book relevant to loving v. virginia

[Hugh Lawson]

"What Comes Naturally traces the origins, spread, and demise of
miscegenation laws in the United States-laws that banned interracial
marriage and sex, and which were enacted and applied not just in the
South but throughout most of the country, in the West, the North, and
the Midwest. "

http://www.oupcanada.com/catalog/9780199772353.html

Can this be true? Gasp!

[MITO MINISTER]

So, the South is off the hook?

[hla...@triad.rr.com]

MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:


> So, the South is off the hook?

What hook are you talking about? Explain.

[hla...@triad.rr.com]

What is this hook? Obviously Mito Minister, it is a figure of speech, a
metaphor. But you are the one who used it. Are you talking about a
meat hook, like the ones the Nazis uses to hang up their victims? Or
the Mafia?

I don't see the South on any hook. Do you? Explain yourself. Is there
somebody who claims to "have the South on the hook"?

HL

[MITO MINISTER]

On Oct 28, 3:13 pm, hlaw...@triad.rr.com wrote:

Your tactic is transparent. Bring out a book that details nation-wide
discrimination so as to say "See, see, you did it too. So we're not so
bad after all". You are slime, a defender of Jim Crow and an
apologist.

[Hugh Lawson]

MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:


> Your tactic is transparent. Bring out a book that details nation-wide
> discrimination so as to say

What is the hook, MM? Is it a meathook, a boathook, or what?

Evading the question, MM falsely attributes a quotation to somebody
else:

> "See, see, you did it too. So we're not so
> bad after all". You are slime, a defender of Jim Crow and an
> apologist.

Now about that hook, Mito M. Explain yourself. You placed yourself
under the spotlight.

HL

[Hugh Lawson]

MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:


> Your tactic is transparent. Bring out a book that details nation-wide
> discrimination so as to say "See, see, you did it too. So we're not so
> bad after all". You are slime, a defender of Jim Crow and an
> apologist.

If you could prove that you wouldn't have to invent quotations, and
mendaciously attribute them to others.

You are the one who is fixated on blame and guilt. But you seem to have
some hidden rules about to whom you attach it.

Must be a result of Canadian schooling. LOL.

By the way, what year did you earn your baccalaureate at university?

[Hugh Lawson]

Mito Minister false attributes statements to another, pretending to quote
directly. This is the same Mito Minister who pretends to know what he
does not know.

I feel pity for you Mito Minister. Lying about others, over a phoney
signature. A read sad sack you are.

hl

[MITO MINISTER]

On Oct 28, 11:13 pm, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:

Why don't you just call it a B.A. or a B.S.? Pompous ass.

[MITO MINISTER]

You are a defender of the White South. In 2012. You are the sad sack
here.

[Hugh Lawson]

MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:


>> By the way, what year did you earn your baccalaureate at university?
>
> Why don't you just call it a B.A. or a B.S.?

When did you earn your baccalaureate?

[Hugh Lawson]

MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:


> You are a defender of the White South. In 2012. You are the sad sack
> here.

How pathetic you are, Mini-Mouse. If you were in middle school in the
early seventies, that puts you in your fifties now. Right?

You are anonymously taunting southerners with your posts on a
newsgroup.

"Look at your self, if you had a sense of humor you would laugh to beat
the band." (old pop song)