I don't think we'll be seeing more of John Payton

[lvrog...@aol.com]

I think the Observant Lurker has left us, permanently, and not of his own volition.

Roger

[Split the Eights]

On May 8, 1:07 pm, lvroger...@aol.com wrote:
> I think the Observant Lurker has left us, permanently, and not of his own volition.
>
> Roger

I'm sure he'll be missed by many...

[Ace]

Don't worry, you still have me, Sport!

A*

[]v[etaphoid]

Barely...

If your posts in the earlier "Metaphoid, it's time to arrange a
{meeting]..." thread taught us anything, it's that you run like a
shivering rat up a drainpipe when confronted. Heavens, all I did was
answer your challenge by listing my itinerary and asking which time and
venue you wanted to catch up at.

If you don't want to catch up - that's fine. But don't go starting
threads before fleeing like a dentist when your mother walks in the
surgery, at the mere prospect of sharing a friendly ale...

[Split the Eights]

Who are you?

[Split the Eights]

He's all keyboard... would you expect less from a netkook?

[TeddysDad]

On May 8, 1:07 pm, lvroger...@aol.com wrote:

> I think the Observant Lurker has left us, permanently, and not of his own volition.
>
> Roger

Roger, please come clean: What did you do to him? Any links to
anything? Any autopsy pics?

[lvrog...@aol.com]

TeddyDad---

As far as I know, he is alive and kicking. Just not allowed to post on AVLV anymore. The Secret Service doesn't smile on threats on the president's life.

[Ace]

Dr. Brian Gene Kelley, PhD. You know that slugger, you just can't
except it.

A*

[Ace]

:-)

[Ace]

On May 9, 6:16 am, Split the Eights <argus...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> He's all keyboard...

No, that would be you, anonymous one.
You're afraid to reveal your name (same goes for Metetard)... I'm not.
You're afraid to show your face, even on the internet (same goes for
Metetard)... I'm not.
You're not the one who shows up for real life meeting arrangements
(same goes for Metetard)... I am, on numerous occasions.

A*

[Split the Eights]

On May 12, 3:57 am, Ace <blackstu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 9, 6:16 am, Split the Eights <argus...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > He's all keyboard...
>
> No, that would be you, anonymous one.

I'm all over the internet, You're just too fucking stupid to figure
out who I am Mr PhD...

> You're afraid to reveal your name (same goes for Metetard)... I'm not.

Why should I devulge my name? everyone knows your name and nobody give
a rats-ass about it!

> You're afraid to show your face, even on the internet (same goes for
> Metetard)... I'm not.

See above, Dickweed! my face just happens to be all over the internet.
Again, you're too fucking stupid to figure out who I am! And yes,
we've all seen your mug in the real cool videos you've posted on You-
Tube... (Classic net-kook stuff right there!!)

> You're not the one who shows up for real life meeting arrangements
> (same goes for Metetard)... I am, on numerous occasions.

Hey lil ace, living outside of Nevada, I'd rather not bother going to
places where a douche bag like you might want to hump my leg and act
like an internt tough guy...

>
> A*

[Ace]

On May 12, 11:00 pm, Split the Eights <argus...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 12, 3:57 am, Ace <blackstu...@gmail.com> wrote:> On May 9, 6:16 am, Split the Eights <argus...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > He's all keyboard...
>
> > No, that would be you, anonymous one.
>
> I'm all over the internet, You're just too fucking stupid to figure
> out who I am Mr PhD...

That's the same exact kind of evasive BS Payton always tossed and out
LOL

> > You're afraid to reveal your name (same goes for Metetard)... I'm not.
>
> Why should I devulge my name?

Because you made the snarky remark of "all keyboard".
Question is, are you anything else than all keyboard?
I know it's difficult for you, but try to focus on the subject.
Or are you scrabbling for a little Paytonesq obfuscation?

> everyone knows your name and nobody give
> a rats-ass about it!
>
> > You're afraid to show your face, even on the internet (same goes for
> > Metetard)... I'm not.
>
> See above, Dickweed!

My, you get so emotional when you're called out.

> my face just happens to be all over the internet.

And just like John Payton, you have no link to provide; what a
surprise.

> Again, you're too fucking stupid to figure out who I am!

Are you sure you're not John Payton? You sound an awful lot like him.
Failure on his part to come through on anything, was always supposed
to be someone else's failing to "figure it out"

> And yes,
> we've all seen your mug in the real cool videos you've posted on You-
> Tube... (Classic net-kook stuff right there!!)
>
> > You're not the one who shows up for real life meeting arrangements
> > (same goes for Metetard)... I am, on numerous occasions.
>
> Hey lil ace, living outside of Nevada, I'd rather not bother going to
> places where a douche bag like you might want to hump my leg and act
> like an internt tough guy...

Heh heh, I really sent you into hysterics.

Be something resembling a man and admit that you're all keyboard, lil'
Payton, with his size 7 foot in mouth LOL

[Split the Eights]

Braaa... "prove it".....Braaaa... I'm lil ace..... Braaa..

You are too fucking easy! now go get your meds adjusted and make us a
video for You-Tube....

Net-Kook... indeed!

[Ace]

On May 13, 9:31 am, Split the Eights <argus...@hotmail.com> wrote:


>
> You are too fucking easy!

So you admit that you're just a troll. Good for you.

[Ace]

Questa224 wrote:

> PWNED

ST8 isn't much of a challenge to pwen.
Take his repeatedly calling me a netkook, as if that's supposed to
bother someone who's made videos of himself wearing a straightjacket
LOL
Of course I'm not the loner he so desperately wants me to be.

He puts his little foot in his mouth by saying there's no pictures of
me where I'm not by myself, so I post some pictures of me surrounded
by my friends and family. He says I'm never seen wearing a wedding
ring (as if that's supposed to prove anything) so I point out a few
old videos where my wedding ring can clearly be seen.

He associates not being afraid to reveal my real name and willingness
meet anyone as me being a "tough guy" LOL

Of course it's all projecting on his part. He's the perpetually single
loner, living in a cheap apt and working a low paying job, due to an
incomplete education. I actually feel kinda sorry for it.

[]v[etaphoid]

*Except* you're not. You're a ruse, a lying braggard and a coward - and
it kills you that everyone knows it and treats you like the social lepar
and bona fide netkook you are...

[]v[etaphoid]

Unlike yourself - I've never played internet tough guy, challenged
someone to a meeting and then wigged it. Or hid in the bushes and
refused to make contact.

And you don't don't reveal yuur real name - though you do reveal what an
insecure, whining netkook you are with your self-esteem boosting videos.

Can't wait to catch up at Wynn - please have an OP Rum and Coke in a
10oz glass full of ice waiting for me when I arrive...

[Ace]

On May 15, 1:45 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:

>
> > Dr. Brian Gene Kelley, PhD. You know that slugger, you just can't
> > except it.
>
> > A*
>
> *Except* you're not.

My being Brian Gene Kelley, PhD is a fact that was established a long
time ago, newbie.
That's why ST8 didn't refute it. He might pretend to after this, but
it's too late for that.

> You're a ruse, a lying braggard and a coward

Nope, that's you, no name, no photos - just a lonely punk behind a
library computer.

> - and
> it kills you that everyone knows it and treats you like the social lepar

You're projecting again. Show some pictures of yourself with friends
like I have over the years. You can't do that can you? Just like ST8.

> and bona fide netkook you are...

Himm... that just might be why I posted a video of myself in a
straight jacket LOL

[Ace]

On May 15, 2:17 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:

>
> Unlike yourself - I've never played internet tough guy, challenged
> someone to a meeting

Sad that you, ST8 and Payton associate simply meeting someone as an
act of toughness and a challenge LOL

> and then wigged it. Or hid in the bushes and
> refused to make contact.

And yet, you can't supply a link to a singe thread to back up that
imaginary nonsense.
You run on pure imagination, pure fantasy, nothing tangible. Just like
ST8.
That's why he always gets so upset when I ask him for a shred of
proof.

> And you don't don't reveal yuur real name

Sorry newbie, but my real name and credentials were inspected and
verified by a very reliable and impartial member of avlv, many years
ago.
It's something you're going to have to deal with.

> though you do reveal what an
> insecure, whining netkook you are with your self-esteem boosting videos.

This of course is your way of getting out of posting any pictures of
videos of yourself visiting Vegas. How clever of you.

> Can't wait to catch up at Wynn

It might be mildly amusing for me, but I know you won't be there.
Go ahead, show me some pictures of yourself in Vegas (and Paris, Rome
etc). What's stopping you? LOL

> - please have an OP Rum and Coke in a
> 10oz glass full of ice waiting for me when I arrive...

You're the one who invited me for a beer, you twit.

Lemme guess, you want me to show up for nothing and buy a drink for
someone who's not there.
You're always so desperate to score. So sad. The constant "dance
little puppet dance" routine that gets you off.

I have no problem with kicking back at the piano bar, before getting
together with friends at a restaurant there.

A*

[Split the Eights]

Poor lil' ace, I seem to have hit a nerve... he can't get me out of
his twisted little mind....

Braaa... shred of evidence.... Braaa look at me, I've posted pictures
and video for everyone to see and laugh at me...Braaa
see, I'm a real Boy, just like Pinocchio ... Braaa....Braaaa....

Hey lil' ace, have a nice time here on AVLV, it's your kinda place.....

[Ace♠]

On May 15, 7:32 pm, Split the Eights <argus...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> Poor lil' ace, I seem to have hit a nerve... he can't get me out of
> his twisted little mind....

You're uable to follow context as usual. Metetard was chiming in, in
our conversation.

You know, the one where you proved you're an all keyboard troll,
looking desperately to "strike a nerve".

You having no identity makes you a nothing, who has nothing of remote
significance to say.

Even Payton and Mikey one upped you by having an identity.

A*

[Split the Eights]

By the way, would you consider Don Strevel your "Geppetto"?

[Ace♠]

On May 15, 7:32 pm, Split the Eights <argus...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> Braaa... shred of evidence.... Braaa look at me, I've posted pictures
> and video for everyone to see and laugh at me...Braaa
> see, I'm a real Boy, just like Pinocchio ... Braaa....Braaaa....

I see you're still going into hysterics over me calling you out on
your "I'm all over the internet" lie.

When are you going figure out how pointless it is to call someone who
posts a video of himself wearing a straightjacket, a net-kook.
Or think for a second that someone who posts such a video is afraid of
getting laughed at?

Fear is your driving force not mine. That's what gets you so worked
up. You're full of fear over what people you don't even know think
about you, and I obviously could care less.

So you hide behind your keyboard seeking to validate yourself. Because
you're all alone. No wife. No kids. No friends. No money. All you have
going for you is a low paying sucky job and the internet.

A*

[Ace♠]

On May 15, 9:36 pm, Split the Eights <argus...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> By the way, would you consider Don Strevel your "Geppetto"?

You do desperate to maintain that "dance puppet dance" nonsense. So in
need of feeling like there's some sort of "control" going on.

Even Don Strevel has an identity, which makes you lower than him. You
are lower than Mikey. You are lower than Payton.

A*

[Split the Eights]

So is that a "yes" ?

[Ace♠]

Urban Dictionary.

1. Geppetto:

A funny spin on the word pedophile. This is based upon the story of
Pinnochio where Geppetto makes a little wooden boy and dances with
him. Plus it's also fun to say "Geppettophile"
"Dude, stop trying to get with little boys you Geppetto."


2. Geppetto:

The sexual act of fisting a woman's ass and working her hole like a
puppetmaster. When performed by a woman onto a male it is known as a
Madame. (She was a puppett in the 70's. Google it.)
"Dude, your mom's so freaky she wanted me to geppetto her ass without
lube!"

[Ace♠]

On May 15, 10:33 pm, Split the Eights <argus...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> So is that a "yes" ?

No. Your question makes no sense to anyone but you. It's a non-
sequitur. Just as you are a non-person.

But keep on trying to accomplish... whatever.


A*

[]v[etaphoid]

And yet you are the one who hid at the other end of the bar when big
Mikey turned up for your scheduled meet, and dared not speak your name...

Ace "No Fear" Coward of the County

[]v[etaphoid]

On 16/05/12 10:19, Ace wrote:
> On May 15, 1:45 am, "]v[etaphoid"<m...@phoid.con> wrote:
>
>>
>>> Dr. Brian Gene Kelley, PhD. You know that slugger, you just can't
>>> except it.
>>
>>> A*
>>
>> *Except* you're not.
>
> My being Brian Gene Kelley, PhD is a fact that was established a long
> time ago, newbie.
> That's why ST8 didn't refute it. He might pretend to after this, but
> it's too late for that.
>
>> You're a ruse, a lying braggard and a coward
>
> Nope, that's you, no name, no photos - just a lonely punk behind a
> library computer.

'Cos real winners post photos to Usenet to win battles and bonus kookpoints!

Anyway, since you've been begging since my European cruise last October,
here's a little bone I'll throw you, so that I can feel like a winner
like you. Don't get too excited - it's just the view out of the window
of our Hotel Room opposite the Pantheon in Rome. Enjoy;
http://postimage.org/image/5px1vhk0j

>> - and
>> it kills you that everyone knows it and treats you like the social lepar
>
> You're projecting again. Show some pictures of yourself with friends
> like I have over the years. You can't do that can you? Just like ST8.

Friends? Is that how you describe the 15min suaree video where you are
never once seen talking to any of the other attendees, and cowar meekly
when the cameraman dares say hello?

Think you'll most normal people dont't consider Usenet posters as their
circle of friends, and they certainly don't post details about the
latter to the netkooks in the former....

>> and bona fide netkook you are...
>
> Himm... that just might be why I posted a video of myself in a
> straight jacket LOL

No - that's because you're a lonely social leapr with self esteem issues
that would make a 15 year old girl blush. And besides, aren't you the
winner who posted (6 threads ago) that you wouldn't be responding to me
any more?

[Ace]

On May 16, 3:11 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:

>
> And yet you are the one who hid at the other end of the bar when big
> Mikey turned up for your scheduled meet

Nope. I went to the end of the bar because that's were everyone was.
You see, they huddled back there because Mikey had gone on a bit of a
tirade, which I completely missed. Skip, an ex cop was counseling him,
and I didn't want to interrupt like a blundering Aussie.

How many more times are you going to chase your tail over this?
There's way too many archived photographed and filmed occasions were
I've shown up to meet people from this newsgroup. You're just going to
have to accept that fact. Or rely on continuing to make stuff up to
feel better.

> and dared not speak your name...

Yeah, whatever. He was too busy with Skip at the time to notice my
arrival. You're such a clueless uninformed newbie feeling your way
around like a blind man.

> Ace "No Fear" Coward of the County

Poor Metetard, making stuff up is your only alternative. Oh wait,
lemme guess, this is more of your "dance puppet dance", "my little lap
dog" routine. You are so pathetic. You are so in need of validation.

"Tough guy" "No fear" and "coward" are erroneous terms when it comes
to simply meeting someone. I mean you must really be a very messed up
individual to have simply saying howdy to someone to being put into
such words.

Is this June 4th meeting a big event for you Metetard? Me coming over
to you at a piano bar simply to say "hi"? Is it something that's
supposed to involve things such as toughness, bravery, fearlessness,
fear, hiding and cowardliness etc? I mean, really?! Over something so
incredibly mundane? LOL

It's hilarious to see you come up with all this protracted maudlin
nonsense over absolutely nothing.

Still waiting to see those vacation photos of you in Rome and Paris
etc.

Mainly still waiting to see some pictures of you on your last Las
Vegas vacation.

You don't exist. You're just a keyboard persona operated by a grungy
bumpkin who's never been 50 miles away from his Outback village.

A*

[Ace]

On May 16, 3:51 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:

>
> 'Cos real winners post photos to Usenet to win battles and bonus kookpoints!

Nope. People post them because they were actually there. It's liars
who make a big deal out of the idea and start spinning. "Winners",
"battles" "points". Again, completely out of place terms over what is
routine everyday mundane stuff. Only you would make such a huge
production over something as mundane over posting a few vacation
pictures.

> Anyway, since you've been begging since my European cruise last October,
> here's a little bone I'll throw you, so that I can feel like a winner
> like you. Don't get too excited - it's just the view out of the window
> of our Hotel Room opposite the Pantheon in Rome. Enjoy;http://postimage.org/image/5px1vhk0j

Yeah, it must be next to imposable to find a picture like that on the
internet to steal. And again, "begging" "winner" "excited" are such
out of place terms for something so commonplace.

But gee, why not a picture of you in Rome? Well?
Keep spinning Metetard and convincing yourself that you're getting
somewhere.

Oh BTW, here's a picture of me standing on the Moon. Don't get too
excited now.
http://www.geosociety.org/graphics/media/08-52_LunarSurface.jpg

> >> - and
> >> it kills you that everyone knows it and treats you like the social lepar
>
> > You're projecting again. Show some pictures of yourself with friends
> > like I have over the years. You can't do that can you? Just like ST8.
>
> Friends? Is that how you describe the 15min suaree video where you are
> never once seen talking to any of the other attendees, and cowar meekly
> when the cameraman dares say hello?

It's how I describe the dozens of photos of myself with my family and
real life friends I've posted to avlv since 2002. You even stole some
of them and posted them on Inkfrog. Talk about a netkook LOL

> Think you'll most normal people dont't consider Usenet posters as their
> circle of friends, and they certainly don't post details about the
> latter to the netkooks in the former....

You are still working in the dark and going in circles. Once again, my
name, my wife and kids, my credentials, my real life friends, the
events I attend (outside of the avlv video you're stuck on) and
organizations I belong to, have all been chronicled, archived and
verified. It's all been very well established going back ten years.
You just missed the boat. And now you're making a fool of yourself due
to your lack of knowledge, like a bumpkin who's just crawled out from
under a rock.

> >> and bona fide netkook you are...
>
> > Himm... that just might be why I posted a video of myself in a
> > straight jacket LOL
>
> No - that's because you're a lonely social leapr with self esteem issues
> that would make a 15 year old girl blush.

You keep saying that over and over again, but again, that is simply
you projecting. And spinning.

> And besides, aren't you the
> winner who posted (6 threads ago) that you wouldn't be responding to me
> any more?

No, I said I wasn't going to bother reading any dead posts on the side
bar that had be reactivated. You have a habit of posting to something
I wrote months ago. You are so stupid, it's truly pitiful.

As usual you have nothing to offer except for wrong guesses and stuff
you've invented.

You have no name. You have no vacation pics. You have no correct
information. You go on incorrect assumptions. You are just a dull
witted clueless nobody. I know this because you associate anything
outside of that as being a "winner".

Keep burying yourself.

A*

[]v[etaphoid]

Sorry? Did I read the words "protracted maudlin nonsense" in the midst
of that 5kb response to my little two line post?

Simmer down, Ace. Trollin' is supposed to be fun...

[]v[etaphoid]

On 16/05/12 21:37, Ace wrote:
> On May 16, 3:51 am, "]v[etaphoid"<m...@phoid.con> wrote:
>
>>
>> 'Cos real winners post photos to Usenet to win battles and bonus kookpoints!
>
> Nope. People post them because they were actually there. It's liars
> who make a big deal out of the idea and start spinning. "Winners",
> "battles" "points". Again, completely out of place terms over what is
> routine everyday mundane stuff. Only you would make such a huge
> production over something as mundane over posting a few vacation
> pictures.
>
>> Anyway, since you've been begging since my European cruise last October,
>> here's a little bone I'll throw you, so that I can feel like a winner
>> like you. Don't get too excited - it's just the view out of the window
>> of our Hotel Room opposite the Pantheon in Rome. Enjoy;http://postimage.org/image/5px1vhk0j
>
> Yeah, it must be next to imposable to find a picture like that on the
> internet to steal. And again, "begging" "winner" "excited" are such
> out of place terms for something so commonplace.
>
> But gee, why not a picture of you in Rome? Well?
> Keep spinning Metetard and convincing yourself that you're getting
> somewhere.

You need only ask Ace. Here's a video taken a few hours after the
previous photo - and from the exact same location, just in case any
uber-kooks tried to turn my simple holiday snaps into
my-dads-bigger-than-your-dad contest...

http://tinypic.com/r/9a5nyd/6

Now will you please cease with the world-envy? In return, I'll spare
your fifteen year old blushes and snip the rest of your wimpy warbling
about lack of holiday pics...

[Ace]

You see, there are certain individuals on the internet who have a
strong predilection towards schadenfreude, and I exploit that tendency
to see what it will yield. :-)

[Ace]

On May 16, 4:59 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:

>
> Sorry? Did I read the words "protracted maudlin nonsense" in the midst
> of that 5kb response to my little two line post?

Metetard, you are the pot calling the kettle black, because that's all
you can think to come up with at this point, because I've easily
obliterated all your clueless assumptions and empty spinning.

> Simmer down, Ace. Trollin' is supposed to be fun...

Yeah, you've written that many times now. You don't have very much to
work with in your "dance puppet dance", "my little lapdog" routine do
you? And I'm sure most of those often repeated "gems" are ones you've
stolen from others. You've obviously been at this sort of thing for a
long time and you're still very inept at it.

So, where's that picture of you in Rome?

Where's that picture of you in Las Vegas?

You do understand the concept of you in the photo don't you? Where are
you in this one?
http://postimage.org/image/5px1vhk0j

You are such a hopeless clueless bumpkin.

Please, try to come up with something new instead of continuing to go
in circles. Thanx.

[]v[etaphoid]

Indeed. The personification of which are the serial abusers of the
empirical one response, per thread, per netkook golden rule...

[]v[etaphoid]

http://tinypic.com/r/9a5nyd/6

Apology accepted.

[Ace]

On May 16, 5:14 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:

>
> You need only ask Ace.

No, I shouldn't have had to have asked. And it shouldn't have taken
you forever to come up with something anyone else would've posted from
the get go. Or was this supposed to be a big deal one again.

> Here's a video taken a few hours after the
> previous photo - and from the exact same location

That just means it might be more stuff from the same person. There's
absolutely zero indication that person is you.

> just in case any
> uber-kooks tried to turn my simple holiday snaps into
> my-dads-bigger-than-your-dad contest...

More melodramatic nonsense over the extremely mundane. A ticket to
Rome and a cheap hotel room are very extremely mundane. Only someone
who's extremely poverty stricken would keep using terms like "winner"
"my-dads-bigger-than-your-dad contest" etc to describe it.

My only point has been that I have a fully established identity that
defies the nonsense you cluelessly keep trying to make up about me.
Anyone who's been around avalv the last few years knows it to be utter
nonsense.

> http://tinypic.com/r/9a5nyd/6
>
> Now will you please cease with the world-envy?

All I see is a double chinned man who's too embarrassed over his looks
to show his face, in a single occupancy small room. No sign of a
supposed wife's belongings or luggage. No way of knowing that person
is you. Not on any kind of blog that belongs to you. You still have no
established name or identity whatsoever.

> In return, I'll spare
> your fifteen year old blushes and snip the rest of your wimpy warbling
> about lack of holiday pics...

You just keep going in circles and going nowhere. If any of this was
legitimate, it would be on a blog that had been established a long
time ago. And of course you'll keep coming up with excuses for not
having one. And go on about uber-kooks while you swipe my personal
pictures off my well established blog and post them on your Inkfrog
account.

Keep spinning in circles and going nowhere.

[Ace]

There are no rules. There is no "winning".

[Ace]

You need to apologize for continually insulting everyone's
intelligence. You sill haven't gotten anywhere away from fail mode.

[]v[etaphoid]

On 16/05/12 22:40, Ace wrote:
> On May 16, 5:14 am, "]v[etaphoid"<m...@phoid.con> wrote:
>
>>
>> You need only ask Ace.
>
> No, I shouldn't have had to have asked. And it shouldn't have taken
> you forever to come up with something anyone else would've posted from
> the get go. Or was this supposed to be a big deal one again.

Retraction accepted.

>> Here's a video taken a few hours after the
>> previous photo - and from the exact same location
>
> That just means it might be more stuff from the same person. There's
> absolutely zero indication that person is you.

Sure. Plenty of people refer to themselves as Meta and their showering
wife as Mrs Phoid. Whilst shooting a video from the 4th floor opposite
the Pantheon. It could be practically anyone!

What challenge next, Ace - would you like me to send you my passport,
muscles?

>> just in case any
>> uber-kooks tried to turn my simple holiday snaps into
>> my-dads-bigger-than-your-dad contest...
>
> More melodramatic nonsense over the extremely mundane. A ticket to
> Rome and a cheap hotel room are very extremely mundane. Only someone
> who's extremely poverty stricken would keep using terms like "winner"
> "my-dads-bigger-than-your-dad contest" etc to describe it.

I'm not the one who's been claiming "empirical evidence" of
international travel as a badge of honour for the last six months.

> My only point has been that I have a fully established identity that
> defies the nonsense you cluelessly keep trying to make up about me.
> Anyone who's been around avalv the last few years knows it to be utter
> nonsense.

Yes Ace. But no one cares about your imagined identity. That's the part
that really smarts...

>> http://tinypic.com/r/9a5nyd/6
>>
>> Now will you please cease with the world-envy?
>
> All I see is a double chinned man who's too embarrassed over his looks
> to show his face, in a single occupancy small room. No sign of a
> supposed wife's belongings or luggage. No way of knowing that person
> is you. Not on any kind of blog that belongs to you. You still have no
> established name or identity whatsoever.

As countless others have pointed out (including ST8 in the last two
days), netkooks don't benefit from posting photos of themselves on
usenet - we leave that up to the kooks!

But you are right about the small room (and the double chin in that
video - it looked shocking and I'm sorry it disappointed you - I promise
you'll be very pleased by my handsome visage in the flesh on June 4).
European rooms are invariably small, as seasoned travellers know -
particularly in the older countries and capital cities where many hotels
are converted mansions and residential buildings, since no-one was
building Hilton Hotels in the 16th century. In the case of the Abruzzi
Hotel with a balcony view of the Pantheon at Rome, we were definitely
paying for location, location, location. That said, it was far from a
cheap stay (although we did book it very late), and king-beds don't
exactly constitute single occupancy in Europe...

Hope these tips help on your next European trip.

>> In return, I'll spare
>> your fifteen year old blushes and snip the rest of your wimpy warbling
>> about lack of holiday pics...
>
> You just keep going in circles and going nowhere. If any of this was
> legitimate, it would be on a blog that had been established a long
> time ago. And of course you'll keep coming up with excuses for not
> having one. And go on about uber-kooks while you swipe my personal
> pictures off my well established blog and post them on your Inkfrog
> account.

LOL! Stop digging, buddy. Ot at least start digging up!

[]v[etaphoid]

Only if they're as stoopid as you. Ace - the man self-described and
-designed to be Usenet's resident fucknugget...

[]v[etaphoid]

Uh-oh. I think I've broken Acey again...

--
> Ace is a cowardly fuckwit
> Ace is a cowardly fucknozzle
> Ace is a cowardly fucktard
> Ace isn't a real person

[Ace♠]

On May 16, 5:59 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:
> On 16/05/12 22:40, Ace wrote:


> > That just means it might be more stuff from the same person. There's
> > absolutely zero indication that person is you.
>
> Sure. Plenty of people refer to themselves as Meta

It was mumbled so badly. The videographer is speaking in such hurried
hushed tones as if he's doing something he shouldn't or is where he
shouldn't be. It's a very peculiar video. very atypical of the zillion
of other vacation videos I've seen posted here going back ten years.

> and their showering
> wife as Mrs Phoid.

Based on the clothing around the room and the amount and type of
luggage, the room is clearly occupied by a single male; who was
probably in the shower, when the videographer apparently sneaked in to
do a quick video, hence his strange behavior.

> Whilst shooting a video from the 4th floor opposite
> the Pantheon. It could be practically anyone!
>
> What challenge next, Ace - would you like me to send you my passport,
> muscles?

I'd like to see you post normal vacation pictures and video like
normal people produce. Like this:
http://fosterswebsite.com/photos/1%20Rome%202004%20%2846%29.JPG

That incredibly simple request apparently is way too much to ask from
you.

> I'm not the one who's been claiming "empirical evidence" of
> international travel as a badge of honour for the last six months.

Of course not, because you can't seem to provide any. The "I don't
want to show off" defense is ludicrous coming from someone like you.
How on earth can you associate a run-of-the-mill visit to Rome as a
"badge of honor" etc?. You continually use over dramatic nomenclature
regarding commonplace things. It's like describing the flame on a
matchstick as being a "blazing inferno".

>
> Yes Ace. But no one cares about your imagined identity. That's the part
> that really smarts...

My verified identity and the verified facts about me are only relevant
in that these facts contradict the stuff you make up about me due to a
lack on knowledge of the established facts.
You operate in a very narrow two dimensional circular manner. You keep
repeating the same failed tactics hoping for a better outcome each
time.

> As countless others have pointed out (including ST8 in the last two
> days), netkooks don't benefit from posting photos of themselves on
> usenet - we leave that up to the kooks!

That just another cop-out. It's one cop-out after another. People have
been posting pictures of themselves for over a decade here.
http://www.urbanphotos.net/avlv.html

There is no acceptable excuse or cop-out for you not posting a simple
obviously genuine photo of yourself and Mrs. Phoid standing in front
of a Roman landmark or a Las Vegas landmark. But for some reason you
get all squirrely about it. And of course I find such behavior odd and
questionable.

> But you are right about the small room

> blah, blah, blah

What's relevant, is that it was obviously a single occupant room, with
a single male occupant's clothing, items and luggage laid about. And
for some reason the person who made the video was acting like he
didn't belong in there, like he was trying to hurry up before the
bloke in the shower came out. Very peculiar. Very atypical of all
other vacation videos I've seen posted here in the last ten years.

> LOL! Stop digging, buddy. Ot at least start digging up!

The point is, which you keep trying to dance around is, that I
shouldn't have to dig; it should simply be there in plain view. If you
were a forthright and honest individual, it would simply be right
there. But of course you're simply a troll doing the "dance puppet
dance", "my little lapdog" thing over and over.

A*

[]v[etaphoid]

On 17/05/12 15:24, Ace♠ wrote:
> On May 16, 5:59 am, "]v[etaphoid"<m...@phoid.con> wrote:
>> On 16/05/12 22:40, Ace wrote:
>
>
>>> That just means it might be more stuff from the same person. There's
>>> absolutely zero indication that person is you.
>>
>> Sure. Plenty of people refer to themselves as Meta
>
> It was mumbled so badly. The videographer is speaking in such hurried
> hushed tones as if he's doing something he shouldn't or is where he
> shouldn't be. It's a very peculiar video. very atypical of the zillion
> of other vacation videos I've seen posted here going back ten years.

Atypical to a tea. I'm not an insecure online creation trying to
convince Usenet that I'm a PhD. I don't film myself playing with swords,
turtles and womens underwear and post it to youtube. And I certainly
don't pontificate around Rome making it obvious to all and sundry
(including my wife in the next room) that I'm filming some "empirical
evidence" just to expose a fraud in avlv...

>> and their showering
>> wife as Mrs Phoid.
>
> Based on the clothing around the room and the amount and type of
> luggage, the room is clearly occupied by a single male; who was
> probably in the shower, when the videographer apparently sneaked in to
> do a quick video, hence his strange behavior.

How many times have you watched it, kook?

Notwitstanding your devotion, the newly purchase leather jacket on the
bed looks pretty feminine - as did the large red suitcase on the bed
(not to be confused with the large black suitcase by the bathroom door,
presumably used by a 2nd occupant). If it's big hotel rooms which
imprtess you, why don't you ask me to post a photo of the Artemida hotel
where we spent our 2nd week in Rome. It would have a kooky bastard like
you rolling in jelly and faeces pulling his dick in all directions...

>> Whilst shooting a video from the 4th floor opposite
>> the Pantheon. It could be practically anyone!
>>
>> What challenge next, Ace - would you like me to send you my passport,
>> muscles?
>
> I'd like to see you post normal vacation pictures and video like
> normal people produce. Like this:
> http://fosterswebsite.com/photos/1%20Rome%202004%20%2846%29.JPG
>
> That incredibly simple request apparently is way too much to ask from
> you.

Perish the thought. If you really were that desparate for a photo of me
in Vatican square, you need only to have asked. The one below was the
nearest I could find to the same angle above. I've got a great shot of
myself in front of the ceiling of the Sistene Chapel - would you like to
see it next?

http://postimage.org/image/gkrtjasvb/

>> I'm not the one who's been claiming "empirical evidence" of
>> international travel as a badge of honour for the last six months.
>
> Of course not, because you can't seem to provide any. The "I don't
> want to show off" defense is ludicrous coming from someone like you.
> How on earth can you associate a run-of-the-mill visit to Rome as a
> "badge of honor" etc?. You continually use over dramatic nomenclature
> regarding commonplace things. It's like describing the flame on a
> matchstick as being a "blazing inferno".

Ever been to Rome or the Vatican City, Ace? I know it's no big deal, so
I'm sure a worldly fella like you have been there. No need for photos or
empirical evidence - I was just curious to know if you liked it, and
what you favourite part was.

>> Yes Ace. But no one cares about your imagined identity. That's the part
>> that really smarts...
>
> My verified identity and the verified facts about me are only relevant
> in that these facts contradict the stuff you make up about me due to a
> lack on knowledge of the established facts.

And yet still, no-one believes you or cares...

> You operate in a very narrow two dimensional circular manner. You keep
> repeating the same failed tactics hoping for a better outcome each
> time.

To the contrary, if the intended outcome was to make you sound like a
whining little schoolgirl, I'd say my tactics have been very successful.

>> As countless others have pointed out (including ST8 in the last two
>> days), netkooks don't benefit from posting photos of themselves on
>> usenet - we leave that up to the kooks!
>
> That just another cop-out. It's one cop-out after another. People have
> been posting pictures of themselves for over a decade here.
> http://www.urbanphotos.net/avlv.html
>
> There is no acceptable excuse or cop-out for you not posting a simple
> obviously genuine photo of yourself and Mrs. Phoid standing in front
> of a Roman landmark or a Las Vegas landmark. But for some reason you
> get all squirrely about it. And of course I find such behavior odd and
> questionable.

Name the landmark. So far I've fed your netkooky obsession with photos
and video of the Pantheon and Vatican City - what else do you need to
silence the lambs, Clarice?

>> But you are right about the small room
>> blah, blah, blah
>
> What's relevant, is that it was obviously a single occupant room, with
> a single male occupant's clothing, items and luggage laid about. And
> for some reason the person who made the video was acting like he
> didn't belong in there, like he was trying to hurry up before the
> bloke in the shower came out. Very peculiar. Very atypical of all
> other vacation videos I've seen posted here in the last ten years.

Atypical from all you netkooks - got it in one! I freely admit to having
no desire for my showering wife to hear me filming a video just to
silence the netkook who started multiple threads before I went on
holidays because he felt threatened by my upcoming absense. Unlike your
youtube jems, it was not my finest hour, Ace*hole...

>> LOL! Stop digging, buddy. Ot at least start digging up!
>
> The point is, which you keep trying to dance around is, that I
> shouldn't have to dig; it should simply be there in plain view. If you
> were a forthright and honest individual, it would simply be right
> there. But of course you're simply a troll doing the "dance puppet
> dance", "my little lapdog" thing over and over.
>
> A*

Admit it Ace - you love me. You need me and you crave the same online
evidence of my existence as you think substantiates your own. Problem
is, the rest of us just aren't built the same as a kooky kook from
kooksville like you. I have no desire to plaster my private life over
usenet for any purpose other than to make you look like the blundering
twat you clearly are. It's by no means original - but I do enjoy your
whimpering and I'm happy to help facilitate it any way I can...

So there - I clearly do have a bigger dick than you. You just need to
learn to let it go...

[Ace*]

On May 17, 4:25 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:
> On 17/05/12 15:24, Ace♠ wrote:

12kb response? Brother, you've just got to let this go...

> Atypical to a tea.

That's" to a tee". Or improperly "to a T". No one was talking about
tea time.

> I'm not an insecure online creation trying to
> convince Usenet

That's precisely what you are. But unfortunately you're too
pathological to see it.
Anyways, how's about I snip all of your superfluous long winded
convoluted blather and cut to the chase and save miles of bandwidth?

<snip pointless blather>

>
> How many times have you watched it, kook?

Once of course. Everyone knows that I have an eidetic memory.

> repetitive blah, blah, blah tap dance..

<snip>



> http://postimage.org/image/gkrtjasvb/

As usual, it's atypical of a normal vacation pose. Off center and
obscure.

> Ever been to Rome or the Vatican City, Ace?

What does that have to do with Las Vegas? This is alt.vaction.las-
vegas. Where is a picture of you in Vegas?
Did you actually expect me to get distracted by this absurd Rome
breadcrumb trail? LOL

> Name the landmark.

Why? Can't you decide on which one to steal from someone, the way you
stole and posted some of my family pictures to your Inkfrog account?
Mighty stupid move there, fingering yourself as a jpeg thief for me
LOL.

> So far I've fed your netkooky obsession with photos

No, that would you stealing my family photos and pasting them onto
your Inkfrog account.

> and video of the Pantheon and Vatican City - what else do you need to
> silence the lambs, Clarice?

Well, as I've had to repeatedly point out... this is alt.vacation.las-
vegas...
You have a smaller attention span than a gnat.

> Atypical from all you netkooks -

Metetard, true netkookery is you lifting my family pictures and
posting them to your inkfrog account.


A*

[]v[etaphoid]

On 17/05/12 22:34, Ace* wrote:
> On May 17, 4:25 am, "]v[etaphoid"<m...@phoid.con> wrote:
>> On 17/05/12 15:24, Ace♠ wrote:
>
> 12kb response? Brother, you've just got to let this go...
>
>> Atypical to a tea.
>
> That's" to a tee". Or improperly "to a T". No one was talking about
> tea time.
>
>> I'm not an insecure online creation trying to
>> convince Usenet
>
> That's precisely what you are. But unfortunately you're too
> pathological to see it.
> Anyways, how's about I snip all of your superfluous long winded
> convoluted blather and cut to the chase and save miles of bandwidth?
>
> <snip pointless blather>
>
>>
>> How many times have you watched it, kook?
>
> Once of course. Everyone knows that I have an eidetic memory.
>
>> repetitive blah, blah, blah tap dance..
>
> <snip>
>
>
>
>> http://postimage.org/image/gkrtjasvb/
>
> As usual, it's atypical of a normal vacation pose. Off center and
> obscure.

But near identical to your example shot. Accept it fella, I've been
everywhere man...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeadSspZDzM

>> Ever been to Rome or the Vatican City, Ace?
>
> What does that have to do with Las Vegas? This is alt.vaction.las-
> vegas. Where is a picture of you in Vegas?
> Did you actually expect me to get distracted by this absurd Rome
> breadcrumb trail? LOL
>
>> Name the landmark.
>
> Why?

Because I've seen e'm all and have the photos to prove it!

> Can't you decide on which one to steal from someone, the way you
> stole and posted some of my family pictures to your Inkfrog account?
> Mighty stupid move there, fingering yourself as a jpeg thief for me
> LOL.

Should be pretty easy for you to do a reverse lookup and show me any
other copy of the photos I have posted online.

>> So far I've fed your netkooky obsession with photos
>
> No, that would you stealing my family photos and pasting them onto
> your Inkfrog account.

Bollocks.

>> and video of the Pantheon and Vatican City - what else do you need to
>> silence the lambs, Clarice?
>
> Well, as I've had to repeatedly point out... this is alt.vacation.las-
> vegas...
> You have a smaller attention span than a gnat.

You silly cuntnugget asked for something comparative to your post at the
Vatican! I couldn't have got much closer...

>> Atypical from all you netkooks -
>
> Metetard, true netkookery is you lifting my family pictures and
> posting them to your inkfrog account.

Please post the link to this inkfrog business that has disturbed you so
much. I'll happily post a retraction once you man up and show proof of
whatever it is that is keeping you away at night.

--
]v[etaphoid - he's been everywhere man...

[]v[etaphoid]

On 14/05/12 18:59, Ace wrote:
> On May 13, 9:31 am, Split the Eights<argus...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> You are too fucking easy!
>
> So you admit that you're just a troll. Good for you.

He tore you a new one, Ace*hole.

But don't worry, fella - I'll still be here for you - posting videos to
tie you over until we get to meet in the flesh.

So very much flesh...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqJyXo9hqhE

--
]v[etaphoid "He's been everywhere man"

[]v[etaphoid]

I just thought of one more restriction for our meeting next month...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqJyXo9hqhE

[]v[etaphoid]

On 12/05/12 20:52, Ace wrote:
> On May 10, 5:26 am, lvroger...@aol.com wrote:
>> On Wednesday, May 9, 2012 10:27:51 PM UTC-5, TeddysDad wrote:
>>> On May 8, 1:07 pm, lvroger...@aol.com wrote:
>>>> I think the Observant Lurker has left us, permanently, and not of his own volition.
>>
>>>> Roger
>>
>>> Roger, please come clean: What did you do to him? Any links to
>>> anything? Any autopsy pics?
>>
>> TeddyDad---
>>
>> As far as I know, he is alive and kicking. Just not allowed to post on AVLV anymore. The Secret Service doesn't smile on threats on the president's life.
>
> :-)

Don't worry Ace - they've got a much more liberal policy towards
obsessed sub-normal netkooks...

Counting the days till our meeting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqJyXo9hqhE

[Ace*]

On May 17, 7:39 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:

>
> I just thought of one more restriction for our meeting next month...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqJyXo9hqhE

Metetard, I'll never click on the YouTube clips you paste. Unless that
is, it's a full face video of yourself telling
usenet the current date of the video and your actual full name and
describe the highlights of your last supposed Las Vegas vacation.

I will know by your facial movements and eye movements whether or not
you are being truthful ... which of course you are not ... so of
course there will be no video ... Well, that and the fact that your
public library's computer doesn't have a webcam.

A*

[Ace*]

On May 17, 5:55 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:

>
> > As usual, it's atypical of a normal vacation pose. Off center and
> > obscure.
>
> But near identical to your example shot. Accept it fella, I've been
> everywhere man...

No. The sample shot was a normal one where the subjects are in the
center of a centered photograph posing for the photo. What you stole
was an off center random shot of someone walking by.

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeadSspZDzM

Metetard, I'll never click on the YouTube clips you paste. Unless that
is, it's a full face video of yourself telling usenet the current date
of the video and your actual full name and describe the highlights of
your last supposed Las Vegas vacation.

> >> Ever been to Rome or the Vatican City, Ace?
>
> > What does that have to do with Las Vegas? This is alt.vaction.las-
> > vegas. Where is a picture of you in Vegas?
> > Did you actually expect me to get distracted by this absurd Rome
> > breadcrumb trail? LOL
>
> >> Name the landmark.
>
> > Why?
>
> Because I've seen e'm all and have the photos to prove it!
>
> > Can't you decide on which one to steal from someone, the way you
> > stole and posted some of my family pictures to your Inkfrog account?
> > Mighty stupid move there, fingering yourself as a jpeg thief for me
> > LOL.
>
> Should be pretty easy for you to do a reverse lookup and show me any
> other copy of the photos I have posted online.

That only works for legitimately obtained photographs, not ones that
have been stolen by you, a proven jpeg thief, who stole my photos and
posted them your Inkfrog account.

> >> So far I've fed your netkooky obsession with photos
>
> > No, that would you stealing my family photos and pasting them onto
> > your Inkfrog account.
>
> Bollocks.

Fact. One that you will never be able to escape from. That one blunder
that you'll never be able to erase, proving to me that you are a jpeg
thief.

>
> You silly cuntnugget asked for something comparative to your post at the
> Vatican!

No, I've only been interested in Las Vegas vacation photos, as this is
a Las Vegas vacation forum... which you can't seem to adhere to.

> I couldn't have got much closer...

Are looking for a pat on the back for stealing a jpeg you fancied? You
established jpeg thief.

>
> Please post the link to this inkfrog business

Metetard, there's no one here but us. You know full well that you
stole my photos and posted them to your inkfrog account, and that you
admitted to doing so and called me a "net-cop" when I reported you to
Inkfrog which resulted in that account being closed.

> that has disturbed you so
> much.

Quite the contrary, I enjoy the fact that you condemned yourself as a
jpeg thief by doing so. Stupid, stupid move, Metetard LOL

[Ace*]

On May 17, 7:38 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:

> But don't worry, fella - I'll still be here for you

Yes, for me to keep tearing you a new one.

A*

[Ace*]

Only a purely paranoid coward posts a video of himself that only shows
his double chin in the shot. Metetard has provided empirical,
airtight, irrefutable proof that he is a coward who hides. Way to go,
'Tard! ROTFLMAO.

A*

[observant lurker]

On Tuesday, May 8, 2012 1:07:00 PM UTC-7, lvrog...@aol.com wrote:
> I think the Observant Lurker has left us, permanently, and not of his own volition.
>
> Roger

You friggin idiot. I'm still here and no secret service has talked tome. Your full of shit as usual, but what else should I expect from a stupid clown like you?

Just got back from a few days fishing at catalina island. If only the people running the boat could speak english, it would have been a better vacation.
btw...I never threatened anyone especially the black communist in the white house.
I just said, that he should be charged with treason and if found guilty, then his ass should be put in front of a firing squad.
Just punishment for the way he has trashed this country.
have a nice day asshole.

[lvrog...@aol.com]

You're such a liar. I talked to the Secret Service myself and they reported back to me that they had visited you and that they did not feel "AT THIS TIME" that you were a threat to the President, though they shall put you on a watch list. Maybe they misspoke and meant that they visited your posts, but THEY ARE WATCHING YOU. And I don't think your little brain is capable of staying out of trouble.

Roger

[]v[etaphoid]

According to the IP logs, you already did click on it. I really don't
know why you'd bother to lie about such a trivial thing. We've already
established that I've been everywhere, man...

Besides, why on earth would you continually demand all kinds of videos
from me for your self-pleasure, if you aren't going to watch them?

That makes less sense than the results of your last psych profile...

[]v[etaphoid]

On 18/05/12 09:33, Ace* wrote:
> On May 17, 5:55 am, "]v[etaphoid"<m...@phoid.con> wrote:
>
>>
>>> As usual, it's atypical of a normal vacation pose. Off center and
>>> obscure.
>>
>> But near identical to your example shot. Accept it fella, I've been
>> everywhere man...
>
> No. The sample shot was a normal one where the subjects are in the
> center of a centered photograph posing for the photo. What you stole
> was an off center random shot of someone walking by.

Even a kook like you must admit that the random stranger looked a lot
like the dude at the Pantheon!

>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeadSspZDzM
>
> Metetard, I'll never click on the YouTube clips you paste. Unless that
> is, it's a full face video of yourself telling usenet the current date
> of the video and your actual full name and describe the highlights of
> your last supposed Las Vegas vacation.

That's exactly what the link is. As you'd know, because you *did* click
on it.

>>>> Ever been to Rome or the Vatican City, Ace?
>>
>>> What does that have to do with Las Vegas? This is alt.vaction.las-
>>> vegas. Where is a picture of you in Vegas?
>>> Did you actually expect me to get distracted by this absurd Rome
>>> breadcrumb trail? LOL
>>
>>>> Name the landmark.
>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> Because I've seen e'm all and have the photos to prove it!

I miss our chats, Ace...

>>> Can't you decide on which one to steal from someone, the way you
>>> stole and posted some of my family pictures to your Inkfrog account?
>>> Mighty stupid move there, fingering yourself as a jpeg thief for me
>>> LOL.
>>
>> Should be pretty easy for you to do a reverse lookup and show me any
>> other copy of the photos I have posted online.
>
> That only works for legitimately obtained photographs, not ones that
> have been stolen by you, a proven jpeg thief, who stole my photos and
> posted them your Inkfrog account.

Nope it works for anything. Just paste my photo to dozens of different
free reverse lookup sites, and it should be able to tell you where I
stole it from.

Still doesn't explain the mystery of whp that handsome devil is who
keeps cropping up in all those exotic locations...

>>>> So far I've fed your netkooky obsession with photos
>>
>>> No, that would you stealing my family photos and pasting them onto
>>> your Inkfrog account.
>>
>> Bollocks.
>
> Fact. One that you will never be able to escape from. That one blunder
> that you'll never be able to erase, proving to me that you are a jpeg
> thief.

Still no proof of your delusions? I've got a stinkfinger account, but
never had an inkfrog - contrary to your apparent night terrors...

>> You silly cuntnugget asked for something comparative to your post at the
>> Vatican!
>
> No, I've only been interested in Las Vegas vacation photos, as this is
> a Las Vegas vacation forum... which you can't seem to adhere to.

And yet you didn't even comment on my Rehab photo. Sometimes I just
can't understand you, Ace*hole...

>> I couldn't have got much closer...
>
> Are looking for a pat on the back for stealing a jpeg you fancied? You
> established jpeg thief.
>
>>
>> Please post the link to this inkfrog business
>
> Metetard, there's no one here but us. You know full well that you
> stole my photos and posted them to your inkfrog account, and that you
> admitted to doing so and called me a "net-cop" when I reported you to
> Inkfrog which resulted in that account being closed.

Can you refresh my memory via a link to this post? I will happily post
an apology and buy you a big sorry drink as soon as you convince me that
this whole inkfrog business is not just a deluded fantasy you created to
justify why you always seem so scared...

>> that has disturbed you so
>> much.
>
> Quite the contrary, I enjoy the fact that you condemned yourself as a
> jpeg thief by doing so. Stupid, stupid move, Metetard LOL

I bet I look pretty silly in your imagination, eh friend...

[]v[etaphoid]

I am glad you finally seem to be able to accept that I went on a real
holiday to Rome last year, and that I am coming to Vegas next week.

Trust me, you look a much bigger man than the petty fellow who bleated
his way across Usenet that people who claimed to be on holidays were
just imagining things...

[]v[etaphoid]

Roger me olde China,

You're starting to sound more delusional than Ace! As you suggested you
might - why don't you come join us for our drink next week?

[Ace♠]

On May 31, 6:50 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:

>
> According to the IP logs, you already did click on it.

A ridiculous lie only a newbie like you would make up or believe.

>
> Besides, why on earth would you continually demand all kinds of videos
> from me for your self-pleasure, if you aren't going to watch them?

It's easy to tell when you're posting someone else's crap you found on
YouTube, compared to when you're posting your own (usually stolen)
crap on some obscure hosting site that doesn't detect third party i.e.
stolen material.

A*

[Ace♠]

On May 31, 7:02 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:

> Even a kook like you must admit that the random stranger looked a lot
> like the dude at the Pantheon!

Only a newbie like you would think it's supposed to be hard to find
pictures that resemble you. I was pulling that crap 20+ years ago.
You're so 1990, Megatard.

> > Megatard, I'll never click on the YouTube clips you paste.

>
> That's exactly what the link is. As you'd know, because you *did* click
> on it.

Wrong. You only post your stolen/photoshopped stuff to places like
TinyPic; never YouTube.

> I miss our chats, Ace...

Uh huh. That's why you stay hidden away for a couple of weeks at a
time to lick your wounds.

>
> Nope it works for anything. Just paste my photo to dozens of different
> free reverse lookup sites, and it should be able to tell you where I
> stole it from.

Only a newbie like you would come up with or expect anyone to believe
such ridiculous nonsense.

> Still doesn't explain the mystery of whp that handsome devil is who
> keeps cropping up in all those exotic locations...

Only a newbie like you would expect someone to become awestruck over
photoshopping.

>
> Still no proof of your delusions?

LOL you being the one always whining about being asked for proof and
always failing to produce it.

> never had an inkfrog

Not since I got you kicked off it for hosting pictures you stole from
me there.

> And yet you didn't even comment on my Rehab photo.

You mean the one that you either stole or photoshopped?

>
> Can you refresh my memory via a link to this post?

Here's the link to the account I had inkfrog eliminated:
http://imgs.inkfrog.com/pix/Metaphoid/family/photos.jpg

Lemmie guess, you're gonna blather about it being a dead link since
the account was shut down. Yawn, more newbie attempts at cleverness,
you jpeg thief.

A*

[Ace♠]

On May 31, 7:04 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:
> On 18/05/12 10:36, Ace* wrote:
>
> > Only a purely paranoid coward posts a video of himself that only shows
> > his double chin in the shot. Metetard has provided empirical,
> > airtight, irrefutable proof that he is a coward who hides.  Way to go,
> > 'Tard! ROTFLMAO.
>
> > A*
>
> I am glad you finally seem to be able to accept that I went on a real
> holiday to Rome last year

Wrong. It was clear evidence of nothing resembling a real or normal
holiday. You're obviously a flunky who does menial labor for someone
who travels with a crew, and you clearly snuck into someone's room to
to a hurried whispered video of your double chin, while he was in the
shower.

> and that I am coming to Vegas next week.

Uh huh...

> Trust me

LOL.

[]v[etaphoid]

On 01/06/12 18:09, Ace♠ wrote:
> On May 31, 7:02 am, "]v[etaphoid"<m...@phoid.con> wrote:
>
>> Even a kook like you must admit that the random stranger looked a lot
>> like the dude at the Pantheon!
>
> Only a newbie like you would think it's supposed to be hard to find
> pictures that resemble you.

Don't forget the video.

> I was pulling that crap 20+ years ago.
> You're so 1990, Megatard.

You were pulling crap 20 years ago? Preytell, what are you pulling now?

>>> Megatard, I'll never click on the YouTube clips you paste.
>>
>> That's exactly what the link is. As you'd know, because you *did* click
>> on it.
>
> Wrong. You only post your stolen/photoshopped stuff to places like
> TinyPic; never YouTube.

You clicked it.

>> I miss our chats, Ace...
>
> Uh huh. That's why you stay hidden away for a couple of weeks at a
> time to lick your wounds.

Well that, and the fact that unlike some unemployed 55 year olds - I
have a life.

You virtual wound inflicting machine, you...

>> Nope it works for anything. Just paste my photo to dozens of different
>> free reverse lookup sites, and it should be able to tell you where I
>> stole it from.
>
> Only a newbie like you would come up with or expect anyone to believe
> such ridiculous nonsense.

The internet must be such an unfolding world of wonder for you old-timer...

Here's another link that will make you look and feel stupid, before
denying you ever clicked it; http://lmgtfy.com/?q=reverse+image+search

>> Still doesn't explain the mystery of whp that handsome devil is who
>> keeps cropping up in all those exotic locations...
>
> Only a newbie like you would expect someone to become awestruck over
> photoshopping.

Personally, I find the fellow's handsome visage to be a lot more
awe-inspiring than any of your imagined photoshopping...

>> Still no proof of your delusions?
>
> LOL you being the one always whining about being asked for proof and
> always failing to produce it.

Failing to produce? Four photos and one video of me around the world in
response to your goading, with a bonus pic of a personalised message
scrawled on a receipt at Oslo airport. Not to mention a trip to Vegas
tomorrow just to visit you?

I should think you should just be a polite old codger and thank me for
entertaining your ramblings...

>> never had an inkfrog
>
> Not since I got you kicked off it for hosting pictures you stole from
> me there.

LOL! Are you countering by bragging about netkopping? Is that how you
internet pioneers in the 80's get street cred? Go easy, tiger...

>> And yet you didn't even comment on my Rehab photo.
>
> You mean the one that you either stole or photoshopped?

The one I posted starring the handsome Aussie...

>> Can you refresh my memory via a link to this post?
>
> Here's the link to the account I had inkfrog eliminated:
> http://imgs.inkfrog.com/pix/Metaphoid/family/photos.jpg

That link is dead. Please post a link to the post I made of that link so
I may look forward to procuring an apology for you. If not the ensuing
erection...

[Ace♠]

On Jun 1, 4:27 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:

>
> Don't forget the video.

Your video showing only your double chin, proves you're not the guy in
the photos... that's why you hid.

> > I was pulling that crap 20+ years ago.
> > You're so 1990, Megatard.
>
> You were pulling crap 20 years ago? Preytell, what are you pulling now?

Your chain by making you stalk me here for over a year so far.

> >>> Megatard, I'll never click on the YouTube clips you paste.
>
> >> That's exactly what the link is. As you'd know, because you *did* click
> >> on it.
>
> > Wrong. You only post your stolen/photoshopped stuff to places like
> > TinyPic; never YouTube.
>
> You clicked it.

Megatard, I'll never click on the YouTube clips you paste.

> >> I miss our chats, Ace...
>
> > Uh huh. That's why you stay hidden away for a couple of weeks at a
> > time to lick your wounds.
>
> Well that, and the fact that unlike some unemployed 55 year olds - I
> have a life.

Liar.

> You virtual wound inflicting machine, you...
>
> >> Nope it works for anything. Just paste my photo to dozens of different
> >> free reverse lookup sites, and it should be able to tell you where I
> >> stole it from.
>
> > Only a newbie like you would come up with or expect anyone to believe
> > such  ridiculous nonsense.
>
> The internet must be such an unfolding world of wonder for you old-timer...

Your nonsense is nothing but old news.

> Here's another link that will make you look and feel stupid, before
> denying you ever clicked it;http://lmgtfy.com/?q=reverse+image+search

Good grief, I said you are full of nonsense regarding your blather
about "reverse look up sites" which you obviously know next to nothing
about outside of what your tiny addled brain tries to assimilate via
Google searches.

> Personally, I find the fellow's handsome visage to be a lot more
> awe-inspiring than any of your imagined photoshopping...

Nothing to imagine, that kind of photoshopping has been done to
death, going back in the early 90's.
You sure do have the hots for the guy, you poofter stalker jpeg
thief.

> Failing to produce? Four photos

Most likely stolen/photoshopped. Sketchy. Dubious. Unreliable.
Inconclusive.

> and one video of me

Of a double chin.

> around the world

In someone else's hotel room.

> in
> response to your goading

Lab rat.

> with a bonus pic of a personalised message

Hushed and hasty like you were about to get busted for trespassing.

> scrawled on a receipt at Oslo airport.

That sketchy thing was one of your lamest photoshops attempts.

> Not to mention a trip to Vegas
> tomorrow just to visit you?

Liar. You are not coming. You will not be there. You will only lie
about being there.

> I should think you should just be a polite old codger and thank me for
> entertaining your ramblings...

You are boring, not entertaining. I'm sure you're peeing your pants
over this though. Sad ignorant uneducated outback bumpkin simpleton
who's been hooked in and way over his pointy head since day one.

A*

[Ace♠]

TJ wrote:

> Ace♠ wrote:
>
> > Liar. You are not coming. You will not be there. You will only lie
> > about being there.

> Ace, don't underestimate your power over this feeb. You probably got him to sell a kidney to by a plane ticket to Vegas, just to >"show you".

LOL you're probably right. If he does come here, it'll all be because
of me :-)

A*

[Sinatra]

On Jun 3, 5:24 am, The Patriot <takebackoutcoun...@godbless.com>
wrote:

> Last post - you won, Ace!

I am the Champion.

A*

[]v[etaphoid]

> I am the Coward.
>
> A*

Indeed you are, and now we have the empirical evidence to prove it.

[Ace*]

Megatard wrote:
> On 03/06/12 22:52, Sinatra wrote:
>
> > On Jun 3, 5:24 am, The Patriot<takebackoutcoun...@godbless.com>
> > wrote:
> >> Last post - you won, Ace!
>

> > I am the Champion.
>
> > A*
>
> Indeed you are, and now we have the empirical evidence to prove that ]v[eta is a pathological liar.

Yes, your only chance of imagined victory, was your imaginary visit to
Las Vegas.

A*

[]v[etaphoid]

"Ace" <black...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b9dc692a-1836-453e...@ri8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
On May 15, 2:17 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:

>> Unlike yourself - I've never played internet tough guy, challenged
>> someone to a meeting
>
>Sad that you, ST8 and Payton associate simply meeting someone as an
>act of toughness and a challenge LOL

Hard not to when you mention it in 386 different threads as proof positive
of what an internet tough guy you are, you lack-witted fucknozzle!

And they you didn,'t turn up - COWARD!

ROTFPMSL!!!

--
"Don't make me get my IT friend, Ronson, to do a trace on you to find
out your real name." - Brian "Ace" Kelley flexing his online might...

[]v[etaphoid]

"Ace?" <avlvsv...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2365291d-1789-40d9...@h10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com...

> Urban Dictionary.
>
> 1. Geppetto:
>
> A funny spin on the word pedophile. This is based upon the story of
> Pinnochio where Geppetto makes a little wooden boy and dances with
> him. Plus it's also fun to say "Geppettophile"
> "Dude, stop trying to get with little boys you Geppetto."
>
>
> 2. Geppetto:
>
> The sexual act of fisting a woman's ass and working her hole like a
> puppetmaster. When performed by a woman onto a male it is known as a
> Madame. (She was a puppett in the 70's. Google it.)
> "Dude, your mom's so freaky she wanted me to geppetto her ass without
> lube!"

How many times do you need to splutter out an attempted reply to him?

It's bad enough that you keep letting ST8 pummel you, but you really needn't
pull your own pants down as well!

[]v[etaphoid]

On 19/06/12 21:49, Ace* wrote:
> Megatard wrote:
>> On 03/06/12 22:52, Sinatra wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 3, 5:24 am, The Patriot<takebackoutcoun...@godbless.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Last post - you won, Ace!
>>
>>> I am the Champion.
>>
>>> A*
>>

>> Indeed you are, and now we have the empirical evidence to prove it.

>
> Yes, your only chance of imagined victory, was your imaginary visit to
> Las Vegas.

Empiraclly proven beyond doubt, and yet you cannot even shown a solitary
piece of evidence that you were in Vegas on the 4th June, never mind at
our agreed meeting place.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/560/qantastalker.jpg

That's why everyone is saying you're the coward of the county!

Anyhow Ace*hole, my other baby is crying so I've got to take off for a
bit. I just can't handle both of you at once! But don't fret, princess -
I'll be back soon enough. Continue editing out all references to your
cowardice in your "white on rice" responses and I'll be back before you
stick your next G.I. Joe doll headlong up your arse in a futile attempt
to distract you from your proven cowardice...

Don't go changin' - 'cos when ]v[eta says he'll be back - you can bank
on it, Tommy*...

*Tommy = self-titled star of Coward of the County

[Ace♠]

Megatard, who pathologically lies about visiting Las Vegas blathered:

> Empiraclly proven beyond doubt

That Megatard is my little lab rat.

A*

[]v[etaphoid]

On 20/06/12 20:53, Ace♠ wrote:

> That Megatard ownz my cowardly arse. And I lub it!

Empiracally proven beyond doubt, and yet you cannot even shown a

solitary piece of evidence that you were in Vegas on the 4th June, never
mind at our agreed meeting place.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/560/qantastalker.jpg

That is still why everyone is saying you're the coward of the county!

I implore you - please continue editing out all references to your

[Ace♠]

Megatard, who pathologically lies about visiting Las Vegas blathered:

> Empiracally proven beyond doubt

"Empiracally"? LOL

Empirically proven beyond all doubt that you are an uneducated
impoverished inbred outback bumpkin who's never been 50 miles from the
shack your sister gave birth to you in.

> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/560/qantastalker.jpg

LOL poorly contrived forgeries, even by outback bumpkin standards
ROFL.

A*

[]v[etaphoid]

On 21/06/12 22:23, Ace♠ wrote:

>> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/560/qantastalker.jpg
>
> LOL poorly contrived forgeries, even by outback bumpkin standards
> ROFL.

Prove it, my cowardly friend.

No matter what you say, you know - as I do, and as all watchers suspect
- that I was there and you were a coward who was hiding at home.

MU, John Payton and Big Mikey were right - you don't have the mettle...

[]v[etaphoid]

On 18/05/12 09:34, Ace* wrote:
> On May 17, 7:38 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.con> wrote:
>
>> But don't worry, fella - I'll still be here for you
>
> Yes, for me to keep tearing you a new one.
>
> A*

Isn't that what I just said in the post you just editted/replied to?

I really am beginning to think I've completely taken over your kooky,
cowardly psyche, Ace*hole...

Toughen up, princess - I'mm playing the long game!

[Ace*]

Megatard, who pathologically lies about visiting Las Vegas blathered:

> Isn't that

Several responses in a row for you? Why yes it is LOL.

A*

[]v[etaphoid]

On 17/05/12 21:25, ]v[etaphoid wrote:
> On 17/05/12 15:24, Ace♠ wrote:
>> On May 16, 5:59 am, "]v[etaphoid"<m...@phoid.con> wrote:
>>> On 16/05/12 22:40, Ace wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> That just means it might be more stuff from the same person. There's
>>>> absolutely zero indication that person is you.
>>>
>>> Sure. Plenty of people refer to themselves as Meta
>>
>> It was mumbled so badly. The videographer is speaking in such hurried
>> hushed tones as if he's doing something he shouldn't or is where he
>> shouldn't be. It's a very peculiar video. very atypical of the zillion
>> of other vacation videos I've seen posted here going back ten years.
>
> Atypical to a tea. I'm not an insecure online creation trying to
> convince Usenet that I'm a PhD. I don't film myself playing with
> swords, turtles and womens underwear and post it to youtube. And I
> certainly don't pontificate around Rome making it obvious to all and
> sundry (including my wife in the next room) that I'm filming some
> "empirical evidence" just to expose a fraud in avlv...
>
>>> and their showering
>>> wife as Mrs Phoid.
>>
>> Based on the clothing around the room and the amount and type of
>> luggage, the room is clearly occupied by a single male; who was
>> probably in the shower, when the videographer apparently sneaked in to
>> do a quick video, hence his strange behavior.
>
> How many times have you watched it, kook?
>
> Notwitstanding your devotion, the newly purchase leather jacket on the
> bed looks pretty feminine - as did the large red suitcase on the bed
> (not to be confused with the large black suitcase by the bathroom
> door, presumably used by a 2nd occupant). If it's big hotel rooms
> which imprtess you, why don't you ask me to post a photo of the
> Artemida hotel where we spent our 2nd week in Rome. It would have a
> kooky bastard like you rolling in jelly and faeces pulling his dick in
> all directions...
>
>>> Whilst shooting a video from the 4th floor opposite
>>> the Pantheon. It could be practically anyone!
>>>
>>> What challenge next, Ace - would you like me to send you my passport,
>>> muscles?
>>
>> I'd like to see you post normal vacation pictures and video like
>> normal people produce. Like this:
>> http://fosterswebsite.com/photos/1%20Rome%202004%20%2846%29.JPG
>>
>> That incredibly simple request apparently is way too much to ask from
>> you.
>
> Perish the thought. If you really were that desparate for a photo of
> me in Vatican square, you need only to have asked. The one below was
> the nearest I could find to the same angle above. I've got a great
> shot of myself in front of the ceiling of the Sistene Chapel - would
> you like to see it next?
>
> http://postimage.org/image/gkrtjasvb/
>
>>> I'm not the one who's been claiming "empirical evidence" of
>>> international travel as a badge of honour for the last six months.
>>
>> Of course not, because you can't seem to provide any. The "I don't
>> want to show off" defense is ludicrous coming from someone like you.
>> How on earth can you associate a run-of-the-mill visit to Rome as a
>> "badge of honor" etc?. You continually use over dramatic nomenclature
>> regarding commonplace things. It's like describing the flame on a
>> matchstick as being a "blazing inferno".
>
> Ever been to Rome or the Vatican City, Ace? I know it's no big deal,
> so I'm sure a worldly fella like you have been there. No need for
> photos or empirical evidence - I was just curious to know if you liked
> it, and what you favourite part was.
>
>>> Yes Ace. But no one cares about your imagined identity. That's the part
>>> that really smarts...
>>
>> My verified identity and the verified facts about me are only relevant
>> in that these facts contradict the stuff you make up about me due to a
>> lack on knowledge of the established facts.
>
> And yet still, no-one believes you or cares...
>
>> You operate in a very narrow two dimensional circular manner. You keep
>> repeating the same failed tactics hoping for a better outcome each
>> time.
>
> To the contrary, if the intended outcome was to make you sound like a
> whining little schoolgirl, I'd say my tactics have been very successful.
>
>>> As countless others have pointed out (including ST8 in the last two
>>> days), netkooks don't benefit from posting photos of themselves on
>>> usenet - we leave that up to the kooks!
>>
>> That just another cop-out. It's one cop-out after another. People have
>> been posting pictures of themselves for over a decade here.
>> http://www.urbanphotos.net/avlv.html
>>
>> There is no acceptable excuse or cop-out for you not posting a simple
>> obviously genuine photo of yourself and Mrs. Phoid standing in front
>> of a Roman landmark or a Las Vegas landmark. But for some reason you
>> get all squirrely about it. And of course I find such behavior odd and
>> questionable.
>
> Name the landmark. So far I've fed your netkooky obsession with photos
> and video of the Pantheon and Vatican City - what else do you need to
> silence the lambs, Clarice?
>
>>> But you are right about the small room
>>> blah, blah, blah
>>
>> What's relevant, is that it was obviously a single occupant room, with
>> a single male occupant's clothing, items and luggage laid about. And
>> for some reason the person who made the video was acting like he
>> didn't belong in there, like he was trying to hurry up before the
>> bloke in the shower came out. Very peculiar. Very atypical of all
>> other vacation videos I've seen posted here in the last ten years.
>
> Atypical from all you netkooks - got it in one! I freely admit to
> having no desire for my showering wife to hear me filming a video just
> to silence the netkook who started multiple threads before I went on
> holidays because he felt threatened by my upcoming absense. Unlike
> your youtube jems, it was not my finest hour, Ace*hole...
>
>>> LOL! Stop digging, buddy. Ot at least start digging up!
>>
>> The point is, which you keep trying to dance around is, that I
>> shouldn't have to dig; it should simply be there in plain view. If you
>> were a forthright and honest individual, it would simply be right
>> there. But of course you're simply a troll doing the "dance puppet
>> dance", "my little lapdog" thing over and over.
>>
>> A*
>
> Admit it Ace - you love me. You need me and you crave the same online
> evidence of my existence as you think substantiates your own. Problem
> is, the rest of us just aren't built the same as a kooky kook from
> kooksville like you. I have no desire to plaster my private life over
> usenet for any purpose other than to make you look like the blundering
> twat you clearly are. It's by no means original - but I do enjoy your
> whimpering and I'm happy to help facilitate it any way I can...
>
> So there - I clearly do have a bigger dick than you. You just need to
> learn to let it go...

[]v[etaphoid - Ace-ass-owning-machine]

On 09/05/12 23:16, Split the Eights wrote:
> On May 9, 3:51 am, "]v[etaphoid" <m...@phoid.com> wrote:
>> On 09/05/12 17:29, Ace wrote:
>>
>>> On May 8, 4:11 pm, Split the Eights<argus...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>> On May 8, 1:07 pm, lvroger...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>>>> I think the Observant Lurker has left us, permanently, and not of his own volition.
>>
>>>>> Roger
>>

>>>> I'm sure he'll be missed by many...
>>
>>> Don't worry, you still have me, Sport!
>>
>> Barely...
>>
>> If your posts in the earlier "Metaphoid, it's time to arrange a
>> {meeting]..." thread taught us anything, it's that you run like a
>> shivering rat up a drainpipe when confronted. Heavens, all I did was
>> answer your challenge by listing my itinerary and asking which time and
>> venue you wanted to catch up at.
>>
>> If you don't want to catch up - that's fine. But don't go starting
>> threads before fleeing like a dentist when your mother walks in the
>> surgery, at the mere prospect of sharing a friendly ale...
>
> He's all keyboard... would you expect less from a netkook?

Good point, friend.

Glad you enjoyed the depantsing of his cowardly arse! How long do you
reckon before he feels the need to "validate" via a turnip shoved
headlong up it?

[]v[etaphoid]

So true...

[]v[etaphoid]

LOL! Great thread...

[]v[etaphoid]

LOL! Netkooks claiming to have scared off John Payton 2 years ago!

Still making fanciful claims in a ceaseless bid to give his lonely life
some meaning...

[Ace♠™]

I had Roger eliminated.
Payton still thrives to test the weak minded.
My will be done.

A*

[]v[etaphoid]

This re-ignited old thread is now hereby closed.

There will be no more posting to it by myself or anyone else of any
importance...

[Doc]

On Saturday, November 23, 2013 8:50:14 AM UTC-8, ]v[etaphoid wrote:


>
> This re-ignited

The term is "bumped", you bumpkin.

D*