Nachricht von Diskussion
labelling writers as "southern" writers
Received: by 10.66.72.130 with SMTP id d2mr2737083pav.33.1348532298823;
Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: a8ni23571862pbd.1!nntp.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:18:18 -0500
From: Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.war.civil.usa
Subject: Re: labelling writers as "southern" writers
References: <87d31fxf9z.fsf@gmail.com>
<bb9b4f15-7089-4a03-a379-c68da2e9e564@v9g2000pbu.googlegroups.com>
<87d31d3cly.fsf@gmail.com>
<b9b141e2-d0d7-4600-903b-70353aefb344@ql4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<9n4t58lrbo8pitjtnp1n79da23evkc0j2e@4ax.com>
<87mx0h0w32.fsf@gmail.com>
<f2cu589ie9am0tig7umuh52363hfc0ee5k@4ax.com>
<87ipb3fsi3.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:18:13 -0400
Message-ID: <878vbz6jlm.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:irPjxNjGWVinWBL+f4tyLUQZers=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 34
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-kjCmPAFghnc0UuWooahD9sIyHXPuCI4jDakxP/Uwj3mzRwhyvLonxKCXRCZP6Ak3Zr0zgA/MMMC7Yrs!A6DGnyQq0troQXW42rAtMWN7fKDbv2xz6V4xOg7CysKIkq3C
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2375
X-Original-Bytes: 2314
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hugh Lawson <hu.law...@gmail.com> writes:
> A.Lur...@who-knows-where.com writes:
>
> [ snip ]
>
>> Again, if you actually read Lanier, you'd understand why it's natural
>> to attach the "Southern" and wouldn't need to ask the question. I
>> could tell you way -- and indeed the MM already has -- but you're
>> better off discovering it for yourself.
>
> Notice that A.Lurker, by innuendo, accuses others of not having read any
> Sidney Lanier, of knowing nothing of Lanier's life. But he identifies no
> Lanier poems, quotes nothing from memory, and provides no biographical
> information.
>
> Looks like bluffing. Is that what you're doing A.Lurker?
Are you a bluffer, A.Lurker, a hiding behind the skirts of the Lady
Anonymity?
C'mon, 'fess up, A.Lurker. You can always say you were just
kidding. LOL. Or, you can avoid me, and start up a stimulating
conversation with M & M. You and he are soul-mates, wouldn't you say?
HL