"Ant" <a...@zimage.comANT> wrote in message
news:kMqdnY7CKJIph_vS...@earthlink.com...
> Hello.
>
> Today's weather is cloudy, rainy, and cold. Would it be a bad idea to test
> out OTA antennae, indoor (e.g., attic)? Do they affect OTA feeds?
I acknowledge having read the "leaves" response and your comment to it.
The area weather rarely affects short-range TV reception, but it defintely
can affect long-range TV reception.
Pardon me, but I can't precisely establish the dividing line between short-
and long-range reception but my location, about 125 miles from the Los
Angeles TV transmitters on Mount Wilson, should qualify as "long-range" for
most people.
My experience of about six years shows that I receive many of the LA DTV
stations perfectly with a basic rooftop antenna most of the time. I get a
few virtually all the time, like KCBS and KTTV. I get a few more most of
the time, like KNBC, KTLA, and KCOP. The rest are a mix but all share a
common characteristic: they all usually rise and fall in signal strength as
a group. I can press a few buttons on the remote and bring up a display
with little bars, each of which seems to equate to a doubling (or halving)
of the signal. I can watch and see the changes in signal strength in real
time. I don't do it much any more. I"ve already seen most of what I ever
needed to see.
By the way, my location happens to give me a distinct advantage; I am near
the top of a gradual rise and I have an unobstructed view to the north for a
few miles. Most of the time it's great that I have such a location, but
this weekend, the weather has been very rainy and my LA reception is mostly
El Sucko. (Be careful using these technical terms; they're best left to the
experts. ;-)
With my San Diego "locals," I will get a signal strength indication that
never varies unless I switch antennas. In contrast, with my LA "distants,"
I can monitor while some stations will go from six bars to nothing in a half
hour and come back again in ten minutes to three bars. Although this is what
I've seen, I make no claim to a scientific study. As I might have said
before I retired, "I can tell you, but I need a charge number, first."
A phenomenon called "ducting" is usually responsible for what I see in the
way of signal fluctuations. If you google for <uhf vhf ducting>, you will
get as much you want to know.
http://www.google.com <vhf uhf ducting> is clickable in some newreaders.
The search returns are largly ham-radio related but still informative in a
general sense. Will help you get your arms around the phenomenon.
But in summary, local weather can produce atmospheric layers that trap
signals and release them again at other locations, much as the shapes of
mountains and valleys do with rainfall on the ground. The ducts are
weather-dependent and seem to occur more in the summer than winter. A
recurrent summertime duct was reported to carry a Texas Channel 3 signal
into Central California. It banged in with such strength that it interfered
with Channel 3 reception from KCRA -3 Sacramento for some viewers in
California. Now that's a duct!
[Related, sort of: Ducts can also carry sound waves. When the Navy is
doing gun-shoots offshore, sometimes the sound comes ashore from 50 miles
away and it sounds like some a-hole is playing with dynamite on the next
block. Such are the joys of living in/around San Diego.]
The absolute kick-ass duct I ever heard about was in the Indian Ocean. For
months, US Navy ships' radar operators reported mysterious clutter on some
of their radar scope displays. When the official reports began piling up,
somebody finally figured out that their radar pulses were getting trapped in
a duct, traveling a thousand or more miles and bouncing off the Himalayas!
It didn't happen all the time but when it did there was only one solution:
"Get used to it, those mountains are staying put."
I hope this clears things up a little.
"Sal"
(Been around the block so many times, I quit counting)