Military Resume Fraud - NOT - Rebuttal
DGVREIMAN
Military Resume Fraud - Rebuttal
http://tinyurl.com/ygy52yg Smear Merchant Disclaimer which applies to
this post:
Dennis M. McDonnell, who calls himself "Mac the Medic" posted the
following fraud on December 29, 2009:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:57:51 -0800,
I also believe that you have, for whatever pitiful reasons, decided
"> to puff up your military resume with tales, with claiming deeds
that
> you did not perform and actions in which you did not engage. "
Mr. McDonnell is desperately attempting to con the readers into
believing that he has been extracting his long discarded erred, and
typo posts and out of context extracts and "frames" he posts about me
from some kind of "military resume" I have published or posted in the
past.
The truth is I have NEVER posted any military resume, not once,
ever.
Mr. McDonnell's quips and "frames" he attributes to me replete with
his fraud and false definitions, contexts, and titles are from "cuts
and pastes" he or one of the gang members has extracted from various
different posts that have nothing to do with the fraudulent context he
is attempting to convey. Mr. McDonnell knows this, and he has been
told this fact several times. Yet he persists in reposting known
errors, typos and long discarded posts from one of my accounts for
the obvious purpose of defamation, obloquy and harassment.
I should also mention most of the errors and typos he reproduces are
from long discarded posts that were removed from the Google archives
due to a discovered error or ambiguity or typo, and thereby instantly
remedied and set right in respect to their error or typo.
Also note that Mr. McDonnell said that Mr. Rau corrected some of his
false statements about me, and I should accept such corrections. But
when I correct anything Mr. McDonnell ignores the correction. His
hypocrisy is more than glaring.
As a case in point Mr. McDonnell points out that my initial reply to
Chip about Purple Heart Cards was in Feb 2003, and I did not post a
clarification until 2008, but what he is hiding is the Feb 2003 post
was REMOVED from the Google archives on or about 2004 (as Google has
confirmed) thereby instantly remedying any error or ambiguity, and I
was only *forced* to post a clarification in 2008 once members of the
Nigel Brooks smear/hate/and con gang had resurrected this long
discarded post from my waste basket for the purpose of fraudulently
misrepresenting its true context.
When a post is removed from the Google archives, Google then
responds to the remover with an email certifying the removal and the
reason. Google has also proved Mr. Brooks and Mr. McDonnell were
lying when they claimed that it was Google that resurrected these long
removed erred posts and not a key member of the Nigel Brooks
smear/hate/con gang. In fact it was a key member of the Nigel Brooks
hate/smear/con gang that claims he is a "computer consultant" (who
also denies his real name is Steve Leyland) that in connection with
other members of the gang wrote a malicious search to dig through my
electronic waste basket so as to use known errors and typos as a means
to defame and smear me with outright malicious fraud.
Can you imagine the lack of ethics of someone that would actually dig
through your waste basket to re-post errors and typos that you have
remedied by discarding them, and then fraudulently hide the fact they
found those posts in your waste basket? No wonder many of these hate
gang members self-described themselves as "Trolls."
http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos in
this post I provide a copy of the email I received from the Google
legal team that stated they DO NOT read nor decide which posts remain
on their Archives.
After I posted the following proof that Nigel Brooks had been caught
lying by Google, and Google's legal team had verified that fact, Mr.
McDonnell started posting his typical defamation and false accusation
smear routine. Here is what I posted in respect to Google, which
contains nothing but the truth and the facts: (Note a copy of an
email I received from Google's legal team is included)
http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos.
For some reason having yet another independent third party confirm
that Nigel Brooks had lied about this issue several times infuriated
Mr. McDonnell. It appears that facts and truth has a tendency to
upset Mr. McDonnell when it comes to Mr. Brooks or Mr. Rau. Gosh,
could they be "working together" in some manner? Do you think?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. These gang members had lied so much about me
falsely claiming a purple heart medal that when Google confirmed they
had dug up a long discarded post that was long removed due to its
possible ambiguity for those that never served in the military and
could not understand the last sentence of the post, and after Google
confirmed the true context was about purple heart VA cards and not
medals, the gang members that had been posting their lies about this
issue became noticeably upset their fraud had been exposed - and
intensified their fraud and false accusations, and even included
extortion threats, to try and stop me from posting my rebuttals to
their fraud.
Mr. McDonnell has already posted hundreds of posts about me, with more
lies, fraud, false accusations compounding in each post to a degree I
have come to believe he is a crackpot that deludes in and actually
comes to believe his own fantastic fraud and lies. But that is
understandable because he is directly associated with Nigel Brooks -
birds of a feather and all that.
I have noticed that if I have made a typo error, or said something
that could be taken out of context with a fraudulent forged context
and meaning, the Nigel Brooks gang has found that post via malicious
intent searches, and they "frame it" often as a means of harassment,
defamation and general obloquy. Never mind most of these posts were
removed from the Google archive due to their discovered error and the
error or typos thereby remedied; this smear gang has found a way to
dig through my electronic wastebasket and retrieve "discarded and
known typo posts" and then resurrect them and re-post them and
fraudulently claim they say something they do not, or had an intent
they did not have.
Considering I and others have posted more than 40,000 posts under my
various accounts, no doubt the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang
can find a few errors, or waste basket discards they can then
fraudulently "frame" and prop up and fraudulently use to facilitate
their fraud and smears.
Of course this is what hate/smear/con gangs actually do!
I also noticed, incredibly, that one gang member actually attempted
to extort me with threats of more fraudulent criminal charges if I
dared to continue to post rebuttals to his and Nigel Brooks false
accusations, fraud, serial lying, defamation and general obloquy!
Of course they actually believe posting extortion threats is supposed
to make me stop posting my rebuttals to their false accusations and
fraud, which was the design of the first harassing false criminal
charge filed by this gang which was thrown out by my local DA - it did
not work then, will backfire today, and as long as these gang members
continue with their harassment and fraud, I will rebut their false
accusations and fraud with my rebuttals. Hence this post.
Re: Mr. McDonnell's outrageous recent false accusations below and my
rebuttal:
FIRST, what I don't understand is why this crackpot boasts and brags
so much about some medal he received in Vietnam while he was working
for a Hospital Unit as a ward attendant? (His publically available
military records do not state any duties as a combat medic regardless
of the fact he calls himself one, and combat medics are not assigned
to Hospitals, they are assigned to combat units). But that will be a
topic for another rebuttal.
However, this question surfaced again when, in true fraudulent and
false accusatory crackpot style, Mr. McDonnell posted the following
fraud in a desperate attempt to divert attention from the fact that
Google had proved him and Nigel Brooks liars, and that my lawyers had
contacted the US Attorney over a years long defamation and harassment
campaign, which included false criminal charges against me to stop me
from posting rebuttals, and a break-in (unauthorized entry), sabotage,
and subsequent trafficking of my personal VA medical records. (Not
to mention the related theft of my Wife's personal information as well
as mine from Government records).
Here is the false accusations Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell recently
posted, and here is my rebuttal:
"Mac" <1. NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:hf5mj5l8trt1kfaug...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:57:51 -0800,
I also believe that you have, for whatever pitiful reasons, decided
"> to puff up your military resume with tales, with claiming deeds
that
> you did not perform and actions in which you did not engage. "
>
> I believe that you are so pitiful that, when challenged, you have
> indulged in years of blather to maintain your stories, even when the
> descrepancy between your military records and your stories were
> pointed out. "
Mac the Medic (a.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).
2. Rebuttal: A lie typical of Dennis M. McDonnel. Proof. (Note Mr.
McDonnell never posts proof, he hides when asked). I asked the gang
often to produce or even *name* a single document in my military
records that proves their false accusations, and they ran and hid from
that demand and are still hiding today. Simply stated if Mr.
McDonnell was telling the truth he would be able to simply name a
single document he claims exists in my military records that proves
his false accusations, but when I mention the word proof, it is duck
and hide time for the smear merchants.
3. Meanwhile, *independent* military experts I have contacted have
confirmed that my military records DO CONFIRM most of the statements
of fact I have posted in the past. Note also that contrary to Mr.
McDonnell's obloquy above, I posted often in the past that I was NOT
claiming I was anything special, not a hero, nor I did anything
unusual compared to what other Senior NCO's did in Vietnam and
elsewhere . . . of course these posts are always hidden by the smear
gang in a desperate attempt to further their false light vilification.
Here are a few examples of what Mr. McDonnell is hiding:
1. SMEAR GANG HERO LIES - REBUTTAL
http://tinyurl.com/yzhfypt May 2009:
19. Also please note, as usual, I am NOT claiming any special bravado
or braggadocio in respect to my combat duties in Vietnam. However, I
believe that because of the 1968 Tet Offensive and counter offensive,
and the 1969 offensive, my time in combat (under fire included) were
extensive compared to many soldiers that served in Vietnam after I
left or served before the 1968 Tet offensive - such as Sp4 Nigel
Brooks. 1968-1969 were the worst years in Vietnam, and people that
were not there at that time experienced a completely different type of
war. (Note that Sp4 Nigel Brooks was discharged in Vietnam on January
13, 1968, long before the 1968 Tet offensive began - and contrary to
several claims by Sp4 Nigel Brooks in respect to him claiming that he
served during the 1968 Tet offensive).
1. Excerpts From the offical US Army Site: http://tinyurl.com/ywgpar
Fraudulent claims of me claiming to be a hero and other false light
outright fraud - debunked once and for all: Here is what I *really*
said about heroic actions- after reading the following you need to
recount all of the times the gang has lied about this issue. As far as
the hero bunk, and other similar smear merchant claims that some of
what I posted I intended to reflect my service as "heroic" we all can
read what I have often said about this issue several times in the
past - which of course directly contradicts the bizarre and fraudulent
claims from some of the more clownish smear and fraud merchants:
http://tinyurl.com/pv7jmx
November 23, 2005
I state the following: "Second, I have never made "claims of heroic
combat" that lie is of course false... All the combat I saw in Vietnam
certainly was not heroic - it was just combat. "
http://tinyurl.com/q4yykk
November 10, 2008 I stated the following: "Here is my response to
the smear gang member Tom Rau in respect to his recently posted fraud
about me:
Doug Says: Mr. Rau, you are back to your old smear gang process of
lying, using fraudulent accusations, and attempts to con and deceive
the readers. You and I both know I have never made any heroic boasts
ever, and certainly not in Viet Nam, Korea, Cambodia and South
America.
Your fraud and libel and false accusations are nothing more than your
typical fraud, obloquy and libel that you have been posted about me
for months in conjunction with your malicious smear campaign.
I certainly have never claimed to have earned a purple heart medal,
that statement is also blatantly fraudulent and false. (In fact I have
posted the exact opposite at least a half-dozen times, and in some of
those posts Mr. Rau and his fellow gang leader Mr. Brooks, and other
gang members *responded* or added comments to those posts in which I
specifically stated in unambiguous terms that I DID NOT have a Purple
Heart Medal).
May 3, 2008: (Note before the smear merchants start to howl and dance,
I am NOT CLAIMING any special heroic action, bravado, nor Rambo type
action, nor a chest full of medals like some former reserve officers
claim- but you can bet I AM claiming combat experience, enough to last
me a life time.) Doug Grant (Tm)
http://tinyurl.com/p4mp9j
May 2008. Sp4 Olson and the Wall post: "I also am not claiming I did
anything special nor heroic, I did nothing in my opinion much
different from what everyone else was doing during that ambush -
trying to stay alive." Doug Grant (Tm)
http://tinyurl.com/o4qunt
November 14, 2007 "I did nothing in my opinion heroic nor fantastic
in my military service." Doug Grant (Tm)
http://tinyurl.com/q2bc8d
November 18, 2007 "Although I was in dangerous situations often in
Vietnam, I certainly did not perform any combat duties that were
considered special or fantastic or heroic at the time. During the time
I was in Vietnam I do not believe I did anything heroic, nothing
special, nothing fantastic, I simply did what every other NCO was
forced to do during the 1968 Tet Offensive and counteroffensive that
was assigned to a major Infantry Unit like the 25th Infantry Division,
and during the 1969 Tet Offensive and its counteroffensive while I was
assigned to Can Tho.
" Doug Grant (Tm)
http://tinyurl.com/pkvpdm
September 21, 2006 BS BROOKS GANG FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT HEROIC DEEDS,
DERRING DO, AND MY CLAIMS FOR MEDALS - REBUTTED.
July 5, 2006: "A just a few samples, the BS Brooks gang has
fraudulently and publicly accused me of the following: 1. 1. Child
Molester, Child Porno owner, Wife beater, Car thief, my lawyer and I
both criminals for having Child Porno on our computers, traitor,
having a Purple Heart, not having a Purple heart, killer of 1803 men
in Vietnam, priest murderer, cannibal that feasted on the dead bodies
of Vietnamese prisoners I tortured to death, a participant in the Mai
Li massacre, a false claimant for the Medal of Honor, someone that
files multiple frivolous lawsuits, having a fat ass, not being
wounded, being wounded, shot by VC several times, implying I was a 2nd
Lt., in Vietnam, stating I was a "commander" of a VC tactics study
group, not being a linguist, having a bad discharge, discredited by
the FBI as a forged FOIA result provided, claiming I was a decorated
hero, ( fraudulently claimed) I performed heroic deeds in Vietnam, was
assigned to units I was not assigned to, never in Vietnam, never was a
SFC E-7 in Vietnam, never was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division,
was never in Combat, never was injured nor wounded, filed fake VA
claims, washed out of OCS, , that I raped 12 year-old girls in
Vietnam, tortured prisoners in Vietnam, and many more equally
fraudulent, outrageous and defaming similar preposterous accusations
from the BS Brooks gang." Doug Grant (Tm)
January 25, 2006 From: "DGVREIMAN" <DGVREI...@COMCAST.NET>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.news.media,alt.politics,alt.security.terrorism,alt.military
References: <1137988104.742256.18...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
"Doug Says: Strange, I don't remember any "heroic" tales? You have
been caught lying again MAC. " Doug Grant (Tm)
End excerpts (there are about a half dozen more where I clearly say I
was not a hero, did nothing heroic and never claimed I did) but they
all simply repeat the same as I clearly stated above.
The purpose of the smear gang is to paint what I say in a false light
so they can use their forged false light fraud to defame me and smear
me with other Vets. But we all can see what I *really* said about
heroic actions, daring do and such, and I clearly stated, several
times, the exact opposite of what the smear gang is trying their
fraudulent best to lie about, con the readers into believing, and
spewing forth fraud and false accusations by the thousands.
These smear and hate gang members believe if they lie enough someone
is bound to believe them - but there is that pesky Google archive once
again proving they are lying.
I was never a hero in Vietnam, I never did anything fantastic, nor
exceptional ever during my entire military service - I just did what
many other NCO's did - which might seem strange and different to Sp-4
Ward Attendants or Sp-4 draftee personnel clerks, but if you were a
senior NCO in the US Army you already know precisely what I am talking
about - and you already know the gang is lying through their teeth
about this issue and many others.
I suspect those that we should respect the most are the ones that
never made it back - they were the true heroes of that war.
http://tinyurl.com/yzhfypt May 18, 2009: "I have noticed recently
some gang members have posted what they claim to be past statements
from me, and they imply or state outright these statements somehow
represents me claiming some special heroics or bravado in respect to
my military service. Of course this is a complete fraud, lie and false
light accusation.
http://tinyurl.com/ygmczmf Aug 2, 2009
We all know Mr. Rau, that USENET is not an autobiographical web site
for anyone. We all also know that NO ONE posts nothing but
autobiographical facts and non-fiction on USENET! No one is stupid
enough to believe that utter nonsense! You do not , and your gang does
not, and I cannot think of anyone that does! So your assumption out of
the gate that (1) everything everyone posts is intended to be an
autobiographical statement of fact and/or non-fiction is about as
idiotic as your claim that (2) everything everyone posts is a
fictional, fabricated and Von Munchausen adventure!
Both fantastic and moronic conclusions are so idiotic, so completely
stupid, they barely require a response. We all know better Mr. Rau,
and we all also know that if you want to ask an author what he meant,
his intent, and his context, YOU NEED TO ASK THE AUTHOR! URL:
. Doug Says: Please, Tom Rau, as the reference above clearly proves, I
stated in, 1997, 2001, 2003 and more than a *thousand times
thereafter* that I will not post personal information on USENET, see
above, and further, my disclaimers INCLUDED ALL PAST POSTS! You said
you read the disclaimers 270 times, and you clearly knew I referenced
ALL of my past posts and exchanges - now you claim you cannot read?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Your statements are so idiotic I am beginning to think you and a ward
attendant are one and the same - no two people on this planet can be
*that* stupid!
Rau said: FEEL FREE TO SUBMIT THIS POSTING TO ANYONE YOU WISH FOR
THEIR INDEPENDENT REVIEW. Thanks for playing... ***
Doug Says: There is no game to be played in your fraud, libel, false
accusations, con man hate/smears designed to paint me and my service
in a false and fraudulent light. You lied about the context of my
quips, you lied about my disclaimers, and now you are lying about
lying.
If you wish to post some basis for your amazing claims about what were
normal everyday routine duties and events for the times, rank and
positions I held while I was in the US Military - then I cannot wait
to hear them. If not, then you clearly have been caught in a malicious
con yet again. Doug Grant (Tm) "
End excerpts:
Once again:
Mr. McDonnell, please name a single document in my military records
that disproves any statement of fact I have made about my military
service. Your claim that "discrepancies" exist is nothing more than
false accusations, fraud and defamation. Retract and apologize or
face additional legal action.
Here are some of my previous comments to your numerous dredging of
long removed erred posts you and your hate gang seems to wish to
repeat:
http://tinyurl.com/ygmczmf Aug 2, 2009
Doug Grant (Tm)
SteveL
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos in
>this post I provide a copy of the email I received from the Google
>legal team that stated they DO NOT read nor decide which posts remain
>on their Archives.
Actually, as completely expected, there's *no copy* of any email in
that screed anywhere. Just you going on and on and making claims about
having received an email.
Nothing there about Nigel being served by Google and Lycos, except
once again, a link to another unsubstantiated claim from you.
No doubt in the general run of things Google do not read the posts
that get archived. It's completely automatic of course. I suspect any
email you have received from Google would have been a simple form
letter stating that obvious fact, and that you've parlayed it up to
something specifically addressing your shameful Purple Heart boast.
However, if someone such as yourself petitions Google to remove a post
from view then they probably read it before doing so. Also if someone
tells Google that the "removed" post is evidence in a threatened
lawsuit then they read it before they re-instate it to visibility in
the thread.
I suggest you actually quote the alleged email you received from them
instead of just claiming you have such an email and referring people
to a link that does not quote the alleged email at all!!
BTW, what does Google say about "stealing posts from wastebaskets"?
Did the word "huh?" figure in their reply?
SteveL
<stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:46:58 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
><dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos in
>>this post I provide a copy of the email I received from the Google
>>legal team that stated they DO NOT read nor decide which posts remain
>>on their Archives.
>
>Actually, as completely expected, there's *no copy* of any email in
>that screed anywhere. Just you going on and on and making claims about
>having received an email.
I apologise Doug. Your screed was so long that the Google page pointed
to by that tinyurl only showed manageable chunks. If you actually
press "Read More" link then down at the bottom the following is seen:
----- Original Message -----
From: <h...@google.com>
To: <dgvrei...@comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [#542092740] Your mailed complaint
> Hi Doug,
> Firstly, in regards to your requests based on defamation, please
> note that while we're sympathetic to your request... Google is a
> provider of information, not a mediator. We make no claims about
> the content of the many posts in our archive. We suggest addressing
> your concern directly to the author of the post in question.
> We are not equipped to assess the truth or falsity of statements
> posted to our site by third parties.
>If you choose to pursue legal action against this author, we are prepared
>to abide by any orders involving the postings in question.
> In regards to your claims of copyright infringement, we ask that you
> visit the following page for instructions on how to file an
> appropriate
> DMCA complaint for Groups:
> http://www.google.com/groups_dmca.html
> If you have questions in obtaining such information, please feel
> free to contact legal-supp...@google.com.
> Regards,
> The Google Team
---------------------------------
So basically, it's a form letter, as generic as you can get. Going
absolutely out of it's way to be as NON-COMMITTAL as possible! And
you have the unmitigated fuck gall to try to claim that Google agree
with you!!!
!DGVREIMAN
"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:YcCdndVYAPdAYaHW...@giganews.com...
funny. you gots to be careful how you approach a seal....they gots teeth)
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>Military Resume Fraud - Rebuttal
>http://tinyurl.com/ygy52yg Smear Merchant Disclaimer which applies to
>this post:
---ALL THE ABOVE URL is: is simply a reposting of the screed of the
person calling itself Doug Grant vonReiman.... no where in the post is
there any substance, any proof, any evidence, any documentation.
It is simply hundreds of words of this person trying desperately to
deflect the challenges he has subjected himself to by his many claims.
>
>Dennis M. McDonnell, who calls himself "Mac the Medic" posted the
>following fraud on December 29, 2009:
========================================
Mac
<stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote:
STEVEL:
>So basically, it's a form letter, as generic as you can get. Going
>absolutely out of it's way to be as NON-COMMITTAL as possible! And
>you have the unmitigated fuck gall to try to claim that Google agree
>with you!!!
Ah, but he does that so well...!!
Can you just imagine the type of NCO this character was, based on his
antics and his threats over the last several years>
-Mac, the Medic
Nigel Brooks
"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:YcCdndVYAPdAYaHW...@giganews.com...
Absolutely amazing how Reiman is capable of interpreting the words "while we
are sympathetic to your request" into a claim the Google agrees with him.
It is also amazing that he actually believes that he has a right to restrict
commentary on any of his posts in USENET with a copyright claim.
I would not be in the least bit surprised that he has filed a DMCA complaint
with Google alleging that quoting his posts in USENET infringes on a
copyright. If that is the case he had better be prepared to put his money
where his mouth is.
"Please note that you will be liable for damages (including costs and
attorneys' fees) if you materially misrepresent that a product or activity
is infringing your copyrights. Indeed, in a recent case (please see
http://www.onlinepolicy.org/action/legpolicy/opg_v_diebold/ for more
information), a company that sent an infringement notification seeking
removal of online materials that were protected by the fair use doctrine was
ordered to pay such costs and attorneys fees. The company agreed to pay over
$100,000. "
Nigel Brooks
!DGVREIMAN
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7q6rbl...@mid.individual.net...