Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.usenet.kooks
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion NOMINATION: Moronic Murphy for CNotM (was Re: NOMINATION: Chimpy Checkmate for CNotM)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
K Wills  
View profile  
 More options Nov 1 2012, 5:29 am
Newsgroups: alt.checkmate, alt.usenet.kooks, misc.legal
From: K Wills <compu...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 04:29:36 -0500
Local: Thurs, Nov 1 2012 5:29 am
Subject: Re: NOMINATION: Moronic Murphy for CNotM (was Re: NOMINATION: Chimpy Checkmate for CNotM)
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 05:39:56 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda

<nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:02:44 -0700, Where's all the China Blue food?
>wrote:

>> In article <k6sti3$na...@dont-email.me>, Nadegda
>> <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:04:51 -0700, Where's all the China Blue food?
>>> wrote:

>>> > In article <k6sf10$jd...@dont-email.me>, Nadegda
>>> > <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>>> >> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 04:10:54 -0700, Where's all the China Blue food?
>>> >> wrote:

>>> >> > In article
>>> >> > <26da41b1-091b-43dc-9414-ade4486d6...@4g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
>>> >> >  Andrew Wilson <awils984...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> >> >> For professionally hosted web sites, no, but this Derbyshire guy
>>> >> >> is obviously hosting it on his home computer if it has no domain
>>> >> >> name. So the IP will resolve to his ISP.

>>> >> > That's odd because the server I use sometimes in a office in a
>>> >> > business doesn't have a domain name.

>>> >> An internal server on a LAN. Clearly not applicable here.

>>> > Acually it's on the other side of a continent.

>>> WAN or VPN, then. The next point still stands:

>> Since your first guess was wrong,

>Not really. VPNs and WANs play the same functional role as LANs; they
>just aren't co-located in a single building. From the POV of application-
>layer software, though, the physical location of the network nodes is
>irrelevant.

>The fact remains, using Dreamhost et. al. doesn't result in having only
>an IP address; self-hosting on your own hardware does. And trying to
>reach a consumer-level webhost site by raw IP won't work. Bulk cheap
>webhosting is always virtual, because the IPv4 address space is running
>low.

>Thus, when IPs are dedicated to a single site, it's always self-hosted by
>its owner, and lacks a domain name if that owner is an individual without
>much means and has one if it's a business entity.

http://nahee.com/Derbyshire/index.html

     As you likely already know, that's the URL for your, er, Paul's
site.  It's just that rather than being numeric, the URL is using
letters.
     You'll get to the same place.

>Since the instant
>website is clearly someone's personal page and not a business, *and* had
>just an IP in its URL and not a domain name, the result follows from two
>separate converging lines of evidence.

     Said evidence proving you wrong, of course.

>>> >> > You do understand that a domain name is optional, right? That it's
>>> >> > the IP address that's actually used in connect and accept?

>>> >> Sez a kook who clearly is clueless when it comes to how virtual
>>> >> hosting works. Go read a book or two on modern web hosting, then get
>>> >> back to me once you understand why you're wrong here.

>> It's also odd how you keep responding for Ken or Andy. Sounds to me like
>> you aren't clever enough to compartmentalise.

>The Tetrarchy work as a team, unlike you squabbling k00ks.

     When there is only one member of The Tetrarchy, it can't really
be seen as a team to the mentally sound.

--
"I look like I'm in the Harry Potter movie."
     -- Rick Harrison (Pawn Stars)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google