On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 02:22:58 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 05:34:52 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> >On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:58:50 -0500, The Drunken Kook Masquerading As
>> >Ex- FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 03:42:07 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> >> <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>Fred Hall
>> >>>[ ]= Coward of the Month Award; Nominated by kensi
>> >>>(<k522h8$9r...@speranza.aioe.org>); Second by persent
>> >>>(<y4mdnbzyBuwfEunNnZ2dnUVZ_oKdn...@giganews.com>) [ ]= Loony Maroon
>> >>>Award; Nominated by Nadegda (<k57pcj$q1...@dont-email.me>); NOT
>> >>>SECONDED [ ]= Sheldon Ko0ker Compulsive Behavior Award; Nominated by
>> >>>Nadegda (<k57p4e$q1...@dont-email.me>); Second by kensi
>> >>>[ ]= Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart; Nominated by Nadegda
>> >>>(<k4e3mq$qq...@dont-email.me>); Second by Andrew Wilson
>> >> That's it, Paul?
>> >Sorry, Ferd, but, as you've been told repeatedly, there's nobody here
>> >by that name, despite your delusional beliefs to the contrary.
>> >> I command you to do better.
>> >Sorry, Ferd, but not only don't the Tetrarchy take orders from you,
>> >but ... well, how do I break this to you?
>> >Oh, I'll just say it straight out.
>> >You just haven't been kooky enough this month.
>> >You've emptied your bag of kook tricks and scraped the bottom and it
>> >seems we've seen all you can do. You're not very amusing anymore.
>> >So, while the Tetrarchy will not be quitting or plonking you like
>> >cowards, we also may not dignify many of your disjointed ramblings
>> >with replies anymore, other than to occasionally remind you, and
>> >anyone else that needs reminding, that you're a delusional nutjob and
>> >not the FNVW, and perhaps sometimes to debunk specific false k'lames
>> >you might make.
>> >You may, of course, still receive the odd kook award from time to
>> >time, but that's it until such time as you either achieve levels of
>> >lameness that land you in the GKF (and then no more awards at all); or
>> >else display some new and interesting streak of kookiness previously
>> >unsuspected, or have a really major meltdown (and then you might get a
>> >big batch again).
>> >But for the most part, I expect, you'll just scurry around (and
>> >sometimes beneath) our giant boot-heels, largely ignored, because I
>> >don't think you have what it takes anymore to attain your former glory
>> >as a spectacular foam-spewing mega-kook racking up nominations left
>> >and right.
>> >You're spent. Exhausted. A has-been in all areas, including as a fake
>> >FNVW and as a kook. A dried out, hollow husk of a kook, what's left
>> >over when all the foam has been wrung out of a kook. Still kooky, but
>> >really, how many times can any kook expect to win the Kook of the
>> >Month Award for the same damned unchanging, stale delusions and wacky
>> >behaviors, or the Pickett for repeating the same charge for the
>> >umpteenth time, or the Custer for screeding on and on as part of the
>> >same old ongoing failed campaign? Seriously?
>> >The fact is, us kookologists, after studying any particular kook for a
>> >while, eventually run out of anything new to discover about said kook,
>> >and will generally have little to say anymore about that kook, and
>> >little new to nominate him for, from then on. And you're no exception
>> >in that regard, kook.
>> >Your day in the spotlight appears to be done.
>> Well done, Paul!
>> I type nine words and you respond with a lengthy screedbomb. I command
>> you, kooky Paul: Post more and better screed!
> He typed more wurds... he's winning, for fuck's sake!