Shouldn't that be "Biting the Hand that You Feed"? Viewers pay
Dish Network. Dish Network does not get paid by commercial TV.
> Dish Network is offering a new DVR box with a feature called Auto Hop,
> allowing next-day viewers and beyond to skip commercials.
That's "allowing", not "requiring", isn't it?
> I suspect they're in competitive economic trouble; otherwise they wouldn't
> be doing something that's so at odds with their core business. Their
Their core business is delivering content to viewers that the viewers
WANT to view.
There's always a conflict of interest between a distributor and
their suppliers.
> principal job is to deliver commercial TV. Without it, nobody would
> subscribe to their service. They'd be offering C-SPAN, PBS, Jerry Fallwell
> and the Shopping Channel.
>
> That's not enough content to earn a place on my roof, never mind a monthly
> bill. Commercial TV belongs, so the commercials belong.
Soap operas belong, too, but that doesn't mean the viewer has to
go to a lot of effort to avoid them.
> If you side with them, imagine buying a magazine and discovering that
> somebody had clipped out all the ads.
Depending on the magazine, I might be willing to pay extra for that.
However, I think the analogy is more like someone moved all the ads
to be back of the magazine where I don't have to see them unless I
want to.
Are you trying to claim that Dish prohibits people from viewing the
commercials? Allowing them to skip the commercials != requiring them
to skip the commercials.