Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
MM biography
144 views
Skip to first unread message
Hugh Lawson
Oct 19, 2012, 12:38:35 PM10/19/12
to
MM let slip the other day that he studied Latin in school in the early
seventies. So, the pitifus fellow is in his fifties now; he hasn't been a
'young man of promise" for a couple of decades, if he ever was one.
MITO MINISTER
Oct 22, 2012, 7:30:44 AM10/22/12
to
it then. Appreciate it now. I promise.
Hugh Lawson
Oct 22, 2012, 8:28:21 AM10/22/12
to
MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Oct 20, 1:38 am, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
[ snip ]
> On Oct 20, 1:38 am, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I studied Latin in the 70s.
Now, you were born in a European country. How old were you when you
moved to Canada?
I'm interested in how you came to get the ideas you have about the US
South. Tell some more about this.
hl
MITO MINISTER
Oct 23, 2012, 4:54:33 AM10/23/12
to
On Oct 22, 9:28 pm, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
Your assumptions are close, but wrong. I HATE the White South because
I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
That's reason enough in my book.
Why do you defend the evil that your ancestors did? And don't give me
any shit about MY ancestors. They never exploited anybody.
I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
That's reason enough in my book.
Why do you defend the evil that your ancestors did? And don't give me
any shit about MY ancestors. They never exploited anybody.
Hugh Lawson
Oct 23, 2012, 7:42:50 AM10/23/12
to
MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Your assumptions are close, but wrong. I HATE the White South because
> I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
> That's reason enough in my book.
>
> Why do you defend the evil that your ancestors did? And don't give me
> any shit about MY ancestors. They never exploited anybody.
Why do you pretend to know what you do not know?
>
> Your assumptions are close, but wrong. I HATE the White South because
> I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
> That's reason enough in my book.
>
> Why do you defend the evil that your ancestors did? And don't give me
> any shit about MY ancestors. They never exploited anybody.
Hugh Lawson
Oct 23, 2012, 7:54:35 AM10/23/12
to
MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:
> Your assumptions are close, but wrong. I HATE the White South because
> I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
> That's reason enough in my book.
But you express hatred for persons, Mito Minister, for an entire
> Your assumptions are close, but wrong. I HATE the White South because
> I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
> That's reason enough in my book.
population, without regard for individual differences. Your pretense to
hate the sin only is fraudulent.
Explain how you learned what you pretend to know on this point Mito
Minister. Give an account of your origins, where you were born.
Where exactly did you grow up, in what kind of community? Why do you
make this pretense to "classical education", when it doesn't show in
your posts? Is there something you don't want to reveal about your
education?
Explain why you called for the death of an entire population, which is
evidence of something seriously missing in your personal character.
Did you do this just because you wanted to annoy Edge?
You need to be down on your knees begging the forgiveness of millions of
southern whites, because of what you yourself have said. You yourself,
as an individual person did this. You did it repeatedly, and you have
never expressed the remorse that you ought to show.
HL
Joel Edge
Oct 23, 2012, 8:47:54 AM10/23/12
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:54:33 -0400, MITO MINISTER wrote
(in article
<345f2e25-f631-4d9b...@n2g2000pbp.googlegroups.com>):
> On Oct 22, 9:28ï¿œpm, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Now, you were born in a European country. ï¿œHow old were you when you
still hate them? How about northerners that move into the south. Do you hate
them?
(in article
<345f2e25-f631-4d9b...@n2g2000pbp.googlegroups.com>):
> On Oct 22, 9:28ï¿œpm, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Oct 20, 1:38ï¿œam, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [ snip ]
>>
>>> Yes, I studied Latin in the 70s.
>>
>> So you were born c. 1960. ï¿œIn your early fifties now.
>>
>> [ snip ]
>>
>>> Yes, I studied Latin in the 70s.
>>
>>
>> Now, you were born in a European country. ï¿œHow old were you when you
>> moved to Canada?
>>
>> I'm interested in how you came to get the ideas you have about the US
>> South. ï¿œTell some more about this.
>>
>> I'm interested in how you came to get the ideas you have about the US
>>
>> hl
>
> Your assumptions are close, but wrong. I HATE the White South because
> I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
> That's reason enough in my book.
>
> Why do you defend the evil that your ancestors did? And don't give me
> any shit about MY ancestors. They never exploited anybody.
So you hate a geographic location. If everyone in the south moved, would you
>> hl
>
> Your assumptions are close, but wrong. I HATE the White South because
> I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
> That's reason enough in my book.
>
> Why do you defend the evil that your ancestors did? And don't give me
> any shit about MY ancestors. They never exploited anybody.
still hate them? How about northerners that move into the south. Do you hate
them?
MITO MINISTER
Oct 23, 2012, 9:18:11 AM10/23/12
to
On Oct 23, 8:42 pm, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
You always say that, but you are wrong. The historical reacord is
clear: The White South is guilty of slavery and Jim Crow.
clear: The White South is guilty of slavery and Jim Crow.
MITO MINISTER
Oct 23, 2012, 9:36:18 AM10/23/12
to
On Oct 23, 8:54 pm, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
There is no need to talk about my "youthful Latin studies", such as
they were, because they are irrelevant in a discussion about the
White South. Would you have me quoting Spartacus? You are the one who
poses as a benign old academic whiling away the hours in scholarly
Latin studies. I called you out on your squeamish refusal to so much
as admit that the Romans had their own Lawrences and Ginsbergs and
Nins. You are the one with a mania for finding out which dictionaries
I use/used. I answered your idiotic questions. I still don't know why
that concerns you so much, since we all use the same friggin' standard
dictionaries anyway.
My education is also irrelevant since we are discussing a well-
documented White Supremacist society that you and Edge are so happy to
defend. I have called for the obliteration, through education (the
teaching of accurate history) of Southern White Heritage because it is
merely a justification of Slavery and Jim Crow and I have further
stated that Federal Law is also the way to go about it, by prosecuting
and sentencing those Southern Whites convicted of crimes in a court of
law.
It's too easy to annoy Edge. He was born angry.
It is ironic that you want me to apologize to an entire society that
is guilty, today, in 2012, of still harbouring White Supremacist
attitudes. Better to track down the lynchers of the 50s, the
segregationists of the 60s and the current crop of Klansmen and their
ilk.
they were, because they are irrelevant in a discussion about the
White South. Would you have me quoting Spartacus? You are the one who
poses as a benign old academic whiling away the hours in scholarly
Latin studies. I called you out on your squeamish refusal to so much
as admit that the Romans had their own Lawrences and Ginsbergs and
Nins. You are the one with a mania for finding out which dictionaries
I use/used. I answered your idiotic questions. I still don't know why
that concerns you so much, since we all use the same friggin' standard
dictionaries anyway.
My education is also irrelevant since we are discussing a well-
documented White Supremacist society that you and Edge are so happy to
defend. I have called for the obliteration, through education (the
teaching of accurate history) of Southern White Heritage because it is
merely a justification of Slavery and Jim Crow and I have further
stated that Federal Law is also the way to go about it, by prosecuting
and sentencing those Southern Whites convicted of crimes in a court of
law.
It's too easy to annoy Edge. He was born angry.
It is ironic that you want me to apologize to an entire society that
is guilty, today, in 2012, of still harbouring White Supremacist
attitudes. Better to track down the lynchers of the 50s, the
segregationists of the 60s and the current crop of Klansmen and their
ilk.
MITO MINISTER
Oct 23, 2012, 9:36:57 AM10/23/12
to
On Oct 23, 9:47 pm, Joel Edge <joele...@planttel.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:54:33 -0400, MITO MINISTER wrote
> (in article
> <345f2e25-f631-4d9b-95eb-06a1c26e4...@n2g2000pbp.googlegroups.com>):
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:54:33 -0400, MITO MINISTER wrote
> (in article
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 22, 9:28 pm, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 22, 9:28 pm, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> writes:
> >>> On Oct 20, 1:38 am, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> [ snip ]
>
> >>> Yes, I studied Latin in the 70s.
>
> >> So you were born c. 1960. In your early fifties now.
>
> >> [ snip ]
>
> >>> Yes, I studied Latin in the 70s.
>
>
> >> Now, you were born in a European country. How old were you when you
> >> moved to Canada?
>
> >> I'm interested in how you came to get the ideas you have about the US
> >> South. Tell some more about this.
>
> >> I'm interested in how you came to get the ideas you have about the US
>
> >> hl
>
> > Your assumptions are close, but wrong. I HATE the White South because
> > I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
> > That's reason enough in my book.
>
> > Why do you defend the evil that your ancestors did? And don't give me
> > any shit about MY ancestors. They never exploited anybody.
>
> So you hate a geographic location. If everyone in the south moved, would you
> still hate them? How about northerners that move into the south. Do you hate
> them?
You know what I mean, punk.
> >> hl
>
> > Your assumptions are close, but wrong. I HATE the White South because
> > I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
> > That's reason enough in my book.
>
> > Why do you defend the evil that your ancestors did? And don't give me
> > any shit about MY ancestors. They never exploited anybody.
>
> So you hate a geographic location. If everyone in the south moved, would you
> still hate them? How about northerners that move into the south. Do you hate
> them?
Hugh Lawson
Oct 23, 2012, 11:47:14 AM10/23/12
to
MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Oct 23, 8:42 pm, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Your assumptions are close, but wrong. I HATE the White South because
>> > I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
>> > That's reason enough in my book.
>>
>> > Why do you defend the evil that your ancestors did? And don't give me
>> > any shit about MY ancestors. They never exploited anybody.
>>
>> Why do you pretend to know what you do not know?
>
> You always say that
That's what is said to people like you who pretend to know what they do
> On Oct 23, 8:42 pm, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Your assumptions are close, but wrong. I HATE the White South because
>> > I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
>> > That's reason enough in my book.
>>
>> > Why do you defend the evil that your ancestors did? And don't give me
>> > any shit about MY ancestors. They never exploited anybody.
>>
>> Why do you pretend to know what you do not know?
>
> You always say that
not know.
Hugh Lawson
Oct 23, 2012, 11:49:37 AM10/23/12
to
MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:
> My education is also irrelevant since we are discussing a well-
> documented White Supremacist society that you and Edge are so happy to
> defend. I have called for the obliteration, through education (the
> teaching of accurate history)
You are trying to weasel out of having called for their death.
> My education is also irrelevant since we are discussing a well-
> documented White Supremacist society that you and Edge are so happy to
> defend. I have called for the obliteration, through education (the
> teaching of accurate history)
> It is ironic that you want me to apologize to an entire society that
> is guilty, today, in 2012,
condemning an entire population, without regard to individuals. And you
called for their death.
MITO MINISTER
Oct 24, 2012, 4:08:48 AM10/24/12
to
On Oct 24, 12:49 am, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
I certainly call for an immediate investigation into civil-rights
violations, regardless of any 'statutes of limitation', and, if
necessary, (and it will be necessary) the arrest and trial of all
Southern White miscreants. I figure about 10,000 jail cells can easily
be filled up.
violations, regardless of any 'statutes of limitation', and, if
necessary, (and it will be necessary) the arrest and trial of all
Southern White miscreants. I figure about 10,000 jail cells can easily
be filled up.
Hugh Lawson
Oct 24, 2012, 7:02:47 AM10/24/12
to
MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> I certainly call for an immediate investigation into civil-rights
> violations, regardless of any 'statutes of limitation', and, if
> necessary
You are not a normal person, MM. There is something wrong with you.
>
> I certainly call for an immediate investigation into civil-rights
> violations, regardless of any 'statutes of limitation', and, if
> necessary
hl
MITO MINISTER
Oct 24, 2012, 11:48:17 PM10/24/12
to
On Oct 24, 12:49 am, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
"Miseducation" is not a word, you Worthless White Boy!
MITO MINISTER
Oct 24, 2012, 11:49:41 PM10/24/12
to
On Oct 24, 8:02 pm, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
You are being repetitive. You are merely a knee-jerk defender of Jim
Crow.
Your property should be conficscated by Federal Bailliffs and
transferred to the NAACP.
Crow.
Your property should be conficscated by Federal Bailliffs and
transferred to the NAACP.
Joel Edge
Oct 25, 2012, 8:03:53 AM10/25/12
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:36:57 -0400, MITO MINISTER wrote
(in article
<dc21aaa1-80eb-45ed...@vy11g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>):
> On Oct 23, 9:47ï¿œpm, Joel Edge <joele...@planttel.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:54:33 -0400, MITO MINISTER wrote
>> (in article
>> <345f2e25-f631-4d9b-95eb-06a1c26e4...@n2g2000pbp.googlegroups.com>):
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 22, 9:28ï¿œpm, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>> Now, you were born in a European country. ï¿œHow old were you when you
experience trying to convince other people of your value.
(in article
<dc21aaa1-80eb-45ed...@vy11g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>):
> On Oct 23, 9:47ï¿œpm, Joel Edge <joele...@planttel.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:54:33 -0400, MITO MINISTER wrote
>> (in article
>> <345f2e25-f631-4d9b-95eb-06a1c26e4...@n2g2000pbp.googlegroups.com>):
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 22, 9:28ï¿œpm, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> On Oct 20, 1:38ï¿œam, Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> [ snip ]
>>
>>>>> Yes, I studied Latin in the 70s.
>>
>>>> So you were born c. 1960. ï¿œIn your early fifties now.
>>
>>>> [ snip ]
>>
>>>>> Yes, I studied Latin in the 70s.
>>
>>
>>>> Now, you were born in a European country. ï¿œHow old were you when you
>>>> moved to Canada?
>>
>>>> I'm interested in how you came to get the ideas you have about the US
>>>> South. ï¿œTell some more about this.
>>
>>>> I'm interested in how you came to get the ideas you have about the US
>>
>>>> hl
>>
>>> Your assumptions are close, but wrong. I HATE the White South because
>>> I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
>>> That's reason enough in my book.
>>
>>> Why do you defend the evil that your ancestors did? And don't give me
>>> any shit about MY ancestors. They never exploited anybody.
>>
>> So you hate a geographic location. If everyone in the south moved, would you
>> still hate them? How about northerners that move into the south. Do you hate
>> them?
>
> You know what I mean, punk.
You don't even know what you mean. You're a blowhard with zero life
>>>> hl
>>
>>> Your assumptions are close, but wrong. I HATE the White South because
>>> I hate bigotry, prejudice, racism and exploitation. I HATE HATE.
>>> That's reason enough in my book.
>>
>>> Why do you defend the evil that your ancestors did? And don't give me
>>> any shit about MY ancestors. They never exploited anybody.
>>
>> So you hate a geographic location. If everyone in the south moved, would you
>> still hate them? How about northerners that move into the south. Do you hate
>> them?
>
> You know what I mean, punk.
experience trying to convince other people of your value.
Joel Edge
Oct 25, 2012, 8:05:31 AM10/25/12
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:36:18 -0400, MITO MINISTER wrote
(in article
<e13ca435-f835-4afb...@kt16g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>):
> White Supremacist society that you and Edge are so happy to
> defend.
See, wrong again. How do you manage to be this stupid?
(in article
<e13ca435-f835-4afb...@kt16g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>):
> White Supremacist society that you and Edge are so happy to
> defend.
Joel Edge
Oct 25, 2012, 8:09:05 AM10/25/12
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 04:08:48 -0400, MITO MINISTER wrote
(in article
<2fb1febf-700a-4057...@v11g2000pbs.googlegroups.com>):
I've often said 'Make it happen'. I've also questioned what (if any) property
you own. It'll be mine afterwards. Just to rub salt into the wound, I'd
probably donate it to the SCV. Put up or shut up, witless.
(in article
<2fb1febf-700a-4057...@v11g2000pbs.googlegroups.com>):
you own. It'll be mine afterwards. Just to rub salt into the wound, I'd
probably donate it to the SCV. Put up or shut up, witless.
hla...@triad.rr.com
Oct 25, 2012, 8:37:08 AM10/25/12
to
MM's ignorance is cute, isn't it?
hla...@triad.rr.com
Oct 25, 2012, 8:38:42 AM10/25/12
to
MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> You are being repetitive.
That's because you display the same repulsive faults over and over.
>
> You are being repetitive.
That's because you display the same repulsive faults over and over.
Joel Edge
Oct 26, 2012, 7:50:34 AM10/26/12
to
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:37:08 -0400, hla...@triad.rr.com wrote
(in article <87lieu6...@triad.rr.com>):
> MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> "Miseducation" is not a word,
>
>
> MM's ignorance is cute, isn't it?
>
Kittens are cute. Mito is repugnant.
(in article <87lieu6...@triad.rr.com>):
> MITO MINISTER <cigarm...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> "Miseducation" is not a word,
>
>
> MM's ignorance is cute, isn't it?
>
MITO MINISTER
Oct 29, 2012, 6:34:05 AM10/29/12
to
On Oct 26, 8:50 pm, Joel Edge <joele...@planttel.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:37:08 -0400, hlaw...@triad.rr.com wrote
> (in article <87lieu683v....@triad.rr.com>):
on-Black crime and rape. That's what it's all about for you and your
ilk, White Boy!
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:37:08 -0400, hlaw...@triad.rr.com wrote
> (in article <87lieu683v....@triad.rr.com>):
>
> > MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> "Miseducation" is not a word,
>
> > MM's ignorance is cute, isn't it?
>
> Kittens are cute. Mito is repugnant.
Edge is an unrepentent segregationist who yearns for the days of White-
> > MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> "Miseducation" is not a word,
>
> > MM's ignorance is cute, isn't it?
>
> Kittens are cute. Mito is repugnant.
on-Black crime and rape. That's what it's all about for you and your
ilk, White Boy!
Joel Edge
Oct 29, 2012, 8:38:49 AM10/29/12
to
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 06:34:05 -0400, MITO MINISTER wrote
(in article
<4ee4fe70-1c9e-421f...@y5g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>):
Please post proof.
That's OK. I invite anyone to read my posts.
(in article
<4ee4fe70-1c9e-421f...@y5g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>):
That's OK. I invite anyone to read my posts.
0 new messages