to you previously ----
""..... do you really want two or three or
more posts regarding the claims that Doug
made over the years on several newsgroups
and the counter-claims??""
Still waiting for your answer to the question.
-Mac, the Medic
>Do your own homework. I have already reviewed the archives extensively
>in great detail and everything I said is in fact substantiated as
>documented proof that you not only brag about being awarded a Purple
>heart for simply hiding under a truck while others defended you, but
>that you also claimed to be a severely disabled combat Veteran.
>
>Gee whiz hero, you must be real disabled considering the fact that you
>can fly to and from Haiti and perform medical work there as you have
>specifically claimed to this very group. You have been exposed and are
>now branded not only a coward, but a compulsive liar.
>
>You have also committed the unpardonable sin by knowingly and with
>malicious intent cross posting off topic information to Old Sarge'e
>newsgroup which more likely than not will come back and bite you right
>in the ass. Nobody fucks with Old Sarge, he is a REAL combat Veteran.
>Mark
**************************************************
>Funny those posting you attribute to others have been forensically
>traced back to your computer.
**************************
Your lack of proof is such a surprise...
And now you manage to bring forth yet another accusation?
And, of course, you will be able to present documentation, proof, of
the above statement you have made?
How about the office involved?
How about the specific posts?
etc., etc.
Your fantasy, your paranoid-fantasy is NOT reality.
Jeez.
-Mac, the Medic